answers: 13

  1. Rodion
    27.02.2017

    The photo seems to be nothing like that.

    Reply

  2. Andy
    27.02.2017

    Lens reviews are fed up, to say the least. I'd love to read well and adopt if possible))) photo tricks from Arkady)))

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      27.02.2017
      • Andy
        27.02.2017

        thank you)

        Reply

    • Carl Zeiss
      30.11.2018

      Andrei! Arcadia lens reviews cannot be annoying by definition! Nobody is likely to do such work in this regard, as he does, in the post-Soviet space ..
      As for the lens discussed here. Given its cost, dimensions and the resulting picture, this is an excellent fifty dollars! According to the picture, he devotes most of his modern counterparts. The only negative, of course, is the lack of modern enlightenment on the glass. So, without a doubt, it would produce images even more interesting
      Anyway, something the farther I am, the more the old manual lenses tighten. There is something elusive in the images that they give out, something that makes the picture unique. Most modern glasses cannot do this. Although there are exceptions of course. Which shoots better, sharper, more contrast and better. But these exceptions are very, very expensive.

      Reply

  3. Michael
    27.02.2017

    "... looks like many other similar fifty rubles." What is it like? soapy? cutting? Backlight? Earlier, you paid more attention to some of the features of the lens and image. But still, thank you for your work. It turned out to be crumpled somehow ...

    Reply

    • Dmitriy
      27.02.2017

      The Japs were engaged in the cloning of these polys. Everything looks the same, only focus rings with different finishes. Products for the mass consumer. We drove the "plan" and no tasks for artistic transmission. It will be much longer and more expensive, you cannot keep up with a competitor, which during this time will rivet more and occupy a niche somewhere.

      Reply

  4. AL
    28.02.2017

    The corners are soapy, the bokeh is absolutely not artistic. What caused the interest in this dinosaur? Even Helios, starting with 44M-4, draw kosher.
    In short, 500 rubles ($ 10) to him the price on the most crowded day.

    Reply

    • anonym
      11.04.2017

      As for the Helios, the question is controversial ... Here at least the quality is stable ..

      Reply

  5. Alexander
    25.03.2017

    Friends join a group where you can buy similar manual optics and photographic equipment.

    https://vk.com/oldlens

    Reply

  6. Oleg
    06.08.2017

    I had such an objective, it’s a pity that I sold it, I was standing on the old pentax ist ds dinosaur, the photos were awesome, although this may be due to the large pixel of the ist ds matrix.

    Reply

  7. Fedorov Andrey
    26.09.2019

    Interestingly, and RIKENON P 1: 2 50mm RICOH with thorium glass or normal? Is there any radiation from it?

    Reply

    • Sergei
      27.09.2019

      At one time, they tried to put thorium glasses on super-fast aperture or ultra-wide-angle optics.
      Attempts to put such (and expensive) glasses on a regular standard mount of 50 mm / 2 have not been recorded in the history of lens construction.
      Although 1,8 was one attempt.

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer