According provided by Nikon D750 camera many thanks to Alexander Logachev.
For those who do not like to read a lot: Nikon D750 was announced on 11.09.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX and so far is Nikon's best amateur CZK. That's all :)
Nikon D750 BODY
All tabular data can be found on the official website, I don’t want to retell the same parameters once again that wander from one review to another. In this mini-review, I will only leave my own impressions of using the Nikon D750.
I want to warn you that on the official sites nikon.ru, nikon.ua, nikon.kz and even europe-nikon.com, the Nikon D750 is located in the section 'Professional SLR Digital Cameras' (proof image). This information is not true and is a marketing ploy. Or maybe the world just went crazy and the level of 'professional equipment' fell below the plinth.
Unfortunately, my favorite site imaging.nikon.com, although it remains more honest, nevertheless went along the paths indicated by the marketers and deleted the professional / amateur equipment separation directories, leaving only one large list (proof link) Even the vile Pedivikia puts the D750 on a par with D700 (proof link) At the same time, the fact that the Nikon D750 is still an amateur camera (ENTHUSIAST DSLR) can be easily verified on nikonusa.com (proof link) Sneaky marketers generally try to pass off the D750 as the first camera in some new weight category, even adding it to the Nikon NPS lists.
I lead to the fact that sometimes, when choosing a camera, users are guided not only by its capabilities, but also by positioning in a certain segment. Do not follow the lead of marketers, be vigilant!
Nikon D750 - something in between Nikon D610 и Nikon D810... Unfortunately, Nikon D750 is not a direct replacement for the legendary old lady Nikon D700... When Nikon D750 came out, I was very upset that everything in Nikon D750 is very cool, but all this 'beauty' is housed in a body with amateur controls.
Nikon D750 with lens Nikon N AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm 1: 4G ED VR SWM IF Aspherical Nano Crystal Coat
Personally, I absolutely love the Nikon D750. To the question 'Is it worth changing Nikon D700 on the new Nikon D750 'I can definitely answer - it's worth it.
At the same time, Nikon D750 still cannot reach some of the heights conquered by the 'XNUMX':
- D700 It has a full metal case, the D750 has a composite case, with a composite front.
- Minimal excerpt у D700 is 1/8000 sec. against 1/4000 sec. the D750. This difference is often sucked around on the forums, in fact, for real work it has no fundamental value, you will find details on this issue in my article '1 / 4000 vs 1 / 8000'.
- excerpt flash sync D700 makes 1/320 sec., against 1/250 sec. at the D750.
- Nikon D700 has a protective eyepiece shutter (what is she for?).
- the maximum burst speed for the D700 is 8 fps versus 6.5 fps for the D750. This is critical for sequential shooting.
- The D700 can use the MB-D10 butlock with the optional BL-3 cover, which allows the use of large and very capacious EN-EL4 or EN-EL4a batteries from flagship cameras Nikon D3, D3s, D3x, which significantly increases the number of shots taken on a single battery. Nikon D750 can only use standard EN-EL15 batteries in its butblock.
- The D700 can use uncompressed RAW files with full raw data read from the camera's image sensor. The D750 can only use Lossless RAW format for maximum photo quality. Both cameras can use 14-bit color depth. What is it and what it is eaten with you will find in the section '12 bit raw VS 14 bit raw'.
- with the same RAW compression settings (14 bit, lossless compression), the Nikon D700 buffer stores 17 frames, the Nikon D750 buffer only 12 frames.
- Nikon D700 can shoot in TIFF format.
- viewfinder magnification Nikon D700 is 0.72X versus 0.70X for Nikon D750. Although, at the same time, the D750 has 100% frame coverage, compared to 95% for the D700.
- The D700 uses a professional memory card form factor - CF, D750 – SD (SDHC, SDXC). But at the same time, the D750 has two memory card slots.
In all other respects, the Nikon D750 is either better or at the same level as the Nikon D700.
Nikon D750 with lens Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm 1: 1.8G IF SWM
I would also like to dwell on the focus module. Nikon D750 first uses focus module Advanced Multi-CAM 3500FX II, which, at least theoretically, is better than all its predecessors. The operating range of this module is from -3 to +19 EV. At the same time, D4,D4s, D800,D800E, D810, D810a operating range is -2 to +19 EV A good focusing module was severely lacking in cameras Nikon D600, D610 and Nikon Df. On the other hand, it's a pity that Nikon has not yet come up with a really new focusing system and continues to build all its sensors based on the Multi-CAM 3500FX, shown back in 2007.
Working with the D750, I had no complaints about the focusing system. I can't say for sure how much better it is than that of the Nikon D700, but what's no worse is for sure. But when working, it seems that the coverage area of the focus points is slightly reduced compared to the D700.
I was also very pleased that at last “Father Nikon” heard the prayers of his followers and improved the color rendering. Now, an acceptable color in JPEG with the D750 can be obtained immediately, without strong dances with a tambourine. But if you dig into RAW with non-native converters, then everything becomes not so rosy :(. Generally, many people do not like the color in Nikon D750 pictures, especially skin tone (skin color in portraits). Color has its own specifics, which is superimposed on many rumors and myths.
Prices for Nikon D750 in popular stores can look at this link.
Prices for modern Nikon cameras in popular stores can look at this link.
In comments Can I ask you a question on the topic and you will answer, and you can also express your opinion or describe your experience. Many little things for a photo can be found on AliExpress.
You can download RAW source files at this link (71 files in .'NEF 'format, 2 GB) + at this link (40 file in .'NEF 'format, 1 GB). All photos were shot with Nikon D750. All photos in this gallery are on-camera JPEG without processing. Then I'll add more examples.
Nikon D750 with lens Tamron AF 28-75mm f / 2.8 SP XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
When working with the camera, which I visited in the review, I did not find problems with glare, which are a kind of failure in the Nikon D750. But still it’s very disappointing that after the unsuccessful Nikon D600 the company again launched a raw product on the market, fortunately, if there is such a drawback in the D750, then it can be eliminated free of charge (proof link).
The bottom line:
Nikon D750 turned out to be a very nice camera, almost completely balanced camera, which was very important after a long absence of replacement for the D700. I can't say the D750 is a complete replacement for the Nikon D700, but the D750 itself is a very attractive camera.
If don't know which camera and lens to choose, then my article will help with this - Which Nikon amateur DSLR camera and lens to choose?
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
Come on! Turning to Canon!
+ 100 %
Do you need to go to Kenon blessing what do you need?
Better buy brains
nafininado !!! (but I don’t have such money!)
FUJI our vsio !!!!
and he has a rotary screen, but it's not a touchscreen !!! 111 and the Canon 650 has a touchscreen! where you poke - there it is directed!
In short - nikon nismog into a new normal workhorse, marketers defeated the remnants of common sense
Yes, Fuji is becoming more and more interesting :)
I would say that Fujik in comparison is a slow-witted sclerosis
visually impaired
The masses will not go, alas. Sad for Nikon, degrading.
Degrades? Where? 810 is an excellent camera, 4s is an excellent camera, 7100 is an excellent camera (if the buffer were normal), 3300 is an excellent camera, 5300 (or 5200 or how many are there?))) Is also an excellent camera, that’s 600ka and Df, these were really strange moves
Well, how does it not degrade if the model, as of 11.09.14/XNUMX/XNUMX, is a complete G ... in comparison with what you listed?
yes why r then? I personally only have 1 \ 4000 and I didn’t like the shutter resource of just 150, just forget the number 000 at the beginning, this is actually a good d7 and not a bad d600
So that's just the point, would Nikon put the number 6 at the beginning - it would be happiness, and people would not spit so much.
It is not the first time that Nikon has been confused in names and positioning, and not only Nikon suffers from such garbage. Of course, the owners and “respectfuls” of the D700 were waiting for a round viewfinder and some supernova buns and maybe they have something to be upset about, but as for me the camera is very attractive. Especially considering that the price is not far from d610. At least in the first approximation, no distinct jambs are observed.
Nikon was already confused in the name, there is nothing wrong with that. As for me, the Canon hierarchy is no less "weird". As for me, an absolutely normal sane camera is close in price to the D610. Another would be a round eyecup and everything in openwork. Based on the preview, no obvious mismatches were noticed.
Basically YES, nothing that Nikon called D750 - NEW LEGEND, and D700 - OLD LEGEND, which meant replacing the professional camera, which was discontinued. Let's not talk about + \ - - anyone can understand this.
I believe that due to the lack of an eye-guard ktugolo, just do not have to leave a comment. For this is generally a trifle!
Totally agree with you! Nikon made a stuffing camera: if you look closely, those in the know will see parts of different Nikon models that come together and get fig knows what. The D700 was a professional camera, and on the D750 there was now a mode wheel from the advanced full-frame amateur D600 / 610 ... why? and you can go on and on, but everything will end with a simple question: "Why ???"
Well, what does this wheel interfere with when shooting, what place? By the way, the choice of pre-configured user modes in this form factor is MUCH more convenient than on the D700. Maybe the “amateur” prefix interferes with fully working with this camera and taking first-class pictures with it?
And what bothers you in this wheel? Knowledgeable photographers will not be a hindrance. And in general, I personally do not share the opinion that it is necessary to assign a camera to a professional level only if there is a magnesium alloy body and no mode wheel. For everyone knows that it is not the technique that takes the photo, but the person who controls this technique.
810 is excellent, but getting expensive, and with pixel busting which most do not need (yes, someone needs it, but there is no choice)
....
7100 - excellent, yes, but ... with a pixel-by-pixel search. Totya is still tolerant, and with an uncomfortable turret, But with awesome focusing. And yet this is an advanced amateur crop, not a prof.
....
3300 and 5300? do not make me laugh. 650d and 100D make them, in terms of convenience and other things, without even thinking (plus the BUILT-IN Wi-Fi and touch screen - more than convenient for younger carcasses). The evolution of the suitability of junior cameras ended at 3100/5100, and then unnecessary and meaningless perversions followed instead of suitability.
Df - well, ok. A camera for show-off on the street and convenient work in the studio, with an awesome matrix and fap-fap on a film design. All the rules, coup into a niche.
Professional report crop with a normal, long-conceived interface, ergonomics and a shutter - where?
profile / action FF with normal ergonomics, focuser and shutter - where?
An amateur D600 with “we focus normally only in the center of the frame, and then we use it as an initial soap dish”, or “but we can shoot a healthy video” because “there is no other option”?
The other day I helped a friend choose a camera for “further development” after a year at the school d40. And she wanted 650d (selling everything typed under nikon), and it CAN be understood.
Himself in thought for a long time stood above 100d and 70d.
The only thing that stopped me was the realization of how scary-looking canon's glasses are - like Chinese toys, and the inconvenience of the system for me personally as a whole.
What uncomfortable turret are we talking about? maybe the arms are too big? The D7100 is a great pixel camera as many as you need, if you were shooting landscapes, you would understand that. She lacks only a swivel screen in some situations. And most importantly, taking it in your hands and trying to take it off, you see what color depth it gives out and no one even stood nearby. I’m silent about this stubborn design by the Canon.
Everyone needs Wi-Fi and a touch screen, do you remember what photography is? Ansel Adams wasn’t pointing his finger at the screen. What for you need wi-fi, all studio photographers ??? Love Live View mode, then a soap box is better for you.
Yes, even the supposedly small buffer, in May, are you shooting all football matches? It is terribly annoying when people still pose and the photographer gives out a shooting series of 6-8 frames. What for? Afraid of blinking?
