answers: 80

  1. Alexander
    10.12.2018

    Who will tell you in what position of the zoom ring to store the lens? The smallest, medium or largest? And is it critical, as on the Canon 17-85 mm? It’s just that I covered 17-85 because of this, I don’t want this to happen.

    Reply

  2. Jauhen
    26.12.2018

    For planespotting I used 70-200f4l for 40d. On photo stocks, I regularly received rejections for blurriness at the edges of the frame at f4 (in the center of OK). I bought 55-250stm and the question with sharpness on the open one disappeared. Bonus - OS. I don’t know how in terms of artistry, because in spotting it is secondary. Another obvious plus is the saving in weight and size in the backpack of an air traveler (55-250 cm + 100d (200d) would generally be super in a light and compact body). Result - 70-200f4l sold without any regret.

    Reply

  3. BORIS
    03.09.2019

    will he fit the bezerkaks

    Reply

  4. Alexander
    13.08.2020

    Can you please tell a photography lover? Does it make sense to buy a Canon Zoom Lens EF-S 55-250mm 1: 4-5.6 IS STM in addition to the Canon Zoom Lens EF-S 18-135mm 1: 3.5-5.6 IS STM on a Canon 700D carcass in the hope of getting a sharper shooting in the FR range from 55 to 100mm? Are my hopes justified that 55-250 will be a step lighter than 18-135mm and this will give its effect? Indoors I shoot with an external flash (one or two).

    Reply

    • Dmitriy
      14.08.2020

      Not. I own both of these lenses, and I can say the 18-135 is much sharper.

      Reply

      • Alexander
        14.08.2020

        Dmitry, thank you!

        Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        03.08.2021

        Hello. Is this difference in sharpness clearly visible?
        Also a problem. There is Canon 30D + 18-55f4, I was interested in Canon 55-250 f4-5.6 is II. Think. There is an alternative to buying the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f / 3.5-5.6 IS. But who will buy 18-55f4? Somehow the solution doesn't come.

        Reply

      • Novel
        03.08.2021

        The 18-55 / 4 is a very good lens and the 55-250 is a good complementary lens. What do you pray for this sharpness? Or do you think that the crop of your bird shot at 135 mm will be sharper than a bird shot at 250 mm without a crop?

        If sharpness is important, then look towards IS STM, not IS II, most testers are sure that it is higher. Perhaps because of this, the used price. IS II is significantly lower.

        Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        17.08.2021

        Thanks. It's not that I'm praying for sharpness, perhaps I don't see this difference yet. Another question. Is STM so good compared to the option without it? Those. if you dig, is it better STM? Or is it not worth it?

        I also like 18-55 / 4, but I have not compared it with others.

        Recently I bought 75-300 for a ridiculous price, that's why I bought it, I immediately looked at 55-250 and now I'm thinking about it.

        I can not understand. Only I am not receiving response notifications? Like subscribed to the news.

        Reply

      • Sergei
        17.08.2021

        The manufacturing company itself (Canon) is positioning the STM version for video enthusiasts. Because the STM motor is faster and quieter.
        As for the difference in photo quality, it is minimal.
        Especially if you have older Canon EOS models.
        But the presence of a stub is much more important if you are comparing this lens with a 70-300mm (which is usually without a stub),

        Reply

      • Gennady
        28.04.2022

        You need to throw out 55-250, most likely it is or not stm, it allows 24 megapixels in any position - the question is how 18-135 can be sharper? Or do you shoot something far away and because of the air gap you think that “not sharp”, in general, do not mislead people ...

        Reply

      • Gennady
        28.04.2022

        I meant in comparison with 18-135 ... The PPC convector keko hd from this glass gives a more detailed sharp picture than the crop from it, this is nonsense suggests that the resolution is with a margin in optics.

        Reply

  5. Novel
    14.08.2020

    Tell me what B.U. take glass on a crop: is it or CANON EF 75-300 mm f / 4-5.6 IS USM?

    Reply

    • Mr. Boggy
      08.07.2021

      Even if you have already made a choice, it will be useful for others: the old version for ef, uncomfortable and soapy, is 300 mm full of potatoes. Even on the old FF, this tube is soapy, purely “so that it was up to 300mm” ... Plus, the front element rotates when focusing. For crop, unambiguously choose ef-s 55-250 STM, just by cut, and optically cutting rates.

      Reply

  6. Alexander
    13.12.2020

    Everything is cool, of course! But in the photo with the girl between the trees, at f / 4/5, the HA are still present.

    Reply

    • Michael
      13.12.2020

      Nothing surprising chromatic is almost always

      Reply

  7. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    17.08.2021

    It would be nice to understand the difference between STM and without it, I do not focus quickly. Is it worth looking for STM, is it as good as it is more expensive?

    Reply

  8. Vitya
    02.05.2023

    In conjunction with the Canon 1100D, the lens works great. Excellent sharpness and color reproduction. I highly recommend it, especially since you can find it in the secondary market in new condition for only $100. I enclose a frame made by this glass.

    Reply

  9. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer