answers: 29

  1. Dmitriy
    11.08.2016

    But how it looks! Like L-ka! Feel like a pro for five cents))

    Reply

  2. SemperFi
    11.08.2016

    Є such a non-APO thing. I am drowning on Sonya 77th. Catch nepogany shots, although it is required to illuminate nepogan, for diaphragms 8-11.

    Reply

  3. Vladimir G
    11.08.2016

    Judging by the review, the lens is rather weak, but the photos from 700 are gorgeous!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.08.2016

      On cover, sharpness is good, and resize :)

      Reply

  4. Oleg
    11.08.2016

    Sharpness is not enough of course. But "Fotika" - respect and respect.

    Reply

  5. Kirill Yankovsky
    11.08.2016

    I have a very rare TELE MACRO 400mm F / 5.6 screwdriver. At 5.6, too, not very, but better than the review version. On f9-13 shows the wonders of sharpness and a very beautiful color

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      12.08.2016

      Can you send her appearance here in comments?

      Reply

      • Kirill Yankovsky
        13.08.2016

        Arkady, here is my Telemacro

        Reply

  6. anonym
    11.08.2016

    With the move to a new address, constant glitches with access to the material began. And now there is text, there are no pictures.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      11.08.2016

      Let's fix it :)

      Reply

  7. Rodion
    12.08.2016

    I don’t know how it was possible to make a lens with 11 lenses that wasn’t the most interesting in quality.
    At one time, Volosov met only three and was able to make far from the worst three hundred, at that time it was one of the best.
    IMHO, it is better to take something shorter and cut, and then sprinkle.
    PS Somewhere I saw a test of nikkor 400 mm against 80-200 / 2.8. As a result, the conclusion is that it was easier to sprinkle 80-200.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      12.08.2016

      Now they put 12 lenses in fifty dollars, although you can recall teccars from the 4th. Yes, and Tahir is not 400 mm.

      Reply

      • Rodion
        12.08.2016

        They put 12 at fifty if it's F / 1 or so. Those. with extreme performance. There is nothing extreme here. Just think, the same 70 mm aperture as Tair-3.
        And there is no difference - 300 mm or 400 mm for Tair-3. Because there is Tair-16 500 / 4.5 with only 4 elements.
        And it is much better than the lens from the review in the photo. See for yourself on the Lens Club his card.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        12.08.2016

        Much better than?

        Reply

      • Rodion
        12.08.2016

        Sharpness first of all - the resolution is noticeably higher, judging by the photographs.
        For the military Tairov (and the T-16 is a military one, also something connected with aerial photography) some very interesting types of glass (?) And solutions were selected, they were not at all like what was produced for the consumer.

        There was also an F-3 400 / 4.5 lens, constructed according to a modified classical telephoto lens circuit. It turned out also a sharp little thing.

        It is a pity that I myself have not tried these glasses, but not yet evening)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        12.08.2016

        Let's hope that it falls into your hands :) there will be an interesting review!

        Reply

  8. anonym
    12.08.2016

    I have a question and suggestion for Arkady.

    Many lenses have such a parameter as the focus distance.
    For example, at
    - Sigma 17-50 f2.8 is 0,28-2m and after 2 meters it's infinity.

    - Nikon 70-300 is 3-15m and after infinity.

    I’m wondering why this characteristic is not indicated anywhere on the websites of sellers and does not attach importance to it? Can I write an article about how it affects the quality of the photo, is it worth paying attention to when choosing and buying a lens, or is it not worth it?

    For me personally, the topic of this characteristic has not been disclosed, and I have not seen sensible explanations anywhere.

    Reply

  9. Arkady Shapoval
    15.08.2016

    Fixed

    Reply

  10. anonym
    15.08.2016

    And “inexpensive” is HOW MUCH ???
    ... a good "portrait" ...;))))))))))))))

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      15.08.2016

      In the region of 250-400 cu

      Reply

    • maugli
      15.08.2016

      Now Avito is sold under canon for 10 tr

      Reply

      • Oleg
        27.09.2016

        On OLH yesterday I saw silver, written under Canon, the price is 1700 hryvnia. It is written that in good condition, but only removes on an open aperture.

        Reply

  11. anonym
    15.08.2016

    Nikon D700 - SUCH a device can take pictures WITHOUT a lens !!! ;)))))))))
    Good car" …. ;)
    And the lens from a distance can be mistaken for a professional Canon for sure ...

    Reply

  12. Charleshed
    17.08.2016

    In addition to a variety of optics, Sigma also produces SLR cameras. The main difference between the SD15 model and other cameras is that it uses a very peculiar matrix.

    Reply

  13. Dmitriy
    24.04.2017

    This is not a Sigma AF TELE 1: 5.6 f = 400mm MULTI-COATED APO Review.
    This is just Sigma AF TELE 1: 5.6 f = 400mm MULTI-COATED. The APO version is much better. Straight generally better.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.04.2017

      The lens has the inscription APO (https://radojuva.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/sigma-lens-apo-tele-400mm-8.jpg). The one you are talking about is another lens.

      Reply

    • cybernetics
      11.01.2024

      > It's just Sigma AF TELE 1:5.6 f=400mm MULTI-COATED
      On the first generation Sigma, the tripod ring does not protrude from the body, there is no APO inscription on it, and there is no strap on the tripod foot.
      The review is specifically about APO, a second generation lens.

      Reply

  14. Andy
    26.12.2018

    Arkady, what do you think, if we compare sharpness at 400 mm and f8, which will be better - this sigma or the new sigma zoom contemporary 100-400? It is clear that the price segments are different, but still. Thanks.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer