The camera was introduced on 25.02.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX Canon 4000D (also known as Digital rebel t100 и Canon EOS D3000) New items here or here.
Canon 4000D
Key features include:
- plastic mount
- 18 MP (without support for Dual Pixel CMOS AF or Hybrid CMOS AF I / II / III)
- 2.7 dots 230.000-inch screen (no touch)
- 9 focus points, central cruciform type (sensor parts here)
- 3 fps (maximum burst speed)
- Full HD 30 fps up to 30 minutes
- Wi-Fi
- DIGIC 4+ (cameras on this processor can be looked here)
- 63-zone metering sensor exposure (sensor details here)
- 30-1 / 4000 s
- ISO 100-6400, in 1-step increments and additional extended ISO H equivalent to ISO 12800
- 436 grams
- pentazerkalo without diopter adjustment
Canon 4000D
Canon 4000D
Canon 4000D
Canon 4000D (The photo shows the camera with the lens Canon Zoome Lens EF-S 18-55mm 1: 3.5-5.6 IS II)
A list of all the cropped Canon EOS DSLR cameras is available. look at this link.
Recommendations for choosing an amateur / advanced amateur CZK Canon EOS can look at this link.
A list of all original Canon EFS lenses that are ideally suited for this camera can be look at this link.
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
A bit of philosophy:
In September 2009, the wonderful Canon EOS 7D camera was introduced, on board which was an 18MP matrix (to be precise, it could create an image of maximum dimensions 5184 x 3456, which is about 17.9 MP). Subsequently, this matrix was used in a large number of other cameras:
7D, 60D, 60Da, 550D, 600D, 650D, 700D, 1200D, 1300D, 100D, 4000D, M, M2, M10 (total 14 cameras).
The 650D, 700D has been refined to use Hybrid CMOS AF technology when focusing in Live View. The 100D has been modified to use Hybrid CMOS AF II technology.
It is very strange that after updating this matrix in 650D, 700D, M and another update in 100D, M2, M10, the newer Canon 4000D cameras installed an older version.
Make a very budget option. Therefore, they put the old matrix. It doesn't look very serious. On the other hand, there are quite a few users who, over the course of several years, shoot 5 frames, and often with one lens. This is quite suitable.
Yes, that's right, I understand the logic of Canon with the release of 4000D, and if the real price tag on it is suitable, then it will be very cool.
Plastic mount, screen for 270000! This is a joke before the first of April.
2.7 inches :) 230.000 screen, like in the Canon 400D since 2006 :)
Something reminds a Buddhist koan when a student says: I don’t understand anything, and the teacher answers: yes, I myself do not understand anything. And the price is still unknown? Are you preparing something mega-budget? Every family has a DSLR? On the other hand, for a family home, for many, a set is often enough: 18-55 plus 50 / 1.8. And the difference, for example, between my 1100d and the modern 200d is, by and large, in one stop of the working ISO, all the rest of which can be dispensed with. If it is budgetary, it may be a good option for our crisis time.
I have 1100D and 200D.
The difference is very significant.
12 and 24 megapixels.
The ability to quickly shoot only 2 frames in jpg + raw, and then wait for recording to the memory card, and the ability to take about 5 frames is a very big difference for me in practice.
Integrated low-resolution screen and much higher-resolution convenient flip-down touchscreen. Touch control itself is very convenient.
Slow contrast autofocus in LiveView and fast phase detection in the same LiveView.
Different work of the mirror and shutter in LiveView - in the 200d, the shutter works softer and quieter even in normal mode (there is also a quiet mode, I did not use it).
Video recording 720p with 30 frames per second and 1080p with 60 fps.
The lack of direct connection with the smartphone and the presence of wi-fi + bluetooth + nfc (I use only wi-fi), with the ability to use the smartphone as a convenient wireless remote control.
The difference in ISO - at 1100D you can use 3200 as the upper value, and then the pictures will turn out to be mostly too noisy. The 200D allows you to shoot at 6400 and get an acceptable result, especially if you then reduce the photo size by 50% (and the megapixel allows this). With an eye on the subsequent reduction of the photo, you can, in principle, try to shoot at 12800.
If you wish, you can find some other differences, such as the absence and presence of an integrated matrix cleaning system, and so on.
Of course, you can do without anything. But sometimes this will lead to inconvenience of use, and sometimes to the loss of valuable frames, for example, if it is not possible to take several pictures in a series in a row, or install a camera and conveniently take a picture of yourself using the phone as a remote control, or shoot a 1080p video (and even with working autofocus), or just shoot outdoors in LiveView mode, holding the camera just in front of you and without attracting attention.
In any case, the difference between these cameras is significant. And not just in bare technical specifications, but in ease of use in practice.
I will support all of the above, plus the size of the camera is smaller even in comparison with the small 1100D. At 1100 you can just shoot, at 200D it’s already convenient to shoot.
Canon even hesitated to write his brand on the display)))
On the Canon 100D there is an inscription at the bottom of the display. On the Canon 200D, the display is rotatable, the front part without an inscription. The form factor is compact, nothing more. The joystick and buttons are like dual-purpose soap dishes. Those. the camera hits a niche, oscillating between a compact and a DSLR or moving from a soap dish to a DSLR. In general, the question of price, from the point of view of technology, is quite a sensible marketing move. There is a choice.
Sooner or later, Canon and Nikon and Pentax and Sony will reduce their line of cheap cameras.
Already now there is not the slightest sense to produce so many crop cameras in a low price range. Those who don't want to spend money on a DSLR come with an iPhone. But buying cameras with plastic mounts ... Not nafig.
I think that it would not be much more expensive to make a metal mount. Well, what is this ring with fasteners, which canon makes tens of thousands - yes, of course, it costs a penny. It's just that this camera should be the most, the cheapest, in order to catch the eye at the price of the brand and pay attention to Canon. The company doesn't even have to buy the camera at all, after all.
The difference is big in how they are made using different technologies. Metal is much more expensive, you can even just look for its price as details.
The price for spare parts is often several times higher than the real costs - such a practice. The price of the ring as a spare part is not an indicator. I think the main savings here are due to the use of old components, the equipment for the production of which has paid for itself long ago. And the materials, of course, are cheap. Bayonet, I think, did not make the most significant contribution. In my opinion, it was made plastic not so much for economy as for separation with cameras of a higher class.
Plastic is stamped in a few seconds. Metal is milled much longer from a whole piece or ring. Lots of time, lots of waste, expensive equipment. The savings are decent. It is not for nothing that cheap lenses have plastic mounts. But if the lens is interchangeable, then the carcass is much more permanent. And to reduce the cost to this is a kick-ass.
Metal is perfectly stamped. And stamped metal would still be more reliable than plastic. Yes, more expensive, bucks, at most, by 10. In reality, there is some kind of “saving on matches” here.
The price of an individual part is not an indicator here. Canon obviously doesn’t order them individually.
Both the lens and the camera are tools, not consumables, but the bayonet lock is consumable! A plastic mount is better for amateur cameras, since there are almost no changes of lenses, but some professionals change them quite often, the lock may break and wear out, metal is needed here! If you drop your treasure with a plastic bayonet, then if you are lucky you will only break the bayonet, and then replace it, continue to shoot, but if both locks are metal, then this is a fiasco! only the bayonet will survive the tragedy))))
For interest, I looked at how much the Chinese sell mount rings. 40-50 bucks against a cheap plastic. A healthy reduction in price even with 100% wrapping up by the Chinese.
I admit 40-50 bucks for a bayonet mount, but only if it is wrapped in some Canon350D + kit18-55 :)
I recently bought a TRW germanium wheel bearing for my golf for $ 50. Two kilograms live weight, the cutters to reduce the weight worked well there, and the requirements for the accuracy of the ball bearing and the strength of the steel were not at all stamped under the name “bayonet”.
