answers: 31

  1. Yasya
    23.08.2017

    And how is he comparing Nikon N AF-S Micro Nikkor 105mm 1: 2.8G ED VR SWM IF Micro 1: 1 Nano Crystal Coat?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.08.2017

      These are quite different lenses, although they are intended for the same task. 105 VR is a replacement for 105 AF, 105 AF-D and is generally better than them. But these old people will remain relevant for a long time to come.

      Reply

  2. Olegjan
    23.08.2017

    Fabulously beautiful pictures. The colors are just not naturally chic. The power lens of course.

    Reply

  3. Alexey
    23.08.2017

    Loved the photo.

    Reply

  4. Michael
    23.08.2017

    Wow! Waiting for a review of hundreds of Eng?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.08.2017

      Yes, the review is actually ready, I want to record another video with it, but so far there is no time.

      Reply

      • Jurassic
        23.08.2017

        Is it worth waiting for anything from Yongnou at 85,105,135mm (for Nikon) ????? and then the price of used AF bend godlessly. even 50mm 1.8zhi in CSN costs 14k.rub but on second-hand Avito and for 16k they sell ((((

        Reply

      • Oleg
        23.08.2017

        It is interesting of course, on the FF, budget, aperture and portrait.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        23.08.2017

        100 / 2.0 for Nikon is already shown on August 1 at the office. site. On sale most likely in the fall.

        Reply

      • zengarden
        23.08.2017

        I think it will be the same as for Kenon, just with a different bayonet mount.
        Ketayts well done, of course ...

        Reply

      • NE
        24.08.2017

        I wonder why they do lenses primarily for canon?

        Reply

      • Michael
        24.08.2017

        Because weaving is laced with Canon

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        24.08.2017

        40 / 2.8 is primarily for Nikon, because there are no exact answers.

        Reply

      • Michael
        24.08.2017

        I agree. If you don’t get it better, I'll take a Chinese miracle, because I take portraits very rarely and the toad strangles spending money on such a lens

        Reply

      • NE
        24.08.2017

        I formulate the question posed earlier :): why do they "lick" with canon and not with nikon

        Reply

      • Michael
        24.08.2017

        Who knows. Maybe Canon bought the old equipment, for example)))

        Reply

      • mimocrocodile
        24.08.2017

        Arkady, good day!
        Is there a test YONGNUO YN40mm F2.8N in the near future?

        Reply

      • Alexey
        24.08.2017

        Only if somewhere near Arcadia DeLorean is hidden. This lens is expected to start next year immediately after 85 mm and 100 mm for Nikon.

        Reply

      • Ivan
        17.09.2017

        5ka for lorika ?.

        Reply

    • zengarden
      23.08.2017

      The Yongnuo YN 100mm f / 2 is kind of like a copy of a Kenon lens. At $ 170, it's a pretty good alternative. I'm waiting for them to make the same (autofocus) for Fujifilm X :) although this is unlikely ...

      Reply

  5. zengarden
    23.08.2017

    As sharp as [sudden childhood surprise]. Dear, although you can find used and cheap, if you're lucky. But not very for portraits - except for cats, of course :)

    Reply

  6. reader
    24.08.2017

    Hello Arkady. the question is off topic of course. But following the link from the banner of this site I got to the store and did not understand: “Helios 44-2 lens for Nikon” - is it a ready-made lens with infinity? I will be glad if you tell me.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.08.2017

      They have an online consultation there, check this question.

      Reply

  7. reader
    24.08.2017

    Yeshkin the cat. probably with a lens therefore it is written that it is compatible with nikon.

    Reply

  8. Denis
    26.08.2017

    Well, Yongnuo can't do that ...

    Reply

  9. anonym
    27.08.2017

    It is very transparent, with d glass it’s just a chip, new g glass will be better optically. But these have some amazing micro-contrast, which gives such a clean transparent picture.

    Reply

  10. Vyacheslav
    17.09.2020

    It seemed that nikon d90 was carrying nikon 3200?

    Reply

  11. Alexey
    26.06.2023

    Recommend a budget lens 1:1 macro f mount. Autofocus and stub are not particularly important.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.06.2023

      macro rings and Jupiter-37, or Industar-61

      Reply

      • Alexey
        26.06.2023

        And if Tamron 90 / 2.8 172E is not better?

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        26.06.2023

        will be better, but also more expensive. Old Tokins, Tamrons, Nikons are chic

        Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer