This topic was created so that everyone can call your own most 'steep'at the moment a camera :).
offtopic
In the comments indicate:
- The camera you have and why is it really 'cool', it is advisable to attach one 'cool'photo from it :)
- The best'/'steep'a camera that you don't have, but which is perfect for this title :).
Until the next recording in Radozhiv temporarily amnestied all prisoners from blacklist.
Under the term 'steep'let everyone understand whatever he wants.
also
well enough
I forgot to add that everything was filmed on the Nikon AF-S 80-200 / 2.8 (version 4 with a motor)
Am I am amazed how you can shoot such a gag on the D800 and even the Nikon AF-S 80-200 / 2.8? Where is the volume? Where is the light and shadow drawing? Here, with the D90, photos were laid out more artistically. Such good equipment added to you only show-offs, no more. Everything is flat, there is no difference with crop even. Sorry for the frankness, did not want to offend.
Dear critic (who even hesitates to write his name) ... please demonstrate to begin with something of your own, where there will be "Volume and light-shadow pattern" And the fact that you are crushed by a toad that I have a normal technique, well, who is your doctor, me she did not fall from the sky and if you consider that photography I do not earn my living, and this is my hobby, then I am forgivable to take pictures as an amateur. Well, please present your “MASTERPIECEs” and when I see that you did better, then we will continue to discuss ... with respect Ruslan R.
Anonymous, as they say, envy silently) A man simply wrote about his technique and posted a couple of good photos, without trying to compete with anyone.
I forgot to show off that everything was filmed on the Nikon AF-S 80-200 / 2.8 (version 4 with a motor)
By the way, writing on my behalf is at least indecent ...
Ruslan, great photos, don’t listen to anyone.
Good luck!
I also liked the pictures.
Thank you.
I have d7000, I want d610!)
The coolest camera is the Nikon D3100. Because this is my camera. (here is a smiley face).
I use Nikon D3100 and several manual lenses. Helios 81N, Kaleinar 5N, Industar 50-2, Pentacon Auto 50mm 1.8. Most of all, the first two. While there is enough technology. In the future, I want Nikon DF
Interest in manual optics was awakened after reading several reviews by Arkady. Arkady - thank you!) Very useful and informative resource, deep bow to you.
I repeat, but still,
the best camera is the one
which is now in the hands.
Only
do not forget
that when you look at the photo, the viewer should die. Otherwise, the meaning is completely lost.
It freezes when I look at pictures of people
in the devices of which there were 5 shutter speeds and a light meter was absent.
Therefore, a Nokia with 2 megapixels is rude, but this is all that is needed for the talent to manifest.
I realized this only now, and before that I did not have the courage to try.
Whether it will succeed or not is another question.
It is important to BE brave.
And do not assume that beautiful photographs are the lot of men with huge muzzles
It's like running sneakers. A bunch of different companies, bright colors, colorful labels. But the problem is that we already have everything for running. This was proved by Ababa Bikila, who became the winner of the Olympic marathon and overcame him barefoot.
While his peers collected sneakers.
Also now with photographic equipment.
We look not there.
Well then, and I'll post a couple of my works. For the first time, by the way. Disgraced or not? Serious critics here :)
Another
And more
And the last
Everything was filmed on the D3100 with Helios 81n and macro rings or on whale 18-55
Well, I want myself a D90. The limit of dreams is D7000.
I will only be glad to criticism. All photos without processing, only reduced the size.
Nikon is not a Canon!
The converse is also true. :)
I’m a modest half-bum, at the time I was infected D5100, kaleinar 5n, gelios (arsat) 81n, vega 12b.
mriyu about nikon Df i 85mm 1: 1.4 :). current frame
and the axis of the chain, on gelios 81n.
Znovu gelios
Helios also gives me such circles around light sources. Is this the way it should be, or is it their sore?
One to one pictures))))))
The coolest fotik from which I just bastard is the mirrorless Sigma DP3. Yes, it has a working ISO of only 100, slow autofocus and slowly writes to the card, but what happens is just super! I bought another top camera from Sigma Sigma SD1 on a wave of euphoria, but it's more difficult with him. The kit lens 18-50 / 2,8 is good, but not as good as that of the DP3 (fixed 50 / 2,8 macro). You have to buy a good Art series lens for it. I post photos from DP3, if interested I can also upload from SD1. I would very much like to talk with those who take pictures with these two cameras. )
Petra Tower
Several times I tried to buy a sigma SD, then I read once again “horrors” and beat myself on the hands. Although there are distant acquaintances who are very good. interestingly shoot sigma. I catch myself on the fact that I continue to monitor ads with sigma, in search of a successful purchase option.
If not difficult, upload pictures from SD1 /
Here are pictures from Sigma SD1 Merrill. It’s also a working ISO 100. I need a good lens, preferably the Art series which I don’t have, I have a whale 17-50 / 2,8. Of course, you need to adapt to it. I bought in Italy in Livigno, there is a duty free zone. The lens cost 1050 EUR.
sky
first primer
hamburg
jurmala
Almost the flag of Germany)))
Peter
Also Peter, but a little brighter. I also once wanted to take Sigma - I heard a lot about their incredible colors.
yeah .. unbelievably golden irreducible skin!
A random shot in a table with magazines, for some reason I liked ..)
Peter again. Why did he do the grain himself ..)
Rocket
I use Nikon D600. I'm quite happy. Nnikkor 28 1.8g, 85 1.8g, 50 1.8g, 80-200 2.8d lenses (2 versions). I ask you not to judge strictly for photos; I am an amateur, I'm studying)))
A good selection of lenses, I also began to use fixes. I have Samyang 8mm 3.5, Samyang 35mm 1.4, Nikor 20 2,8, Nikkor's 28 1.8g, 85 1.8g, 50 1.8g and 70-210 F4. Favorite 28 1,8G and 85 1,8G for photos and Samyang 35mm 1.4 for videos. second carcass panasonic gh4 c 12-35 2.8 and Leica 25mm 1.4 mainly for video. although the watering can draws beautifully. And Nikon D600 is very pleased with the sense of changing to d750; I don’t see my money is worth it :)
And I prefer zooms. I have a Nikkor 28-300 and 50 / 1.4. I also want to buy a zoom-shirik while I am studying the topic. Carcass - Nikon d610
Beautiful!
Vasily, you have a very beautiful shot!
1
and why should I photoshop the children?
Nnikkor 80-200 2.8d
Nikkor 80-200 2.8d ... .. The first photo Nnikkor 28 1.8g, the second 85 1.8g
Nikkor 80-200 2.8d
Nikon D3000 Zenithar 50 -1,7
Nikon D200 Helios 44th
Nikon D5100
good photo
I, of course, understand - the artistic intent, the transfer of mood through color, here and there, the fifth or tenth, but why use the D200, and then heroically transform the colors into faded, and even marsh?
Well, actually I’m an amateur, although by profession I’m an artist. I shot it when the sun had almost set on a manual lens. In addition to the BB error (the colors are acid unpleasant), the photo turned out to be of low contrast. I had to edit in the lightroom, which by the way, I still do not know very well.
but for me the rules. D200 does not oblige to anything in terms of color. This is someone who came up with the idea that the color center gives magic color. How did -so and well, all the same, this dog in the swamp only you saw)))