answers: 61

  1. Alex de Kairoy
    23.12.2015

    hi
    bought Tokin 12-24 4.0 AF
    you had one but AF-S
    I can fit), the glass by the way is pretty good

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.12.2015

      Hey. I see, took my advice. There will be time, I'll take a review :)

      Reply

  2. Maugli
    23.12.2015

    Very cool! Thanks!

    Reply

  3. Kotofalk
    23.12.2015

    Olimpusi OM-D E-M5, E-M10 Mark II, E-M5 Mark II and M.Zuiko 17mm 2.8?

    Reply

    • Serge36ru
      23.12.2015

      Kanesh)

      Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.12.2015

      There are a lot of suggestions for reviews. I have little time. The essence of this post is that you yourself can prepare a review / note about your super-duper technique.

      Reply

    • alexey_laa
      24.12.2015

      Tsіkavo chi nabagato krashiy Zuiko 17mm f / 2.8 for Sigma 19mm f / 2.8 while, moreover, more expensive at half the time.

      Reply

      • Kotofalk
        24.12.2015

        Without twisting it, ale optically not gripping for 17mm 1.8, about how much to say not to be brought up, it’s very sharp, the difference is a program in shvidkosti af (in the older version of vin mittuviy), more msc-drive. I sell it to you, I know the reportages, and such a focal point is no more handy for me, just more fics.

        Reply

  4. Peter Sh.
    23.12.2015

    I can try to write about Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f / 2.8 Pro FX.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.12.2015

      Try it, do it.

      Reply

    • Jury
      29.12.2015

      I have been looking at this glass for a long time. A review would be welcome.

      Reply

  5. Novel
    23.12.2015

    Are you interested in flash reviews, or just optics? If yes - I can write about Canon EX600-RT (2 years of use)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.12.2015

      Of course, interesting!

      Reply

      • Novel
        23.12.2015

        OK. At the weekend I will send to the chief editor)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        23.12.2015

        Super

        Reply

  6. anonym
    23.12.2015

    I will try to roll the review on the Elka 70-200 f4 without a stub.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      23.12.2015

      Will be great

      Reply

  7. Tigran
    24.12.2015

    Good afternoon. Please tell me what to buy sony a77 or sony a77.ll.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.12.2015

      Offtopic.

      Reply

  8. Vyacheslav
    24.12.2015

    Ready to write a review about Sigma AF 30 1.4 ART with docking station

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.12.2015

      Super. Try to approach this carefully, because the lens is interesting :)

      Reply

  9. anonym
    24.12.2015

    Thanks for the opportunity! I'll try to write a review: Nikkor 85 / 1.8G Vs. Helios 40-2 85 / 1.5 N. And then I took pictures a long time ago, but I was too lazy to write ...

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      25.12.2015

      Yes, write, of course :)

      Reply

  10. Markush Yuriy
    25.12.2015

    If it’s tsikavo, then I’ll try to look around the manual ob'єktiv Vega-30U with an accent vikorystannya yogo for macro-zyomka.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      25.12.2015

      Yes, it will be interesting.

      Reply

  11. Alexey
    25.12.2015

    I can make a review on Canon 20mm 2.8 (I did not find this glass on the site.)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.12.2015

      Of course do

      Reply

  12. Vyacheslav
    28.12.2015

    I can write about the Nikon wu-1a wireless transmitter, although I've seen reviews about it) A funny little thing.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.12.2015

      Write, it will be interesting.

      Reply

  13. Andrei
    29.12.2015

    There is a Carl Zeiss Pancolar 80 1.8 electric - you can get confused with the review if it is interesting.

    Reply

  14. orenkomp.ru
    09.01.2016

    And I don’t argue that my reviews are more evaluative than analytical. True, when it comes to lenses that were not described on the network, I try to adhere to the traditional format and analyze them in more detail

    Reply

  15. Max
    25.03.2016

    Oh, I can write a review about TOKINA AF 10-17 mm f / 3.5-4.5 which you fisheye

    Reply

  16. Irina
    08.04.2016

    And I don’t argue that my reviews are more evaluative than analytical. True, when it comes to lenses that were not described on the network, I try to adhere to the traditional format and analyze them in more detail

    Reply

  17. Michael
    12.04.2016

    Arkady, in what format should I send you reviews? I mean the format of the document. I can do a review on the Canon 28-70 f / 3.5-4.5 and on the Tokina 10-17, if interested.

    Reply

  18. Dron
    19.06.2016

    I can offer information and photo material on the Cyclops 1.5 85mm if necessary.

    Reply

  19. Bogdan
    15.07.2016

    Aloha!
    I got myself a few days ago Tamron Adaptall-2 35-70mm F3.5 CF Macro (17A).
    I took a photo of the lens itself, collect some information, test shots and try to make a review.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      15.07.2016

      Great!

      Reply

  20. Igor
    15.10.2016

    And why not in the list of optics review Canon ef 200mm f / 1.8L

    Reply

  21. Igor
    17.10.2016

    Good day. Tamron. 18.250. IF / Zmotorom. I will put. On Nikon. D. 5000. Yak will be malyuvati. Zpovagoyu.Igor

    Reply

  22. Fanil
    26.03.2017

    Arkady which Chinese lens fifty dollars can you advise the budget is limited for earlier thanks to Nikon 3200

    Reply

    • Denis
      26.03.2017

      if you are with autofocus, then the model is only one. if manual, then there is a choice

      Reply

  23. Oleg
    29.04.2017

    Will anyone be interested in the Pentax MX-1?

    Reply

    • Oleg
      29.04.2017

      In any case, it will be interesting

      Reply

  24. Eugene
    31.01.2019

    I see a link to a review of Nikon Df, but it leads to a review of the lens from Sigma 24-105 Art. Can I fix it, or is there no review on Df in nature?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      31.01.2019

      Fixed

      Reply

  25. Vladimir
    01.02.2019

    Good afternoon, Arkady. I have a rather rare lens Nikon IX-Nikkor 60-180mm f / 4-5.6 with a maximum aperture of 45)) I want to write a review, what can you advise?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      01.02.2019

      I advise you to make a lot of sample photos

      Reply

      • Vladimir
        02.02.2019

        Well, I’ll try how the weather will improve a bit))

        Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer