According provided by Nikon D750 camera many thanks to Alexander Logachev.
For those who do not like to read a lot: Nikon D750 was announced on 11.09.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX and so far is Nikon's best amateur CZK. That's all :)
Nikon D750 BODY
All tabular data can be found on the official website, I don’t want to retell the same parameters once again that wander from one review to another. In this mini-review, I will only leave my own impressions of using the Nikon D750.
I want to warn you that on the official sites nikon.ru, nikon.ua, nikon.kz and even europe-nikon.com, the Nikon D750 is located in the section 'Professional SLR Digital Cameras' (proof image). This information is not true and is a marketing ploy. Or maybe the world just went crazy and the level of 'professional equipment' fell below the plinth.
Unfortunately, my favorite site imaging.nikon.com, although it remains more honest, nevertheless went along the paths indicated by the marketers and deleted the professional / amateur equipment separation directories, leaving only one large list (proof link) Even the vile Pedivikia puts the D750 on a par with D700 (proof link) At the same time, the fact that the Nikon D750 is still an amateur camera (ENTHUSIAST DSLR) can be easily verified on nikonusa.com (proof link) Sneaky marketers generally try to pass off the D750 as the first camera in some new weight category, even adding it to the Nikon NPS lists.
I lead to the fact that sometimes, when choosing a camera, users are guided not only by its capabilities, but also by positioning in a certain segment. Do not follow the lead of marketers, be vigilant!
Nikon D750 - something in between Nikon D610 и Nikon D810... Unfortunately, Nikon D750 is not a direct replacement for the legendary old lady Nikon D700... When Nikon D750 came out, I was very upset that everything in Nikon D750 is very cool, but all this 'beauty' is housed in a body with amateur controls.
Nikon D750 with lens Nikon N AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm 1: 4G ED VR SWM IF Aspherical Nano Crystal Coat
Personally, I absolutely love the Nikon D750. To the question 'Is it worth changing Nikon D700 on the new Nikon D750 'I can definitely answer - it's worth it.
At the same time, Nikon D750 still cannot reach some of the heights conquered by the 'XNUMX':
- D700 It has a full metal case, the D750 has a composite case, with a composite front.
- Minimal excerpt у D700 is 1/8000 sec. against 1/4000 sec. the D750. This difference is often sucked around on the forums, in fact, for real work it has no fundamental value, you will find details on this issue in my article '1 / 4000 vs 1 / 8000'.
- excerpt flash sync D700 makes 1/320 sec., against 1/250 sec. at the D750.
- Nikon D700 has a protective eyepiece shutter (what is she for?).
- the maximum burst speed for the D700 is 8 fps versus 6.5 fps for the D750. This is critical for sequential shooting.
- The D700 can use the MB-D10 butlock with the optional BL-3 cover, which allows the use of large and very capacious EN-EL4 or EN-EL4a batteries from flagship cameras Nikon D3, D3s, D3x, which significantly increases the number of shots taken on a single battery. Nikon D750 can only use standard EN-EL15 batteries in its butblock.
- The D700 can use uncompressed RAW files with full raw data read from the camera's image sensor. The D750 can only use Lossless RAW format for maximum photo quality. Both cameras can use 14-bit color depth. What is it and what it is eaten with you will find in the section '12 bit raw VS 14 bit raw'.
- with the same RAW compression settings (14 bit, lossless compression), the Nikon D700 buffer stores 17 frames, the Nikon D750 buffer only 12 frames.
- Nikon D700 can shoot in TIFF format.
- viewfinder magnification Nikon D700 is 0.72X versus 0.70X for Nikon D750. Although, at the same time, the D750 has 100% frame coverage, compared to 95% for the D700.
- The D700 uses a professional memory card form factor - CF, D750 – SD (SDHC, SDXC). But at the same time, the D750 has two memory card slots.
In all other respects, the Nikon D750 is either better or at the same level as the Nikon D700.
Nikon D750 with lens Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm 1: 1.8G IF SWM
I would also like to dwell on the focus module. Nikon D750 first uses focus module Advanced Multi-CAM 3500FX II, which, at least theoretically, is better than all its predecessors. The operating range of this module is from -3 to +19 EV. At the same time, D4,D4s, D800,D800E, D810, D810a operating range is -2 to +19 EV A good focusing module was severely lacking in cameras Nikon D600, D610 and Nikon Df. On the other hand, it's a pity that Nikon has not yet come up with a really new focusing system and continues to build all its sensors based on the Multi-CAM 3500FX, shown back in 2007.
Working with the D750, I had no complaints about the focusing system. I can't say for sure how much better it is than that of the Nikon D700, but what's no worse is for sure. But when working, it seems that the coverage area of the focus points is slightly reduced compared to the D700.
I was also very pleased that at last “Father Nikon” heard the prayers of his followers and improved the color rendering. Now, an acceptable color in JPEG with the D750 can be obtained immediately, without strong dances with a tambourine. But if you dig into RAW with non-native converters, then everything becomes not so rosy :(. Generally, many people do not like the color in Nikon D750 pictures, especially skin tone (skin color in portraits). Color has its own specifics, which is superimposed on many rumors and myths.
Prices for Nikon D750 in popular stores can look at this link.
Prices for modern Nikon cameras in popular stores can look at this link.
In comments Can I ask you a question on the topic and you will answer, and you can also express your opinion or describe your experience. Many little things for a photo can be found on AliExpress.
You can download RAW source files at this link (71 files in .'NEF 'format, 2 GB) + at this link (40 file in .'NEF 'format, 1 GB). All photos were shot with Nikon D750. All photos in this gallery are on-camera JPEG without processing. Then I'll add more examples.
Nikon D750 with lens Tamron AF 28-75mm f / 2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
When working with the camera, which I visited in the review, I did not find problems with glare, which are a kind of failure in the Nikon D750. But still it’s very disappointing that after the unsuccessful Nikon D600 the company again launched a raw product on the market, fortunately, if there is such a drawback in the D750, then it can be eliminated free of charge (proof link).
The bottom line:
Nikon D750 turned out to be a very nice camera, almost completely balanced camera, which was very important after a long absence of replacement for the D700. I can't say the D750 is a complete replacement for the Nikon D700, but the D750 itself is a very attractive camera.
If don't know which camera and lens to choose, then my article will help with this - Which Nikon amateur DSLR camera and lens to choose?
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
great option, soni R7 just lost all meaning.
It is strange to see mostly negative comments on the generally pleasant announcement.
It feels like everyone wants absolutely all the existing buns + all the technical innovations that will come up in a couple of three years to be in the camera right now, so that in spirit and will to win it would be cooler than the 300s and 700 combined, and it would be nice to have a price tag see not much different from ... (substitute your permissible level, but up to 2k dollars).
I haven’t read all the comments, but I’m sure that there should be (or already is) a funny comment like: "crap, there are auto-modes, which means this is not for the pros"
fig of you cassandra.
I don’t pretend to be a title. I just heard such a comment about the D600 from a “professional” and suggested something similar. Again, I didn't expect to see so many negative reviews. Widespread pessimism and indignation.
Rather disappointment. We expected to see the d700 wearer, but got the modernized d610. Even Nikon himself modestly transferred this model to the ranks of the amateur ...
I don’t understand this. What is the actual disappointment?
The camera was given a new percentage and an exposure meter from the oldest, a quite interesting sensitivity range (it would be interesting to see the real working values), albeit a limited one, but a rotary screen, quite good shooting speed, normal video and control over its shooting.
What was better in its predecessor? Fast shutter speed and flash sync, round eyecup and “Take your weight from your hand” status ???
I wrote about the shutter speed 1/8000 above, I don’t even see the point of writing about the speed of synchronization with the flash. The status of the 700-ki and the loyalty of its users are understandable beyond doubt, but it’s worth recalling that there wasn’t everything going smoothly and the new camera certainly took more than one step forward.
Perhaps the only thing that causes concern for me is the crowded focus points. Of course it's difficult to judge, but as I understand it, it will be scattered a little wider than in d600 / 610, which is not very good. It makes little sense in 51 points if they take up a quarter of a frame.
Your opinion is understandable, marketers are not in vain eating their bread.
1/4000 with a light fix in the afternoon is not enough, shooting with light glass 1,4 in the summer is in question.
re: Anatoly
And here are the marketers? I just dryly evaluate the numbers in the official specifications and draw preliminary conclusions that the camera is very attractive and has a number of interesting points.
Of course, there are artificial limitations that we are observing now and then for differentiating models by classes and directions (such a disaster is not only in the photo world) and it is definitely worth referring to their minuses, but there are clearly no reasons to hang up the mirrors for the camera just announced, as well as there is no reason to moan about the fact that Nikon is no longer a cake, I am leaving and slamming the door, and we were waiting (what was actually waiting for?). I repeat again about the shutter speed: there is ISO 50, that is, in fact, we get the same amount of light as on the D700 with ISO 100 and shutter speed 1/8000. If with such a pair of light is not enough, please give examples (a request without a banter), but then it means that all the crop are also not designed for such tasks (correct if you made a mistake).
Smart people whine and yell, inflated from their own greatness. Normal photographers will wait a bit until the price bites, they buy this Nikon and they will be happy.
that's exactly the "photographers" although I will apologize if I touched a certain graph, because we will also be cheaper thanks to you "photographers" PS got the comments PRICE is expensive !!!
Yeah, smart guys ... Yeah, photographers ... Well, you are funny :)
A possible beginning of the article could look like this - Nikon originally celebrated the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks by announcing another boring camera ...
Although I personally do not care deeply. Is that laughing what grief people have. :) .... Although no - it is a sin to laugh at sick people.
great camera, no competitors.
Vanya, you provided a fun evening for today :)
Yes, I have fun den, but if the case, then someone does not like except the price ?!
Ivan, read my comments above, I don't want to repeat myself. But, everything is bad, sorry ...
I looked specifically what I do not like
Great Ivan - no competitors :)
call with what to compare
am go write poetry
Ivan - well, why are you doing that? You are being given compliments here, but you are like that. It's not good dear.
I answered for a long time) do not be smart. g
I waited for you to form a thought into symbols. Apart. In three posts.
Please tell me - have you seen the Nikon D750 tests? What is your comparison with other cameras based on?
http://cs14107.vk.me/c540105/v540105113/25e8f/ZtY2RX-6fOg.jpg
ahh ... specs ... no - it doesn't fit. I asked about tests. I'm sure that the camera will show quite acceptable results, but this is more of an empirical conclusion. I was interested in your comparison with “soni R7”, which, by the way, I have never heard of.
when compared with sony a 7, I meant the class of the camera and the "sizes" they are comparable
Yes? it is unlikely that you are confusing something - they are not comparable neither in class, nor in size and weight.
Yes, Nikon is a little bigger, but a rotary screen and so on. Sony systematically rejects the optical viewfinder and mirror, so the A7 / A7R / A7S series is unlikely to interest Nikon fans. And the problem of the lack of high-end optics for Sony is still quite acute. So the D750 has an unoccupied niche and a margin of time.
The conversation is not about that. The fact that you are comparing with Sony A7 - well, health - who will forbid you? If for you these cameras are somewhere comparable - these are your problems, excuse me ... Yeah, well, well, everyone expected something like the upgraded D700, but a very strange (NOT BAD !!!) hybrid of the D600 / 610 and D800 / hybrid came out. 810 - and what it is and for whom is not entirely clear. Nikon has one mistake here - an oversaturated lineup of full-frame cameras.
Where is the review of your favorite i6 movie camera?
Nokon worries me a little, and lately canon. It's better to take old men or professional 1d ...
In my opinion, nikon and kenon are the same in marketing moves. About the camera: and there is a buyer on it! Not the main thing to shoot, the main thing is how. Arkady, what do you think Rey, the camera came up?
Rei just bans silently, not takes off. She would give a new Eve!
Waiting for new episodes! Eve at number 00
The camera can be recognized by amateur photographers. Good performance characteristics, universal FF camera segment, reasonable price.
What is very alarming - Nikon still does not release ANYTHING new. Another shifting of modules in a different combination ... The camera was too late to enter the market - a lot of people switched to other systems. In fact, the Camera should have been released instead of DF (another epic fail), or better, instead of D600.
People are outraged that for an amateur camera they ask prof. money. And they are trying to make fools out of them tosuya marking models. Something like this…
The discussion of the camera, which no one has ever seen before, is simply surprising.
The debate is just like today in politics, some kind of nonsense turns out, chesslovo ..
At the same time, the majority is upset by the number of the camera, and not its properties (in fact, no one knows them). If she had been D620 or D650, the reviews would have been different ..
http://www.kenrockwell.com Already, too, its 5 cents, or rather 5 cents about it inserted.
And what can I do? Boring, oseen - it's time to wang)))
Greetings!
As for me - a very interesting thing. The 700th did not suit because of the impossibility of filming a video.
I shot earlier at 5100 - I fell in love with a wonderful rotating screen, which allows incredible angles. I switched to 7100 - everything is fine, only the buffer is too small, and there is not enough swivel screen. Its 24 megapixel with a good lens works wonders. Definitely: more good than bad (for those who make money by shooting - an increase in detail, but more requirements for a computer :))
Of course, the heir to 700 did not work here, anyway. one FINDER what it cost !!
And talking about a subject in absentia is sheer speculation and delusion. As soon as it appears in the salons - I'll go and feel, maybe that's what we can do with him. Thanks.
Tin.
Canon makes the announcement of a new professional camera on the Crop 7D Mark 2, and Nikon releases a new full-frame DSLR. I am glad that the matrix is not overloaded with megapixels. 24 megapixels in full frame, against 36 for the D800.
Roman, in 99,9% of cases and 24 above the roof.
I would love to buy a full-frame camera with 10-12 MP so that it would be faster, but it would not require expensive modern lenses such as high resolution.
And to release crop, it seems to me, is no longer interesting. I can of course be mistaken, but the real cost of crop and FF matrices is almost the same, the difference is minimal. I am waiting for the first to announce the complete cessation of the production of cameras with crop factor, due to their irrelevance and the proposal of FF at the price of crop.
You will be surprised, but, I will tell you the terrible truth - it's not about interest, but about profitability / not profitability. If this is hard for you, you can simply compare the small sensor compact camera market to the full frame camera market. Moreover, in addition to purely economic reasons, there are still a bunch of technical and production reasons to produce something less than the so-called. Fullframe. Well, if you are sure that you only need a full-frame camera for a good shot, then you can forget what you have read up to this point.
PS: It seems that there is an article on joyfulness that compares all + and - “full” frame and “crop” - I recommend finding and taking communion.
On the same Radozhiv there is the author’s claim that crop for development is a dead end :)
If matrices are approximately equal in cost (I don’t know for sure), then what to do with optics? I myself would have switched to FF long ago if it had not been for the price of glass, the entire fleet of which I would have to replace.
Sergei, if you can still argue about the cost of matrices, then about lenses definitely not. Until 2000, the very concept of a crop lens did not exist and all lenses were FF by default. And EXCLUSIVELY for the sake of cutting down more dough for new crop cameras, they "invented" some "crop lenses". And the difference in crop and FF lenses is in a few extra millimeters of glass to cover the FF matrix of 36 × 24 mm. It is clear that in absolute terms, these extra mm cost money, but the difference is scanty and hardly noticeable.
Maybe. But on sale, the price difference between DX and FF lenses is overwhelming. It is such that the tempted lover would not be tempted to overpay a bit and buy glass, which will later be suitable for a full frame. It is necessary to overpay twice. It also seems to me a swindle.
Sergei, it seems to me that you are exaggerating about "You need to overpay twice." I can only agree that for a full frame there are less budgetary and at the same time modern lenses like 18-55mm f / 3.5-5.6G, 18-105mm f / 3.5-5.6G.
Still, you want a zoom - buy a used 28-105mm f / 3.5-4.5D for a penny, you want a fixed - 35mm f / 2d, 50mm f / 1.8d (g), 85mm f / 1.8d (g) - all this is quite available. It's the same with telezoom - the crop Nikon 55-300 costs 30% less than the comparable Tamron 70-300 for a full frame. And so on.
Duc such a camera already exists. Canon 5d. I put any trashy glass on it and get a decent result :) It's a pity there is no life-view and the percentage is rather weak. Otherwise, it's an ideal budget ff.
Sony A7s and you can forget about a tripod
I looked at the design and went nuts, one to one copy of the 7100, only one "info" button on the back is located a little differently. I think if I had picked up 750, I probably would not even have noticed the difference.
The same weight? if so, then do not notice the difference.
Yes, and where does the weight, you might think someone uses carcasses without a lens, and the glasses weigh differently.
So I also wanted to develop the idea that you expressed.
—
In my opinion, the D750 is just the most similar to the evolutionary FX continuation of the D7100. And if we evaluate it from this point of view, we see almost the same body, the same ergonomics, while many of the camera's characteristics have risen a step higher (except for the repeatedly announced shutter 1/4000 and synchronization with the flash at 1/200):
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d7100/spec.htm
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d750/spec.htm.
—
In general, the D7000 and D7100 are considered quite successful models, they have collected a lot of good reviews at the time of release and have found many owners. So these owners often expressed that sooner or later they would like to go to full frame. Some, who are very carefully planning for the future, even selected an optics park for reasons of “after the crop I will take it with me to the FF”. However, this also applies to enthusiasts with other models (D90, five thousandth series, etc.).
—
I think for the above people, the D750 is the easiest way to “jump off the crop”.
Have you used the D7000 and D7100? Ideal option: a full frame in almost the same body (well, a little heavier)!
Do you like to shoot video, use the rotary screen, wi-fi (and what else did we cram into the basic equipment of new models there)? Well, do not deny yourself anything!
—
The theory of the evolutionary development of the D7100 can somehow explain the first number "7" in "750".
—
Of course, the owners of the D300 and D700, who perceive the DSLR as a camera (and not a multimedia combine), are accustomed to other ergonomics, to the fact that most functions can always be found under their fingers, turning some two-handed "combo", will not forgive Nikon no steps back (again, 1/4000, 1/200 ...) or unnecessary, unnecessary functions, for which they require an additional fee.
But this camera is clearly not for them. I just really wanted it to be for them. And “750” seems to be hinting, but… no… wrong number… again old men will have to wait for replacement.
—
PS All this is 100% IMHO
the size of the camera, by the way, is even a little smaller than the D600 / 610 :) finally added exposure metering in high light (without overexposure). Although the AF is steep, the AF points are made more boring than the D810, a fly in the ointment, like 1/4000. Nikon planted the same, as always recently.
cool promotional videos (after watching the hotstsa buy in earnest):
http://vimeo.com/105934767
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/dslr-cameras/D750.html#!lightbox/media=/Video/D750_product-tour_01_en.mp4
of. full sizes: http://www.nikon-image.com/products/slr/lineup/d750/sample.html
But somewhere, by the way, is there a viewfinder rendering with focus points?
here there is a samopal: http://forum.ixbt.com/post.cgi?text=%CD%E0%EB%EE%E6%E8%EB+%F2%EE%F7%EA%E8+%C4800&user=&date=&date_days=29&date1_d=18&date1_m=8&date1_y=2014&date2_d=15&date2_m=9&date2_y=2014&posts=&pages=&id=print%3A20%3A031129
Mmdya…. I'll go take a closer look at the 7100, perhaps.
Thank you.
If Nikon did SRAW at 16mp. with new firmware for d800, with a rate of fire increase of at least 8k / s. and the d800 is now selling a new one in Kiev for $ 2250, then the rest of the cameras would fade.
That’s all we can, obscure someone else’s own empty space against the background of the Japanese, but how many smart people !!!!! Maybe you should at least be shy in expressions and show respect to those who deserve it !!!
And according to the review, a perfectly sane camera will definitely find its buyer, in order to reduce it, it’s generally beautiful. I have a D700, the camera is good, but each frame through f.sh. dd not enough, high is rustling with dirty shadows, rubber bands are swollen, D800-810, definitely not a replacement, D600-610, some kind of toy, let's see how the D750 shows itself in life. I was personally pleased with the extension of ISO 100-12.500, it seems that if ISO 1.000-2.000, there will be no noise, it will be quite working, that's good! Swivel screen, it's convenient! Focus on the screen, from time to time, is also convenient for relaxing your eyes! Two memory cards are also good! Good Akum! Focus points, not really, but personally, I use, in 90% of the central. Exposure 1/4000, not good, of course, but in the studio, did not apply, basically it is needed, in the sun, with an open aperture. Here's a sync shutter speed of 1/200 versus 1/250, about shooting with flashlights, that's a minus, but fans will probably not notice. And I’m 1/250, it’s not enough, it would be 1/500, it would be good.)))) It’s too early to blame the camera, to look at the ravas, and even better, to compare with the D700 ravas, and if there is an increase in the quality of the picture, then and there will be happiness to all, middling lovers. My opinion is subjective, I, too, have been waiting for a long time, what’s next, after the D700, there was even a hysteria, a system change, the truth passed, but I still want to improve the quality of the picture, dd, shadow, detail. And yes, I’m an amateur photographer, I’m shooting for the soul, I don’t earn money with this.
Your D700 for repairs or for a photography school ...
I don’t have such claims to my 700ke, until I see a replacement for it,
and with this approach of the office to updating photographic equipment, I’ll shoot with a 700k to the stop.
Hmm !!! Nikon tramples back!
+1000. Something wrong with a guy with seven hundred
))) Are you talking about me? And what can I do with my 700ka? I really don’t have enough d, d, and shadows on ISO 1 / 1000-1 / 2000, noisy and dirty, when I shoot in my home studio, the light from the window, but it's a bit dark for me) ISO has to be lifted up so that the shutter speed is as good as possible less.
And again, AF from the crop as in the D600, the characteristics are artificially overwhelmed ????? ... At such a price, D800E is profitable to buy…. And the most incomprehensible THIS is the fastening of the bayonet to the plastic case with small five self-tapping screws .... The back of the case is iron, the front plastic .... HERE is the SOAP. Let's look at the picture on the test, I will not be happy if it is the same as in the D810 horror ..
We will look here http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM on a red cloth, the blur will immediately be clear. (noise)
Nikon has convulsions !!!!!
And it's a pity, the kenon will not have a competitor, and it will also fall under the plinth….
Where the world is heading !!!!!
we need innovations ... ... feed the same, just not a lot of expensive.
What did you expect?
progress does not stand still. but for the result of technological progress to be accessible to the masses, not a little time will pass. therefore, now we can be satisfied only with external improvements, and not with a coordinated increase in productivity.
by the way, let Moore’s law also work, but this is supported by not small costs that affect the final result in the form of a piece of iron.
theoretically, it’s quite a universal camera, in which shooting video was not a secondary role (aperture control, live view autofocus, rotary screen). smaller RAV size, and faster shooting speed than D600 / 800.
and at first glance, the 750 is more versatile than the D800 in video and photography.
1/8000 800ki masses do not need.
the price of 750 rubles is still slightly higher. yes .. the viewfinder is not the same ...
Of the D800 and D750, I would give priority to the D750.
to the filthy dancer, I ...
It seems to me that the marketers were a little mistaken when releasing Nikon D600 \ 610, and somehow it's not clever to update the name every year. And they decided to spoil the name of the glorious D700. Although my opinion is that now everything that is produced without a soul, there is no zest that was in the old cameras, take the D200, D90, D300 \ 300s, D7000, D700ku finally, well, not that. There is no soul in them, the former owner of the D600 himself (stole) now the D200 - and this camera has a soul, you always want to take it in your hands, take pictures without stopping, but 600tk and super quality of a full frame (I still can't measure it with a crop). But she was like a toy. And about Canon I will say, they have the same joke, take 450D, 550d, 60d, 70d, these are real cameras, and now take the super mega duper 6d, which is so special about it, on the other hand, we went to photograph mountains, for one day, I forgot a tripod, but he doesn't have, well, they built a mini tripod out of stones, he puts his 6D on the stones, does not throw it, does not rub it against the stones, but simply puts it neatly, takes about 10 pictures using a WiFi and a phone, and picks it up. And you know what, the whole camera is scratched from the fact that it just stood on the stones. I beat my D200 and the sea both on stones and on a tree, but at least she could. And 6D in my life would not buy, especially for almost $ 2000, like. And you also write about the touch screen, that's cool, wow. I'm afraid to imagine what will happen to the camera after one trip, this is not a camera, this is a “TP toy” like everything that is done now :(
It is a pity that with cameras as well as with cars, there is no soul, before each car was unique, with its own zest, and now, that, one junk.
Do not be offended if you offended someone, did not want to, I am for world peace :)))))
6d gives drop dead high ISO. And her case is not protected due to positioning as an amateur ff. Of course, the d200 is stronger, but at 400, it is already quite noisy. And 6d and on ISO for 2000 does not make noise.
One gets the impression that in the near future we should expect 610 s and 750 s, both without low-pass filters.
You still forgot about the 760, which, for example, will not fall off the rotary screen, or still there will be a shutter speed of 1/8000 so that people do not ache, or firmware bugs will be fixed.
Well, and then it will be logical to remove the low-pass filter :)
Explain dear, and for what purposes you personally need an excerpt of 1/8000
So I don't really need it, it also clearly says: "So that the people do not whine."
That's where the lair of the Nikonists is. A small offtopic I think Rei will not be angry http://yandex.ua/video/search?text=беседы%20на%20фотокухне%20видео&path=wizard&filmId=qxIys4bQUXI&fiw=0.00893191 sincerely talking
sincerely)