answers: 25

  1. Alexey Shch
    16.01.2018

    And I just started to miss Rodion))

    Reply

    • anonym
      19.01.2018

      Another review is about nothing. Amused by this - "the opposite feature is positive: the lens has an unexpectedly large back section, which makes it possible to adapt for full-frame SLR cameras! "

      Reply

  2. zengarden
    16.01.2018

    Yes, there is no point in using it on a modern figure; but, probably, it was interesting to tinker with him :) Thanks for the review, Rodion.

    Reply

    • Rodion
      16.01.2018

      This "tinkering" well, somehow it was quite an amateur, to be honest.

      Reply

  3. Victor
    17.01.2018

    Oh, finally again that Radozhiva that I love so much! By the way, inspired by your handicrafts, last fall I unleashed my grandfather's "Vilya" and tried to put the hero of today's review on Sony E, but nothing good came of it precisely because of the large back section, it turned out only macro. Apparently, in order to use it normally at the UPC, you need to model and print a special adapter on a 3D printer ...

    Reply

    • Rodion
      17.01.2018

      If it turned out only macro, it means that you just didn’t have enough working length and you need to deepen the lens block)

      Reply

  4. Stepan
    17.01.2018

    Where are the meanings? Where are the results? Ideas? Photo?

    Reply

  5. anonym
    17.01.2018

    Thanks for the interesting review. Inspiring to experiment.

    Reply

    • Yuri Molchanov
      17.01.2018

      Thanks for the interesting review. Inspiring to experiment.

      Reply

  6. Alexey
    17.01.2018

    And if you put a front diaphragm lens?

    Reply

    • Rodion
      17.01.2018

      This is not a projection 90/2 - here the vignette will be from this option. It is possible, if you lay down 5 thousand rubles, to make a lens with a za-lens diaphragm, but with a different aperture. Non-native. But who needs it at such a price?

      Reply

  7. Kamil
    19.01.2018

    Why not just cut out “diaphragms” out of black cardboard?
    In the center of clean Helios-44, I did not see any interesting artistry

    Reply

  8. Alexey de Paris
    20.01.2018

    Thanks for the review, maybe something shifted during the rework? for example, a lens ... If the picture is on the crop, then what was it on the full frame?

    Reply

    • Rodion
      20.01.2018

      The lens block did not understand.
      In full frame ... Look at the photo of Viliya)

      Reply

  9. Andrei
    20.01.2018

    Viliya-Auto is the worst Soviet camera that I have ever met.
    The quality is so-so, but the price and dimensions are not the smallest.
    The change is essentially the same, but it was almost 2 times cheaper, and in photo schools it was handed out at all.

    Reply

  10. Ilyas
    21.01.2018

    Well sooo ... you can indulge)

    Reply

  11. Koba
    24.01.2018

    In my opinion this is an extremely valuable review. The fact is that now it is already possible to safely use any lens from any manufacturer in any condition and not worry about the quality of optics, etc. If by this, in fact, optical garbage, one can get such frames as are shown in the examples, then what is there to talk about? Everything else depends on the photographer himself and his skills. Thanks for the review again!

    Reply

    • Rodion
      24.01.2018

      Thank you for your health.
      Yes, given that I made the footage just for show ... Perhaps a thoughtful application will reveal it.

      Reply

  12. Rodion
    22.10.2019

    The lens reappeared for several days in my hands, so I was able to add a photo from a full-frame camera.

    Reply

  13. Eugene
    20.02.2020

    Good afternoon! First of all, I have a question - can you please tell me how to remove the lens from Viliya? There are no screws on it, everything is covered by the outer lens housing.

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      20.02.2020

      The camera body is disassembled, most likely.

      Reply

    • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
      21.02.2020

      A round nut with slots is unscrewed from the inside of the camera.

      Reply

  14. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    21.02.2020

    I unscrewed the Triplet from Orion, experimented with the diaphragm. I changed it to control not a standard lever, but a shutter speed ring, the mechanism of which, together with the shutter, was almost completely removed except for the figured brass ring. On this ring, I fastened a leash-fork to the glue with a screw, which goes into the cut off the diaphragm lever, into its thin part. I checked it by putting it on Nikon 1 - everything worked out, now you need to invent a mount. On Nikon 3100, only macro is obtained, it is necessary to cut the skirt of the case.

    Reply

  15. Yura
    17.04.2020

    Tsіkavі photos viishli (especially on Ff).

    Є, maybe, in whom the square is on the 4/3-th. Theoretically, on a microcircuit of an object, it is a regular one))

    Reply

    • Yura
      17.04.2020

      (sign of food) - in the corner in front of the post

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer