According provided by lens F = 92 1: 2 No. 651348 of the KOMZ plant (Kazan Optical and Mechanical Plant) many thanks to Fantom Felini.
UPDATED: more info here.
F = 92 1: 2 (lens from a slide projector Lety-60 / 60M)
The lens presented in this review was taken from the Soviet overhead projector 'LETI-60' (aka 'Leti-60'), and possibly from the 'LETI-60M' (aka 'Leti-60m'). An adapter ring KP-42 / N was glued to it for mounting on Nikon cameras, while the lens itself has no mounting thread or bayonet mount. This option has a white metal back, but there are also under versions of the lens with a back that is the same black as the front (link to a completely black lens and description of the alteration).
Labels on the lens F = 92 1: 2 from the slide projector Lati-60 / 60M
This lens was produced in two main versions, Radozhiv already has a review of one of them - '2/92'(# 8204338).
Differences between models' F = 92 1: 2 'and'2/92':
- Different frame of the case. Front lens'2/92'is set much deeper into the lens barrel, thus creating a kind of small hood. Also, '2/92'has a different focus ring with zebra markings.
- Different identification marks. So, on 'F = 92 1: 2' there is a mark of the KOMZ plant, while '2/92', presumably, was produced at the LOMO plant. I want to add that there are lenses with the designation 'F-92 1: 2' and without the manufacturer's mark (see an example).
- Different enlightenment. Version '2/92'has a pronounced orange coating of the front lens,' F = 92 1: 2 '- a pronounced lilac. However, I would like to clarify that some lenses'2/92'also had lilac enlightenment (see an example).
As a result, there are a bunch of different versions / subversions / subversions of this lens :).
Lens F = 92 1: 2 from the overhead projector Lety-60 (60M)
What can be called a focus ring rotates 180 degrees. The front lens rotates when focusing. With such a alteration, as shown in the photographs, the lens has a clear flight of infinity, MDF is about 60 cm.
Rear lens of the lens F = 92 1: 2 from the overhead projector Leti-60 (60M)
The copy that came into my view has a slightly shabby or shabby lens enlightenment.
Enlightenment of the front lens of the lens F = 92 1: 2 from the overhead projector Lety-60 (60M)
Chamfer lenses are poorly blackened. The lens does not have an aperture device, and therefore it always shoots at full open.
F = 92 1: 2 from the overhead projector Lety-60 (60M) and a classic boring portrait Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm 1: 1.8G IF SWM
The lens is still afraid of back and side light. At the same time, it is quite sharp and has a rather interesting pattern, in fact, for the sake of which all these 'dances with a tambourine' were made in attempts to shoot with a projection lens.
Here link to the archive with the originals - 184 MB, 16 photos in .NEF format (RAW) from the camera Nikon D700. On Nikon DX cameras EGF lens will be 138mm (classic portrait focal length).
Lens F = 92 1: 2 from the overhead projector Lety-60 (60M) on the ZK
All reviews of film projection and filming lenses:
- RO3-3M 2/50
- RO2-2M 75/2 (review from the reader)
- PO 500-1 F9 CM. 1: 2 P (review from the reader)
- LENKINAP RO500-1 F = 9cm 1: 2 P (review from the reader)
- ЛЭТИ-60/60М F=92 1:2 (review from the reader)
- 2/92
- F = 92 1: 2
- ОКП-6-70-1 F=70 1:1,8
- LENKINAP OKS1A-75-1 F=75 1:2 P (review from the reader)
- LOMO RO501-1 F = 100 1: 2 (+ materials from the reader)
- LOMO RO500-1 F = 90 1: 2
- 16KP-1,4 / 65 (review from the reader)
- 35KP-1,8 / 65 (review from the reader)
- 35KP-1,8 / 70
- 35KP-1,8 / 75 (review from the reader)
- 35KP-1,8 / 85
- 35KP-1.8 / 100 (review from the reader)
- 35KP-1.8 / 120 (review from the reader)
- 35KP-1,8 / 120 (with aperture, reader's review)
- LOMO P-5 F = 90 1: 2 (review from the reader)
- LOMO P-5 F = 100 1: 2 (review from the reader)
- LOMO OKS1-22-1 F = 22 1: 2.8 (review from the reader)
- ЛОМО ОКС1-40-1 40/2.5 (review from the reader)
- LOMO OKS1-300-1 F = 300 1: 3.5 (review from the reader)
- LOMO OKS11-35-1 F = 35 1: 2 (review from the reader)
- LOMO J-53 F = 75 1: 2 (review from the reader)
- LOMO J-54 F = 85 1: 2 (review from the reader)
- LOMO OKP4-80-1 F=80 1:1,8 (review from the reader)
- LOMO OKP8-90-1 F=90 1:2 (review from the reader)
- Tair-41 50/2 (review from the reader)
- KO-120 1: 2,1 120mm
- KO-90 1: 1,9 F = 9cm (review from the reader)
- KO-120M 1: 1.8 F = 120mm (review from the reader)
- KO-120M 120 / 1.8 with a diaphragm and helicoid (review from the reader)
- KO-120 1: 2.1 F = 12cm (review from the reader)
- GOZ “KO-140” 1:2,2 F–14cm (review from the reader)
- MP RSFSR GLAVOCHTEKHPROM PLANT №6 ★ F=7.7cm ★ (review from the reader)
- MSO USSR SSD UPP-1 ★ KHARKIV ★ F-7 CM ★
- Schneider Super Cinelux 70/2
- Meopta Meostigmat 100/1.7
- Projection aplanates: "Petzvali" and "Richter"
The names of the lenses correspond to their exact spelling on the body.
Catalog modern brand lenses 'Zenitar' и 'Helios' can look at this link.
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.
Results
F = 92 1: 2 (lens from the overhead projector Lety-60 / 60M) - like its version '2/92'turned out to be an interesting' creative lens'. You have to get used to working with it for a long time, but with such unusual lenses you get a lot of pleasure while shooting :).
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
So he will give odds to many portrait painters by drawing
And what a pretty milkmaid in the photo?
Very very, very not beautiful of you.
For God's sake, forgive me if I offended anyone! I didn't want to get personal. I just like this look in girls. And this was said with sympathy. Forgive me if I did not convey my thought so well ...
Moderator ban took off.
Thank you!
Sergey, Vy redkostnyj dolbo ... Vobshem Vy vkurse
You would learn to communicate, young man! It doesn’t color you at all.
Conveys cosiness
This is his girlfriend))))))
As our commander liked to say: "In the right hands, any object can become a balalaika."
Very warm shots. The alley is simply fabulous.
I always agreed with that!
The jade rod in the hands of a samurai sitar sings :)
And the photos from Arkady, yes, are excellent! Real Artist!
My glasses are already on their way. Soon I will try them myself.
Cool stuff! Did I understand correctly that there are only 2 lenses inside? For such an old and simple "device" (it is difficult to call it a lens) the picture is very pleasant.
Understood correctly, in the review of version 2/92, which are supported throughout the review links, indicates an optical design for 6 elements in 4 groups (link confirmation). At one time, due to the optical design, I even made a mistake, calling this lens' Helios' in the version review 'zebra'.
Can you specify how the rear lens is on the Lety 92 1: 2 - with a larger bulge outward or inward? According to the diagram from the instructions - a large bulge of the rear lens INSIDE the lens, on my sample - OUT. Now I'm in doubt - either it was originally assembled incorrectly, or I confused it when I went through and cleaned it.
I have a version of this lens without the zebra and is completely black. Marking F-92 1: 2 No. 681279 without the plant logo. I don’t know how the rear lens was originally there, but when you try to install it according to the diagram in the LETI-60M instructions (with a large bulge inward), it rests slightly against the second gluing and the spacer ring inside rattles when shaken. On the LETI-60 diagram, the rear lens generally looks symmetrical. Try to gather the larger bulge inward and shake the lens. If the spacer ring does not rattle inside, then it is assembled correctly. Although not a fact! I read somewhere that it is correct - with a large bulge outward, like the front lens. Which is logical, given that Planar, aka double Gauss, is a symmetrical lens.
Bomb. Unexpectedly nice photos with such a simple lens
The bokeh drawing on some photos reminded me of a triplet scheme. But the contrast is clearly not triplet :)
For some reason, many attribute this lens to triplets.
lies in the collection :) adapter has not yet been fixed :)
Decent glass. Thanks for the interesting review.
Planar diagram in explicit form :)
https://vk.com/albums203674251?z=photo203674251_338846678%2Fphotos203674251
Draws beautifully !!! Interestingly, everything, as you wrote - versions / subversions / subversions, come with an M42 thread?
https://vk.com/albums203674251?z=photo203674251_341141784%2Fphotos203674251
I think it’s clear why the M42-Nikon was chosen :)
Douzhe garni pictures! Clearly convey the brightness of the last warm days :) as if I had a photo of the object itself, thinking that there would be no difference, no contrast! ale yak will show the result, “dancing with a tambourine” bouly not marni!))
Enlightenment is “worn out” on all F-92s I've seen. Perhaps this is due to some peculiarities of the technology ... well, or they were all once cleaned with a dirty handkerchief with cologne.
It is not so difficult to make an F-92 with a diaphragm in the presence of a lathe; Industar-51 works great as a “donor”. You can even fully cram it into the "Vega-12", there will be a super-duper-exclusive medium format lens. The main trick of turning in compliance with the optical axis is to clamp not from the outside, but from the inside (the part is put on the straight jaws of the chuck).
Chemical enlightenment is one of the weakest, after leaving a fingerprint over time, the fingerprint interacts with enlightenment and there enlightenment loses its color
This is IMHO Industar. For they were most often placed on projectors.
Well, what kind of nonsense, in Arcadia everywhere there are links to the previous review where it is indicated that he is a planar, a few comments ago Arkadry wrote the number of lenses and group, plus first of all, I threw off the comments of the photo that was visually disassembled of exactly that, in the review, the lens . Well, here's how you can not respect yourself so that even half do not read.
It was not on Projectors Industriala put. Or all sorts of aplanates, or triplets, or more complex schemes. You will not find Tessar-type lenses among them.
Industars were put on enlargers, do not confuse with projectors.
Wonderful!))) I indulge in such dances with bells…. pushing old Soviet medium format glasses onto modern “numbers”…. and in general, unhurried work is always a break from everyday life)
The glass is not without a twist, but rather for the enthusiast. The color rendition, of course, is lame, but in this photo - https://radojuva.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/sg/leti-60/leti-60-m-lens-92-mm-f-2-sample-11.jpg straight kakosy under the 80s in color. Blows illustration from an old magazine
There is a LOMO version black, with lilac enlightenment and blackening of the ends. I liked the color rendition, sharpness, pattern.
Made a nozzle: 14 blade diaphragm with a hood and a ring for 52 mm filters. Optically, this is certainly not right: place the aperture on the front lens, but it works: the sharpness increases, the depth of field also. She did it for the Cyclops 85, f1.5 (because there is a bit much marriage so far on it), but it will be possible, if necessary, to cling to this.
Cyprus looks great in the pictures of Arkady, if you give him the bottom of the bottle and there probably will work out.
Do not dampen Arkady. The growth portrait is unsuccessful, but the waist one with hands on the neck is really good.
I think few have achieved this result with this lens.
I have been using this projector for a long time!
In terms of drawing, he is just super! Portraits come out with a bang! If interested - I can throw links to VK
http://foto.by/ru/photo/view/19296.html?page=4&sort=date&user=yes
http://foto.by/ru/photo/view/28254.html?page=2&sort=date&user=yes
http://foto.by/ru/photo/view/28369.html?page=2&sort=date&user=yes
and there are many more. Anyone interested - write VK http://vk.com/idolmfd
so projection glasses should be used backwards, the light goes back to front and not vice versa
For shooting, they are used in their normal position.
in connection with the blackouts, with the help of a flashlight there was time to test, and the projection on the wall is much clearer and more beautiful if, on the contrary, it is very clear and without ha and sa
about projector glasses - there the light fries from the inside, and it is put to receive light from the side from which it comes out on the projector, is this normal?
Think about it yourself :)
That's right, Peter the First and the First Oleg say. I once wrote about this in the review of the I96U photo magnifying lens. Both lenses are projection lenses and are designed for the opposite path to that shown here. Correctly put them the other way around, with a large lens to the matrix. But no one can argue with this reasoned, they just grin :-) Arkady, it is better to repeat Oleg's experiment.
... and Peter the Great.
In 92, in the absence of equipment, he shot an advertising poster for one of the Lyubitel plant. On orvochrome ut18. Developed slides with a 36-degree hex developer. So that the temperature does not change, the column was activated. And they took it! You can look at iskander_ulumbekov_0394 Why am I: until you take it off, you won't understand. And only Mr. Stern in Kazan could actually shoot. Once, on a dare, he took off an empty tin can, and developed the film also blindly, covering the tank of his coat. And you are talking about Nikon! That's who you need to talk about! (I'm kidding, of course).
Well, the light goes from the projector to the rear lens, forms a high-quality image on the wall, there is a canvas. and if you turn it over, you get some kind of picture, too, but not so clear.