answers: 93

  1. Gesha Exhale
    13.01.2017

    I don’t understand why the author wrote so much discontent and complaints not this lens, the pictures are gorgeous, although I saw better from this glass. In terms of sharpness, I do not just see no problems, but I am even impressed. What smears is not the fact that the glass is to blame, even the Nikon D810 carcass is smeared. But the atmospheric transmission quality is phenomenal judging by the pictures, although the bokeh is not strong but delicate and original (a peculiar character is observed), the same Nikon 24-70 mm with a hole 2.8 can not produce such pictures (I gave this example because I myself am a Nikonist). I'm thinking of taking it for reporting and weddings. And I think that in vain you are so complaining about this lens, Yuri, he is a premium and very powerful. Thank you for your review and opinion!

    Reply

    • 1
      23.03.2018

      “He's premium” is the argument.

      Reply

    • Andrei
      12.07.2018

      Sigma Art requires individual adjustment through the Sigma USB Docking, then they become razor sharp and focus accurately. This 24-105 is adjusted on 16 points.

      Reply

  2. Artyom
    06.02.2018

    Good afternoon. In the twentieth photograph, with lilac flowers, the shooting mode is 135mm f 2,8. The killer whale was shot at 300mm ... How's that?

    Reply

  3. Anton
    20.01.2020

    And what kind of vignetting? In the photo of the village with a lighthouse and in the penultimate 2-3? Is it regular or because of a light filter?
    Choosing a lens for wedding / reportage photography (D810). Among Nikon's optics, there is not much to choose from ... 24-70 is too expensive and optically imperfect. New Sigma 24-70 by the way is also not ice, judging by the targets. But this 24-105 seems to be the best choice.

    Reply

  4. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer