answers: 23

  1. Ruslan
    25.02.2016

    I do not recommend anyone to buy this .. It is soapy at all aperture values ​​+ inaccurate autofocus

    Reply

  2. Alexander Malyaev
    25.02.2016

    Did you like Sigma 18-250 more? Well, or less did not like? :)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      25.02.2016

      I liked 18-250 more

      Reply

      • wharfage
        09.03.2016

        Thank you!
        I already put an end to sigmotamrons and Nikkor 18-200 +, I completely agree that they are all WORSE 18-105 in quality / price.
        I'd like to see a detailed analysis of the tamron 16-300 from Arcadia!

        Reply

  3. Annatol
    25.02.2016

    In vain that passed by.
    It was necessary to carefully examine it.
    Century is one of the best lenses. Many of the best shots have been taken but he

    Reply

    • Interestingly
      25.02.2016

      Share it? I don’t chickens, the pictures are really interesting, I also shot them))

      Reply

  4. Oleg
    26.02.2016

    it’s just a lens with a pronounced soft effect (well, there’s a warm, lamp still)

    Reply

    • Andrei
      26.02.2016

      soft effect for monocle, Jupiter 9, canon 135soft, and this one is just soap

      Reply

    • Oleg
      26.02.2016

      I was kidding. In fact, the spread of focal lengths is smaller than that of Sigma 18-250, and the quality is inferior. You won’t guess. This can be attributed to the topic of third-party optics. Each lens can carry a surprise - 50/50

      Reply

  5. anonym
    26.02.2016

    Well what to say. Arkady can show both the best and worst qualities of the lens and camera. The review is useful and intuitive. Everything is not very bad.

    Reply

  6. Franz
    26.02.2016

    I don’t know what you expected from him, an ordinary, normal (at one time, and even now quite) “travel” lens, so as not to carry a bunch of expensive glass with you, not expensive ... Price-quality ... you come home, you can process, if you don't like it ..

    Reply

    • Andrei
      26.02.2016

      for me it’s worse than 18-55.
      You say that the range of focal lengths is 4 times wider, so it’s 4 times more expensive than new, and if used. look, then 6-7 times more expensive.
      from the budget it is better to buy a conditional 55-250.

      Reply

    • Artem
      27.02.2016

      For a travel case, dragging only a Nikon 35mm. The rest is hard to carry.

      Reply

  7. Andrei
    28.03.2016

    Thanks for the review. Arkady, I recently got a Sigma 50-200mm f / 4-5.6 DC OS HSM Nikon lens in my hands. Have you had any experience with such a lens? I would like to hear your opinion.

    Reply

  8. Koba
    04.08.2017

    Someone might be surprised, but I have such a lens on my Sigma SD14. I can say the following about him: everything for the review is correct! Apart from a more or less acceptable focusing speed, it has nothing worthwhile. At aperture 8, one way or another, you can "work". Therefore, such a lens in China now costs about 50 dollars, although in my opinion it is not worth it!

    Reply

  9. Still
    13.09.2017

    I don’t know how where on d5100 in Live View aftofocus does not work at all

    Reply

  10. Artem
    20.09.2017

    Well, I don’t know ... I have been using Sigma Zoom DC 18-200mm 1: 3.5-6.3 II HSM OS (Optical Stabilizer) for more than six months, a newer model. I got a new one at a ridiculous price. Took to replace 18-55 kit for Nikon D5100. The impressions are positive. Of course, the sharpness on the open hole suffers a little, but if you cover it up to 5,6 or up to 9, then very much nothing happens. Excellent build and quality materials.

    Reply

  11. Matthew
    13.03.2018

    Thanks for the great review! He made the right conclusions for himself)))

    Reply

  12. Alex
    10.06.2018

    Mіsyatsі zo two krystyusya 18-200 for Canon -polіt normal)) З 6.3 no problems at all. Alone, scho, spravdі, drauє - nerіvnomіrne zusilla when wrapped around a circle zoom. Enemy, at the same time, it was possible to get angry there. Vіm - quiet pennies, for yak I bought wine, madly, vartiy. Especially, in the quality of a walking tour.

    Reply

  13. Garma
    15.12.2019

    Is Nikon 3500 compatible with Siqma DC 18-200 1: 3,5: 6,3

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      15.12.2019

      Yes, if only these are versions of HSM / II HSM / HSM C under Nikon

      Reply

  14. Alexander
    21.01.2023

    I got a great lens, I'm even very pleased.
    I tried Nikon 50 300, 50 200 G1,18 105, they have better stabilizer and paints and sigma in color is closer to reality in color, on the d5200 I corrected everything in the settings, I’m glad that one lens for all cases

    Reply

  15. Nikolas
    05.03.2023

    In my opinion this is a great lens for the money. It's heavy, but that's a plus for me. Yes, aperture is not enough, but this is not a problem, at night I shoot on old boots, 450-550-650D at 800 ISO and the picture is very pleasing. Color reproduction is excellent, sharpness is excellent, autofocus is fast, versatile ... At a wide angle, 18 mm, there is some distortion, (it can be corrected in any editor) at 20 mm and higher is gone. At a maximum focus of 200 mm, it is difficult to focus if there is no dexterity to shoot hand-held with the trunk extended. Of the shortcomings, I can only point out the lack of fixation in any position, except when the lens is in the maximum wide angle mode, 18 mm. There is a fix.

    In general, I am satisfied with this lens. Moreover, he got me almost for nothing.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer