06.02.2015/5/5 Canon introduced several cameras: Canon EOS XNUMXDs, Canon EOS XNUMXDsr, Canon EOS 750D and Canon EOS 760D.
Canon EOS 5DS
Key features of the Canon EOS 5Ds can be found on the official website, there is information about other new products.
And welcome to the comments :), with a discussion of this epic iconic event (the psychological mark of 50 MP for a full-format sensor was passed).
Tell me, what is the diffraction threshold for a 50MP FF? About F: 7? The camera is positioned, among other things, for high-quality shooting of landscapes and architecture, and they are usually filmed on a closed hole. Then it turns out that by closing the hole to F: 16, the diffraction will “eat” 50Mp, if they are not “eaten” by the glass earlier.
Yes, it doesn’t matter, then in Photoshop, sharpen the sharpness and everything will be fire, no one will notice anything. :)
Looking at the test shots from the camera - this is exactly the feeling that develops.
The “blooming” aunt simply could not get into the Internet without being retouched. And they mocked the mountain specifically.
Txt pictures of Rockwell - galimo soap. This is not a camera, but a shame!
I think the result could be better, just until the Canon glasses allow the matrix. Canon announced the 11-24 f / 4 wide-angle lens for this camera, unfortunately for the same insane $ 3000. Perhaps with this lens it will be possible to get sharp pictures on the hyperfocal without closing the aperture much. See you soon.
Judging by the tests on the Web - everything is not so hopeless: the updated deshmansky fifty fifty / 50 STM (SUDDENLY!); and quite low-cost 1.8 / 85 and 1.8/100 USM - on f / 2 they do a pretty good job with the 5.6Dsr small pixel: https://tinyurl.com/y7anknlj
And by the way, Aleksanych, you remember d7100 - it will have exactly the same diffraction threshold as this new Canon miracle, but you somehow cope with it :)
Photo of the mountain at Rockwell is a real nightmare!
That's exactly how it is. But firstly, I don’t print posters, the maximum is A4 and even that is rare, secondly, the D7100 does not claim to be an excellent camera in any way, and thirdly, many glasses from FF resolve the frame center well, which means 24MP on the crop. But buyers of 5Ds, which costs almost an order of magnitude more, will want to get the stated permission from it. But this will not be possible in any way in landscapes and architecture, but in the best case in the center of the frame on some eyelashes. Because for a sharp landscape across the entire FF field, and not only, you need to close the diaphragm, but closing the diaphragm will blur the picture a little ... in general, you can't get 50MP on the FF where they are needed. Although a good resize to 20MP will most likely look more advantageous than just a 20MP matrix, but ... not for the same price ?!
collect on camera!
waiting for a review: D
smash it on the floor !!! as I was on NIKON - and I will stay, whoever says what - whom the picture does not correct, shoot in RAW and learn to develop this RAW !!! NIKON = reliability, shoot on a semi-dead camera without any problems. unlike Canon which = will show an error ...
and reliability = above all ... I work as a reporter in the government media, where a missed moment or an event that has not been filmed - I can fire it ... with Canon there were problems, both with carcasses and with optics ... with NIKON there was only one problem - rubber bands ... and the mileage was twice exceeded - the mirror starts to wedge ... and Canon, he is such a Canon ... from the entire line of Canon cameras - I consider only the 1D line of professional cameras ... and all your Pyataks - fi ...
I can recommend the book "How to manage the universe without attracting the attention of orderlies"
A link to download the book? :)
http://malyaev.ru/other/kak-upravlyat-vselennoy-ne-privlekaya-vnimaniya-sanitarov.htm
III Is this picture your book?
No, Sash, it's just a button accordion. In fact, there is no such book, it should not be taken so literally. The meaning of what was said was “between the lines”. ;) Well, okay, something has gone completely flood, and will be postebalsya, otherwise it will be ban_set. :)
Is that why canonists run hanging around with 2-3 cameras? ;)
PS This is a joke. I have nothing against Nikons or Kenons. Each camera has its own merits and demerits, and everyone chooses according to their needs and pocket. Well, taking into account: the service "close by", "religion" and the quantity / brand of the already available optics.
canonists only? I saw how Nikonists run around with two - body and shirik on each
so the fact of the matter is that not two cameras, but two different lenses ready for shooting.
as well as two videos (if approved)
http://youtu.be/STMZwlVIAGw
http://youtu.be/7d_LDbxh1tw
Correctly! Nikon rules! And those who do not like his colors are cross-handed color-blind!
Canon current camcorders were doing good! Before ... XL-1 ... In appearance!
When instead of 6 MP I had a 16-megapixel camera, the problem of the so-called. "Micro-lubrication", which I have never encountered before ... I involuntarily thought that 12 MP would be enough for me. And 50 - is the camera to the tripod you need to immediately fasten and walk like that without taking off?
Yeah, and hang a weight on a model so that it staggers less.
Finally, Canon decided to release a “camera for Zeiss Otus” (read - a normal camera, not good yet, but already normal)! And then the glass is good, but there is no camera for it! Well, figs with him that there are no more normal glasses on Canon! But you don't have to choose - bought both Otus and rejoice!
PS. According to rumors, Nikon has long been preparing a device based on a 54-megapixel matrix from Sony! The form factor is still unknown: D4s or D810. So, let the Canonists be a little proud - maybe they will get 1 (2,3,4,5,6,7 ...) place in the DXOmark ranking at least once! (?) :-))))))))
By the way, I wanted to give an example by referring to DXOmark, when one person started talking about the super katinka Boot against the wretchedness of the picture and so on. Nikon :))) But I did not want to get into a meaningless argument. Because their opinion is more authoritative, where is DXOmark;)) So, Boot starts its chart from position No. 32 :)
Today on Mordoknig slipped information about Nikon D5.
I really look forward to seeing an analog of the Canon 7D mark II from Nikon.
… We must rejoice! Progress goes FORWARD!
And then where does the progress? Canon has released a very niche model with a very controversial contingent of buyers.
Dmitry Evtifeev has a very brief description of who will suit and who this camera will scare
http://evtifeev.com/24107-canon-nu-nakonets-to-canon-5ds-50-mpiks.html. Demand creates supply. Yes, if those who need it are not very many
And on the topic of camera niche: Nokon announced the D810A for astro photography.
Fuck! Well, the price tag (((~ $ 3800 ...
Well, this was to be expected, I think that 50 is not the limit, Kenon is great, but I just don’t need these 50 for that kind of money, I’m 12-16 for the eyes, as an amateur. I’ll wait when it gets cheaper)))
The D3X was bought by a friend of mine for $ 10200 in Moscow a few years ago. And until recently it was on sale for 320 rubles (almost $ 000 at that rate). It was a TOP camera from Nikon. She bought it with the words “for 10 years it will be enough for me). The camera has repulsed itself long ago. Together with a set of top-end lenses 000, 10, 24 (well, this is not top-end) 35 and 50. Whoever earns this, who needs exactly what this particular camera offers, will buy it.
And stop whining already :)
+1
The price is quite normal.
Another question is which optics will be able to fully “reveal” 50 megapixels.
I doubt half of the L-series lenses can do that. Elki are far from the best lenses.)
It's nice to read the thoughts of smart and different people, even when they are not supported by a research study of the issue. For myself, I realized a long time ago that new cameras are always better than old ones, although they are not ideal. And on any old optics they will shoot in something better. In a year or two there will be something even better ... and so on until the end of civilization. And the price-quality ratio is an intimate, emotional question))
Where are the reviews of Canon photo equipment?
What is Nikon's ardent fanaticism?
Subjective opinion about Nikon. The last 5 reviews are not about Nikon. Do not believe it, see for yourself in the Radozhiva ribbon:
1. Tokina AF 20-35 1: 3.5-4.5
2. SIGMA 18-200mm 1: 3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM MACRO | C (Contemporary)
3. Samyang MC Mirror Lens 1: 8.0 f = 500mm
4. Sigma Zoom DC 18-200mm 1: 3.5-6.3 HSM OS (Optical Stabilizer)
5. Sigma Zoom DC 18-250mm 1: 3.5-6.3 HSM OS (Optical Stabilizer)
Only then start writing something for “ardent” fanaticism :)
Thank you.
Maybe you will have time for reviews:
1. Canon EOS 5Ds, Canon EOS 5Dsr
2. Canon EOS 750D
3. Canon EOS 760D
And the lens would also like to Canon. A lot of new ones came out. STM versions especially. How much better they are compared to older versions. There is still not enough review for the oldies: 70-200 f / 4L, 135mm f / 2.0L and more.
Vladimir, you do not understand the main thing - Arkady is testing the equipment that is given to him for the test. Give him a Canon EOS 5Dsr and I'm sure he'd love to review. Why do so many people think that the author of the site works in a photographic store and can take any technique as soon as it is on sale? ..
Yes, I had 5dsr on my hands, but then I was sick, I had time only 50 1.8 on it to test.
boot professionals Ninuzhyn!
Śmieszą mnie te wasze komentarze “pseudo fachowców” i popisywanie się żargonem małych dzieci.
04.04.2016-29.09.2023
Bardzo spóźniony śmiech.