Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer Review

According provided by lens Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer (OS, AF) for Nikon many thanks to Alexander Fetisov.

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer Review

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer Review

Among the fast zoom 70-200 / 2.8 class in the Sigma lens line, there are several models:

  1. Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO EX HSM Is the oldest version.
  2. Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG EX HSM is an updated model, with the same optical design as the first version, but the lens is already optimized for working on digital SLR cameras. The main difference from the previous model is improved enlightenment.
  3. Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 Macro APO DG EX HSM - a version with a different optical design, produced since 2008. The main difference is a different MDF and more weight.
  4. Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 II Macro APO DG EX HSM - Model II, updated previous version.
  5. Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG EX HSM Optical Stabilizer, released in 2010, has a built-in image stabilizer. This lens is presented in this review.

The Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer is a classic, professional, fast telephoto lens with image stabilization. This lens will be a good helper for a huge number of photographers in a huge number of photographic tasks. Personally, don't feed me with bread, but let me shoot on a 'light' TV set. Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS is available for various brands of SLR cameras, this review presents a version for Nikon cameras with Nikon F mount.

In addition, there is another interesting lens of this kind - Sigma AF Zoom APO 70-210mm 1: 2.8 (two versions).

View from the Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer mount

View from the Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer mount

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer is externally identical to the 'cropped' version of the lens - Sigma 50-150mm 1: 2.8 APO DC HSM EX Optical Stabilizer (for Nikon)... The body, hood, caps and markings are identical for both lenses. The only differences are the different inscriptions: '50 -150 'and '70 -200', 'DC' and 'DG', and the full-length has a depth of field scale, which is not available for a cropped lens. Therefore, this review will partially resemble the review Sigma 50-150mm 1: 2.8 APO DC HSM EX Optical Stabilizer :).

Sigma Covers 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Sigma Covers 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Everything is top notch in the Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS lens, which should correspond to the 'EX' designation ('Excellent' - top quality lenses). First of all, I would like to note a very good build. The lens itself is very huge and heavy - it weighs as much as 1430 grams and uses large 77mm 'professional' light filters (a kind of standard for professional photographic equipment).

Sigma 21-70mm 200: 1 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer Tripod Foot

Sigma 21-70mm 200: 1 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer Tripod Foot

The focus ring and zoom are rubberized, rotate smoothly and nicely. The focus ring is a little narrow, its stroke is 120 degrees. During auto focus, the ring remains stationary. In manual focus mode, when the ring reaches its extreme positions, it does not rest, but continues to rotate, slipping, like on many native Nikon lenses. When focusing and changing the focal length, the lens does not change its size, because it has internal systems of focusing and zooming. At the same time, the rear lens also remains stationary (no 'vacuum cleaner' effect).

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

The lens focuses using the HSM motor (HyperSonic Motor, an analog of Nikon SWM) quite quickly and almost silently. It is a pity, but still I did not observe an instantaneous reaction in the focusing system. Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS will fit all Nikon cameras, even those that don’t inboard motor focusing. The closest focusing distance is 140 cm and the maximum macro zoom ratio is 1: 8.

If compare focusing time from infinity to MDF and back with the native Nikon 70-200 / 2.8 VRII, then the latter focuses about 2 times faster :(. Yes, and the Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS does not change the speed of automatic focusing depending on the focal length or on the orientation of the lens.

There is a focus switch 'AF / M' ('Auto / Manual') on the case, as well as a three-position switch for stabilizer operation mode 'OFF-1-2'. In '1' mode, the lens stabilizes along 2 axes (analogous to Nikon Active VR). In '2' mode, stabilization is performed in only one direction (mode for shooting panoramas, analogous to Nikon Normal VR). In the 'OFF' position, the stabilizer is turned off. The stabilizer turns on when you press the focus button (usually a half-press on the shutter button). As soon as you press the shutter button, for an instant the picture in the viewfinder trembles significantly and the sound is heard from turning on the stabilizer. The same thing happens when the stabilizer stops working. This is normal and should not be scared.

On the case there is a focus distance scale in meters and feet, as well as depth of field scales for the wide-angle range (indicated by the letter 'w' - 'wide' - 'wide' for F / 5.6, 11, 16, 22) and for the television range (indicated by the letter 't' - 'tele' - 'tele-band' for F / 22 only).

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

The lens comes with a wonderful case, lens hood, lens hood extension for cropped cameras and a tripod foot. The tripod foot can be easily removed, and there are 3 marks on the lens body to quickly rotate the camera mounted on a tripod to portrait or landscape position (vertically or horizontally). The tripod foot can rotate freely 360 degrees around its axis. To remove the foot, pull on its clamp.

The lens hood can be installed in the reverse position (transport mode), only when the hood is worn back and forth, access to the focus ring and the zoom ring are completely lost. With a lens hood, the lens looks very, very solid :)

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS can use a special Sigma APS-C Hood HA 850-01, which serves as an extension of the main hood LH850-02 to work on cameras with an APS-C sensor. As you know, the field of view on cropped cameras with Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS will be narrower, and therefore the hood can be made longer and at the same time blocked more parasitic flares. A very interesting and simple solution to improve image quality when using a lens on cropped cameras. The Sigma APS-C Hood HA 850-01 fits into the slots on the lens, and the main hood is installed into the slots of the nozzle. In some cases, the nozzle itself can serve as a small hood.

Enlightenment of the front lens Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Enlightenment of the front lens Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

The TS-21 tripod foot and LH850-02 lens hood are also used by the lens. Sigma 50-150mm 1: 2.8 APO DC HSM EX Optical Stabilizer, which is analogous to Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS for cropped cameras. In addition, the TS-70 tripod foot can be attached to the Sigma 200-2.8 / 41 OS lens.

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with a hood

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with a hood

The optical design of 22 elements in 17 groups has 3 SLD elements and 2 FLD elements. 'SLD' - 'Special Low Dispersion' - 'low dispersion elements' and FLD 'F Low Dispersion' analog Nikon Extra-low Dispersion... Thanks to this optical design, the lens is close to apochromats, as evidenced by the APO ('Apochromatic') inscription in the lens name.

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with hood in transport mode

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with hood in transport mode

It is stated that the lens supports constant manual focus control. This is true, only such control works exclusively in AF-S and AF-A and only after the camera successfully focuses. The lens does not have a full-fledged mode of constant manual focus control Nikon M / A, and, in fact, performing manual focus override with the Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS starts to compete with camera and lens automatics. We can say that Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS has only focus mode Nikon A / M. Personally, this annoys me a lot. Native Nikon optics with this mode immediately turns off auto focus as soon as you touch the focus ring and it does not depend on the focus mode set in the camera. Most third-party manufacturers have not learned how to copy this wonderful feature. Of course, you should not worry about this, I think few users of this lens will notice the difference at all.

Extension cord for hood Sigma APS-C Hood HA 850-01

Extension cord for hood Sigma APS-C Hood HA 850-01

Diaphragm consists of 9 petals, closes over the entire range of focal lengths to F / 22. The circles in the blur zone almost always remain smooth :).

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with Extension

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with Extension

Personally, I liked the Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS, though it's hard for me to recommend it instead of my family Nikon ED AF Nikkor 80-200mm 1: 2.8D (MKII) и Nikon ED AF-S Nikkor 80-200mm 1: 2.8D MKIV... I think that a stabilizer in this focal length range is a very profitable solution, but the native lenses that I reviewed were much better at F / 2.8. Of course, if there are funds, then personally I would prefer Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8G ED VR (even a second-hand version) or Nikon N AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8GII ED VR: ).

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with extension and hood

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with extension and hood

It is stated that the stabilizer can compensate for 4 stops excerpts, for example, the native Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8G ED VR (first version) had a stabilizer, which was announced about 3 stops of compensation excerpts... Of course, 4 stops is the maximum, in real conditions the lens stretches 4 stops weakly. For me personally, when shooting handheld, the image stabilizer allowed me to shoot at 1 / 60s and 200mm focal length without any problems.

On Nikon DX cameras EGF lens will be 105-300mm. When I use this lens on cameras Nikon D700 и D80 There were no problems with focus accuracy.

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with extension and hood in transport mode

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer with extension and hood in transport mode

Optically, the Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS turned out to be a good lens, however, I would find fault with not the best sharpness at F / 2.8 (it does not reach the native 80-200 / 2.8 MKIII, MKIV), as well as a small distortion almost everywhere range of focal lengths (if you don't look very closely at the pictures, you will never find it), vignetting at open apertures (in more than half of the scenes, you will not notice vignette either), weak chromatic aberrations. They say that the Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS seriously loses to the native nanocrystalline monster Nikon N AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8GII ED VR in sharpness, especially in the corners, but the price tag of the native lens is completely different :). I think the Sigma 70-200 / 2.8 OS is a pretty good lens in terms of price / quality ratio. I want to note that the sample from this review turned out to be optically weaker Sigma 50-150mm 1: 2.8  (when used on the same Nikon D80).

Here link to the archive with the originals - 716 MB, 70 photos in .NEF format (RAW) from cameras Nikon D700 (FX) and  Nikon D80 (DX). When shooting was used protective filter Hoya HMC UV (c) 77mm, for examples of the operation of the lens with highlights and highlights I protective filter filmed to see the 'naked' result. Many thanks to Vika aka DoveHunter for her good mood.

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX OS on the ZK

Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX OS on the ZK

Catalog of modern Sigma lenses can look at this link.

Below is a list of all fast class 70-200 / 2.8 lenses with built-in image stabilizer:

Canon (Canon EF / EF-S / RF)

  1. Canon Zoom Lens EF 70-200mm 1: 2.8 L IS USM
  2. Canon Zoom Lens EF 70-200mm 1: 2.8 L IS II USM
  3. Canon Zoom Lens EF 70-200mm 1: 2.8 L IS III USM
  4. Canon Lens RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM

Nikon (Nikon F, Z)

  1. Nikon ED AF-S VR-Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8G Vibration Reduction SWM IF (black or silver version)
  2. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8GII ED N VR Nano Crystal Coat SWM IF
  3. Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm 1: 2.8E FL ED N VR Nano Crystal Coat SWM IF + its modification 'Nikon 100th Anniversary Edition'
  4. Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm 1: 2.8 VR S

Sony (Sony E)

  1. Sony FE 2.8 / 70-200 GM OSS
  2. Sony FE 2.8 / 70-200 G GM OSS II, 2021

Sigma (for different mounts)

  1. Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX OS (Optical Stabilizer) (for Canon EF / EF-S, Nikon F, Sony / Minolta A, Sigma SA, Pentax K, no longer available for Pentax)
  2. Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 DG OS HSM S | Sport (for Canon EF / EF-S, Nikon F, Sigma SA)

Tamron (for different mounts)

  1. Tamron USD DI SP 70-200mm F / 2.8 VC Ultrasonic Silent Drive A009 (for Canon EF / EF-S, Nikon F and Sony / Minolta A)
  2. Tamron SP 70-200mm f / 2.8 Di VC USD G2 A025 (for Canon EF / EF-S, Nikon F)
  3. Tamron 70-180mm F / 2.8 Di III VXD Model A056 (Sony FE only)

Panasonic

  1. Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 1: 2.8 / 70-200mm OIS (Leica L, Fall 2019)

Nikon ED AF Nikkor 80-200mm 1: 2.8D (MKII) and Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer

Nikon ED AF Nikkor 80-200mm 1: 2.8D (MKII) and Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer


Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.


Results

The Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer is a very pleasant lens, made to the highest standard with internal focusing and zoom, as well as image stabilization and a comfortable focal length range. True, optically, I would like a slightly better performance at F / 2.8, perhaps there is a difference in quality between Sigma lenses.

Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram

Add a comment: Victor

 

 

Comments: 79, on the topic: Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX Optical Stabilizer review

  • Jackie

    It seems that the pigeon in the hands of the girl sooo regretted that he was born into the world. The first backlit photo of the leaf is a bomb.

    • atypical Kiev

      tooting. The dotsi himself is the same age as the one in the photo - that's why I'm sorry for the bird - ((

  • Yana

    What happened to that bird in the girl’s hands? :-)

    • Arkady Shapoval

      I asked her to let her go, but she catches them in batches, this is a hobby :) that's why I affectionately called her “dove hunter” in the review

    • Novel

      )))

    • Novel

      You need to add: “Let's take a look around the given object for an hour without suffering a blue one” And then green at once will be revealed to the robot. ))))

  • Edgar

    At one time, this sigma or canon 2.8 was faced with a choice without a stub. I took the second one, and I have never regretted it. Sigma did not give such confidence that it is possible with it both into water and into fire ...

    • Gene jb

      According to reviews, some sigma is better than canon. However, he will come - we'll see ...

    • anonym

      Unfortunately, with "Canon" 2,8 without a stub it is impossible to fire and water - dust and moisture protection - no.

  • Igor

    Arkady, yes, the lens is interesting for the price + stab! May I ask you to review the Canon 80-200 2.8?

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Send, we will do)

  • Alexander Trekhsotkovich

    At one time, rushed between the purchase of Nikkor 80-200mm f2.8D ED MKIII and this Sigm-oh. As a result, he took Nikkor and still did not regret it at all, because the picture on Nikkor rings with a sharpness of 2.8, and the colors are pretty close to reality, and the boke is old) And the stub, as it turned out, is basically not needed, at 12 megapixels on my D300s often I take a photo shoot at 1/200 in the evening at sunset at a focal length of 200 mm, for insurance I do 3 frames each, and almost always 3 out of 3 are sharp without stirring. In general, when the lens weighs 1.4 kg and the body is 1 kg, then in the presence of strong and straight arms, shake is unlikely. Therefore, on VR from Sig, we wouldn’t look too much when choosing))) but VR from Nikkor is a completely different song.

