answers: 45

  1. lesa
    20.05.2015

    Arkady, good afternoon.
    Could you put in the plan a certain opus about which camera you are basically shooting now.
    D700? A7 Or do you have a certain separation of tasks?
    Each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages. I would like your opinion, as the owner and, probably, an active user of these devices in parallel.
    Thanks (:

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.05.2015

      a7 only for reviews, rented on d700.

      Reply

  2. Lynx
    20.05.2015

    Just like in other “rangefinder” Industars 50, it is enough to unscrew the locking screw and twist the outer body extension and the inner black “dimmer” (attention, it has a left-hand thread!) - we get a regular mirror 50-2, albeit with a landing m39.
    As for the “red thread”, it just wiped off the black paint from the rim of the front lens unit to the red primer-substrate. There is no thread there, just a series of concentric circles, similar to those found on the inner surfaces of good blends.
    in fact, due to the erasure of the black coating, in places to the metal, and its "haughtiness" is explained.
    The problem is solved with a simple black alcohol marker.

    Reply

    • Anton
      20.05.2015

      Lynx, is it possible to redo the rangefinder Industar 61 in a similar way?

      Reply

      • Lynx
        20.05.2015

        alas, no .. 50-2 is perhaps one of the few that received a rangefinder from a conventional mirror simply by screwing an extension ring and a blackening tube.
        Most other industries have a monolithic enclosure.

        Reply

      • anonym
        20.05.2015

        What other of those “few” rangefinder lenses can be converted to a mirror system? And then such an industar lies, one might say as an exhibit, but it turned out they can also be filmed)

        Reply

      • Lynx
        20.05.2015

        offhand from common, and a simple alteration - FIG knows.
        More complex alterations - you were given the links below.
        I personally use rangefinders as very good makriki.

        Reply

      • anonym
        20.05.2015

        Thanks! in principle, before reworking, you can see what it can be in macro (infrequently in macro I shoot something, but I like it).

        Reply

      • anonym
        22.05.2015

        I really surprised by the simplicity of the alteration of Jupiter-11 contax-cues, took it by accident, remade it in 15 minutes, as a result, a portrait lens for cheap, such Jupiters are the cheapest of the eleventh series. I rummaged a lot in the net about reworking USSR lenses, but how the contax cues with an external bayonet are being altered is just a fairy tale, the working distance is 34.85mm, from the landing surface to the body is about 13, and with a thin ring I have about 10 km

        Reply

      • anonym
        21.05.2015

        What you call the blackening tube is the pusher of the range finder lever.

        Reply

      • Lynx
        21.05.2015

        and that too.

        Reply

    • anonym
      21.05.2015

      There is also a mirror version of the I-50, it (like I-50-2) differs from the rangefinder smaller MDF

      Reply

  3. Dmitry K
    20.05.2015

    SURPRISING, the center of the 'Indus' is sharp even at F / 3.5, which is EXPECTED from the optical scheme of the 'Tessar'. After the step of correcting spelling and factual errors, it's time to move on to the “grammar” step)))) Thanks for the review! The only pity is that after the purchase of a mirrorless lens, the reviews were mainly about mirrorless lenses. DSLR owners yearn)))

    Reply

    • Lynx
      20.05.2015

      and what is wrong with this sentence?

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        20.05.2015

        really, and what is wrong?

        Reply

      • Dmitry K
        20.05.2015

        Well, one thing - either the lens is expectedly sharp, maybe this is a Tessar scheme, or the lens is unexpectedly sharp, in spite of, say, its venerable age or something else. And in the form in which your proposal has an internal contradiction - in the first half you are surprised by the sharpness, and in the second half it is no longer, because it is a tessar. You already decide))) well, or build the phrase differently.
        examples:
        1 in the center of the 'Hindu' sharp even at F / 3.5, which is expected from the optical circuit 'Tessar'.
        2 in the center of the 'Hindu' is surprisingly sharp even at F / 3.5, which is expected from the optical Tessar
        3 Surprisingly, in the center the 'Indus' is sharp even at F / 3.5, despite…. (time, state, etc.)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        20.05.2015

        Fixed Write more often.

        Reply

  4. Rodion
    20.05.2015

    This I50 is interesting only in the full frame because of the twist. And so - it merges 61 by the interestingness of the picture on the crop and by other characteristics. And for convenience, this is generally something ...

    Reply

  5. Ivan Wolverine
    20.05.2015

    my father left “Sharp” with Industar-22, the release of the camera in 1953 and the lens, too, in 1953…. made of German optical glass taken out for reparations .... as for the thread, the I-22 has a thread in front of the front lens for light filters .... if I'm not mistaken M22…. but the aperture setting ring on the I-22 is located right at the front end of the lens .... in contrast, the photos from the I-22 were of quite good quality….

    Reply

  6. Rustam
    20.05.2015

    Why is noise in photos with low ISOs?

    Reply

    • anonym
      20.05.2015

      Because it is processing with grain (grain) :), it is indicated in the review.

      Reply

  7. Rustam
    20.05.2015

    Why is noise in photos with low ISOs? Is it from the network?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.05.2015

      Because it is processing with grain (grain) :), it is indicated in the review.

      Reply

  8. Bo
    20.05.2015

    this alpha has no soul

    Reply

    • Ivan
      21.05.2015

      Patience, thank you Arkady for what you are doing.

      Reply

  9. Yura
    24.05.2015

    NUTRITION is global =)

    Frkadia, why did V take the facebook button from “likes” = /?

    Reply

  10. Gerych
    24.05.2015

    Yes, good, but there is a better technique

    Reply

  11. Serge
    24.05.2015

    Providence as they say

    Reply

  12. anonym
    26.05.2015

    As for me, the lens is soapy. On a Barbie camera, even better photos can be taken.
    A good review. It is good that Arkady spares no time and effort creating such reviews. Such reviews will bar people from buying such under-lenses.

    Reply

    • Dmitry / Dust
      28.05.2015

      there are soap. but this is understandable: age plus the well-known range of Soviet quality. but to claim that the camera barbie will do any of these Tessars is too bold. dealt with at least ten very different modifications. most of them were very good, two were so-so (I remember this well, because I'm used to much better quality) and two were real glass cutters. I sold one, because it was in a clamshell case, to the second I refined the case and constantly carry it in a photo bag.

      Reply

  13. anonym
    28.05.2015

    something for a long time there are no articles ..

    Reply

  14. Michael
    01.06.2015

    Who will tell you what Soviet widths are on m39 except for Jupiter-12 and Orion-15?

    Reply

  15. Bo
    01.06.2015
  16. Pacman
    15.01.2016

    The design of the lens allows you to easily remake it under Nikon while maintaining infinity. But while there is no time to remake it.

    Reply

  17. Alexander
    11.08.2018

    The lens "Industar-50" 1: 3,5 F = 5 P No. 5917982 white. I installed it on my Nikon D3300 through 2 adapters - M39-M42 + M42-NikonF according to the method described on this site. He removed the adjustment rings and immediately appeared focusing on infinity! No additional settings were needed. Judging by the lens number, its year of manufacture is 1959. Lenses without visible defects, but still washed in a soap solution of plant origin (not chemistry). The rear and front windows are molded in purple. When focusing on the visor, a slightly yellowish tint is visible. Perhaps it should be so. When using "Industar-50-2" 1: 3,5 F = 5 (black) this shade is not observed. The lens is sharp. Contrast transmission is insufficient - edit in the editor. In the attached photo, the brickwork is clearly visible. The horizon is visible. The inscriptions on the banners are read.

    Reply

    • Victor
      07.12.2021

      What kind of rings need to be removed? Kenon 600 industar -50 nifiga is not guided

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        07.12.2021

        this is a rangefinder, you can't remove anything, at 600d only macro

        Reply

      • Rodion
        07.12.2021

        If this is not a folding lens, then you can unscrew the screw and remove the M39-M39 ring at the base of the lens, then replace the adjustment ring between the lens unit and the helicoid with a thinner one (by 0.3 mm) and screw the EOS ring + M39 by 42d through M42-M600. )

        Reply

      • Andy
        07.12.2021

        Or you can buy the I-50-2 and do without the M39-M42.

        Reply

  18. Alexander
    11.08.2018
  19. anonym
    17.09.2018

    Can I attach this lens to the Canon 600D through an adapter? Will it damage the mirror?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      17.09.2018

      Yes, you can, but there will only be macro shots. The mirror will not hurt.

      Reply

  20. Eugene
    27.12.2020

    Hello!
    Please tell me what I'm dealing with:
    I got into the hands of an industrial-50 with a strange bayonet mount, or something like that, it looks like an additional nut screwed onto the thread.
    I did not find anything on the Internet about this.
    Thank you in advance for your attention.

    Reply

    • Sergei
      25.11.2021

      This "nut" is most likely the bayonet removed from the camera.

      Reply

  21. Sergei
    25.11.2021

    A question for connoisseurs - where can you find information about the mirror modification of the I-50 (m39)?

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer