According provided by OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm lens. Many thanks to Andrey Golubenko.

OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm. The lens is shown on the Canon EOS DIGITAL Rebel XSi (aka Canon EOS DIGITAL 450D, aka Canon EOS Kiss X2), installation was done using an adapter Olympus OM - Canon EOS.
In short
OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm is an old lens for Olympus OM film cameras. It has a very compact size and stylish design with a chrome insert near the bayonet. Externally very similar to other shorter older lenses from OLYMPUS, such as Olympus Om-System Zuiko MC Auto-S 1: 1.4 f = 50mm.
At F / 2.0, the lens is sharp enough, with a moderate amount of chromatic aberrations, unfortunately, the picture can be overloaded with freezing (chromatic aberrations in the out-of-focus area, coloring contrast elements in purple and green). At F / 2.8 it is already confidently sharp. OLYMPUS 2/85 tolerates back and side light well, but in some situations it noticeably loses contrast and requires the use of a hood. Bokeh and color rendition are neutral, pleasant and non-intrusive.
OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm is considered a classic portrait lens (fast aperture telephoto lens) and copes well with its tasks.
Main technical characteristics of OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm:
Review Instance Name | Near the front lens: OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm 201529. On the chrome ring: Lens made in Japan |
Basic properties |
|
Front Filter Diameter | 49 mm, metal thread for filters. |
Focal length | 85 mm
|
Zoom ratio | 1 x |
Designed by | for film cameras with a frame size of 24 x 36 |
Number of aperture blades | 8 petals, at a value of F / 2.8 form a hole with serrations. On F / 4-F / 16, the hole is in the shape of a regular octagon. In photographs, sometimes you can see octagons in the blur zone (example). |
Tags | focus distance scale in meters and feet. The depth of field scale for F / 4, 8, 16. The label for working in the infrared spectrum (red bar, combined with the right line of the depth of field for F / 8). |
Diaphragm | from f / 2 to f / 16. The lens has an aperture control ring. There are marks on the ring for F / 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11. The ring rotates with clicks without intermediate values. Auto iris control is supported on the respective cameras. |
MDF | 0.85 m |
The weight | November 260, XNUMX |
Optical design | 5 elements in 4 groups.
Please note that this lens is available in several versions with different optical designs. The lens does not use special optical elements in its optical design. |
Lens hood | Threaded, screwed into the front filter thread |
Manufacturer country | Lens made in Japan (lens made in Japan). |
Period | Produced since about 1986 |
Price | From 200 to 300 cu for used option.
Prices for modern Olympus lenses are available see here. |
OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm well assembled. The focus ring is rubberized, rotates approximately 180 degrees. The ring travel is smooth and pleasant. During focusing, the front retractable body does not rotate. Focusing occurs by moving the entire lens block, the lens has image correction while focusing at close range. The aperture ring is located near the front lens (a huge number of lenses have a diaphragm control ring near the lens mount). Like all similar OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm lenses, it has a bayonet mount and aperture repeater on its body (usually the retainer and repeater are on the camera body).
Sample Photos
Pictures from Canon EOS Digital Rebel XSi (aka Canon EOS DIGITAL 450D, aka Canon EOS Kiss) An adapter was used for shooting Olympus OM - Canon EOS (with preservation of infinity). The photos in the gallery below are shown without processing, on camera JPEG.
Download source files in format JPEG can at this link (76 files in the '.JPG' format, 220 MB). One photo in processing here.
All autofocus 85s
Choosing a good 85mm portrait lens is very important for a large number of photographers. I pay a lot of attention to this issue, therefore I have prepared this list of all such autofocus lenses for full frame cameras with F <= 2 and a focal length of about 85 mm.
Nikon (F, Z mounts)
- Nikon 85mm 1: 1.8 AF Nikkor [December 1987]
- Nikon 85mm 1: 1.8D AF Nikkor [March 1994, Thailand/Japan]
- Nikon 85mm 1: 1.4D AF Nikkor [November 1995]
- Nikon 85mm 1: 1.4GN AF-S Nikkor SWM IF Nano Crystal Coat [August 2010]
- Nikon 85mm 1: 1.8G AF-S IF SWM Nikkor [January 2012]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 85mm 1: 1.8 S [July 2019]
- Nikon Nikkor Z 85mm 1: 1.2 S [January 2023]
Canon (EF, RF mounts)
- Canon LENS EF 85mm 1:1.2 L USM [September 1989
- Canon LENS EF 85mm 1: 1.8 USM [July 1992]
- Canon LENS EF 85mm 1:1.2 L II USM [March 2006]
- Canon LENS EF 85mm 1:1.4 L IS USM [November 2017]
- Canon lens RF 85mm F1.2L USM [May 2019]
- Canon lens RF 85mm F1.2L USM DS (DEFOCUS SMOOTHING) [October 2019]
Yongnuo/YnLens (different mounts)
- Yongnuo YN85mm F1.8 (YN85mm F1.8) [9/6, Canon EF, February 2017]
- Yongnuo YN85mm F1.8 (YN85mm F1.8N) [9/6, Nikon F, May 2019]
- Ynlens YN85mm F1.8S DF DSM (YN85mm F1.8S) [9/8, Sony E, August 2020]
- Ynlens YN85mm F1.8R DF DSM (YN85mm F1.8R) [9/8, Canon RF, May 2021]
- Ynlens YN85mm 1:1.8Z DF DSM (YN85mm F1.8Z) [9/8, Nikon Z, March 2022]
- Yongnuo 85F1.8S DF DSM [9/8, Sony E, August 2022]
Sony / Sony Zeiss ZA / Minolta (E / FE, A mount)
- Sony FE 1.4/85 GM (SEL85F18GM) [February 2016]
- Sony FE 1.8/85 (SEL85F18) [February 2017]
- Sony FE 1.4/85 GM II [August 2024]
- Sony SAL85F14Z / Carl Zeiss Planar 1,4 / 85 ZA T* [June 2006]
- Minolta AF 85mm 1:1.4 (22) (AF lens 85) / Minolta Maxxum / Dynax / G / G+D / G+RS / G+D+LE and other versions of the same lens, A mount [1987]
Sigma (different mounts)
- Sigma EX 85mm 1: 1.4 DG HSM (two sub-versions with different body finishes, for Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K, Sony A, February 2010)
- Sigma 85mm 1: 1.4 DG | A [Art] (for Canon EF, Nikon F, Sigma SA, Sony E, Leica L, September 2016)
- Sigma 85mm 1: 1.4 DG DN | A [Art] (for Sony E, Leica L, August 2020)
Viltrox (different mounts)
- Viltrox PFU RBMH 85mm F1.8 STM (Sony E/FE + Fujifilm X, 2018)
- Viltrox AF 85/1.8 STM ED IF (Nikon Z, Canon RF, December 2020)
- Viltrox AF 85/1.8 II STM ED IF (Sony E/FE + Fujifilm X, July 2020, light version XNUMX)
Pentax (K mount)
- SMC Pentax-FA* 1:1.4 85mm IF AUTO FOCUS PENTAX 85 [1992]
- HD PENTAX-D FA * 85mm 1: 1.4 ED SDM AW [May 2020]
Samyang / Rokinon (different mounts)
- Samyang AF 85 / 1.4 EF (for Canon EF, scheme 9/7, June 2018)
- Samyang AF 85/1.4F (for Nikon F, scheme 9/7, April 2019)
- Samyang AF 85 / 1.4 FE (for Sony E, scheme 11/8, March 2019)
- Samyang AF 85 / 1.4 RF (for Canon RF, scheme 11/8, May 2020)
- Samyang AF 85 / 1.4 FE II (for Sony E, scheme 11/8, July 2022)
Meike (Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony E, Nikon Z, FujiFilm X)
- MEIKE 85mm AF 1: 1.8 [review] (Canon EF / Canon EF-S, April 2018)
- MEIKE 85mm AF 1: 1.8 [review] (Nikon F, Aug 2020)
- MEIKE 85mm 1:1.8 Auto Focus Lens FF STM [review] (for Sony FE/E + Nikon Z, Canon RF, FujiFilm X, June 2022 + March 2023)
- MEIKE 85mm 1:1.4 Auto Focus Lens FF STM (for Sony FE/E, Nikon Z + Leica L, September 2023, July 2024)
Zeiss (various mounts)
- Zeiss Sonnar 1.8 / 85 T * (Batis 1.8 / 85) [April 2015, built-in stabilizer, Sony E/FE mount, 11/8]
- Carl Zeiss Planar 1,4/85 ZA T* (Sony SAL85F14Z) [June 2006, Sony A/Minolta A mount, 8/7]
- Carl Zeiss Planar 1,4 / 85 T * [November 2002, Contax N mount, 10/9]
Tamron (different mounts)
- Tamron SP 85mm F/1.8 Di VC USD Model F016 (for Canon EF, Nikon F, Sony A [without VC function], March 2016)
Tokina (Sony E / FE mount)
- Tokina atx-m 85mm F1.8 FE (for Sony E, most likely a complete analog Viltrox PFU RBMH 85mm F1.8 STM, January 2020)
AstrHori (Sony E/FE mount)
-
AstrHori AF 85mm 1:1.8 [December 2022]
7Artisans (different bayonets)
- 7Artisans 85mm F/1.8 AF STM [FE, Z, L, July 2024]
Panasonic (L mount)
- Panasonic LUMIX S 1: 1.8 / 85mm [November 2020]
SIRUI (different bayonets):
- Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 AF FF [Sony E, Nikon Z, FujiFilm X, October 2024]
Separately, you can still highlight non-classic 85s:
- macro lens Canon Lens RF 85mm F2 MACRO IS STM [2020, RF]
- longer LEICA APO-SUMMICRON-SL 1: 2/90 ASPH. (2018, Leica l)
- less aperture Sony 85 / 2.8 SAM (SAL85f28) [2010, A]
- shorter SMC PENTAX FA 1:1.8 77mm Limited (1997, K)
- shorter HD Pentax-FA 1: 1.8 77mm Limited (2021, K)
- shorter Samyang AF 75 / 1.8 FE (2020, E) + Samyang AF 75/1.8X (2023, X)
- shorter TTArtisan AF 75/2 ED (2024, E, Z)
- cropped Samsung Lens 1:1.4 85mm ED SSA i-Function [2011, NX]
- cropped and longer FUJIFILM FUJINON LENS SUPER EBC XF 90mm 1: 2 R LM WR [2015, X]
- cropped and shorter Viltrox AF 75/1.2 XF STM ED IF [2022, X, E, Z]
- cropped, less aperture, macro lens Nikon DX AF-S Micro Nikkor 85mm 1: 3.5G ED VR SWM IF Micro 1: 1 [2009, F]
- many 90/2.8 class macro lenses

OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm. The lens is shown on the Canon EOS DIGITAL Rebel XSi (aka Canon EOS DIGITAL 450D, aka Canon EOS Kiss X2), installation was done using an adapter Olympus OM - Canon EOS.
This lens can be easily installed on any modern digital mirrorless camera. For installation, you should use the appropriate adapter/adapter, which allows you to use lenses with an Olympus OM mount on the desired mirrorless system without any problems or restrictions. Below is a list of systems/mounts with links to the necessary adapters/adapters: Sony E/FE/NEX, Canon RF/RF-S, Canon EF-M, Nikon Z, Nikon 1, Leica l, FujiFilm GFX, fujifilm x, Samsung NX, Micro 4 / 3.
Results
OLYMPUS OM-SYSTEM ZUIKO MC AUTO-T 1: 2 f = 85mm - fascinates with its compactness and pleasant picture. The image quality is at a good level, as for old optics. The main task of such lenses in the modern world is creative photography, for which the OLYMPUS 85/2 suits with a bang.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval.
Film oliki is one of the most awesome lenses now
I agree! And the price is holding on. Mama don’t cry! But they are worth it!
But this one is kind of strange. Not impressed even once, without a twist.
Olympus has excellent 50s and 100s, and this ...
hundreds are generally beautiful.
I restrain myself so that om-1 and a half do not buy, and I already have a hundred.
.........
but this type of "fashion" is obtained.
The girl in the photo - you can't take your eyes off. Good :-)
Yes, baby is lovely))
Great lens. In general, if you look in the direction of the old manual optics, then it is probably in the direction of the olives. Just two heads taller than all gelics, jupiters and kaleinars. Plus, all lenses are compact in size. 24mm Olik, for example, is a small pancake that covers a full frame and has good optical performance, similar Soviet lenses are not even nearby
Gorgeous lens. Somewhat similar to the white Krasnogorsk Jupiter-9 - image neutrality and size. He can be replaced in the arsenal.
I fully support all the positive reviews about "oliki". Once I read an article that the developers of the OM-series, simply but tastefully, position it as “an inexpensive alternative to Leitz”. I think they were slightly bent, but “100mm \ 2,8”, “28mm \ 3,5” and “50mm \ 1,4” impressed me. In addition to excellent color rendition and sharpness, there is some kind of special airiness and transparency in the “OM-ovsky” picture.
The review is excellent, the lens is excellent, the model is lovely! Arcadia - RESPECT!
Arkady, tell me why for a long time on the site you did not even mention the mechanical NIKKOR 85 2.0? He is, as it were, from a galaxy of mechanical film tops from the 70s from everyone's favorite filming equipment manufacturer? I do not understand…
Why didn’t you mention? If you have one, why not make a review?
I'm just screaming about him now !!!)))
Scream further. And they could write a review and send to Arkady. They say it’s possible now, but it’s not accurate)
There are no olives, but you hold on :)
)))
“But this is not certain” - burns young people.
Make noiseLet's flood!And because it is also likely that no one needs my review here by default))) I love this site, and I find it useful and necessary. But here for me there are many incomprehensions. Why, for example, in the MISCELLANEOUS section, there is literally no Olikovskaya optics of the times of autofocus, which has already died 4 by 3 ??? The same whale 14-42ED which are essentially the BEST whales before the release of Nikkorov VR24, recalculated under 2mp ??? The same line of 420 520 620 cameras, which objectively, before their imminent resignation, was one step ahead of the planet for the convenience of having an already built-in camera stub of an incredible resource price (yes, ordinary plastic ones still work with a MINIMUM number of warranty failures). Why is not all this?
Why?
But you yourself, as an adult (I hope) a person, why do you think?
Because I have probably not had the go-ahead until now. We are waiting with….
The rest of the users send and I post, and many do not ask - they do.
Because the representatives of Olik did not give a review, and users also did not want to. No secrets or conspiracies. Want to tell, prepare the material, I will gladly post it, what is the problem?
Look I can do on 85 2.0 Nikkorushka starting and on Olympushka 14-42ED. Then just evaluate for yourself and decide whether you need a sequel ... Once again, there is everything to fill for an amateur Olik, from body to flashes and optics.
So something like this)
Usefulness is likely to be appreciated by users. More work, less flooding.
OK ATP
The review is definitely needed and will be interesting to many. With the same success, you can announce a conspiracy against Kenon: "where are the reviews: 70-200, 16-35, 17-40, 24-70 \ f4, and where are the L-fixes: 24,35,50, 85, 135mm? "
Yes, yes, 70-200 is especially needed. If the site is already growing, then it is worth going beyond)))
And ATP for support)))
Simply, Radozhiva is a rather huge project, which essentially rests on the enthusiasm of one person and which covers reviews from Industar-96u to, say, the top Kenonov and Nikon macroflows, also with carcasses from the simplest to the most advanced, which requires tremendous time and effort. Yes, there aren’t enough reviews of top-end lenses and cameras, but you need to understand that 70-200 \ 2.8 is not the lens that everyone has in the locker and which he just picked up and filmed the review or sent it by mail for review
It's clear. Just 70-200 4 is optically the same as 2.8 and is still able to lie with all fans of the boot)
For the same reason that I did not mention millions of other lenses. He was not in my review.
Exactly
It's just that general WOW about the old Olik, of course, are largely justified, but it seems to me that in general you have forgotten about your native ... The same bold film pixel is the same size as top-quality picture quality for the 70s. The same Rockwell, for example, simply screams about him - it is about him, if not strange - defining him as one of the sharpest and most balanced objectives in the history of Nicocorpe. Or is it wrong, like the on foto tests and many others? Throw a link for study?)))
Ask Kenny, I just think you won’t get an answer :)
So, for my part, I can stir up about the 85 2.0 Nikkor as a new state as out of the 77gv box and walk widely across Olik about ALL of his lenses except for the PRO and TOP PRO series and the 420 520 620 camera. site content more Arkady is necessary for you. It’s like this for me - so that they don’t forget about my loved ones ... So no offense - I kind of like everything here - give the go-ahead - I’ll work on it. Everything is in stock.
Already three of you, including Arkady, have given the go-ahead (quotes: “prepare the material”, “why not make a review”, “could write a review and send Arkady”) what are you still waiting for?
Direct green light from the author of the project)))
# 00FF00
Fine!!!
Do not aggress) I just love my olikotech Pts and want to give it a light) Maybe you will like it if it comes to that. Decisions here are made by the author whose opinion we all here value and perceive adequately)
Write, send, you may not even ask - https://radojuva.com/2015/12/end-of-line/
And the Nikon system will become Olympus glass?
I'm not sure exactly, but in my opinion there may be problems with "infinity"
They will, but there will be no infinity and adapters are rare. There are adapters with a lens, but they will spoil the picture + their cost is high.
You can put on Nikon without a lens, but not all. 100 \ 2,8 and 28 \ 3,5 turned out to be transplanted, but 50 \ 1,4 - no. Below is an example with 28 \ 3,5. In this regard, I often think about the Pentax or Kenon, so that the lenses are not "crippled" to use.
You can replace the mount. There are instructions on the Internet. I have remade so fifty dollars.
By the way, the girl from the review was asked to choose 20 photos for processing. Seth was filming a dark hypersum Sony 24-240 and this Olyk. As a result, she chose only 2 photos from Olik, the rest from a sterile zoom. Here you have Olik :)
And here everything is just natural. There photos are more colorful and the eyes of the young lady are more mysterious in color, so she is guided by this and opted for Sonya))
Yes, in general, and not surprisingly. Sonya will have flowers, more contrast, the focus is accurate. Yes, and the portraits on the big focal were still successful.
Why did she like Sonya so much, Olik, despite the fact that the crop camera was, but still the portraits are more voluminous, 3-dash, as it were, the bokeh gives the effect of oil paints, soft tonal transitions, plasticity, and Sonya has a harsh, flat picture, too much the contrast is heaped up like for a female portrait, saturation without tenderness like Olik's, the picture is more synthetic, not tasty))) But this is my IMHO of course.
You are talking like a photographer, right. A high-quality portrait fix, of course, gives 1000 points ahead to some kind of superzoom, which by definition cannot have such a picture. If you were a female model, maybe you would look differently)
Arkady, I have a question about the OM-EOS adapter, which you indicated under the link “An Olympus OM - Canon EOS adapter was used for shooting (with preservation of infinity)”: Does the adapter behave normally in the camera mount / lens mount? not backlash? My adapter, bought on Ali (but in another store), is shamelessly backlash, I want to change it to a more efficient one, your application experience is interesting.
There are different, I had 2, without backlashes.
I see. Thanks!
Some lens is inadequate in different situations - it seemed gorgeous, then nothing ... You have to do it yourself ....