The Canon EOS 7D Mark II was introduced on September 15, 2014.
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
You can look at the basic information on the camera on the official website.
Leave your opinions, impressions and conjectures in the comments :)
|
|||||
Discussion page for Canon EOS 7D Mark IIComments: 158, on the topic: Canon EOS 7D Mark II talk pageAdd a comment |
|||||
|
|
|||||
Nouveau, we arrived, and the rice only just aimed at d7100.
One hope is that today at the exhibition Nikon will get some kind of d8100 from under the floor, without marketing quirks and made in the mind.
And even better d370.
Nikon 7100 is a very worthy thing. It is unlikely that 7d will surpass it in DD, color depth and picture quality. But 7d was always good. The irony is useless here, I think.
in addition to these parameters, there are others, often no less important.
What can be more important for a camera than the quality of the picture? Maybe you remember the film days when there was amateur and professional film? And her price was different. Often times. Why? The picture quality is also different: color depth, color rendition…. Figuratively speaking, Canon is a device whose “film” is slightly worse than that of Nikon, and at the same time it cannot be changed. Of course, it remains to look for pluses in something else, but this other is secondary.
You drive.
And I don’t want to start further discussion and argumentation, because you are also a troll
many things may be more important than the penny difference in pictures.
I agree absolutely. But the difference between canon and nikon is pretty penny. The rate of fire is also a penny difference. Here in these "kopecks" people are poking around, and according to the results they no longer pay a penny.
you rave.
cameras of the same price category are the same for all manufacturers
also faced with a similar situation on the Canon 70d and others.
capture one to the rescue! In other matters, on Nikanon, too, helps out. Although I like the colors of the Sonykovsky matrix more.
I absolutely agree, D7000 / D7100 rule!
“Boot” has made an excellent step forward.
We are waiting for a little time before the appearance of ravs on the network from ordinary users :)
Although I myself shoot with Nikon, I’ve been convinced many times that in Kenon there is a more logical name, more far-sighted eyes in time, in some scenes even a little more plausible color rendition. Of course, the photographer takes pictures, of course, each system has its own problems, but it seems to me that Kenon sets the pace in the mass mirror photo industry now.
How oddly Nikon sets the rhythm in photo-photography. Canon lags behind in the plan.
Of course it sets the rhythm, first produces a clumsy D600 with oil and dust on the matrix, then d610 with the correction of these bugs, and after a short time d750 with more sane characteristics that should have been in d600. In general, the rhythm is drop dead !!! And now answer me a simple question: call me a Nikon report camera with serial shooting 10 fps, professional body, CF card, professional focus and professional metering and all this for $ 1800.
"Professional focusing and professional metering ..."
How's it, shy to ask?
For example, d600 has amateur focusing, while d3s or d300 have professional focusing. The professionalism of exposure metering is also determined by the number, quality and speed of sensors
And you call? With a decent buffer that allows you to shoot at least three seconds? In RAV? Yes, what are you, dear.
Yeah, otherwise all sports reporters are direct. I shot a series of ten times in my life. Therefore, always “ha ha” props when lovers start screaming about the speed of serial shooting :)
+ 100!
How tired of you all ... D600 DOES NOT have OIL on the matrix! NO! A neighbor shocked 150 shots in two years, and at least henna. But all the specialists, although they never held it in their hands.
Well, you need to do something (basically scolded from online articles to swear) :)
That buffer is short, then the map is wide)
At first, only the born D750 was “killed”, now they will move to this branch and will look for “fatal” ailments in an interesting camera from Canon.
As for the oil…. There is oil on almost all models, on junior models (D3000, D5000, etc.) it is not less than on the D600, they just do not pay attention to it, the wrong goals. My daughter has D5000; 12000 mileage, pulled me to check for dirt, at first I just vacuumed, and then I looked. I counted more than 40 oil stains (exactly stains). After wet cleaning (on my own), the spots all disappeared.
The time spent is approximately 50 minutes, the financial costs are 350 rubles (for 50 ~ wet cleanings). Well, in no way can this be attributed to the category of big problems, as usual prevention.
You drive.
But I do not want to start further discussion and argumentation, because you are also a troll. I am returning your portrait to you.
No oil, no. If the d600 is such a drop dead camera as you say, so why was it changed in a hurry to d610 ???
I think that they simply changed the nameplate with the number, without fundamentally changing anything. Type: "here, we fixed everything!" Just buy. Marketing is such marketing. How long does it take to set up a production line for a new camera without actually changing anything?
I had oil on the D600 ke, although I took it a year ago, that is, from the last series. Nikon changed nothing for a free shooter. In general, if I hadn’t shot panoramas at night, I wouldn’t bathe. Since before F4 it was generally not visible. After receiving everything seems ok
10 frames in a series - this is for true photojackers
how not to recall the old French joke:
"Monsieur, you throw the whole block off the beat!" (from)
crop….
nikon d750 for a little more money is more attractive
Do not compare - 750 full-frame. This one can only be compared with 7000 or 7100.
Hmm, at first I tensed like a nikonist. And then I realized that I did not want a crop for 76 thousand rubles.
And where does the price information come from?
half a year or a year and reduce, I think.
this is what I understand the camera, this is the focusing module, this is the speed, really an analogue of the flagship made in crop ... but the price tag .... in general, d7100 if it had not been deprived of the buffer, then the camera would also be excellent, worse, but with a normal price tag, but no….
:) while Nikon and Kenon are perfecting the old, the FUJIFILM X-T1 with the X-Trans matrix overtakes them smoothly :)
why x-t1? x-pro1 has long overtaken
At such a rate, it will still overtake it for 5-7 years, and then it will quietly remain where it is today - of course, a branded, but niche product at not sane prices. Yes, judging by the photos on the network, a very decent camera, but I did not find anything extra outstanding in comparison with advanced and professional DSLRs of other brands. Maybe not looking there?
Canon EOS 7D Bl .. Mark Bl .. II
dumber PR I have not seen at canon
??
Canon has released some soap box with the prefix Mark. especially for imbeciles, apparently
With a nickel, the brands were rolled, with the seven, apparently, they will be rolled, we are waiting for 100d mark2 :)
it is much better than each subsequent
model call: "3100,3200,3300,3400,3500, etc."
Type of matrix 22,4 x 15,0 mm. Even for me, a beginner, it is clear that the crop does not make sense to compare with the d750. Well, where are those wise men from a branch about d750 who, as a whole crowd, fled to the store for the Kenons? -)
Clever men remembered that their lenses do not climb Kenon.
The rate of fire is awesome! It's very nice to see such a novelty. Let them sell it for a couple of years for wild money, and then I can buy a used one for a price of 30 thousand :) I’ll replace my reporting favorite Canon 50d :)
whoever says that, but ergonomics and ease of operation are better on this boot, better than 750
The taste and color of felt-tip pens, as you know ... It's a matter of habit IMHO.
SPEED SOAP
there could be a good camera for video, we regretted a rotary touch monitor
Was the throw-in with the Nikon 750 not enough? )) Thanks to Arkady - a couple more days of laughter ahead)))
Yeah! Copies, I think, will be broken quite a few. A logical continuation of the series, and then it would be just a series, it would be necessary to add here something from the last Sonek and pull up the Pentax K-3 here, for the thrill. That would be a nice "srach" and measuring with "pipiski"! ..
And many thanks to Arkady for the "provocation"! It's very interesting to read the comments.
De Nikon D 400 ???
And I’m shooting at 700k and I turned these Marketers on a bolt :)
Here you have a Nikon D300s version under the canon nameplate
D300s cost, at one time $ 1500, I think that 7d will cost about the same after the recession
but sho, there is hype ???
When a new product enters the market, its price is usually overpriced. I think that those who were waiting for the second version of the 7-ki will buy it at this price. Manufacturers will “skim the cream” from the product and set a price for it that matches the realities of the market
No guys, this is great. Fot, the campaign turned out awesome.
They praise them beautifully, but I think the Canon EOS 70D is enough for all tasks, I'm not sure that the matrix on iso3200 will give a normal picture, 7 frames per second is quite a decent result. And for the hobbyist, the rotating screen matters. One of the pros for the pros is the presence of two memory cards.
$ 1800 is expensive. Nikon has the D610 at this price. And do not talk about ergonomics here, 610 at the moment looks more profitable.
Kenon has 6D for less money.
Yes, but this is just a vivid example of a marketing divorce in a household carcass to cram an FF matrix. The 2 is quite a decent reporter, and if the Mark 1600 ISO 7 is working, then you don't need more, and you need a rotary screen, this is a feature only for vidyushniki and amateurs, for normal operation an angular viewfinder is enough. Well, they could also throw out the built-in flash from the XNUMXD mark II - an extra gadget for cameras of this level.
There is nothing household in the 6D, it is really affordable FF from Canon. I had Simon, 2 years old, sold only because of the noise. The 2nd Semyon may be a little better due to the new processor, but we'll see it after real tests.
I do not agree. Sam moved from 1d mk3 to 6d. In ergonomics, of course, it’s not 1d, but it doesn’t limit anything at all (the central point holds up to -3, which is really interesting). Iso up to 6.400 does not bother with noise at all, but if you want, you can also 25600 (b / w and compression up to 5-10mp), crop will not give this. You can disagree, this is a personal opinion
I don’t know, either different cameras were looking, or eyes were different, ISO 800 working, further noises. The autofocus is very thoughtful and often smears, it is very similar to the autofocus of the second dime, the functions are truncated, there is no dust and moisture protection. As a result, we get a household fullfruit, or a marketing scam, and not like a prof. camera.
Don’t talk nonsense, I switched to EOS 1D with EOS 6D and my main task is photo hunting, with its tenacious 11 points it catches birds on the fly and absolutely working constant ISO 3200
My works can be seen here: http://dvk.artphoto.pro
P.S. There used to be Nikon and I switched to Canon never regretted it!
in fact, apart from the price (so far), there are no serious minuses. But there is something that they no longer put in nikons, something new))) and specifically the waiting system for an impulse of artificial light. And this is not even in the flagship cameras. thing I think will take root maybe very useful.
The most interesting thing is that I have never seen such an explosion of emotions about new lenses, light, etc.
The carcass is in third place after them, where did such feelings come from?
Because pioneers. Who has a steeper and newer carcass, he is a sharp photographer. I always said that even in junk you can shoot excellent shots. Look at the binder for all years, “Digital Photo” or “Photographer“ - there people on some Canon 20D or Nikon D70 made such shots! Downloading. Although, there were always enough lovers to try their pussy. Glass, after all, will not add as much to FSW as a carcass. So they find out on forums and blogs whose dream is cooler)))
join up
absolutely true +++
Canon standard circuit:
- we take the top reporting (1D Mark IV / 1D X)
- put the cropped matrix
- “cut off” the battery pack
- call (7D / 7D Mark II)
- we sell at a price slightly lower than the lower fullframe
- PROFIT
Z.Y. And I would not say that I do not like it)
It only remains to be regretted that with the transition of the top line to FF, to 7D markII did not jump from them crop 1,3.
I agree. It would be nice.
Crop 1.3 is a controversial thing, there were no optics for it, and there is no, and it turns out neither here nor there - a full-frame one loses a wide angle, and a cropped one will give a vignette.
And whoever put cropped optics on XNUMX? Cropped optics is a marketing price-quality ratio, where the dominant component is price.
For such a price I would rather buy 6d)