answers: 23

  1. Andy
    22.06.2017

    but a personal impression? How is he to you?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      22.06.2017

      Personally, I don't really care, Zeiss Planars (and similar ones on their diagram) are "cleaner" in design. I expected more from the “killer”, because I did not indicate my personal impressions in the review itself.

      Reply

    • Victor
      23.06.2017

      Almost all Takumaras (not stupid, of course!) Are excellent optics. It is difficult for an outsider to determine their optical qualities. The pictures that Arkady exhibits here (thanks to him for his work), for me, personally, say absolutely nothing. In fact, they all look the same on the monitor. Another thing is to try it for yourself. I think that among the readers of this portal there are still “mastodons” who independently printed b / w photos on an enlarger - they will understand me. Take it and try it! Like it! (Note. At one time, I had Takumaras in my arsenal. I was pleased! But ... you should always have the opportunity to compare!)

      Reply

      • reader
        10.10.2017

        Arkady does not even bear the shadow of a doubt about German optics. even if the most advanced aliens send optics to a billion megapixels, it’s still not worth comparing with German, but where are the Asians. how many joys I don’t read is just such a view develops. once you write reviews you have to be impartial. it’s not even criticism, so that there is some kind of result, it’s necessary to blurt out just like that to get it.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        21.10.2018

        Most likely this is an erroneous opinion

        Reply

  2. Molchanov Yuri
    22.06.2017

    It behaves well against the sun (35.jpg). That's what they cost money in Germany, even pretty worn out.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      22.06.2017

      In fact, against the sun is so-so (worse than average). As an example:

      Reply

  3. Ilyas
    23.06.2017

    Oh, would you roll)
    and yes, soapy

    Reply

  4. Onotole
    23.06.2017

    Arkady, a typo has crept into the title of the review - 8/7 instead of 8/6, judging further in the text.

    Z.Y. Thanks for the review, it may be optically and far from the strongest glass, but the picture from it is very pleasant, much better than yesterday's Takumar.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.06.2017

      Fixed

      Reply

  5. anonym
    23.06.2017

    Thanks for the review. :)

    Reply

  6. Reader
    23.06.2017

    Judging by the archive with examples for the review, Arkady shot 2000 frames

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.06.2017

      About 3000

      Reply

  7. anonym
    23.06.2017

    Super-Takumar 1: 1.4 / 50 (8/6, Planar killer) ... ..and photographers.)

    Reply

  8. NE
    26.06.2017

    In my opinion, in Helios some rear lens also protruded, but not so much .. or on the verge. However Helios 44 58 1: 2 it was

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.06.2017

      No, the focal is not that and the aperture is not that.

      Reply

  9. Ilya
    17.07.2017

    Thanks for the review, the only thing forgot to mention one important point is that this is the only 50 1.4 takumar in which there are no radioactive elements.

    Reply

  10. anonym
    08.08.2017

    Comrades, will infinity work on the specified adapter (micro 4/3) installed on the OM-D em10 Mark 2?

    Reply

    • anonym
      08.08.2017

      In the comments on Ali they write:
      The thickness of the adapter is 25,38. should be 26,21 focus more infiniti.

      Can anyone advise a proven adapter with infinity?

      Reply

      • Michael
        08.08.2017

        If the adapter is shorter, infinity comes earlier, i.e. it will be with this adapter, but there will be no MDF. I can’t tell you a proven adapter

        Reply

      • Sergos
        04.11.2019

        Once upon a time, in the 90s, I got a super takumar No. 3961988. judging by the review, it is not radioactive and the lens does not yellow. finally bothered to put on a sony 7r and was shocked by the sharpness of the picture. the only drawback is that it lathers at infinity but only at f1.4 . put f2-everything is fine. what is it.

        Reply

    • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
      02.10.2017

      I had a regular adapter, no name, everything worked. There was infinity, MDF did not measure, but approximately corresponded.

      Reply

  11. Frozen Dog
    28.12.2021

    There is one caveat. The Planar killer wets the Planars in the near field, up to 5 meters, or even closer. Then everything is as usual. In addition, sticking is possible in the rear component, so there are not so many such lenses in a live state.
    In the middle field and at the end, the later versions with SMC enlightenment work better.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer