Today, 02.02.2016 a new camera was announced - Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II Announcement
Technical innovations can be viewed on the official website.
|
|||||
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II AnnouncementComments: 69, on the topic: Announcement of Canon EOS-1D X Mark IIAdd a comment |
|||||
|
|
|||||
The question is about the quality of the sensor - if the ISO rating for 3000 goes to dxo - there will be wines. But hardly. There will be 2500 - 2700. And everything will return to normal - Nikon has rubber raves, Canon has color and video.
I am sure that due to the Dual Pixel CMOS AF sensor, high ISOs will not be as working as modern sensors without this technology.
I derived an approximate pattern for myself - if on crop ISO points are equal to X, then on an FF matrix from the same era and the same production technology they are equal to 2.25 x X, maybe a little more. (The area ratio is shorter). There are about 1000 points in the second seven, which means that we will count on 2500 here. In the first Dyksa there were 2200. There will be progress, but not awesome. Wangyu so about))))
oh, blah .. in the first dyks 2780 .. Well maybe 3000 will be .. I xs ..
Gentlemen, do not quarrel. The problem is that different people have different criteria for a "working" ISO ...
For example, on Canon 550D, ISO 800 is absolutely working for me, but my colleague already sees wild noises by 200. So everything is subjective.
Solid microlenses. If it’s not a ghost - a very interesting matrix. Maybe, finally, the working ISOs will really be improved, and not the resolution? Who knows. So far, this is all advertising, albeit an intriguing one.
As it is not screwed in the photo 50 / 1.8
And then on the flagship camera they hitched a controversial lens according to their characteristics. Or does he think they just look good? :)))
So that the camera is not too cluttered
A sensor resolution as in 6D
Is everyone so cute Hayon Hayat? which has not yet come out, has not turned over) Just nya ^ _ ^
there is only one unit. 1 DX reportage. Everything else is crafty. Mark 2, 4, 6 .. yes even mark 126. It’s impossible to beat Dyks, it makes no sense to produce cameras that serve for years and bring loot, but do not die after a certain time and require repair, which again replenishes the manufacturer’s budget . It always has been and will be. The Japanese first create things by jumping above their heads on the performance characteristics, and then they begin to realize that they’ve messed up, released a too high-quality product that is one step higher than time. I’m not giving an example from the field of photography; I myself am engaged in professional fishing, at one time in 2000 the Japanese diving company launched the lightweight TD-Z reels on the market, for those years it was a real jump over the TTx. The main difference of this unit was the minimum and to this day mass assembly with the highest possible dimensional qualities. Judge for yourselves - size 2506 weighs 186 g, today not a single coil of this size 2506 weighs as much as the casing and filling would not lighten. - all weights are about or more than 200 g. And these coils have been living for 16 years now, they have been working with athletes) And then the Japanese started to play pranks with this technique, the quality fell, the weight increased, the cost just didn’t fall) They don’t try to repeat the 2000 record, it’s not profitable for them. Translating speech to photo business, the same thing.
where are the harsh nikonists?
Tapping on d5
And someone switched to A7x2 (:
HERE Nikonists))) well, it came out and it came out - the nikon D5 has a half higher iso))) and more than 150 focus points, and a complete set of both CF cards and QXD cards)))
Finally.:)))
In terms of the number of points, I have my opinion that even millen and this nifiga will not help if you don't cover most of the viewfinder. And there would be enough crosses in four points of thirds and in the center and then fill in by generosity :)
exactly
The harsh Nikonists are here. D5 outperforms 1D X MII in all respects except AE sensor and rate of fire. But given the size of the buffer and the length of the series, even Canon’s gain in rate of fire is dubious. I don’t touch the video, because we are discussing cameras. And yet there are no matrix tests for DD and high ISO. I think that everything will not be in favor of 1D either. http://spp-photo.ru/2016/02/03/sravnenie-nikon-d5-s-canon-1d-x-mark-ii/
Did they touch you? Or make smart hunting? So the bazaar with its kenonists. In the ban provocateur.
Those who firmly sit on one system will not jump back and forth if flagship cameras are released in different systems every two years - it is simply not profitable to lose money on the sale / purchase of optics. I'll be glad for the kenonists, they have a new landmark
Harboring!
Mdyayayaya .. fotik certainly not very ..
Typically a commercial product trying to leave on the same name ..
Not really because you cannot afford? Arguments, as always, zero)))
In general, nothing super-revolutionary, just an update. By the time it was time to update the unit, and that's updated. For video, of course, good opportunities open up, but for photos, unless the workers improve their rate of fire, although 1dx didn’t have any problems. In terms of noise, even on ISO 12800, everything was completely nothing. The new unit will probably be even better. And the focus worked out a bit (although in the unit it was better than in d4, and even in d4 it was super :)). There is still hope for lower prices for other models (not only 1dh, but also used devices like 1dm4 and 1dsm3). Will see.
There is no technological breakthrough. There is a lick of technology of the 20th century :( And so in everything. Scientific and technological stagnation has come.
Dear Pokemon, you probably Nikon d3100?
and where does Nikon 3100?
I don’t have it, but I also think that the dumb little bubble came out.
and I'm waiting for Nikon to release it by the 100th anniversary. Perhaps some Df2 ...
Well, who will need it? It’s better to let the normal 4K video be filmed, or FullHD at 120fps, for normal slow-motion.
And in the case of DF, it would be nice to just make a video, at least some wretched, but that was.
+10 in vain they killed him there.
it’s not profitable for marketers.
df did not take off.
Df did not take off for three reasons:
1. Expensive
2. For the price, very high functionality in terms of buns (same video)
3. In vain they made him a mirror. It was necessary to sculpt a competitor for Sony a7, focusing on a huge fleet of manual and autofocus glasses for every taste and budget, leaving the F mount and full compatibility with all the puffs, lenses, and other stray from the existing system.
1, yes did not guess with the price, but the matrix.
2. nafig there is no video needed. But suitable autofocus, a couple of flash drives and 1/8000 sec for this price would be suitable. Or significantly lower price, competing with the D610.
3. mirrorless and so a dime a dozen. Its meaning is in mirrorless form, if you need a motor and an adapter 2 cm long, which loses any sense of its compactness.
So the topic was good, marketers only everything as usual, alas.
The meaning of mirrorlessness is in reducing the cost of construction and reducing the weight, well, and the fashion is now at the UPC ... But with the working segment, yes, it will not work compactly, but there are also advantages:
- many owners who have a formed optics park would probably be interested;
- no costs for the development of new optics.
Personally, the only ambiguous situation with autofocus lenses in the system that stops me from buying a Sony a7.
cheaper? O_O I'm afraid this is a myth of people who think that “a mirror is the most valuable part of a camera”.
Df was not given the task of "weight reduction" at all.
.......
- And many owners (what?) Have a formed range of rangefinder optics?
- what nonsense. If this is a nikon camera, then the whole optics park is suitable anyway.
.......
Well, you somehow already figure it out - do you need to attach some kind of “huge mirrorless park of optics” from third-party manufacturers, or are you native to autofocus lenses? ))
....
Df, in principle, would not be the option "buy cheap, because it looks like the old zenith." Even if the price had not been raised, the DF would still cost more than the D610.
It's about optics with the F mount. Lynx, you're not careful. Have you even bothered to read a few lines that I wrote above? And what does the rangefinder have to do with it? It turns out like Zadornov’s:
- Fresh yogurt?
- Pear.
Once again, since you accuse me of inattention, you have to repeat again:
1. Df was not meant to be either “easier” or “less”. It was meant to be retro.
2. to him and SO all native objects fit, there is no need for "mirrorless".
3. he and SO are taken for the sake of working with the old Nikon manuals.
4. The fashion is not mirrorless, but the retro style.
5. So the Nikon Df mirrorless is generally unnecessary.
Lynx, can I ask you one personal question? Are you a teacher by any chance? I understand, of course, offtopic, but still?
PS In no way intends to offend.
Let's just say - there is considerable experience in this.
Where does this epidemic come from? What is bad about him?
yes there is no epidemic. Just the niches of the mirror were occupied by Nikon and Canon, the rest also needed to go somewhere. The mirrorless, like the old rangefinders, has its pros and cons compared to the mirror. Separate niche photo.
....
The main “bad” about a mirrorless is still focusing. Either not too hastily, but exactly, like Fuja, or quickly but inaccurately, like Olik, or “completely don't understand how” - Sonya.
:)
Hmm .. Well, okay, hi will be “inaccurate”, ale, like I’m just knowing the reportage, does it matter the concert if there is not enough illumination?) річ.
As a bi nemati, I understand why you should bother with this presentation, as if that job is more obvious than IMHA randomly, like fairy tales are libidinal
since the discussion of photographic equipment without performance characteristics is the same as making love without a lady, then I offer you data on the topic ...
Canon EOS 1D X
*****
Overview
A professional full-frame digital single-lens reflex camera with a resolution of 20 megapixels.
• two DIGIC 6+ processors;
• maximum sensitivity of ISO 51200 (409600 in advanced mode H3);
• burst speed 14 frames per second (16 frames per second with a locked mirror);
• 61 focus sensors;
• touch screen with a resolution of 1,62 megapixels;
• the ability to shoot 4K video;
• support for CFast memory cards.
Launch year: 2016.
Price (February, 2016): $ 6000 (without lens).
Compatibility
Canon EF mount.
Fully compatible with all Canon EF, Canon TS-E and Canon MP-E lenses.
***
Matrix
Type: CMOS, Bayer filter, smoothing filter.
Size: 36 x 24 mm, Full-Frame.
Resolution: 20,2 MP.
Image Size: 5472 x 3648.
ISO sensitivity: 100 - 51 (in increments of 200/1 or 3 step), 1 (L), 50 (H102), 400 (H1), 204 (H800), auto.
Matrix cleaning: yes.
Processor: 2x DIGIC 6+.
File format
CR2 (RAW): 14 bit
Jpeg.
CR2+JPEG.
Color Space: sRGB, Adobe RGB.
Automatic image rotation: yes.
**
Video
Resolution: 4096 x 2160 (4K), 60/50/30/25/24 p; 1920 x 1080, 120/100/60/50/30/25/24 p.
File format: MOV (high or normal quality).
Compression: H.264 / MPEG-4.
Built-in microphone: mono.
Memory cards
Two slots: CF and CFast.
Viewfinder
Type: mirrored with a pentaprism.
Frame coverage: 100%.
Magnification: 0,76 (for 50 mm lens).
Diopter adjustment: from -3 to +1 diopters.
Viewfinder focus point: 20 mm.
Focusing screen: Ec-C6.
Live View: yes.
Aperture repeater: yes.
Screen
Type: touch TFT LCD monitor.
Diagonal: 3,2 inches.
Resolution: ~ 1,62 million pixels.
Brightness adjustment: manual.
Additional display: two (top and back).
Shutter
Shutter speed range: 1/8000 - 30 s (in 1/3 or 1/2 stop increments), bulb.
Flash sync speed: 1/250 s.
Burst shooting: 14 frames / s (16 frames / s with a locked mirror).
Modes of descent: single, continuous slow, continuous fast, timer, silent.
Timer: 2 s, 10 s.
Preliminary raising of a mirror: is.
Remote release: RC-6 IR remote; RS-80N3, TC-80N3 cables.
Shutter Life: 400 shots.
Exponometer
Type: TTL, RGB + IR sensor, ~ 360 thousand pixels.
Methods of metering: estimated, center-weighted, spot.
Exposure detection modes: program (P), shutter priority (Tv), aperture priority (Av), manual (M).
Exposure compensation: from -5 to +5 EV (in increments of 1/3 or 1/2 steps).
Exposure bracketing: 2-7 frames (in increments of 1/3, 1/2 steps).
Auto focus
Phase AF module: TTL-AREA-SIR.
Number of focus sensors: 61, of which 41 are cross-type.
Autofocus modes: single-frame (AI One-shot), servo (AI Servo), automatic (AI Focus).
Modes of choice of focusing points: single-point, zone, automatic.
Autofocus highlighting: no.
Fine-tuning autofocus: yes.
Auto View in Live View: Phase.
White balance
White balance modes: auto, daylight, shadow, cloudy, incandescent, white, fluorescent lamps, flash, manual, color temperature.
Fine-tuning white balance: yes.
Flash
Built-in flash: no.
Flash compensation: -3 to +3 EV (in increments of 1/3 or 1/2 steps).
Flash modes: fill flash, red-eye reduction, slow sync, slow sync with red-eye reduction, rear-curtain sync with slow sync, rear-curtain sync.
Food
Battery: LP-E19 (Li-ion; 11,1 V; 2750 mAh).
Battery life (CIPA standard): ~ 1210 shots.
Charger: LC-E19.
Mains power: requires optional ACK-E4 AC adapter.
*******
Interface
USB: 3.0
HDMI output: Type-C mini-HDMI connector
Video Output: NTSC, PAL.
Audio Input: 3,5mm TRS.
Audio Output: 3,5mm TRS.
GPS.
Dimensions and weight
Dimensions (Width x Height x Depth): 158 x 167,6 x 82,6 mm.
Weight: 1340 g (with battery and memory card).
***
Contents of delivery
Camera: 1D X Mark II.
Battery: LP-E19.
Charger: LC-E19.
Viewfinder Eyecup: Eg.
Bayonet cover: RF3
USB cable: IFC-130U.
Audio / Video Cable: AVC-DC400ST.
Strap: L7.
Software: EOS Digital Solution.
Comparison
1D X Mark II 1D X
Launch year 2016 2012
Resolution, MP 20 18
ISO range 50 - 409 600 50 - 204 800
Burst speed, frames / s 14 12
Touch screen, 3,2 ″, pixels 3,2 ″, pixels
1 620
Viewfinder frame coverage,% 100 100
4K Full HD Video
GPS there is no
CF, CFast CF, CF memory cards
Battery LP-E19
(2750 mAh) LP-E4N
(2450 mAh)
Weight, g 1340 1350
***
****
Source: http://vasili-photo.com/equipment/canon/cameras/1D-X-Mark-II.html#ixzz1ZcrpmtXb
I wonder why do you think this line with the link “Technical news can be viewed on the official website.” Under the picture?
Vasili-photo.com knows better what is in the middle :)
No, he knows where to leave links :)
Muahaha ... the dude is promoting a school-assembled site at the expense of joy?
here the main thing as in the 70D: Autofocus in Live View: phase.
then the video will focus normally.
Who buys a TV camera for video? What nonsense? What is it called “anyhow it was”?
Do you know a lot of this class of photographers who shoot 4k?
Why? Somehow the program “Inspector” came across on “Friday”, so there are two people from different angles filming a video, even the lens was examined kenon 24-105. But the camera is most likely 6d. Cheap and cheerful for such consumer goods
It's elementary ... Those who have no money for Red / Arri, but want to shoot “something like a movie”, they buy.
Yes, the design has become dull.
An insidious bandura-made with a stone ax inspired by the Fukushima accident.
And what exactly is wrong with the case?
Maybe there is a desire to cut down the pentaprism, saw off the battery pack, make a red carcass (the competitor has such solutions) or polka dots, see the inscription Nikon.
What beauty do you want to see in a classic professional mirror?
good, harsh beauty.
Polka dots, in red, would be nice!
Harsh red peas! I would like to take a look at this. Angri birds come to mind.
If they painted, for example, a kangaroo on a carcass, then everyone would look at the kangaroo. Nobody would notice any cones and dimples. And so, there’s nothing to look at.
A great machine is coming. Soon films and videos will be shot on it.
An important step forward from Canon is the installation of a Dual Pixel CMOS AF sensor.
Autofocus when shooting video promises to be the fastest and quietest with STM lenses.
But there are very few STM lenses for a full frame (40mm and 50mm). We look forward to the early appearance of new ones! It looks like a fix approach: 85mm / 1,8 STM. Time will tell.
Phew, hack. The Kenon authorities summoned the chapters. engineer (well, after the release of D5), and said, spitting saliva that he would fire.
As a result, we get this, the same Kenon egg, only on the side.
New items from kenon and nikon go toe-to-toe with kenon slightly higher rate of fire at nikon workers iso. Again, in the article above, it is written correctly that all pictures taken on ISO above 25600 will be noisy on both cameras. And the value of 3280000 is more like the same race for megapixels from the manufacturers they are of little use. It's hard to imagine shooting a wedding or fashion on ISO 25600, but rather use additional light sources. For nature, there is a tripod for long exposures. In the report above 25600 purely “sho-boulo” just to capture
For most reporting tasks and a worker, the 6400 is usually enough for the eyes.
Yes, and I just about 3280000 something like a battle of megapixels. Millions, that is, but they really need
A novel, and 12-15 megapixels are enough for a spread of a glossy magazine. ISO for those photos generally does not rise above 200-400. For reporting 7 Mpixels and 6400 ISO "behind the eyes". so what is now to boycott scientific and technological progress?
Today, 25600 are certainly working on TOP cameras, and seven years ago on the same Nikon D3 it was today's three lemas.
And the concept of a "worker" ISO is also different for everyone. Two colleagues (both of them have 5D IIs) almost got into a fight due to the fact that one 3200 is unconditionally working, and the second already sees wild noises for 200 ...
So to each his own
In no case do not boycott. Cameras are slowly expanding horizons: kenon in the rate of fire nikon in workers and
Video review of the new Canon 1D X Mark II on http://q3d.livejournal.com/