answers: 27

  1. Vladislav
    31.05.2017

    To understand whether I need a TV set or not, on occasion, for 3600 rubles. a similar Sigma 70-300 Macro was bought, but with a “buzzing” motor for Nikon. The lens pleases on a bright bright day. With a lack of lighting, everything is sad.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      31.05.2017

      Thanks. I supplemented the review with versions with a built-in focusing motor (especially for d40, d40x, d60 in 2008 Sigma updated the lineup).

      Reply

  2. Vyunenko Andrey
    31.05.2017

    I also got on the occasion of the Sigma 70-300mm F / 4-5.6 DG, for Nikon carcasses with a motor.
    if interested, here are the pictures from him-https: //www.flickr.com/photos/95728322@N04/albums/72157684504006285

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      31.05.2017

      Thanks for the link :) This is one of the latest versions, released according to the version with the stub.

      Reply

      • Vyunenko Andrey
        31.05.2017

        Yes, his case is not made of smooth plastic, but has some rough-velvety coating, very pleasant to look and feel. When focusing on the Nikon D70, it emits a powerful sound, which frightened, for example, my cat (-:

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        31.05.2017

        All Sigma DG 70-300 have such a coating on the case, this is an old Sigma chip that they refused, because the coating is wiped and looks ugly.

        Reply

      • Andrey Vyunenko
        01.06.2017

        I see, but it looks really unusual and somehow “rich” (-:

        Reply

  3. Oleg
    31.05.2017

    I have a similar lens, only versions 70-300 APO DG. There is an option to buy a Nikkor 75-300, and the question is, since you already have experience with such a Nikkor: how noticeable is the quality difference between the Nikkor 75-300 and Sigma from this review? I would not ask if I could just check that Nikkor, but you need to go to another city after him, but I just don’t want to go like that. Sigma is almost 2 times lighter and there is macro, does Nikkor give a significant advantage in quality in order to exchange it for a more solid weight and lack of macro 1/2?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      31.05.2017

      75-300 is much older and optically no better, stay with APO DG.

      Reply

  4. Vladislav
    01.06.2017

    I wrote above about Sigma 70-300 1: 4-5,6 DG MACRO with a motor. Like this

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      01.06.2017

      This is the latest version of DG 14/10 for Nikon with motor (golden inscription Sigma DG)

      Reply

  5. Michael
    01.06.2017

    Thanks for the review, of course, but somehow it turned out poorly. It is unclear if the focus ring of this lens rotates during AF operation? The plate with the characteristics was clamped ... I didn't even immediately understand what kind of subversion the review was talking about. Well, there is very little about the image quality, especially considering the originals in JPEG. I understand that they are all the same, but I want more specifics in the reviews. Yours faithfully

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      01.06.2017

      The meaning of describing everything is the same. All 14/11 and 14/10 are similar as two drops of water, especially mechanically, this is in this review

      Common features of all Sigma 70-300 1: 4-5.6 lenses (except for the OS version):

      The ring rotates and is described here. https://radojuva.com/2011/12/obzor-sigma-70-300mm-14-5-6-d-dl-macro/
      Moreover, in the same review it was indicated:

      rotation of the front lens along with the front of the barrel during focusing

      Information that the model is shown in the overview - added / Fixed.

      Reply

      • Michael
        01.06.2017

        I didn’t mean to offend you, sorry. Just opening a review for a specific lens, you want to see a specific review or a phrase like “everything is the same and it was described here / link /”, as, for example, in the D300s review, otherwise it will be difficult for an unprepared person to find this “identical” text. Anyway, thanks for your hard work.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        01.06.2017

        Yes, I’m not offended, but before you write that you didn’t find something, it’s better to first get acquainted with even the meager text that is in this review.

        Reply

      • Michael
        01.06.2017

        Yes, I got acquainted, but did not correlate the rotation of the frame and the rotation of the focus ring)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        01.06.2017

        Added information.
        In general - on Nikon, any lens that does not have a focusing motor and at the same time does not have a focusing mode switch will by default have a rotating focusing ring in automatic focusing mode.

        Reply

      • Michael
        01.06.2017

        Thank you

        Reply

      • Oleksandr
        01.06.2017

        ... but what is the minimum focusing distance?

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        01.06.2017

        I’ll make a tablet in one of the reviews, as everyone is very lazy :)
        mdf 1.5 in normal mode and 0.95 in macro mode. For pathfinders, this is it is seen on the focus distance scale :)

        Reply

  6. Maksim
    24.09.2017

    Sigmovsky 70-300 is a very difficult lens to classify, but the list in the article was almost error free. The mere observation that marking II was found on the boxes and instructions, but not on the lenses themselves, is worth a lot. There are only two points.

    1. 70-300 Macro Super (both DL and APO) existed in two versions. The early one (codes 504 for APO, 505 for DL) had an almost cylindrical body: the zoom ring was almost the same diameter as the focus ring. In the later version (codes 506 for APO, 507 for DL), the zoom ring has a much larger diameter than the focus ring. Schemes are identical, characteristics too.

    2. 75-300 is a completely different lens, with push-pull zoom. It is not clear why he is here.

    https://radojuva.com/2017/06/sigma-70-300mm-apo-dg/comment-page-1/#comment-185926

    As for the velvety coating - this is a temporary phenomenon; at some point, it changed to glossy (the letter D disappeared earlier, possibly with the advent of the motor).

    And the Sigma 70-300mm D 1: 4-5.6 APO DG and the Sigma APO DG 70-300mm 1: 4-5.6 are the same lens. Just the design (including labels) changes over time.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.09.2017

      Thank you.

      Reply

  7. Edward
    16.04.2018

    I own a similar lens - but it has differences

    Inscription - Sigma 70-300mm 1: 4-5.6 D DL MACRO SUPER (s / n 1138739)
    1) It has a red ring - exactly the same as in the APO DG version
    2) the inscription on the MACRO switch - Golden - as in Quantaray
    3) macro turns on only at 300mm
    4) there is no scale on the trunk
    all other elements are the same as on the Sigma 70-300mm MACRO SUPER presented in this review

    This lens is strange and does not fit the descriptions - tk
    he is DL MACRO SUPER - but only 300 macro
    and at the same time - has a red ring - but not APO DG

    Maybe they just don’t have a system in names
    or is it 15 kind

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer