Impressions of the Canon EOS 300D

The Canon EOS 300D was marketed under two other names, Canon Digital Rebel and Canon Kiss Digital. This is the first digital Rebel / Kiss Digital camera. The entire series of subsequent cameras in this lineup have been successful or highly successful.

Canon EOS 300D

Canon EOS 300D

The Canon 300D camera was introduced on August 20, 2003. Featured Nikon Amateur Cameras - Nikon D50 и Nikon D40 were presented much later.

Canon 300D is the ancestor of the new Canon EF-S mount which lenses fit EF и Ef-s. This is a new mount for cropped Canon cameras with APS-C sensor and Kf = 1.6x. Original Canon EF-S Lenses (i.e. lenses for cropped cameras) cannot be mounted on cameras with EF mount due to mechanical incompatibility. But here are most of the lenses for Canon cameras с APS-C sensor from third-party manufacturers have a bayonet mount EF and can be installed on any cameras of the Canon EOS family.

More information about compatibility can be found in the section about Canon EOS.

The main thing to pay attention to:

  1. Canon 300D is the sixth full-fledged digital SLR camera in the camera family Canon EOS. Prior to Canon 300D, only more advanced cameras were released Canon EOS D30, Canon EOS-1D DigitalCanon EOS D60 DigitalCanon EOS-1 Ds Digital и Canon EOS 10D Digital.
  2. The Canon 300D uses a 6MP CMOS sensor. The maximum image size is 3072 X 2048, which is quite enough for a very wide range of tasks even in our time. This sensor was also used in Canon EOS 10Dthen migrated to the Canon 300D.
  3. Maximum burst speed is only 2.5 frames per second, making the Canon 300D one of most low-performance cameras in history. At the same time, this speed is quite enough for a very wide range of photo tasks. The only less productive camera is the Canon D30 (not to be confused with the 30D).
  4. Minimum excerpt classic and is 1/4000 s.
  5. The ISO range is from 100 to 1600 units without the possibility of expansion, changes occur only in full stops (i.e. only ISO 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 can be set). There is no automatic ISO control in the camera. You can use third-party firmware and overclock ISO to 3200 units.
  6. Small 1.8-inch display with 115.000 dots.
  7. A monochrome display that sits on top of the main display. Unfortunately, the additional display is uninformative.
  8. Focusing system with only 7 points. For the first timefocus sensor appeared in camera Canon EOS 10D and later used in models 350Dand 1000D... The center point is a regular cross-type, works with lenses no darker than F / 5.6. This is one of the weakest focusing modules.
  9. For measuring exposure used TTL SPC sensor with 35 zones. This sensor first appeared in Canon EOS 10D and was used even in models Canon EOS 50D и Canon EOS 5D Mark II.
  10. Canon 300D uses memory cards format CF up to 4 GB. If you install a more capacious memory card and format it, only 4 GB of memory will still be available. I've used 2GB and 16GB memory cards (formatted as 4GB) without any problems. Also, the outdated USB 1.1 interface is used to control the camera and transfer data.

Examples of photos in the gallery below were obtained using a lens Yongnuo Lens EF 35mm 1: 2 (YN35mm F2).

You can download the original 'jpeg' photos at this link (74 files, 170 MB). You can see examples of photos with a little processing in my gallery at 500px.

My experience

The Canon 300D was primarily aimed at amateurs. The number of menu functions is very small.. In this case, the camera cannot directly select such important settings as the measurement method exposure (spot, weighted average, etc.) or focus method (One shot, Single, AF Servo, etc.).

It’s always interesting for me to shoot and work with old equipment. Despite the fact that the camera has been around for many years, the quality of images at ISO 100 may surprise many. I sent pictures from the Canon 300D to several of my acquaintances, everyone was very surprised that the Canon 300D could give such a picture. First of all, the Canon 300D pleases with its color. Auto white balance works well, which for such an old camera may seem odd.

Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.

Results

The Canon EOS 300D is a functionally very limited old SLR camera. During his presentation, it cost about $ 900, which for 2003 was not so much for the Central Control Commission. Canon EOS 300D has become a new era among Canon's CZK, this camera has attracted many amateur photographers in the world of digital SLR cameras.

Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram

Add a comment:

 

 

Comments: 74, on the topic: Impressions of the Canon EOS 300D

  • VV

    It was once. I remember the hellish brakes during almost any operation except the shutter release itself and a strange bug with a memory card, when it was locked for recording, and it was possible to remove the block only from a computer through a card reader

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Yes, the old lady is slow, especially on turning on. I personally had to dance with a tambourine to turn 16 GB into 16 GB again (the camera formatted to 4)

      • Vyunenko Andrey

        After an alternative flashing, https: //www.ixbt.com/digimage/canon300dfw2.shtml
        Now you can use CF 8Gb. My camera is defined as 7,4Gb. Card SP008GBCFC200V10.

  • Jury

    I remember when I worked in a computer hardware store, we had the EOS 300D in the Double Kit configuration (with 18-55 and 55-200 lenses) on the display window. Gently and even with some trepidation, they took it into their hands, as if it were a diamond. With that salary, one could only dream of such a technique)

  • TSerg (Sergiy)

    A glimpse of the 14th castle. However, historical photography almost wants to know trochies, just like a photographer to tell yourself. To that, Arkadiy, I’m kind to you for those who want to write about something not so far from digitally old, as it’s already very old.
    I wanted to specify bi de scho dodati chi. Presentations of the whole device buv in Ukraine in the spring of 2003 rock and buv on the first amateur mirror digital camera of the EOS series At the time of the presentation, I was sure that I’d made a mistake with the kitty about ”999u.o. The axis in front of me is the price list of the Kiev store "Videosvit" for the month of 2004. The price for a new Todi Bula is 1300 quiet units themselves with a set of two obs: 18-55 and 55-200.
    I could go Dovgo, snuggle up to the camera, lick my lips, but I couldn’t add it. Piznіshe bought not dzzerkalku, and prosyumersku Sony DSC-R1, yak i became my first digital camera.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Comments in response to user 'TSerg (Sergiy)' have been removed. Please do not post off-topic. As noted here, policy topics are strictly prohibited.

    • Hektor

      For your time, the Canon EOS 300D has a great camera!
      I can navigate at once with it.
      Without sleep, true)))

  • Valentine

    Great photos! And not CCD from Nikon, and the colors, perhaps, will not yield. Everyone did such a juicy color rendering at that time. Skinton by default is also not bad. But here the sky in some photos, alas, gives out the age of the camera with noise and a harsh gradient. Thanks for the review, very interesting.

  • Igor_K

    It is curious that the exposure metering with manual optics in 300D works more correctly than in 40D, while the exposure metering sensor is the same.

    • Igor_K

      And the detail, as at 6MP, is not so bad.

      • Igor_K

        Trying to insert an example.

        • Arkady Shapoval

          Resolution can not be cut, the main thing is that the photo is up to 1 mb (you can increase compression, while the quality will not visually suffer much)

  • Andrey Vyunenko

    I bought this camera about three years ago, on Avito for 1000 rubles. It seems that they almost never used it. I asked for alternative firmware. I like the large size of the case itself, the convenience of holding it in my hand. Extremely leisurely (and where to rush (- :), but solid apparatus. I use a 28-90 mm EF lens from a Canon 300 film. Through a ring with a chip, I put Jupiter-9 on it, and all sorts of Industars. Focus confirmation is.

  • Pastor

    Cool, I have been waiting for a review on this camera for a long time :) I really like it, working with it is somewhat similar to working with a film camera for a number of reasons:
    - everything is pretty slow;
    - you won't see the result right away;
    - I got it with a card less than a gig (256MB in my opinion) and it turns out, I'm limited to a small number of photos, like a film.
    Of course, this is not a problem. The shooting speed makes sense when reporting, but if it's just a walk around the city or portraits, then 300d is enough. However, even a report can be removed, the main thing is not to try to beat in series, but to capture moments.
    The screen is small, of course, but you can roughly understand whether the focus has hit the right place. It is also possible to see the general picture and understand whether everything is arranged correctly. It turns out, except that the cilia on a full-length photo cannot be looked at, so the screen is quite enough.
    Well, you can insert a card even more, but for the sake of getting used to the role of a photographer from 2003, I do not change the card :)
    Here is the real jamb of my copy - these are autofocus misses. It doesn't work on all lenses, but some do it. Moreover, the cheap 50 1.8 (not even STM) hits the target, and the expensive 24-70 2.8 misses, although I shoot both on the open and, in theory, there are more chances to miss half a barrel. Naturally, on other carcasses, both glasses behave quite normally.
    The monochrome screen, although uninformative, is still better than its complete absence, as on almost all subsequent models of the initial Canon line. And the battery is saved, and the speed increases.
    As for the result itself, it is expectedly good. Somehow you no longer expect from the old camera a dirty trick in the picture. And the old dormouse on ssd are good, and the old nikon are good (at least d80, at least d40). So the old canons, although not ssd, but the colors give out cool. In addition to 300d, the old canons really like the colors 400d, 5d. The latter is generally comparable in a number of parameters with 300d. If you do not take into account the size of the matrix, then both are slow, with small screens and a beautiful picture. But my newer canons can no longer boast such a nice picture right in the jeep. Even the rather old 40d is already noticeably worse than 300d in color.
    I also note that by placing 300d and 650d next to it, the difference in size is huge, but next to 40d or 7d the 300d looks almost the same in size. The grip of the camera is very comfortable, nothing slips out and is comfortable in a man's hand. The chamber weighs more than the new initial carcasses. Severity is reliable. Even if it doesn't shoot, you can always hit it in the head. (from)
    The conclusion for me is this - the camera is worth buying to this day. She can even be a workhorse in the hands of a poor photographer, at least the number two for sure. Due to the low price of 300d, any beginner can afford it, it is cheaper than going to a restaurant. At the same time, with straight arms and a normal lens, a 300d will give a picture no worse than cameras for 1000 bucks. All in all, the camera is on fire! It is a pity that there are fewer and fewer of them on the used market - nevertheless, a decade and a half do not pass without a trace even for such reliable equipment.

    • BB

      Well written. But still: either you have very expensive restaurants or very cheap carcasses :)

      • Pastor

        Well, I specifically wrote about 300d :) I bought it for 1500 rubles, complete with half-working 18-55. I count on a trip to the restaurant based on two of my frequent layouts:
        1) a hot dish within 500 rubles,
        a bottle of the cheapest wine - 700-800 rubles,
        some kind of snack such as slicing cheese and meat or a vegetable plate - 300-400 rubles.
        2) a glass of beer to warm up with croutons - 200-300 rubles,
        300-400 grams of vodka - 600-800 rubles;
        salad - 300 rubles;
        juice - 100 rubles;
        pickles / cucumbers / bacon / herring - 400 rubles.
        Both layouts imply an emphasis on alcohol, but you can spend the same amount by taking more expensive dishes and dessert with tea. Also, additional costs such as coffee, cigarettes, hookah are not taken into account, which also take place. The same hookah - plus another 500-800 rubles. If you take a more full-fledged trip to a restaurant, then 3 thousand can be spent, and more. I'm not even talking about the cases of meeting with a very close friend and long winter get-togethers with him on Friday / Saturday - there, even 5 thousand for one can be easily eaten and drunk if desired. Naturally, the restaurant is taken with a small letter "p". Expensive Moscow restaurants can have a bill for a price of 5 dm4 for a similar set of products :)
        But if you do not take into account expensive restaurants, then in simple places in Moscow, as well as in most cities of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, the prices in restaurants are roughly similar to my selection. Therefore, I allowed myself to compare the price of 300d with a trip to a restaurant :) Let's say I bought it inexpensively, the average price for Avito is 3-4 thousand. So, you need to deny yourself one good trip to a restaurant for such a carcass :)

        • anonym

          Luxurious comments

        • anonym

          Do you really think in your mind that in Ukraine, given the current state of affairs on the photo site, someone is really interested in reading about how much and what you spend in Moscow restaurants? You are simply beyond the bounds - the photo matches you.

          • Andrei

            Dear anonymous author, you simply cannot read.
            The pastor responded to comments about cheap carcasses and expensive restaurants.
            And what does Ukraine have to do with it? The site is common to all the inhabitants of the planet.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Thanks for the comment.

  • anonym

    Enough museum exhibits for the test take))

    • Arkady Shapoval

      I did not take it, but bought it specifically to drive.

      • Valentine

        And how is it compared to the D40?

        • Arkady Shapoval

          It is extremely difficult to be objective, because the D40 is one of my favorite cameras, and the ion is significantly newer. Both are good in the picture, the D40 is more pleasant due to a good display and relatively quick response, memory cards up to 32 GB, etc.

          • Valentine

            Yes, I agree completely. The picture is quite decent for both cameras. Technically, the D40 is better. It came out three years later and could afford a more advanced technical base, even in its trimmed-down package (special "thanks" to Nikon engineers for the 3 focus points). Notably, the D40 also had a gray case.

  • anonym

    If I'm not mistaken, the exposure meter and AF sensor are borrowed from the film EOS300, which is “just 300”.

  • Sergeyich

    I don’t understand the meaning of the article on an entry-level digital camera 14 years ago.
    It is not relevant, no one is looking at it and will not look after the article either.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      There are reasons. The implicit reason is that this site is, oddly enough, my blog where I can describe my camera experience. In this article, I wanted to express an idea and demonstrate the fact that even on a 14-year-old camera you can get something useful, while all photos 500px gallery fell into the popular section, and several of my colleagues could not believe for a long time that 300d did it (I have a couple of setics from the 300d studio, where it proved to be good). At the same time, at ISO 100 it was even difficult for me to realize that it was 300d and a simple 35/2 yaga.
      Without some knowledge, for example, I would not have distinguished the ISO 100 300d from many other cameras. For a amateur photographer who does not need all kinds of modern lotions, this is an interesting decision to shoot with a digital SLR. By the way, the 300d was sold to a amateur photographer who wanted to test himself as a digital mirror.

      • Sergeyich

        I have been a reader of Radozhiva since 2013.
        Honestly, when I saw the heading 300d, I thought about the last update 200d.
        Your blog has a very good guide to optics, especially for Nikonists. If you need to choose a lens, then everything is just super! Taking off my hat.
        But a serious gap appeared on the cameras.
        At Nikon's Radozhiva: 7100 (2013), 750 (2014). 7200, 7500, 500, 850, 5 came out.
        Kenon: 7d (2009), 70d (2013). 77d, 80d, 7d2, 6d2, 5d4 came out.
        Pentax: K-5 (2010). K-5 (2) S, K-3, K-3 (2), KR, K-1 came out.

        If you climb on most other photo forums in the CIS, you can see the following pattern: among amateur photographers MUKI CHOICE, within the same brand, between the upper crop of the last generation and the younger FF of the previous generation. Here it is salt! Nikon 7200 or 610? 500 or 750? Kenon 80d or 7d2 or 6d? Fuji HT-20 or HT-1? Cross-brand puzzles are also enough, for example, for landscape + street, which is better, d7200 or 5d2? The question is really difficult, since the first model is 2015, and the second one is 2008.

        I’m glad in the cameras, 4-8 years behind in digital cameras. Nowadays, this is a very strong backlog.

        • Arkady Shapoval

          Are we in a hurry somewhere? And then I am preparing a review of Helios for 60 years, which means that the review will be 60 years behind :). Jokes aside, even if a person writes a similar question to me in PM, for example - D7200 or 610, after a clear and unambiguous answer the person continues to suffer. There are no single answers :)

          • Sergeyich

            We are not in a hurry, they are in a hurry. In fact, a lot has happened in recent years and it is very difficult not to reckon with it. In addition, you yourself, in general, are delighted with modern technologies. Mirrorless cameras are stepping on the mirror in the same way that digital once stepped on film ... and, perhaps, the mirror, in a couple of years, will also give up its positions in the lower segment. No matter how you scold a6300, take a brick d7200 in your hands, and answer our question: what will a travel amateur take with him, with Kf = 1,5 and the same quality of pictures? Or still carry with you a slightly larger d610 brick, but realizing that this is at least for the sake of FF? Or maybe spit on everything and take a7? After all, it is not much larger and more expensive than a6300 ... Marketing has already lifted it.

            These are pressing issues of today. A camera guide is important too, especially considering the size of the sensor. Here is (cunning) Nikon released d500 ... So the crop is alive?

            • Arkady Shapoval

              It's very simple - a million problems and a million solutions. If for travel - one thing, then for work - another. Most people want for a penny, as it is not pictorial, to get a light, fast full-frame camera with a cheap fast lens. In the general case, there is a clear gradation by cameras, which in the general (general!) Case is better, the easiest way is to determine this among the line of the same brand. But in a particular case, the answers are always different and it is worth writing 100500 articles of the type d610 or d700 with a booster, or d7100 or d5200 with 17-50. The combinations are endless.

            • Valentine

              Is the crop alive? And not only APS-C is alive and well, micro 4/3 is developing at full speed. I often see that people consider cameras with a cropped sensor to be inferior, completely not understanding exactly what a full-frame sensor can give and when solving which tasks. Full-frame is often perceived as a full-fledged one, and crop as a kind of crop thrown by marketers for the poor ... But this is nothing more than a word game and a fundamentally wrong statement, because you need to understand exactly where you will get the advantage of a full-frame camera, which you can never get crop. Moreover, a competent photographer for many tasks where you thought to use a full frame, will give you options for a solution with a crop. And besides, if you even understand exactly why you need a full frame, there is also an economic side to this matter, since a full frame pulls the rest of the expensive rig along with it. Finally, when it comes to transporting and carrying, choice mistakes begin to press on the neck in the truest sense of the word. While some believe that over time all cameras will be full-frame, others, on the contrary, see the development of crop and its improvement as narrowing the niche of full-frame technology.

              • Sergeyich

                Regarding Crop vs FF, in order not to strongly develop the topic (for the million first time), I will say one thing that the advantages of FF are clearly visible at 100% increase. A larger scale of the image falls on a matrix with a larger area ... the detail will be better. But if you do not print images larger than A3 and the camera often stays at home, since it is large and heavy, then, in the absence of practice, the pictures will not get better, regardless of the size of the sensor. You must have your camera with you to practice.

              • Valentine

                This is precisely not the main thing, and especially not the only advantage of the FF. Moreover, many crop and large sizes can compete well. The theme, I agree, should not be disturbed once again.

        • Valentine

          Sergeich, and I just read such articles so that there is no MUK OF CHOICE. Indeed, you are right that many amateurs are trying to solve the issue of improving their photographs by switching to more advanced cameras. And that usually doesn't work. And it would be okay for a person to amuse himself for his own sake, but after all, unfortunately, many are moving into the category of commercial photographers who simply make useless shots with very poor processing. Reviews of Arcadia the best cure for such FLOURS OF CHOICE is not in the camera, and the lover does not need to suffer much with the choice of the camera, it is necessary to work on the skill. In the hands of a master, almost any DSLR gives a result that is sufficient for an amateur in 90% of cases.

          • Ivan

            The eternal theme about a dog with a tail.

          • Amateur

            The truth is somewhere near !
            I also have a rarity. True, not 300d, but 350d. ) I bought it not for 1500r, but for 4000r with a whale 18-55 3-4 years ago approximately. There is another 50d, I also took second-hand for inexpensive somewhere in a year, I thought they would trample masterpieces. But no, 350ka has remained a favorite carcass. ) Small, but remote. Series 1000d, took from friends, I don't like it after the old man. Yes, there are many goodies, but the ergonomics are not at all the same. Although, it would seem - a new model. ) I take pictures on the sly and all worry that there will be nothing to choose from new products if it breaks. Painfully used to her.

        • ы

          “Radozhiva, in terms of cameras, is 4-8 years behind in terms of digital cameras. In our time, this is a very strong lag. ”
          Radozhiva is a private blog.
          If you are worried that there are no tests of new expensive cameras, just provide them to Arkady as soon as possible, if finances allow you.

          • Carl Zeiss

            Yes, Radozhiva does not lag behind "on cameras"! As in the lens reviews, however, too.
            This is not a resource where the latest news about the most top-end news of the world camera industry should appear in a hurry with lightning speed. There are many other specialized resources for this.
            Here everything, without haste, with feeling, with arrangement, is described about the technique of the most different years of release. Which at the same time passed a good test of time and many users. And, by the way, about new cameras and lenses, I like reading notes and articles less than about already tested ones. Because the new ones have essentially nothing to say. In addition to what has already been announced by the device manufacturer. Believing this all unverified information is premature. And for serious testing of new items you need a good material and technical base and the presence of a large amount of free time. All of this, of course, is necessary and there is no change. But not here. And on well-sponsored manufacturers' resources, designed for experienced pros who are willing to spend large amounts of money on all this. So, for the announcements of new products, this is there. And for sincere reviews of the already beloved and proven classics, this is just here.

        • Andrei

          << >>

          I have no choice. While the camera is working, I'm not going to change it.
          I don't see any sense in top-end crops. Allows the budget -FF, does not allow - an entry-level crop.

          • Sergeyich

            You, you see, have excellent eyesight. I can’t see anything in the viewfinder (i.e. keyhole) of the younger crop. Just some kind of mockery.

          • Sergeyich

            Even with the top croppers, the strapping of the mauryza is probably better.
            Color depth, DD, RAW bit depth, as a rule, are better for top crop than for younger ones of the same generation.

        • Ruslan

          Indeed, Canon decided to confuse consumers by releasing a lot after the 300D model 200D?

    • Hyc

      It is possible and necessary for a beginner photographer to spend money on such a camera. Because for the price “I drink more in the evening”, you can get a more or less grubby digital mirror, and a huge amount of optics, including Soviet ones, are put on it without dancing with sabers.

      And at least evaluate “do I need it at all, or will I continue to click on the soap dish”.

      • Charles

        Are you eating digital mirrors? You must be a crocodile.

      • Ruslan

        I’m afraid to upset you, but a modern, I repeat the modern one, soap dish will take a photo no worse than an old DSLR, even in low light conditions, not to mention daylight and even programmatically blur the background in the portrait. Therefore, in my opinion, such an old DSLR is for people confidently, consciously choosing a weighty device with all its outdated photo capabilities, and not try and be disappointed. And for this, you still need to have experience with more or less modern devices.

  • Alex_46

    That's what I love old cameras for, because they have great color right out of the box. And the three hundred have complete order with this. Buy yourself one, or something ...

    • Vania

      You can also look at the next generation of matrices, those that are 8mpx. 350d, 20d, 30d. There is practically no difference at the price, in color from the crust, I personally do not see much difference either, but you can find something more lively in terms of iron, and they are just a little faster and more responsive, especially 20d and 30d. On avite in the area of ​​3-6 tr. can be found easily.

      • Andrey Vyunenko

        I agree. 300D, well, too thoughtful!

        • Alex_46

          I mainly shoot film, so the thoughtfulness of the subject compared to my thoughtfulness during the shooting is simply nothing))).

          • Andrey Vyunenko

            well, that’s fundamentally changing the matter! (-: I somehow shot one film on the Nikon F70. but it seems to me that if you don’t participate in the photo printing process, but just give it to someone for digitization, this is the same digital photo as a result . all the magic of sitting in a dark bath with a red light-fading away. although I'm in this film case, a complete ignoramus.

  • Andrey Vyunenko

    some photos from the 300th

  • Andrey Vyunenko

    more

  • Andrey Vyunenko

    and more

    • Valery A.

      Is this a variant of Malevich’s square?

  • Peter

    See what you can shoot with the 300D - 350D fixed
    http://www.robertmekis.com/?kateg=photos&subkateg=landscape
    So the result is determined by hands and not by the camera.

  • Rodko Alexander

    A year ago (in 2016) I bought a 300-ku for 1300 UAH. This was my first DSLR, I recently took a 40D) 300-ka is a fotik for a beginner, she will learn to take pictures and it is understood what you need next. He repaired and carefully put it on the shelf))

  • a lion

    I had 350d. Left a positive impression. I took it for inexpensive, then gave it to a good person.

  • Alexander

    They were hired in 2004. Then there was no alternative for a reasonable price. After the film, it seemed like a miracle! Even with a whale lens, it gave quite decent shots. Which, among other things, were included in several color monographs. And they also designed the exposition at the All-Russian Exhibition Center - from one frame - 2 strips per meter by two (of course, with strong processing). As a background for the stand, it turned out pretty well.
    Now children are training on it. I think that this is now a great camera for those who want to shoot with a DSLR, but there is no money.
    PS According to my feelings, at low ISO it still surpasses the latest soap dishes (if you can shoot :))

    • Ivan

      “Outperforms the latest soap dishes”
      yeah nafig where to find these latest soap dishes? Smartphones killed them in a particularly perverted form.

  • Sergey

    08 2018 the review is relevant for me, I want to buy myself the first inexpensive DSLR, so I'm trying to figure out which one.

  • Old amateur photographer

    This blog has been visited for five years now. Thank you, Arkady, for your work! A lot of useful and practical things can be found in your articles. Comments read vaasche-well, very exciting. Who can you not meet here from a pedantic specialist who perfectly knows the topic - to a complete layman (and sometimes a moron who makes 5 mistakes in the word hedgehog). Truly, your blog is becoming popular!
    But back to the topic of this article. I would like to know your unbiased opinion, and the other owners of the camera under discussion. What is the situation with the 300d with the LPG? Are there very contradictory statements about this? I would be grateful for any opinions expressed. Having a short experience in using 60d, Kenon understood that this is a weakling.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      It all depends on the shooting conditions. You can get both excellent jpeg and bad. Rather, it's not about the format.

  • Yaroslav

    How do you like the jeepie from her? Or do you still need to shoot in a rabbi?

    • Vyunenko Andrey

      For my taste, the jeep is not very. I prefer RAW. More options for processing. Re-flashing greatly improves the functionality -Https: //www.ixbt.com/digimage/canon300dfw2.shtml
      filmed in the twilight at the Picasso exhibition with kitovs 18-55 IS hand-held, without flash-https: //www.facebook.com/media/set/? set = a.2399758630097261 & type = 1 & l = 873cadfd23

  • Alexander

    Arkady You are always on top. Thank you so much for the review. And I am writing for the fact that being impressed by the review today I purchased this camera for 1000 rubles on Avito. A set of two batteries charging the device itself with a whale. I shot about 50 frames so slow but the color is awesome. wish you more such clever helpful reviews. Thanks.

  • SERGEI

    MAY 2019 I AM INTERESTING TO READ

  • Andrey Tekunov

    I’m still shooting portraits for the 300th, and I and the end consumer (girls) like them! They have a drum technique, the result is important.

    • Michael

      Well, in photography, in general, the main result) And the methods of achievement are not important

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2023

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2017/11/canon-300d/comment-page-1/

Version en español de este artículo https://radojuva.com/es/2017/11/canon-300d/comment-page-1/