Excerpt 1/4000 is not the fastest, but I’ll ask all the wise men to take and take off their whale lens with such an exposure, you will have blackness. Are you constantly shooting Formula 1 races? or a bumblebee flight?
A reporting camera needs protection, good focus and color depth, the rest is marketing moves as well as 8 cores in a smartphone or 64 bit processor. What for??
what a horror! one must have hands of the appropriate size.
If you do not understand what kind of inconvenient we are talking about, then what are the questions?
.......
What is photography I remember (it’s like a picture, how do you get it, right?), And you remember something besides the expression learned by novice photographers “the photographer takes pictures and Nikamira !!! since I know that I'm already cool !!! ”?
.......
Phrases about “all studio photographers” and “why a series of real people” - let's forget about your inexperience, as well as the mention of “your whale”. Many people, you know, have never taken a whale ride in their entire lives. ;)
If you don’t understand why you need good ergonomics for a reporting or story camera, for example, this does not mean that others do not understand either.
A normal tower there, the hike is really all about the hands ... :))
“A nikamira” Yes, this is what beginners are taught. I'm sure you are a journalist working in hot spots, then you probably have D4, it does not suit you ??
In fact, I spoke about the depth of color, and not about coolness.
High-speed shooting exists for fast-changing objects in the frame, did I discover something new for you ?? How interesting it was to take portraits during film photography without 10 frames per second.
Now show me at least one photo of yourself where 1/8000 shutter speed was really needed.
About the fleet of my equipment, it’s better not to speak out anyway, you don’t know, and yes I have not only a whale lens.
As for the reporting camera, again I didn’t see serious journalists using the touch screen.
You probably are those who already pre-ordered the iPhone 6.
Then you have a road to Canon.
In the end, I would like the characteristics a little better than the 750th, but you don’t have to give them a mockery trick, otherwise Canon will cram the possibility of posting pictures directly from the camera to Facebook and people will say that it is very convenient.
Denis, about Facebook: The boot announced a new 6d mk2, so it will work on the Android OS ... Vkontakte and Instagram lovers rejoice ...
And before advising a friend to switch to 650d and to sell everything, they had to show the graphics first http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Nikon-D7100-versus-Canon-EOS-650D-versus-Canon-EOS-7D___865_813_619
It seems that the photographer is shooting and not the camera? and you are on the chart, um ... referring. )))
I completely agree with you Denis. But the Lynx has long been time to shut up and go on a well-deserved rest. And from the photo industry in particular.
http://www.lux-et-color.ru/wordpress/?p=1465
About Dxomark
Their approach to testing cameras is completely mechanistic. That is, he captivates us with numbers, but says absolutely nothing about the real picture, its subjective pleasantness, and the hassle-free reception of the final, harmonious frame. As practice shows, record technical indicators do not guarantee this at all, and often even vice versa. The problem with color saturation, skin tones and the overall integrity of the picture in the latest Nikon cameras (the ones that, according to DXO, have great color depth and huge DD) has become a real disaster for users and a talk of the world for others. But users, stupefied by the numbers on DXO, often do not want to and cannot see these problems ("How is it - these are the numbers, the camera is not to blame! What are you - the owners of other poor cameras - climb into us? Is it enviously something?" - that’s all primitive logic) and are even ready to distort their aesthetic perception in order to see such a picture “right”. The same applies to optics - all measurement data will not say anything about the most important thing - its design and the sophistication of image rendering. Therefore, this approach has nothing to do with the essence of photography. And those who like to cite the numbers from this site as an argument, not paying attention to the camera image, do not understand anything in photography either.
Everything is needed for a reporting camera. And last but not least, a touch-screen swivel screen. It’s stupid not to use photographic achievements
Ansel Adams would be happy to poke a finger on the touch screen, if he had such an opportunity. As for the D7100 with 16 megapixels, it would be meaningful
I'm on D90, it just strains 1/4000 (very often it's too much). I have no neutral filter. The sun, you know, is very bright. In short - not enough!
And what photographic equipment do you use, dear Lynx?
Alexander, it seems like a lynx left Nikon for Fuj X-trans. although, HZ ...
who changed the trot? lynx praises KENON ??? The lynx saw the color and understood why they buy not only Nikon or Fuj? something in the forest died ...
this is not our ryka !!! ))))
Ryska? How do you freeze me, Alex. What a parrot and upstart you are.
Well, that anonymous and not anonymous or not cheated :))))
Alexei never knows anything.
Lynx, how many winters! )))
someone under your nickname and avatar viciously posts mediocre photos taken on
Fujifilm X-T10, Jupiter-3 in LJ and VK. like eyes on deadly pale skin on tree branches.
Glad to hear that you have not stooped to such a horror!
More fans !!!!
You are not in our group yet? Then you have already left!
http://vk.com/club120870471
And what seemed STRANGE to you in six hundred? Great camera! I took it "second" to the D700, but gradually it became my "first". I think that the new D750 will replace my old D700 now.
and how much? I probably bought it, but what is interesting in Fuji - is there a fullframe?
2300 green - go ahead :)
amers announced 2299 dollars per carcass
considering that the Pindos 610 costs 1800-1900, then the price is adequate.
fuji and crop are already good
well, everything is simple, the d600 finally became what it should have been right away, well, almost, it’s ridiculous to say that the d7100 has a better shutter (1 \ 8000), we’ll wait a year for d760 with 1 \ 8000))))
+ 1)))
And if you look at the history, there is a Nikon camera with a shutter of 1/16000. So everything after her sucks brandy? Also, ISO 50 + 1/4000 = ISO 100 + 1/8000 isn't that right? The question about the regular need for such an excerpt is somehow not asked.
"is not it?" - is not it.
What is wrong? We obtain equality by exposition. If we draw an analogy with the predecessor camera, then there, if I’m not mistaken, the minimum ISO 200 (100 already as Lo1).
Of course, if you shoot on a bright day and something in the snow and the aperture is stuck at 1.2, then the shutter speed of 1/8000 or 1/16000 would not hurt, but otherwise ...
Can you give examples when such a pair (50/4000) is not enough for shooting?
Do not grab onto the expopair, sometimes you only need ISO 50, sometimes you need an shutter speed of 1/8000 with ISO higher than 50. That's just the point, in this regard.
This is already special. super fast shutter speed case.
There is a special for this. cameras, do not require this from an amateur.
In other cases, a low ISO is preferable.
1 \ 8000 is needed only for sports photography, take a "sports camera" for this. Nikon is not obliged to release short exposures in studio cameras on a “whatever it were” principle. 1 \ 4000 is enough for the eyes both in the studio and during reporting, given that you shoot most of the events either with a flash or indoors - what for is 1 \ 8000 there? For show-off in front of other photographers? :)) By the way, the well-known rule when reporting to cover the diaphragm to provide a greater depth of field here and there
I'm wondering if there were trade expeditions from Palestine to Japan in the Middle Ages (or earlier)?)
Well, often 1/8000 rent?
Well, here we are! But I am very upset, I thought he would remain in Prof. technology, but in terms of characteristics and button interface - this is a slightly improved D600, i.e. amateur class. But respect for the rotating screen. Arkady, how do you like the D700 receiver?
Yeah, rotary screen ...: /
I think that this is not a successor for the d700 - wrong control, wrong sync speed, wrong shutter speed, wrong body, wrong round eyecup, wrong speed. Personally, I would call this camera D650, and would not spoil the reputation of the 700 :) IMHO of course)
I agree, a hike is a divorce for beginners. D700 RIP, calm down already fans :(
Nikon decided not to continue the line of D300 and D700
And instead of 700 people are offered a choice of D4s and D810
That is no replacement for the D300s at all. There will be no semi-reporter in crop factor.
But how do you like the newly made D500?
fully agree…. a crippled body, torn off AF-ON buttons, a children's control dial, instead of buttons, a stripped-down shutter ... and I doubt about dust and moisture protection ... this is not a successor to the legendary D700. this is a D5000-D5300 with a full frame (very upset ... either take d810 or nafig go to the canon
Take Hasel which is trifling)
There is no remote control connector :)
And for me - it's the same 610 camera with a Wi-Fi module now in a new case ... it has nothing to do with the reportage d700!
From d700 drag those who do not have money for d800-810
Doesn't it seem that you are just blindly in love with your D700 and not mentally prepared for anything new.
Maybe D700 and RIP, but it seems that Nikon won't build such a camera anymore - something went wrong with them, or something was signed with Kenon. At the expense of the transition to Kenon - it's all calf instincts - where everything is, where and I am. No Kenon has yet surpassed Nikon d40, d5100, d7000 and d700 in its class, respectively. Kenon 5d mark 3 is good, but according to the picture it is one to one seven hundred, and in terms of lubrication it is eight hundred, and those who shoot video need to take Sony, etc. Several years ago I switched to FF 5. Then I had five of them, since after each tried kenon (5d, 3d mark1, 2dc mark1, 3dc mark700) I again switched to seven hundred. So I don't even know DXNUMX RIP, or long live
+ 1000!!!
No Kenon has yet surpassed Nikon d40, d5100, d7000 and d700…. still outdid it!
In general, any shortcomings of any unsuccessful camera Nikon can cure (and make it successful) the price, they would lower the price and everyone will be happy and say: “Oh, what a joy, it’s true that this is not very good here, but for that kind of money it’s a bomb and in general happiness"
mgm, a new device came out ... And who-nit will squeeze all 100% of the possibilities out of it?
Damn saddened ... I look towards other manufacturers in search of a camera for reporting, leaning towards sony a6000 and canon 7d mark II, I don't see anything else standing
If for reporting, then you are not looking there.
Sony’s mirrorless camera will not have AF reporting, compared to the phase-locked one, the D300 is slow-witted. But the Canon 7DmII has not yet been released, and it is not known how much the release is postponed.
Look towards D4s or used. D3s
You look at tests of Sony A6000 with a dog running to the camera. DSLRs have never dreamed of this. Judging by the development of the office, Sony is soon paying both Canon and Nikon (in principle, it already did, one A7s is worth it).
If we take D600 / D610 for D3000 /… / D3300, then D750 is clearly D5000 /… / D5300, a rotary screen, everything is ...
Nikon is expanding its segment of full-frame cameras for advanced enthusiasts, it is a pity that this happens due to the former professional camera.
Personally, I expected a D710 with characteristics similar to the D810, with only a 24MP matrix.
A rotary screen is an indicator of an amateur tsyatski !! Where are you prof. cameras saw this muck?!
<>
I don’t understand why the flip-up screen interferes? Still, apparently, this is some kind of flawed "master". If “pro” is a willingness to fall into a puddle instead of using a flip-up screen, then I'm not on my way with you!
Yes, I also have an opinion D610 is analogous to D3300, D750 is analogous to D5300. Along the way, the so-called professionals are not interesting to anyone - the market is too small
Nikon does not know yet how much you can ask for this camera for a new market. Surely prices will float to determine the point with maximum profit, and the 750 index is a demonstration of the desire to earn more :) I can’t say that it’s hard to understand
There have been five times talking about some fuji
Can you give links to models?
Fuji has a cool X-T1, a 1,5 crop with cool ergonomics and a fleet of high-quality optics. Only expensive is a pleasure, especially optics.
Do you call the optics park 8 lenses?
Yes, and ergonomics to say the least controversial.
After the elders, Nikonov will want to smash against the wall so as not to climb the menu so often.
In Fuji, only the matrix is very, very promising.
Fuji now has two cool cameras: 1. XT-1, top of the line, with fast phase focusing, a huge viewfinder, a matrix without an AA filter and with a film camera design (I can smell the XT-2 to NG). and a little simpler - X-e2, with the same phase focusing, but not so many settings on the external drums, smaller in size and price.
For “take out on a trip and shoot inexpensively” - X-M1, without a viewfinder and, alas, not so
quick focus, but extremely inexpensive compared to others.
They say Fujikovsky 35 / 1,4 is very soulful, it turned out another 58 / 1,2 (at equine price)
Plus - even though the entire park of manual rangefinders through an adapter with an automatic exposure pair, well, adapters for Nikon-Canon, apparently, are also available.
There is a d7000 with 18-105, 10-24, 50mm1.4 sigma, Nikon d800 24-70,70-200nikory, has already cooled down on new cameras, for walking the Samsung nx11 with all its available optics 55-200,16mm.20mm, 30mm, 18-55,
And I was impressed by the autofocus ... -3EV sensitivity is something! And I would like d750, being the owner of d610. Probably really the model is not a replacement for the 700, but still tasty
The model is not a replacement for the 700, but according to the declared parameters it is much better. At the 200 itself, for many years it was the “first” camera paired with the D300, then with the D600s. After purchasing the D600, my 39 became the “second”. Still, the D24's colors turned out to be more correct, the noise is much less, the DD is much wider. I began to spend less time on processing. Suddenly 70 points were enough. Autofocus from 2.8-1 f8000 works fine. 1/1000 and before there was no need to use. I shot half my life on film, for sports, 1/8000 was enough for the eyes, it was not on film cameras 750/XNUMX. And the DXNUMX is even newer, and no matter how skeptics find fault with it, even those who are now spreading screams and snot around it WILL buy it.
While Nikon was pushing and the third time introduced a more or less sane budget full frame (D600, 610,750), Canon did not suffer from any nonsense and released a 7D-cropped professional camera with two processors, 10 burst frames, a refined focus system and a bunch of different interesting goodies for the photographer. Draw conclusions ladies and gentlemen.
7D Mark2 only rumors are inflating, and where was it presented or is there any reliable information somewhere? pathetic crop vs ff don't laugh
- laugh further
http://dphotoworld.net/news/osnovnye_specifikacii_i_novye_izobrazhenie_canon_eos_7d_mark_ii/2014-09-13-2858
Is there actually an official release somewhere? Everywhere only "will be presented", I myself wonder what will be shoved there :)
750 is, there is no second 7d because there is no argument, let the cannonists say that they stamp their 10mp scraps for 18 years
How is it not D7 MarkII? And then what? http://dphotoworld.net/news/canon_predstavila_dolgozhdannuju_eos_7d_mark_ii/2014-09-15-2874
Here is a review from Russia http://prophotos.ru/reviews/16254-canon-eos-7d-mark-ii-nedelya-s-ekspertom
Here you can see the x-ki and price
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00NEWZDRG/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00NEWZDRG&linkCode=as2&tag=canorumo-20&linkId=4IHYPE3ZKJN5VL4X
I myself prefer nikon, but as it is not sad for me, I completely agree with you (
give pruflink about the second seed!
I bought 2 years ago D7000 nikon sb9100 nikor 50 1/4 I thought I’ll go to the full frame, well, over the years some disappointments like more than one poop will be released like the other, it was the last straw, I’ll sell it all, go to the dark side ((((((( ((I buy CANON, there the announcements are getting cooler and cooler on cameras
Come on, on our street it's been a long time a holiday: D4s, D810, where to Kenon. Although, your business.
Buy D3S Ali D4 and you will be happy, then it’s business!
+1
and became more expensive at times 24-70 114000 rubles, soon mark4 will come out with a rotary screen, it will cost just two hundred thousand
Something Japanese has a burst of activity in the photo industry: Nikon produced 4 new full-frame cameras in a year, Sigma began to make wonderful lenses, Sony is perfecting a curved matrix, so Tamron surprised - http://www.dpreview.com/articles/9045794681/tamron-develops-full-frame-15-30-ultra-wide-zoom-with-vibration-correction?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=related-news&utm_medium=text&ref=related-news
this monster would also have filters)))))) eh, dreams
Cool announcement, I was happy. To replace the canon 17-40. And lighter and with a stub. I hope the price will be Tamron, not Nikon-Canon :)
The main bias of the camera is shooting video. The camera remained wedding, only other trends were seen later)))) on the photoexex on YouTube there is a video about it. But the fact that Nikon announced another 20 1.8 that they all somehow missed it))))))))))))) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBGmLRyHeS8
In general, some kind of trend went not to make universal cameras, apparently to buy 2 to cover the necessary tasks. So the camera is not bad, but the surname obliges to be its best. That's right, someone said about the name d650, so there would have been less bathheth. And if you look at it in a vacuum, then this is a product between six hundred and professional eight hundred. with buns from both rulers, but with pedal control
Great amateur camera! 11 cross f8 points, a smart inclined screen, 6,5k / sec., ISO 50. For the pros, there is D800,810, etc. Nikon went the way of the economy class, maybe they are right. Make a magnetic housing for this camera, a 1/8000 shutter with 200 thousand mileage and it will cost more than the D800. With the name they got excited, this is really D650. But Nikon has the best picture compared to other manufacturers!
But this is the first full-frame DSLR with a rotary screen!
strikes the hands of Japanese designers ... where do those people who developed d700, d3, d3x, d3s and even the awful and stupid d300 ...
Oh, by the way, there is simply no replacement for D3X, either, as such :) but this is less critical, because the camera is very specific.
Well, why are you talking about three hundred? It's a good camera. But in general I agree.
The 300 finishes off with the fact that shooting in RAW 14-bit is only 2,5 frames per second ... but in a TIFF that nobody needs - right up to 8 ... and with noises above ISO 1250 it's already scary.
but I’m already higher than iso 600, especially in the shadows, it was scary :)
in the shadows of which just does not hide in the evening.
... it does not have a shutter speed of 1/8000 because of the “fat-pixel” photographers who shout about the redundancy of 36 megapixels in eight hundred. which give 24 mp and that's it! so break off! so that competition with d810 is not done so.
but in general, buy better than the 810th! the price tag is not much more expensive - but everything is with her! and stop crying about micro-lubricants ...
(I know the work of two "professionals": one shot the whole wedding on mark2 and a wide-angle zoom at f4, and the second on d300 17-55 / 2.8 at f8! All shots! It's like "to make everything clear."
The D750 is a camera for videographers, reporters (they do not use high-aperture optics, they rarely reach 1/2000 s), manual operators (who do not want to crawl on the ground and have light filters), well, and rich lovers who will only shoot by little screen.
The D810 is the camera for versatile photographers.
What are you talking about, D750 is a camera for videographers, reporters ...
D750 is another show off from marketers, it’s not clear who it is intended for.
you couldn’t just put the matrix in the D700 and its ergonomics like in D4S, make sRAW, change AF as in D4S, leave the rate of fire like the D700 did, and this new one would simply be swept off the shelves.
canon recipe with 5dm3 /
no - rotary screen and 1/4000
“So that there is no competition with d810,” and so with d600 / d610 a direct competitor was cut down. If they really wanted to breed in different market niches, then it was necessary to do exactly the heir of the seven hundred with dust and moisture protection and an armored hull
There will be no direct competition, the price tag is higher and consider only because of the focus module, many will spit on swearing and buy d610 (because it’s cheaper) or spit on swearing, but put off buying a bicycle \ lens \ something else useful and scrape everything out on the d750.
market in action
all who whine about the price- rotten drochery
Ban.