answers: 27

  1. Jury
    18.07.2017

    “I would even trade some Jupiter-37A for Tamron AF 75-300mm 1: 4-5.6 LD TELE-MACRO (1: 3.9) 672D”
    At the very beginning of my passion for photography, I bought Sigma DG OS 70-300mm 1: 4-5.6, bought new ones, still like some photos, but after buying Tair 11A, I sold this sigma, because in the range of 200-300 mm it produced a soapy picture, the bokeh was not very good, and at 135 mm Tair, even in the open, showed sharperness better, not to mention the picture as a whole. If there are several Yu37As in stock, then I agree, one, which is worse, can be exchanged for a similar lens :). Thanks for the review!

    Reply

  2. AL
    19.07.2017

    Arkady, if you don't have a snapshot, then the delight of a pedophile)))
    No offense was said)

    Reply

    • Pokekmon
      19.07.2017

      Maybe Arkady takes off his children or the children of relatives)
      Or maybe she just loves children (in a good sense of the word). And it seems normal to me.

      Reply

      • Pokekmon
        19.07.2017

        And then it's difficult to photograph children - they are very mobile.
        Thus, it is immediately clear how tenacious and fast autofocus is.

        Reply

    • andrey.ali
      19.07.2017

      about pedofelism in general, the person blurted out the topic ... apparently a sore subject ... or a sore head ...

      It is best to test this kind of lenses on children, because as a friend from the previous post said, children run and jump, this is where all the weak or strong sides of autofocus or stabilizer appear ...

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      19.07.2017

      Everyone sees in the photo what he is located to, which is close to the viewer in spirit :)
      In general, I shot fountains here at short exposures, at the same time it’s clear how autofocus responds, and in the same previous review try to find children.

      Reply

    • anonym
      19.07.2017

      Ken Rockwell also removes children and palm trees :)

      Reply

    • anonym
      07.08.2017

      The head is not just for eating stupidly. Not all Ms were killed in the war - FACT ...

      Reply

  3. Oleg
    19.07.2017

    “I’d even exchange any Jupiter-37A for Tamron AF 75-300mm 1: 4-5.6 LD TELE-MACRO (1: 3.9) 672D” I don’t know how for 75-300, but for 55-250 on focal 100- 135 aperture is already 5, but I would like at least f4. Therefore, somewhere Jupiter is preferable. Autofocus is another matter, and the picture from these dark zooms is usually so juicy, contrasting.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      19.07.2017

      F / 5 versus F / 3.5 is exactly stop (the difference in the hole is exactly 2 times). Instead of ISO 100, you can use ISO 200. Since telephoto cameras usually shoot outdoors, and not in rooms with poor lighting, raising the ISO to stop is not critical. And if you look at Jupiter-11 with F / 4, and this Tamron, then the difference in aperture at 135mm is a third of a stop (F / 4 vs F / 4.5). On the other hand, the drawing is for Jupiters and autofocus + zoom for Tamron. I once shot with the d700 and Nikon 70-300VR, and so, some portraits Nikon pulled out much better than Jupiter because of the zoom capability. Even this Tamron at 300 / 5.6 can squeeze out a picture more interesting than Jupiter at 135 / 3,5. I'm not talking about Zonnar's sharpness and masterpiece blur, but the number of successful shots from af telephoto will be several times higher than manual lenses.

      Take for example the same photos from this review. The zoom is very convenient to compose shots while sitting on a bench. There is no need to run like crazy for every shot, to attract attention. Where needed - 70 mm, where needed 300 mm. Different perspective harvesting already gives different images in the photoset set. In the same fountains, it takes a split second for a moment, even with a slow autofocus, you can catch a target much faster than unscrewing the focusing ring on the Ju-37A. The same applies to aperture - on a telephoto lens it is very convenient to shoot in P mode, when the camera automatically selects the optimal aperture / shutter speed. For a telephoto camera, this is critical, because on covered ones it becomes much sharper, while the bokeshka does not suffer much. Televisions blur the background even on covered ones. The cart about the fact that you only need to shoot in M ​​or A / Av mode is also very old. Personally, I use A / AV mode at 40% outdoors and P mode at 40%. With Jupiter, P and S / TV modes are lost. And so on - it all comes down to a manual vs a bad af.

      I do not want to offend the feelings of those who believe in the God of Jupiter, but science in the person of the lousy Tamron 75-300 has gone much further than the ancient Greek traditions. In this weak Tamron there are more developments, technologies and opportunities than in all Soviet optics combined :)

      Reply

      • Anonymous
        19.07.2017

        I agree that our people are poor because of the bad. The scoop could not even talk about ld lenses, because the best is 80-200 / 4.5 disgusting.

        Reply

      • Andrei
        19.07.2017

        Finally, someone supported me.
        Manulny lenses for photodr @ cherov. I also have them, but exclusively for nostalgia. Under Jupiter 8 I even want to take the BZK.

        Reply

      • Oleg
        20.07.2017

        Arkady, but such a question? Of course the top of the zooms is 70-200 / F2.8. But his younger brother is 70-200 / F4, which is also not cheap as far as it has an advantage over similar dark zooms in the 75-300 or 55-250 class in terms of bokeh, these half-stops, stops play some noticeable role in the formation of bokeh. Moreover, in the case of dark zooms, we have a bonus as an additional 50-100mm

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        20.07.2017

        Fours usually work better in the open, the difference between F / 4 and F / 5.6 is already stop, which is sometimes significant. Bokeh is model specific. There are beautiful ones, there are neutral ones. Fours are usually better lenses on their own, as they approach the TOP lenses with 2.8.

        Reply

  4. Reader
    19.07.2017

    And what is this Nikon ED AF-P Nikkor 70-300mm 1: 4.5-5.6E VR listed?

    Reply

    • Yura
      19.07.2017

      This is a new lens with AF-P (electronic-aperture + silent focus motor, no buttons on the body.) Only for new carcasses or the latest firmware updates. like I understand)

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        19.07.2017

        No, there are buttons. Just update to the previous version. First AF-P for FX cameras. The first 'E' lens without the letter 'N' (i.e. budget). First budget with A / MM / AM switch.

        Reply

      • Denis
        19.07.2017

        I really look forward to this new full-frame 70-300, which for some reason everyone is confused with the same on the crop. If earlier it was torn between a used tamron of 70-200 usd and Nikon 80-200 af-s, now now a new state employee has been added to them. Shipment of new items is scheduled for the 29th, I hope at least by September it will reach us. I hope that the copywriter will fall into the hands of Arkady, I would very much like to know his opinion on medium televisions! :)

        Reply

  5. Sergei
    19.07.2017

    Good day! The question is off topic: Arkaly, have you ever filmed a large format?

    Reply

    • Sergei
      19.07.2017

      Forgive me generously for the mistake in the name ...

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      19.07.2017

      I didn’t shoot on a large format :)

      Reply

      • Sergei
        19.07.2017

        But how to cover yourself with a black blanket? :)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        19.07.2017

        Better to use DarkRoom :)

        Reply

  6. Demidov Denis
    24.07.2017

    I am pleased to read your blog for many years. It was he who knocked me to the acquisition of the first Soviet lens to his reflex camera and experiments!

    Thank you for this, Arkady!

    Also wanted to ask your advice.
    Which lens (possibly Soviet) from the budget you recommend for attempts at astro photography of the starry sky?

    The requirements, of course, are simple: focusing at / beyond infinity, aperture and ... yes, the main problem is the focal length, since the camera is a Nikon D5100, and, accordingly, a cropped matrix. Auto focus is unnecessary.

    Now I work with a regular 18-55 whale, but 3,5 is darkish at 18mm, I have to sacrifice exposure.

    Perhaps something up to 2,5 and not expensive?

    Thanks in advance if you can answer.

    Reply

    • anonym
      07.08.2017

      He knocked you down, unfortunately ... Sell all your Soviet stuff and buy at least one normal fix from Nikon ... And you will be happy!

      Reply

  7. Michail maren
    10.08.2017

    Thank you for your objective assessment of the Tamron AF 75-300. I use it on a Sony A200 DSLR, shoot outdoors and outdoors. Macro gives nice bokeh.

    Reply

  8. CHIM
    14.12.2018

    Recently presented such a lens. I agree with the author, I would really trade Jupiter-37A (I also have one) for this one. The only drawback is the lack of a stabilizer, and everything else is super. (used on kenon 50d).

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer