According provided by Nikon D750 camera many thanks to Alexander Logachev.
For those who do not like to read a lot: Nikon D750 was announced on 11.09.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX and so far is Nikon's best amateur CZK. That's all :)
Nikon D750 BODY
All tabular data can be found on the official website, I don’t want to retell the same parameters once again that wander from one review to another. In this mini-review, I will only leave my own impressions of using the Nikon D750.
I want to warn you that on the official sites nikon.ru, nikon.ua, nikon.kz and even europe-nikon.com, the Nikon D750 is located in the section 'Professional SLR Digital Cameras' (proof image). This information is not true and is a marketing ploy. Or maybe the world just went crazy and the level of 'professional equipment' fell below the plinth.
Unfortunately, my favorite site imaging.nikon.com, although it remains more honest, nevertheless went along the paths indicated by the marketers and deleted the professional / amateur equipment separation directories, leaving only one large list (proof link) Even the vile Pedivikia puts the D750 on a par with D700 (proof link) At the same time, the fact that the Nikon D750 is still an amateur camera (ENTHUSIAST DSLR) can be easily verified on nikonusa.com (proof link) Sneaky marketers generally try to pass off the D750 as the first camera in some new weight category, even adding it to the Nikon NPS lists.
I lead to the fact that sometimes, when choosing a camera, users are guided not only by its capabilities, but also by positioning in a certain segment. Do not follow the lead of marketers, be vigilant!
Nikon D750 - something in between Nikon D610 и Nikon D810... Unfortunately, Nikon D750 is not a direct replacement for the legendary old lady Nikon D700... When Nikon D750 came out, I was very upset that everything in Nikon D750 is very cool, but all this 'beauty' is housed in a body with amateur controls.
Nikon D750 with lens Nikon N AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm 1: 4G ED VR SWM IF Aspherical Nano Crystal Coat
Personally, I absolutely love the Nikon D750. To the question 'Is it worth changing Nikon D700 on the new Nikon D750 'I can definitely answer - it's worth it.
At the same time, Nikon D750 still cannot reach some of the heights conquered by the 'XNUMX':
- D700 It has a full metal case, the D750 has a composite case, with a composite front.
- Minimal excerpt у D700 is 1/8000 sec. against 1/4000 sec. the D750. This difference is often sucked around on the forums, in fact, for real work it has no fundamental value, you will find details on this issue in my article '1 / 4000 vs 1 / 8000'.
- excerpt flash sync D700 makes 1/320 sec., against 1/250 sec. at the D750.
- Nikon D700 has a protective eyepiece shutter (what is she for?).
- the maximum burst speed for the D700 is 8 fps versus 6.5 fps for the D750. This is critical for sequential shooting.
- The D700 can use the MB-D10 butlock with the optional BL-3 cover, which allows the use of large and very capacious EN-EL4 or EN-EL4a batteries from flagship cameras Nikon D3, D3s, D3x, which significantly increases the number of shots taken on a single battery. Nikon D750 can only use standard EN-EL15 batteries in its butblock.
- The D700 can use uncompressed RAW files with full raw data read from the camera's image sensor. The D750 can only use Lossless RAW format for maximum photo quality. Both cameras can use 14-bit color depth. What is it and what it is eaten with you will find in the section '12 bit raw VS 14 bit raw'.
- with the same RAW compression settings (14 bit, lossless compression), the Nikon D700 buffer stores 17 frames, the Nikon D750 buffer only 12 frames.
- Nikon D700 can shoot in TIFF format.
- viewfinder magnification Nikon D700 is 0.72X versus 0.70X for Nikon D750. Although, at the same time, the D750 has 100% frame coverage, compared to 95% for the D700.
- The D700 uses a professional memory card form factor - CF, D750 – SD (SDHC, SDXC). But at the same time, the D750 has two memory card slots.
In all other respects, the Nikon D750 is either better or at the same level as the Nikon D700.
Nikon D750 with lens Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm 1: 1.8G IF SWM
I would also like to dwell on the focus module. Nikon D750 first uses focus module Advanced Multi-CAM 3500FX II, which, at least theoretically, is better than all its predecessors. The operating range of this module is from -3 to +19 EV. At the same time, D4,D4s, D800,D800E, D810, D810a operating range is -2 to +19 EV A good focusing module was severely lacking in cameras Nikon D600, D610 and Nikon Df. On the other hand, it's a pity that Nikon has not yet come up with a really new focusing system and continues to build all its sensors based on the Multi-CAM 3500FX, shown back in 2007.
Working with the D750, I had no complaints about the focusing system. I can't say for sure how much better it is than that of the Nikon D700, but what's no worse is for sure. But when working, it seems that the coverage area of the focus points is slightly reduced compared to the D700.
I was also very pleased that at last “Father Nikon” heard the prayers of his followers and improved the color rendering. Now, an acceptable color in JPEG with the D750 can be obtained immediately, without strong dances with a tambourine. But if you dig into RAW with non-native converters, then everything becomes not so rosy :(. Generally, many people do not like the color in Nikon D750 pictures, especially skin tone (skin color in portraits). Color has its own specifics, which is superimposed on many rumors and myths.
Prices for Nikon D750 in popular stores can look at this link.
Prices for modern Nikon cameras in popular stores can look at this link.
In comments Can I ask you a question on the topic and you will answer, and you can also express your opinion or describe your experience. Many little things for a photo can be found on AliExpress.
You can download RAW source files at this link (71 files in .'NEF 'format, 2 GB) + at this link (40 file in .'NEF 'format, 1 GB). All photos were shot with Nikon D750. All photos in this gallery are on-camera JPEG without processing. Then I'll add more examples.
Nikon D750 with lens Tamron AF 28-75mm f / 2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
When working with the camera, which I visited in the review, I did not find problems with glare, which are a kind of failure in the Nikon D750. But still it’s very disappointing that after the unsuccessful Nikon D600 the company again launched a raw product on the market, fortunately, if there is such a drawback in the D750, then it can be eliminated free of charge (proof link).
The bottom line:
Nikon D750 turned out to be a very nice camera, almost completely balanced camera, which was very important after a long absence of replacement for the D700. I can't say the D750 is a complete replacement for the Nikon D700, but the D750 itself is a very attractive camera.
If don't know which camera and lens to choose, then my article will help with this - Which Nikon amateur DSLR camera and lens to choose?
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
I decided: I bought a D 750. For a beginner, a serious decision.
It seems like a plague. He photographs himself.
With a Sigma AF 150-600mm lens, first photo
Alex If you are a beginner why such a long lens? You won't find plots. Take 50mm and don't listen to anyone. And sell this one, though, who will buy it ... Vybrost.
If you throw, then throw in my direction.
Alex! do not answer my question, a little higher from: "Sergei 06.02.2016/19/37 at XNUMX:XNUMX" In advance ATP.
I wish you all good health! I want to go to the full frame, in particular on the Nikon D750. I read that the first batch was defective and was "treated" in the SC "for free, that is. for free. ”Question: How to determine from which batch the carcass, by number (after such and such has already been fixed), by release date (after such and such a date is already a normal camera)? Or maybe by some other parameters? Who knows, tell me please do not want to drag the carcass through the workshops. I will be very grateful for any information.
if you are now, then most likely you will not stumble upon children's camera glitches ... well, no one is immune from an ordinary marriage. I took mine in the spring of 2015 and at that time it was believed that the cameras were already moving without these glitches. and yet - do not get fooled by low prices (such as a 30-40% discount) and, as it were, a new camera ... there is such crap and sellers as a restored camera, i.e. the same defect returned to the manufacturer, repaired ... the sign is the black dot of the marker in the tripod mount on the camera.
Thank you very much. I almost got it. I just don’t understand why to sell a new camera at a discount of 30-40%? Even if the seller returned the camera for revision, restored it, put a black mark on it, how will I know about it ?! Loses my legitimate ones at a discount?! Maybe I don’t know something? Maybe after the restoration the company is obliged to do a mark on the restoration somewhere, or something else? Enlighten me, please!
Yes, do not worry about this. just don't mess with unreliable sellers. take the camera from an authorized seller with a full guarantee and at a market price.
Got it. Thank you. Indeed, why bother to hammer in the skull too much ... Thank you, Andrey.
Yes, not at all. successful shopping for you !!! :)
I also remembered - when I bought it myself, I shoveled a bunch of information, seemingly buggy cameras were listed in batches released before November 2014.
yeah in November 2015 only I tried to buy this g ... after two returns, I decided not to play with fate anymore
By the way, one of the well-known dealers of mobile gadgets has such "refurbished" iPhones from the office. a legend of a type from the states, renewed, like a second hand ... and in fact, returned and restored marriage .... and you, Ukrainians and others - hawai and rejoice at a buggy balalaika for 12k ...
And the reasons for the return?
another marriage in the long-suffering D750
New Nikon D750 ERR shutter issue reported online
http://nikonrumors.com/2016/04/26/new-nikon-d750-err-shutter-issue-reported-online.aspx/
new marriage in the long-suffering D750 - details on nikonrumors from April 26, with examples of photos and videos
New Nikon D750 ERR shutter issue reported online
Hello Arkady!
I received a lot of useful and worthy advice from you, thank you! Help out again ...
Until the last moment, my children and I had three Nikon cameras: my Df and 800, in children 610.
The company donated the D750, for us it's fat to have so many carcasses. We are not professionals (everything is for the soul, not for business), but, so to speak, active amateurs. But now we have grown accustomed to our cameras, and we still have to part with one of them. Broke my head, but I can't make decisions on my own with which one. Technically, Df is the most compromise - expensive but technically weaker than the rest. But it is more for the soul - children tend to sell it, and I think D800. Give your wise and reasonable answer. Thank in advance!
Sell 610, theoretically it is the weakest.
I ordered 750 for tomorrow, I think the difference in 20tyr from 610 is worth it.
Arkady, I have a question for you and the rest of the owners: are you sure that the d750 has a smoothing filter?
It seems to me that he is not there in the classical sense. That is, the situation is the same as with the d800e, which did not have a smoothing filter, as everyone thought, but it turned out that it actually was there, but some technology was applied in which its presence does not affect the detail of the image . Ie I suspect that the d750 has the same story. My theory is proved by the results of tests in DRL http://www.dxomark.com/lenses/mounted_on-Nikon_D750-975/launched-between-1987-and-2016/mount_type-Nikon_F_FX/focal-from-20-to-200/sensor_brand-Nikon#hideAdvancedOptions=false&viewMode=list&yDataType=rankDxo theoretically, it is impossible to resolve all MP matrices in the presence of a classical smoothing filter, but here we see that top-end lenses resolve the entire matrix completely.
I ask you to give a refutation of my guesses or confirmation. Unfortunately, in the era of marketing, it is very difficult to find real Old on the Internet.
look at the test photos. Sharpness is at nine !!! Is this a sharp camera ?? Do not be weird. A friend replaced the d7100 with the d750 and was disappointed. SOAP. Who has normal pictures (NEF) with sharpness on the top three ?? Take a look at the mail boris65@list.ru. Thank you.
And for some reason no one wrote about one drawback of the NIKON D750: all the raves constantly give off a pinkish tint (magenta). I struggle with it like that. After converting to LIGHTROOM in Photoshop, I automatically lower the red channel curve for all the photos, and in the “selective color correction in red” filter I slightly reduce the saturation of magenta. Photos become clear and clean, no piglets.
pig skinton. confession of a nikonist. sarcasm. please do not take to heart
“Do not take it to heart” - Nikonists will not read it, because all together, day and night, they correct the skin tone in Lightroom ...
BOOTS have their own troubles !!!
Of course have. For example, in the form of plastic lens mounts and the absence of lens hoods, complete with some lenses. For a fifty dollars just not long ago, two aperture blades were added at all 5. However, getting choked
I struggle with it like this - I don't buy d750
In vain, THE CAMERA IS GREAT !!!
not intentionally.
+100500 you just need to have smooth pens
Here he is!
Man hands-rails))
yes, that's for sure, we met - hands rails and a fighter with the purchase of a d750 with a heel around his neck :)))
replies
Above they wrote: "And when you look at your friends or relatives' photos of the wedding - and they are all the same, only the faces are different!" As a wedding photographer, I look at weddings - and they are all the same, only their faces are different. Damn, such connoisseurs of real PHOTO ARTISTS and hayushi weddings amaze ... .. bombiles running .... Blah, and when their children are going to get married, such connoisseurs of the couple do not go to their favorite photographers, but look for a wedding man and do not tell him about the fact that he is not a professional, since he does not take pictures of sharks on the edge of a volcano during hostilities. And they sit and whine that all the money has been spent on grub and I would like to withdraw it for $ 200 as for $ 2000. My colleagues, wedding photographers, no one pretends to be great hobbyists, we just try to do our job with high quality, often embellishing reality.
They wrote above: “If you work on a photo for several hours, this is no longer a photo”. If only they could explain why, why…. In my practice, it happened that on one shot, for example a piece of jewelry, I had to work for more than 5 hours! Not minutes. And not at all because it was poorly filmed.
do not confuse clipping, correction of reflexes and other things on a technical subject photo with a statement about some kind of art photo.
Yesterday I talked with our wedding bombers, and so three of them had 750 already got rid of them (one of them died after reporting in the rain - and two others say that they are extremely dissatisfied with the color (unnatural) and especially the skin with the skin tone (ideally not to straighten in any editor)
The Almighty saved me from acquiring this Chinese miracle! Thank God !
What a horror!
Nascet skintona bred ponyi, otlicinaya kamera a liubiteli bred nesti naidetsa mnogo!
Good day! Arkady, tell me please, I choose between d750 and d810, if you select the first unit, you can also buy a decent lens. I’m tormented by this))) But I read a lot of reviews, including yours, many agree that this is an amateur camera, albeit a full-frame one. And the price is probably too high for the d750 due to the course. I plan to shoot everything, portraits, landscape, including short videos. The camera is needed for creative activities, but who knows, it may be necessary to take pictures to order, that is, the quality should be at the level of professional shots. I would be grateful for your recommendations.
You answered yourself. 750 will be enough, even more than, and the quality at the level of professional shots depends on hands and optics. If you wish, you can squeeze it from Nikon d100. The d7100, for example, may well suit your requests. Or even d610, proceed from what kind of optics you want to buy, it will give more sense ... than a super-expensive pro-phone))))
beritk 610 and do not think, kindly remember two years later;)
I would still take d810 for growth.
Thank you, all three cameras will be growing, because filmed only on d80. There is still the opportunity to buy used Kenon 5d Mark 3 for little money, but it is embarrassing that the used system is different, I don’t want to jump like that.
kindest evening to all! sw. Lady Natalya, if you have, in principle, a question between 750 and 810, then it is better to look towards the choice of 750-610. there the wheels are the same. and then, after all, local pros will tell you, the question itself is not correct - the wheels of the twist are different, from different leagues - semi-profFuflo and ... uuuuuu pro twist on 810 ... and immediately shnyaga - those who look towards 810 do not ask for advice themselves , they say, with a mustache :)
I will explain the skepticism about local experts, everything is subjective. I have 750, and all the rubbish that is written here in the negative addressed to 750 is also ambiguous. someone was waiting for the continuation of 700 and was disappointed in the twist and the non-circular viewfinder at 750, someone raves about the massive drain on the bargaining. sites 750 and other shnyagi ... just read them !! these are not opuses - these are masterpieces (lynx - please enter the arena).
on the case - 610 + smart optics.
Good to you too :) I have no skepticism about 750, I read everything. I chose my first camera almost 10 years ago and very carefully, because I knew that for a long time. Now I want to switch to ff, but so as not to salivate later looking at other cameras with higher functionality. Of course, it all depends on the hands too, but the fact that there are twists and turns, I do not take into account at all. What matters is the result, the picture, and preferably less fiddling with processing ...
and what does not suit you in the eighties, if you need to leave it then?
I think I grew up with her. And then, as it’s not funny, I need to shoot some videos, I work with a small brand of clothes, I want to make videos small, but attractive))) I don’t want to buy a separate video camera.
If the lens park is not recruited with a bunch of tops and is not on the secondary - go to Canon.
650D or the third mark. or 6d.
Iil at all on mirrorless - Sony (A5100 A6000) or Fuji (ht10, or wait for X-t2)
With the new Nikon you are likely to be tormented after eighty if you are used to its colors and so on.
If the above is a little expensive, find a canon 100d. It would be better to get it with good full-length lenses - something like 70-210 / 4 and a zoom or fix for a wide angle
Lynx, thanks for the recommendation!
Good day!
I'm not a pro. Bought a Nikon d750. I read reviews here and on other sites. My opinion about the camera is very positive. A lot of nonsense here is written about Nikon. Especially astonishing are reports of a skiton. So gentlemen, adjust the correct white balance. And you will be happy.
I took pictures on black and white film. Found and color. He didn’t show and print himself in laboratories.
If we discard marketers Nikon and our non-professional nonsense in the comments, the camera is excellent. Yes, it’s possible that Canon in the BB machine sets it correctly and he has a very good jeep. Perhaps in the post-processing, Canon itself somehow corrects the BB. I do not argue.
By the way, remembering myself, after a break in hobby photography. And having purchased the D7100, I spat for a month trying to get a normal jeep. I reread the forums from cover to cover. And I wanted to write the same thing that many people write here…. It turned out to be necessary to read and read the instructions ... She is fat, the truth) The only thing that comes to mind is that on Kaenon the BB works in the machine more accurately. And the pros spend less time post-processing. But my lover has nowhere to rush.
So take the camera if funds allow. If not, then I think the D5500 or D7100 is the most it will be! As I play enough with this camera, I'll probably take Sonya FF which one. Due to its small size.
I must write that this is my personal opinion. I will not engage in polemics. Respectfully to the readers and site owner!
Colleagues, does the 750 accept old non-autofocus glasses, how does the 700 feel them without problems? This is critical for me.
Thank you.
Yes. Details here и here.
Good day everyone! Dear Arkady, I confess, I'm not a pro. But over the years, your site has become a reference book for me, so your opinion and the opinion of colleagues is very important to me. Having d 90 I have a great desire to go to full frame. I plan to shoot weddings, I love art photos, both genre and staged portraits. I have a nikon 50 1.8 g, kit 18 - 105, tamron 28-75 2.8, nikon 80-200 2.8 (4th generation) and flash 910. The video is not very interesting. Thanks in advance for the advice)
Valentina, what is there to ask, of course, go ahead, especially if you have a great desire) You will like it on a full frame - you will get volume, plasticity, a wider frame, low noise level, etc., etc. All lenses, except for 18-105 , will play in a new way.
Thank you for your answer) and the correlation between price and quality is better to look at which model? 610? 750? 800? To be honest, well, there are a lot of laudatory odes about the old woman 700. The agony of choice, really.
Um, what will they play with? Soapy corners and vignetting on open diaphragms?
Anonymous, I wrote above - depth of field, plasticity, more pronounced volume, etc.
80-200 - yes, it will play. The picture will be great. 50 - sharpness in the center, edges will become more or less sharp only after f / 5,6, in addition, the slowness of this lens on the D750 and D810 will become even more noticeable. Therefore, without regret, I sold the D750 after buying. Tamron 28-75 - the same story as with the fifty kopeck piece. On crop it is good (if you do not take into account the lack of a moderately wide angle and flimsy construction), on FF - soapy edges and corners. In my case, the transition to FF entailed a revision of the entire fleet of optics, or rather, an almost complete change of that :). But I am more than satisfied with the result.
Good luck!
Well, if there is a denyushka, then who will forbid you then? Buy for health and enjoy life. Well, video, video now goes to the load of all cameras except Nikon DF, so feel free to take some 750 or 810 and you will be happy, and 610 seems to be the cheapest ff in general.
Thank you, but do you personally like more than 750 or 800? I still can’t decide.
If you don't know if you need a d800, then you don't need it! For raves of 70-80 mb will not please much, and a small pixel is more likely evil ...
The D750 and D610 have amateur ergonomics, less weight. The D800 is a professional camera with more pro-friendly operation and very high resolution. For an amateur, this is rather a minus, because it imposes more obligations on the shooting itself and the optics used. Let's just say that if the 700mm / f35d lens works for the D2, then on the D800 the pictures from it will be soapy.
Everyone has their own needs, I personally would prefer 810, but 610 would have cost calmly. Believe me, all these cameras are great, you won’t lose any of them.
Good afternoon. Who came across, before I had a D90, so I took a D750, a 16G memory card, I always shoot raw + bottom.jpg, on the d90 it displays 900 images, on 750 - 270, what is the reason?
With file size. The d750 carries much more information in its photos, therefore they weigh more. Well, not a canon 5dsr or a nikon d810 bought - there are only 32 gigabytes for a mini-photo session :)
Often I see how PHOTOGRAPH do not distinguish and even compare Full and Crop ... and still do not see the difference ... I wonder what kind of master one has to be so as not to distinguish the dynamic range of an image. And the fact that the client does not see the difference is normal because he is not sophisticated in the image but not always so ...
I'm not a photographer)
but I can give you a simple example when the Nikon crop has a greater dynamic range than the fullframe canon
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon–EOS-1D-X-Mark-II-versus-Nikon-D7200___1071_1020
ready to listen to your arguments, what I'm wrong
Not a photographer, carpenter or shoemaker? What about the photograph here?
You share a link to the numbers ... and the dynamic range is only visually determined by a special scale or an experienced eye.
digits are the measured dynamic range. obviously you are talking about some other component of the image by which you distinguish FF from crop, mistakenly mistaking it for DD
in general, that is, there are quite a few croppers covering full-frame cameras on DD like a bull to a sheep.
And often old crop, new FF.
The dynamic range is determined precisely by numbers, and not visually. Visually, you can compare, but nothing more.
There was such a Temko on photo.ru, it seems. There regularly posted several shots taken on crop and ff. So the best photographers did not always guess where what, even in full size. Most often they were guided by the depth of field and the drawing of optics, but this did not save either. Some of the best wedding designers of the Russian Federation (and they were from other countries), landscape painters, reporters, etc. participated in that branch. Often, even twice the crop could not be distinguished from the top ff. Even for the sake of interest, someone inserted frames from a medium format. So, under normal lighting and decent glass, the difference between the d3100 and the Hassel for 2 lyamas was most often found using the tyke method. Nobody had exact answers to the collections from different sizes of matrices, except that from time to time in one of the collections someone managed to determine where by what method. But the next selection also broke him. And so on dd to distinguish between ff and crop is a completely strange thing. You have already been described the situation where the crop beats ff, if you somehow particularly determine the dynamic range, not like in the rest of the world photo community, then you need to explain this to people.
Working with crop and ff is quite another matter. ISO workers, grip - all this on ff is much more interesting. And image processing most often on ff gives more opportunities. But again, depending on why. Peresvets last much better from the old crop fuja c5pro than from the new ff d810.
Read the mat part and learn what dynamic range is. The best pictures you say? No need to laugh, in the wrong genre ... Dynamic Range is determined by a gradation scale, but visually it is defined as a “noble image” possessing a certain charm, realism, gloss, something like this. In reality, those who run with the apparatus and do not distinguish and do not understand what it is about. Content with pictures for the village consumer. I will not argue for a long time, refer to the works of photographers large and serious - NOT BALL ... They will show you and tell you the difference ...
Thank you, comrade! Let me start the study !? :)
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos5d/22
I ALLOW ... whatever they write here about flu and other nonsense ...
Thanks, sensei :)
Come on ... to be mocking ... I'm for the truth and not for vanity ... Peace be with you ...
Another thing. And you peace!
and what do we see on the link?
that the crop dynamic range is greater
Ff:
Canon EOS 5D - 8.2
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II - 8.1
Crop:
Canon EOS 20D - 8.2
Nikon D2X - 8.4
or am I not understanding something?
some bad example however
"Visually it is defined as a" noble image "with a certain charm, realism"
Afftar zhzhot, write ischo!
But still, DD is the camera’s ability to transmit details in shadows and lights at the same time. About a noble image, charm and gloss did not hear
Once here they argue about the dynamic range. Arkady, it seems that in your articles about the photo there is not enough article on the dynamic range. I think many would be interesting
Good day to all. Arkady, I wanted to know the D800 and D750 today, which is preferable!
“Even mean Pedivikia puts the D750 on a par with the D700” - “the world has gone crazy and the level of 'professional equipment' has fallen below the baseboard” and then “Personally, I am absolutely delighted with the Nikon D750. To the question 'Is it worth changing Nikon D700 to the new Nikon D750' I can definitely answer - it's worth it ”
Frank contradiction. If the camera is definitely better than the professional D700, which aggressive canonists and sympathizers did not attribute to this segment, because Canon called his 5D2 amateur and it was envious of everyone. Now, in the eyes of these same hypocrites, the D700 is a pro-camera, but the D750 is not about, but the fact that it does the D700 to all articles is not important.
Funny you children.
It's simple - between 2008 and 2014, 6 years have passed, during which a bunch of things in the d750 have become better.
I have changed. The skin tone is terrible. What to do?
While semisotka was under repair (valve replacement), bought 750ku. The controls are creepy, but that's half the trouble. But what about skin color, it's a nightmare! The skin is red / purple / pink, but not what it should be! Tell me, is there a solution to this problem? I will be immensely grateful. For the camera is lying on the shelf, and the hardened indestructible machine gun d700 continues to work
looked already http://nikonpc.com/ ?
interesting. But how to apply it if I process in LR + FS?
in LR + FSH in any way, only for the camera and for processing the rav in the native Nikon software