This topic was created so that everyone can call your own most 'steep'at the moment a camera :).
offtopic
In the comments indicate:
- The camera you have and why is it really 'cool', it is advisable to attach one 'cool'photo from it :)
- The best'/'steep'a camera that you don't have, but which is perfect for this title :).
Until the next recording in Radozhiv temporarily amnestied all prisoners from blacklist.
Under the term 'steep'let everyone understand whatever he wants.
and I’m hachu, Nikon D5S, well, when will I see
Leica s2-p
Summarit-S 35mm f / 2.5 ASPH;
Elmarit-S 45mm f / 2.8 ASPH (CS);
Summarit-S 70mm f / 2.5 ASPH;
APO-Macro-Summarit-S 120mm f / 2.5 (CS);
APO-Tele-Elmar-S 180mm f / 3.5;
Vario-Elmar-S 30−90mm f / 3.5-5.6 ASPH
Fuji X-T1 and Leica M9-P
NEX-5T + MC Helios-44M-6 …… ..And I'm SATISFIED
Nikon 750 is a controversial camera. The filling is all from 610 ... Only a slightly new case, and the parameters are identical. The shutter is still the same, up to 1/4000 sec, the same is the same with compression. A purely marketing camera - nothing to do with the pro segment.
The D750 from 610 only has a battery, a viewfinder and a matrix. Moreover, the matrix has a DAC and a reading algorithm replaced. EVERYTHING ELSE is completely different. Why lie or write nonsense without knowing the essence of the question?
Please take the trouble to explain, dear, how strongly the reading algorithm from the same matrix can affect the quality of digital data ?! The matrix is the same, it works according to a single algorithm, regardless of what type of ADC (the matrix is an analogous microcircuit) is used in this camera. In fact, it is extremely difficult to find a difference in the picture between 610 and 750 at low ISOs (in a blind test). Algorithm for encoding and imaging (for which the CPU is responsible) Identical.
At high ISOs, this difference is noticeable. Open an interview with the D750 developers and read, they explained everything in detail. They managed to increase the speed of reading from the cell, due to which there is less loss of information about the light. The algorithm has been changed, and the developers also clearly said this. Besides the matrix, there’s nothing more to answer about you, right? What about the rest of the lie?
Of course, I have nothing more to tell you, you don’t repair them, but believe only what is written in the advertising brochure ... Did you hold it in your hands?
It's funny. First, I “held” both cameras in my hands. Secondly, I am the owner of the D750. I suspect you are the owner of the D610. Only from them you hear that 750 is the same, nothing better than 6xx and that kind of nonsense. Now you are like “repairing”. AND? Having disassembled both cameras, you “didn't notice” different processors, different AF and metering sensors, different shutters and mirror mechanisms, different displays, finally? Or are they "insignificant" little things? And why are you, a “repairman” type, just comparing characteristics from brochures (like these ridiculous “combining” cameras 1/4000 sec.), And not delving into the essence of their differences? It's funny, by God ... :)
Not to be unfounded, here's a link to the interview - https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&tl=ru&u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fdocs%2Fnews%2Finterview_dcm%2F20141020_671710.html&sandbox=1
Nikon D50 is the best!
Yes, good! I advise everyone that he wants to shoot and have fun!
Nikon D3X
I have a 550D and also happy with it))
Nikon F100, although I shoot mostly on a digital (D7000), pleases with its ergonomics, brutality, reliability, a certain secret in terms of results, until you digitize the film.
I have a Fuji S5. It is the best in color. If there were financial opportunities, I would probably take Canon EOS-1D x in addition to it.
OLYMPUS OM-1 + ZUIKO 1.8 - 50
Є Olympus PEN E-PL1
Fujifilm X-E1
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5
I like everything
I have a Nikon D3100. My first SLR. A decent result, from the optics of Kaleinar-5N and Helios-81N. Actually I bought thanks to Radozhiva, for which many thanks, I am pleased with the glasses.
The camera performed well in almost two years. I shoot mostly portraits, but it shows itself well in reporting and astro-landscapes. I also filmed in the cold and in a light rain, I was afraid for the camera, but (thu-thu-thu) everything works.
Maybe not the best camera, but now I want to switch to Nikon D7000 or D7100. I tried to work with him - I liked it. And there are more opportunities.
Take D7000. Less megapixels. He himself followed the same path. D3100 is the first DSLR, it was not enough - I bought D7000, I am happy as an elephant. When it's tight on the crop I take Nikon F-801 or Minolta 7000AF.
Ale bіlshe fudzh
kenon 500d steer))
Volodya’s even half the fate of the Nikon D600, Nikkor 85 1,8d, Nikkor 50 1,8g, riots, brood on the matrix is not stressful. Df Bula with a good other camera. More beautiful photo without zrob.
I have a Nikon D200. Very satisfied. I really like the color of the picture, the ergonomics of the camera and its reliability, the ability to work with manual optics. I really want a Nikon D700 or D800.
PS photo shot on Helios 81N
Love this camera too (D200) Color Color Color! Which practically doesn't need to be edited in editors. The second is, of course, ergonomics and reliability. And although I have expensive modern crop types with views and high ISOs, the more I shoot with them, the more I am convinced that the D200 will not sell. I would like to try D700 or even D3 from Nikons. Sony A7 is also in dreams.
Nikon D7000, photo from him. Cool I think the D800 / d4s. I think the coolest is Sinar http://www.sinar.ch/en/
Nikon D7000, I really like it and I love my camera. I am not a professional, an ordinary amateur, I am satisfied with what I have. And dreams - to make a beautiful picture with your Nikon.
The D700 is 99,9% satisfied, I want D4s, but the price bites ...
nicon d7000 is definitely the best, both for the amateur (which I am) and for the pros. I have glass 16-85, I'm happy), but I want something lighter of course. Well, and makrik for complete happiness))) In general, the coolest fotik is the photographer's direct hands, his tenacious eye, good vision of the plot and of course processing.
I have Fuji S5Pro, Nikon D7000 and Nikon D3000. Both Nikon are decent devices (D3000 likes color, while D7000 likes ergonomics, speed, results at high ISO), but Fuji ... Real film color! Many years of experience with film from Fuji engineers affected ... Now such cameras are no longer produced and it is a pity ... FF matrix for him (12MP, no more) and the price he would not have. Dream-D4s.