Explicit rake run.
Apparently, after the publication of the financial report, the board of directors responded to the savory podzhopnik techies that they began to produce cameras with the speed of diarrhea.
There are no new ideas and no good matrices, but it is necessary to release “new items”. All these 550d, 600d, 650d, 700d, 750d, 800d, 60d, 70d and other nonsense are the essence of the same camera with slight changes.
Well, the financial report there is in any case better than the Nikanosha. For the 32nd consecutive year, Canon Corporation is among the five companies that have received the most patents in the United States, and for the 13th consecutive year it has become the first in the number of registered patents in Japan. This is a quote. So I think the engineers there are clearly not idle. Here the intrigue is how far Kenon can even lower the price of a DSLR. I think there are a lot of people on the planet with very low incomes who will be interested in this. And as a rule, once choosing a system it is very rarely changed. Therefore, with marketing, they are all right
Oleg, with marketing. But not with the head.
To produce like a machine gun a bunch of the same type of crop with similar characteristics is the way to nowhere. I was engaged in a similar nonsense of boots 5-6 years ago. Now it doesn't work anymore. I repeat, who needs pictures from the beaches of Turkey, Egypt, the Black Sea, Cyprus, Greece, Bulgaria, they will do well and manage with modern telephones or DSLRs like 550d / 600d or d5100.
And the funny thing is that they will not see the difference if they buy something from the new crop.
And if there is no difference by eye, then what is the point for them to buy something new?
In phones, the difference between an iPhone 4S and an 8th iPhone is simply colossal.
If Canon revived the 1.3 ASP-H crop, or fiddled with a new generation of its BSi crops, that would be the case. And what is happening now is the release of conventional "new products" in which there is no innovation.
There is almost no real technological progress in crop for the last 6-7 years. This is especially true of crop from Canon.
Those who bought the D5100 or 600D for amateur purposes have not yet developed their resource.
FF is developing and there are more interesting models over the past 7 years and there is a little movement.
As for me - the crop is dead or close to it.
Casual customers will buy phones whose cameras will continue to evolve.
Soap pukalki have already died out or will soon completely retire. There is stagnation in crop because it is not profitable to pour money into it either for producers or buyers. There remains the FF and medium formats that will continue to develop.
In photography, it’s generally difficult to invent something revolutionary, but it’s necessary to sell carcasses in the last 7-8 years, there’s more marketing here: megapixels, wi-fi, rotary display, touch screen, dual pixel you can do without all this. Yes, all the kenon crop are very similar agree and the difference between the already old 1100d and the new 200d is minimal. Will the crop die? I don’t think the full frame has fallen in price and whether they’ll lie in the near future will drop below the fatal mark of $ 1000. New lenses are unique optically, but are very expensive for those who do not earn a photo. Most likely the crop is for lovers, the full frame for professionals will continue. And these cameras confirm this, this is a struggle for the lower segment of the market. I apologize for the multi-letter
> the difference between the old 1100d and the new 200d is minimal
You probably shoot on the manual?
The difference between the already old 1100d and the new 200d is very significant. Described in general terms in response to another comment on this page.
Well, don't put the D5100 next to this shit ... And I don't go to the beach with it ... For this there is a soap dish rx100 ... D5100 is a device for higher tasks
This camera is not released so that the owners of the D550 / D650 decide to change their own. Not the fact that Canon generally plans to make a lot of money on it. The task is to sell exactly expensive models, and this will be the first in a search by price tag among DSLRs. In this case, purchases will be, for example:
1. People who want a DSLR with an APS-C matrix, but limited in money. APS-C, not even the newest, continues to beat compacts / phones / superzoom, etc.
2. Those who have an older carcass and optics in the family, as a second camera for a wife / mother / sister / daughter / son / granddaughter / grandson. Cameras as a gift and on the advice “good-new, but simple-inexpensive” are often bought.
