answers: 206

  1. Maria
    17.09.2019

    Sorry for the previous post.
    It is sometimes necessary to include logic.

    I'm reading an article http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikon-70-200-2p8-vr-n15
    I hope that it will be possible to quickly check in Bright Photo for an extra money. Pixel, as it turned out, gives only three days to figure out what's what.

    Reply

    • Jury
      17.09.2019

      pay attention to the external condition of the body, lenses, to the operation of the focusing motor, be sure to drive the focusing from MDF to infinity and back. Check the operation of the stabilizer, diaphragm, check manual focusing, shine through the lens with a flashlight - you will see what is inside it on the lenses (the diaphragm can be easily opened with your finger). Take test photos, see that there are no one or two blurry corners. These lenses can be used in serious professional use, i.e. very "tired", therefore the price is low.

      Reply

      • Maria
        17.09.2019

        Thanks! I will try to take everything into account)

        Reply

      • Maria
        18.09.2019

        Yuri, since you answered.
        I wanted to ask, in light of the fact that the old lens.

        There are many reviews on very rare books.
        In what workshops do they take them for maintenance?
        HER just immediately called a photo-van in St. Petersburg on B. Monetnaya to order diagnostics, and they told me that only a working copy will be taken to diagnose, so they were taken out of service. I do not understand a bit in the kitchen. There was no old equipment; I’m not exploiting my own

        Reply

      • Jury
        18.09.2019

        Maria, I have experience of contacting Nikon's service only in Kiev (not diagnostics, but lens repair). From personal experience I can say that there is Nikon's service in Ukraine, they even do something there, but “something” is the most accurate characteristic of their activities - the service is very weak. Where lenses can be diagnosed in St. Petersburg, I don't know :). The lens can be diagnosed by yourself or with a familiar photographer, I wrote the main points. In the case of zoom, be sure to check the autofocus operation and take test shots at several (at least extreme and average) focal length values ​​and feel the zoom ring spinning so that there are no jams, crunches, etc. Read more recommendations of other colleagues in the discussions of various articles. When buying, I recommend taking a more expensive copy, but in the best condition and serviceable. It's good if there is enough time for tests, the ability to view the photo on a computer. Or buy from some trusted sellers. I do not recommend contacting non-working copies and defects - it will be more expensive.

        Reply

      • Maria
        19.09.2019

        Thanks again!
        "Buy from some trusted sellers" Well, that's just what I hope)

        Reply

  2. Michael
    18.12.2019

    good day to all) can you give advice, I want to buy myself a lens 70 (80) -200 bu. these two are on sale for about the same price Nikkor 80-200mm 1: 2.8D (MKIII) Nikon ED AF-S VR-Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8G Vibration Reduction SWM IF. 80-200 outwardly less ushatana. camera 7100. the question is what to prefer and why? thank you in advance

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      18.12.2019

      We need a stub - 70-200, mainly for a portrait - 80-200 because of a more "noble" drawing. In general, the VR1 is preferred, but the MK3 is considered more reliable and favored by many photographers.

      Reply

      • Michael
        18.12.2019

        Thank you so much)

        Reply

    • Timur
      24.12.2019

      Arkady, good afternoon.
      Write to me in the mail, I am selling the 70-200 VR II in good condition, maybe we'll agree for the price (switched to the Fuji system).
      My site is timurakhmetov.com, there are contacts. I’m just the seller you can trust :)
      Thank you.

      Reply

  3. Sergei
    10.02.2020

    Good afternoon, Arkady.
    Maybe a little off topic, but I have a question about the predecessor of this glass: Nikon 70-200mm f / 2.8G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor.
    Recently I became the proud owner of this lens. I didn’t find it on your review forum, so I am writing here.
    The question is: Why are the three buttons near the front lens of the lens (approximately at the level of the distance window).
    In this review, they are very briefly mentioned.
    I just can’t figure out their purpose.
    If possible in more detail: their purpose and how to work with them.
    Thank you in advance.
    Best regards, Sergey.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      10.02.2020

      These are buttons AF Lockthat stop auto focus in auto focus mode M / A. It is convenient when you need to keep focusing in focus in one place, while pressing the focus activation button does not keep focus. Often used when the photographer does not want to use an additional button AF ON (or its analogue) on the camera.

      Reply

      • Sergei
        10.02.2020

        Thank you for your prompt response!)
        I just want to clarify a little: do I understand correctly that blocking occurs only when the button is pressed and held, and when you release it, the lens switches to normal focusing mode? Or press - block, press again - unlock? Now I only mean the buttons on the lens.
        I just got the impression that pressing it somehow blocked part of the scale run ... Or is it just my crooked hands?))

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        10.02.2020

        On all lenses with similar buttons that I have tried, the button simply held the focus in one position. As long as you hold it, focusing also holds.

        Reply

      • Sergei
        10.02.2020

        Thank you.
        And let me express my deep gratitude for your work - this forum!
        For many years now, he has been practically my handbook, according to which I study and comprehend the intricacies of photography.
        Good luck in all your endeavors and every success!)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        10.02.2020

        Thank you :)
        70-200 vr1 decent lens, even in our time

        Reply

      • Sergei
        10.02.2020

        I myself am not overjoyed!)
        Compared to the Sigma 70-200, this is just heaven and earth! A stub is generally a plague !! Tenacious like a tick)

        Reply

  4. Sergei
    18.01.2021

    Can you please tell me which one will be better at the long end - the lens from the review + TC20III teleconverter or Nikon 80-400mm f / 4.5-5.6G ED AF-S VR Nikkor?
    Thank you!

    Reply

  5. Jumen
    26.05.2021

    Friends, is the ef 70-200 / f2.8 IS II tele-zoom system much better on the Canon system than this lens? Or, on the contrary, is this one cooler?

    Reply

  6. Anton
    11.08.2021

    Please advise that it is preferable to choose a used Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm 2.8G VRII (handheld) or a new Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 G2 (with a warranty from the store). The price is about the same. Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm was said to be of little use, bought 4 years ago….

    Reply

  7. Alexander
    11.11.2021

    Has anyone compared this subject GII with the new Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8E FL ED N VR ??? Is there a tangible difference?
    Thank you

    Reply

  8. vve
    14.04.2022

    Nikon 70-200mm + CCD Cameras = Perfect

    Reply

  9. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer