This topic was created so that everyone can call your own most 'steep'at the moment a camera :).
offtopic
In the comments indicate:
- The camera you have and why is it really 'cool', it is advisable to attach one 'cool'photo from it :)
- The best'/'steep'a camera that you don't have, but which is perfect for this title :).
Until the next recording in Radozhiv temporarily amnestied all prisoners from blacklist.
Under the term 'steep'let everyone understand whatever he wants.
Fujifilm X-E2 + FUJINON XF27mm F2.8 is what you can always carry with you.
And get these pictures.
Another shot with Fujifilm X-E2 + FUJINON XF27mm F2.8
Also chamber ZhyPeg
And another shot with Fujifilm X-E2 + FUJINON XF27mm F2.8
Also camera ZhyPeg in RAW I do not shoot at all with this camera.
purely a hobby.
I liked the Sony DSC-R1 unit, but lost baggage when flying with a camera. There is a Sony DSC-P200 I bought an excellent soap box with R1, I’ve been holding it for 9 years now, it works very well.
There was a Nikon D300, a class but not for me, I bought myself a Fuji S5 i S3, I remained satisfied as an elephant, one minus slow, I sold S3, I won’t sell S5, then I’ll put pictures, because of my slowness my wife scolded, I bought sony a77, I like fotik, but here’s a glass of plastic, you need to update well, or to buy a hare with ebay.
It is in 77 UTB 12 frames, the quality is low but for the children just the video is at its best.
I want full, but I’m not sure what is needed, but it attracts Sony A99, well, or Nikon d750. since I prefer in jpg, I have a hobby, leaning toward Sony, sorry Fuji Pro S, stopped ((it's a legend, my favorite colors.
Fuji S5
Sony A77
nikon d300
Sony DSC-R1
How did I get to the children's forum about tanks (((.
Sony DSC-P200
Provocation:)))
Canon 6d. FF with sufficient characteristics for amateur shooting.
Crops IMHO is not worse than FF, but you can’t widely cover it and there are more noises.
I suggest the following discussion "which religion is correct: Canon vs Nikon". Advance plus Canon :)))))))
It was already. Read Radozhiv carefully need.
Read. It was about lenses, but I'm talking about religion
Religious discussions, as well as political ones, are prohibited in Radozhiv.
This is a joke, of course :)
Constructive proposal: to vote and make a rating with assessments of the main advantages and disadvantages of cameras.
People don’t understand this, they are fanatical, having bought a brand they become its slaves in 95% of cases. For them, logic does not work. It has already shown one similar article.
My experience began with the Nikon D90, a great app, but I got tired of it.
then Fujifilm X100 - not very
then Nikon d7100 - the perfect device! Not a single minus, except that on-crop
then Nikon d600 - already 2 years old - an excellent device, focusing could be better, well, okay.
The second camera was Fujifilm X100S, then X100 again - still not very good.
Now Olympus EM-10 is not very good.
I would like either the D750 or D810. Well, this is so, if I found it on the street :) I do not see the point of buying.
I would like Nikon 28-70 2.8 and 12-24 2.8
Autofocus is very even there. Yes, to reveal its potential (and the apparatus as a whole), you need good optics.
Everything is relative.
At 7100, autofocus is much better.
With the D7100 is familiar not by hearsay;)
There are a lot of articles, you see, I read ..? firsthand… ))
Vyacheslav is right - the D7100 has a much better focus
I forgot to add that I just love photography.
Much more needs to be learned in this matter.
Nikon D600 can do more than I can.
But I use a powerful camera as a safety net - it can pull out my wrong exposure, and 24MP helps with framing.
High ISO workers, I think 6400, help to take pictures everywhere, always and without flash.
For me, the “coolest” one is the one that is now, namely the Canon 1000D. Everything I need, he knows how and makes me happy. The glasses are different.
Nikon d50, for the amateur the most that. Well, in the desired good aperture optics, and after that we’ll think about the carcass)
I have a D7000 - I have no complaints, if I change it, then for a full frame.
Naikon d3000 + 18-105. Before that, there were Samsung soap dishes with 500 and 500 wb
for me cool nikon df
Good luck to everyone!
A familiar photographer gave me a picture painted from my photo (source) Suddenly (!) It turned out that for the basics he chose my picture from the camera Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro, the funny thing is what conclusions I have in the review of this model. Accidents are accidents :)
The artist is well done, he sees the master and not the iron.
I'm for Fuji S5, S3
Oh how good)
++
One more:
Pratsyuyu photojournalist. Mayu Nikon d600, I photograph at once with 24 2.8, 35 1.8 and 50 1.8 and telephoto 70-300. Garniy DD, middle іso, іncoli really needs 12800, in the dark it is nasty focus, gray is nasty trim. We have a dumb understanding of the ideal entity, in the moment we need our own entity. It is more convenient to photograph by 35. I would call an ideal camera d4s and a spare wheel d750. I’m brave to take a look at the reportage olympus om-d e-m5. While the stench has not matured, there’s a lot of information about them - autofocus doesn’t stand up to all, but it’s just like it.
More to one.
And what is generally filmed here?
Rіchnitsya Єvromaydana. Tovpa people.
h-yeah .... what kind of Euromaidan is a photo ...
Do you dislike something?
Are you seriously pretending to be surprised?
Or do you really sincerely think that someone might like the photo that shows it incomprehensibly and incomprehensibly, that without the author’s explanation what it is and where you don’t understand it?
That don’t call, there’s not all such a miracle photo.
Wonder photo? ))))
Yeah ..) much more miracle)))
One more photo.
Stay.
Віталій, перша the photo with the snacks is really cool! Є singing effect of presence, having felt there himself.
I started with Zenith ... Then Canon ... Then a series of Nikonov. From the D100 to today's D800. I am completely satisfied with it, there would be someone to shoot and to sell to :-)
Nikon FM, Nikon 50mm f / 1.8D, just because it's cool.
I bought a Nikon F75 last week, I guess it's cool too, I don’t know how strong it is.
I will support. It’s much more interesting to shoot on the Nikon F80 than on the D3100. Somehow mesmerizing the process, or something.
example F80 + 50 1.8AF
It’s somehow not even interesting to enter into a discussion without a budget limit, when 99% has a dream limit of FF. No one heard about the medium and large format, Pentax 645z, and matrices without a Bayer filter (Fovion X3), for example. Sigma dp2 quantum, producing frames no worse than 5D mk3. https://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma-dp2-quattro/pool/
Moreover, the development of Bayer filter modernization is carried out by Canon and Sony, but such matrices have their own unresolved limitations.
D610 is capable of much more than I use it :-) It's bad when the technique is smarter than the photographer :-)
D810 perhaps not really needed, gps to 610m will be the perfect device.
That's cool. My old people will not tolerate such endurance. Mustache in points will be
That is why I changed D90 :-( You can leave a little from 35 1,8 - but then you still need a good noise reduction ... I drive the raves into typhus and then play with them in LR /
Well, it's expensive ... You can take the world and play with it on the D90. Yes, you probably have more in photography))
The world will be just right, especially since prices have doubled….
the zenitar itself I bought 16 2,8 recently so that it would not be soared with focusing, it turned out to be the most difficult in night shooting :-) only here either the sky is in clouds or I'm at work :-(
somehow
or so_)
I'm an amateur. I love comfort. I got used to seeing the finished frame on the rotary screen even at the shooting stage. I don't accept any eyes, let alone optical ones. No post processing other than cropping. No RAW. Therefore, my choice is unambiguous - Sony. I was holding Canon and Nikon SLRs in my hands, I don't understand what you find in these optical eyes.
There was (and is) Sony R1 but the focus speed ceased to be enough, there is no video. Now Sony A77 + 18-135 + 50 + puff. Sometimes there is a lack of iso and a wide angle. I would like to try FF from Sony with and without a mirror.
And what is the difference between the optical eyes of Canon and Nikon from Sony?
nikon d600
1.Take a Pentax K-7. For the compact and classy lenses of the Limited series, you can love the Pentax system.
2. The best camera you shoot.