3. Those who like to cling different glasses to separate carcasses, carry a pair of cameras with them and shoot different scenes on different glasses. For example, on one standard zoom, on the second telephoto / portrait / manual. Compactness, simplicity and full compatibility (from optics to rav-converter) are only a plus.
4.Simply as a second compact and cheap carcass, which is not so pathetic to kill, lose, break. Yes, and others are options.
Just do not try to convince me that for these purposes you can solve the problem better. I know, you know, but in fact there are many people who buy it for precisely these reasons.
I agree. I would not be surprised if the pros also buy as a spare or a camping one. But it depends on the mind of marketers - I hope they did not reinvent the wheel and did it for a new battery.
You probably meant 550D / 650D (D550 / D650 something is not googled)? Well, they are generally better than sabzhevoe sharing, why change? Rather, their owners will move if not a class higher, then at 800 / 77D.
the first thing I like about this model is that the number of Canon lettering on the carcass has decreased
The coolest comment !! Respect !!
Having looked at the photo of the carcass, I re-read the name, it seemed that Yongnuo had already begun to produce photos similar to canon. As simplified and impersonal as the first attempt by the Chinese to enter the market. As was the case with flashes copying speedlight.
The cheapest kyoop to the masses, so is the biggest question today. Well, wait for the price tag.
Census sofa analitig in the comments!
)))
As an analyte riding a couch, I will also write that I am a red chtoli.
Those who will buy it do not know at all what a “bayonet” is. And even more so that it must be metal.
Like - Oops, a new DSLR, I'm taking it, I have wanted it for a long time, but then consider it a gift.
Or something like that.
Plastic, but at the same time replaceable :) But you can make it part of the case. Broke the mount, change the case or immediately the camera.
Sony has already thought about these, having released it, I don’t remember a model very similar to the megazum mirror, twisting it in my hands in the store I was surprised that the lens can be removed.
Sonya with plastic mounts has Alpha SLT-A58 and Alpha ILCA-68.
And this despite the fact that past models of the 5x / 6x series came with metal mounts.
Sony generally cleaned out its crop and there were only UPCs more focused on recording in 4K and 77Mark2. Someone from Sonya's management even anonymously admitted a year and a half or two ago that crop is unprofitable for them - less profit than from FF. I readily believe.
but I think they want to strategically create competition, not yet created cheap non-name Chinese crop (such as plastic fifty yangnuo fifty)
But in my opinion no one will buy it. They buy a DSLR not because it's a DSLR, but because it's a good camera. And here is ... Plastic mount ... This is a failure, thought Stirlitz.
380 euros without a lens, is it a lot or a little?
it cannot cost so much 450 dollars they ask for 200d with a lens and a metal mount
https://www.ixbt.com/news/2018/02/27/canon-eos-4000d-380.html
Are they lying?
ok plastic mount, but why put an LCD screen indecently low resolution?
it's a mockery of common sense
From where did they get it, if there are no real prices anywhere else. It is only said that it will be the cheapest CZK ever issued. But, if you recall CZK 4/3, I do not think that this is true either.
Question: where did the central contacts (like on the 2000D) disappear from the hot shoe and with what outbreaks will it work?
The Canon 2000D and Canon 4000D shoes are the same. The central contact (only one contact in the center of the shoe is missing, and not the contacts, as you wrote) is responsible for synchronizing the operation of the camera and the external flash. From the specification of the manufacturer of these cameras: “Not equipped with X-contact connector, max. flash sync speed: 1/200 sec. with compatible Speedlites ”. Note: “Do not use Speedlites other than EX-series or non-Canon flash units. Not all functions of Canon EX series flash units are supported ”.
Contact 2000D + contact 4000D = contacts.
As I understand it, it is a competitor to the secondary market, no one else. For those people who are convinced that the camera should be new and under warranty, they don’t see the difference between this remnant and the good old Canon EOS 50d in terms of level and ease of use.
Lord, even a video finder without diopter adjustment. I’m afraid to imagine what will happen to the camera if I attach any ef 600 to it and, for forgetfulness, raise this camera.
It is highly doubtful that the 4000D will be used with similar lenses.
At the same time, any person, even with minimal experience in shooting with a large and heavy lens, I believe, will quickly learn how to handle it correctly. It is very inconvenient to lift such a bundle even with a large and sturdy camera without touching the lens, and hardly someone “out of forgetfulness” will do it)
But the viewfinder without diopter adjustment, of course, can greatly complicate the use of the camera for people with imperfect vision.
Too harsh criticism. Plastic bayonet - what lens? Even the 50mm 1,8 was produced with a plastic mount. Ned adjustment of diopters, well, on many ultrazoom, too, no. An old matrix, but the same on the 1300D. In short, the price will show everything. If they ask dearly, you don’t need one, and if it’s cheap, then the rules.
The price is already there, in two online stores in the Russian Federation - 23 tr. Not cheap for a super-economy.
price as at 1300d
10 years ago, in 2008, when I was just starting to work, with one of the salaries I bought my first DSLR - Canon 1000D for 18 thousand. Now, after 10 years of progress and technology development, Canon offers to buy 90% of the same thing as then - the same screen, functionality, AF and so on, except that megapixels and ISO were thrown over. But already for 23 thousand. With such a set of characteristics as that of a ten-year-old budget, the 4000D has a red price - 10 thousand.
Victor, do not forget what the dollar exchange rate was in 2008 and now.
The difference in course is more than double.
On the one hand, wonderful. Great budget employee. Plastic mount is not a hindrance. For an amateur, the lens will not be removed often, in my opinion.
On the other hand, for the kind of money you can buy a great second-hand warranty option.
I got it. This will be the best offer in the secondary market in 3-4 years. Prices will be lower than some 10-year-old DSLRs.
When is spring break this year, soon? Some already have a roof that is impatient.
Already started. Therefore, shkoloty and tore off the roof.
Who can tell me if the 4000D is a Digital Rebel T100, then in the Kiss Digital line it has what marking?
The Canon Proprietary Utility Upgrade page lists all supported models, for which different designations for the same camera model are separated by “/”. For example, “EOS Kiss F / EOS REBEL XS / EOS 1000D”.
So, for the specified model it says: “EOS REBEL T100 / EOS 4000D / EOS 3000D”. That is, there is no Kiss Digital designation yet (the reasons can only be guessed at), but for the eastern market there is the EOS 3000D designation. Link from where information: http://support-th.canon-asia.com/contents/TH/EN/0200544802.html
I will add that the camera EOS 2000D = EOS Kiss X90 = EOS REBEL T7 = EOS 1500D
Thanks. They are even more confused.
I did not fully understand the logic. He believed that the younger carcasses for the Japanese came out under the Kiss brand. But in 2017, for example, 77D was called 9000D instead of kiss. In a number of articles there was an indication that under this name the camera will be sold in Japan. As if for Japan, as for the entire eastern market, a name appears from a four-digit number and D at the end. In 2018, one model is called 4000D / 3000D without Kiss (we think that there will be 3000D in the eastern market), and the second is 2000D / 1500D and another kiss X90. That is, in Japan it is kiss X90, in India, Australia (there is a mention of these countries in some articles) it is 1500D. Uniformity in the name of the series does not work, it is simple to get confused.
Well .. I look the comments of the dissatisfied subsided, time itself judged. But I waited for a price reduction .. and I took it as a gift to my family .. for 19 ty, a whale, and to it an additional STM fifty fifty / 50 And it will be a drop dead gift, I'm sure .. and with great photos
All with the upcoming 2019!
Yes subsided, what a shit move?
After a half-hour search, I did not find the information on the file recording format. Does he only shoot in Jpeg? Or is RAW anyway?
I was even surprised at the question - is it even possible - not to shoot in RAW. I went checked. Search took ten seconds - 4000D RAW. https://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_eos_4000d_review/preview_images - here you can download examples