    • Boris

      "And the stub, as it turned out, in principle, is not needed, at 12 megapixels on my D300s I often shoot in the evening at the sunsets of a photo shoot at 1/200 at a focal 200mm, for insurance I take 3 frames, and almost always 3 out of 3 are sharp without stirring." I'd like to see examples.

      • Seogey

        I'm on D800 70-200іі without stub smear and 2 stops higher. Be that as it may, the stub saves, the thing is useful, and you can remove it from your hand for 1/30 sec at 150-200 focus, if the object is static

  • Oleg

    Very interesting review. Thanks!!!

  • Vic

    Offtopic, of course, but nevertheless, pigeons are considered carriers of any infection, where are the parents, damn it? :)) Thank you for the review!

    • Arkady Shapoval

      already the tenth offtopite. Parents in the blur zone.

      • Vic

        Got it, then I’m also leaving the DOF :))

  • Sergey

    Really looking forward to a video review! Thanks for the reviews! Ark as always on the level!

  • Jury

    Thanks for the review, Arkady. In this lens, do lenses knock inside when the lens is not on the carcass?

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Do not knock.

  • varezhkin

    Interestingly, this kind of blur is called “cotton wool” in sigma? noticeably different from nikon ...

  • Amatich

    Thanks Arkady.

  • Camrad

    Thanks to this wonderful site!

  • Vladimir

    Good day!
    I bought for 22k Sigma 70-200mm D 1: 2.8 APO DG HSM EX for Nikon. (No stub)
    If anyone has one, tell me how much worse it is in picture quality
    and optical Sigma 70-200mm APO DG [b] OS [/ b] HSM EX (OS-stub)

  • Sergei

    Thanks for the reviews, Arkady.

    Could you evaluate how much the autofocus speed of this Sigma is higher / lower than the screwdriver Nikon 80-200 2.8?

  • Vladimir

    I wish you all good health! In one of the reviews for the Nikon D750 camera I read that in order to remove a competitor in optics, in the person of Sigma, Nikon made it so that this camera model is not “friendly” with Sigma lenses. When shooting video, or just LiveView, it does not work autofocus. I have a Sigma 70-200 and plan to switch to D750 in the near future. Tell me, please, is it true (about friendship and unfriendliness), is this a trend or an isolated case (or maybe even a duck)? Thank you in advance.

    • Vladimir

      truth! I have Nikon d7100, sigma is not friends with him, there is no autofocus when shooting video, and LiveView too

      • Igor

        O_o Why, tell me why autofocus for the video? He’s just awful, LiveView yes, but why the video?

      • Aleksejs

        My Nikon 7100 with this sigma focuses perfectly in LV, check your technique!

        • BB

          Maybe it depends on the firmware version of the device, which one do you have?

  • Valery

    Please tell me who knows. The store gave the name of the lens. In the price list they have described: Teleconverter Sigma ef 70-200 f2.8L 1.4 ex apo dg Nikon. I was searching in nete for nothing like the letters I did not find. Thank you

    • Yana

      Maybe this is not a lens, but a teleconverter?

  • Kostya

    I am faced with a choice or Sigma 70-200 or 50-100 on Nikon d3100
    what would be the best choice in this case?

    • Kostya

      decided to add a 100-400 sigma lens to the question

      • Michael

        with such a range of focal, no one will answer you

    • Ruslan

      Well, I think the range of 100-400mm is a slightly different position and you should not compare, but as for the comparison of 70-200 or 50-100 sigma per crop, here in the first case there is a stub and the possibility of using the FF (for the future) or aperture 1,8, 70 and convenient focal points for crop. To be honest, he himself made a choice and gained Tamron 200-7100, but lost it at the lower end, but gained a considerable margin into the distance, given that the weight is almost the same and this despite the fact that I have a crop of XNUMX.

      • Kostya

        the point is that there is sigma 17-70-I would like to "continue" the focal poet ui mentioned sigma 100-400

  • Gregory

    The opinion of the author is interesting. If we compare it by the quality of the picture, then which lens would be preferred - this Sigma or Tamron VC (first generation)?

    • Arkady Shapoval

      I did not shoot on Tamvron VC, it's hard to say. Personally, I would take my native VR1 in a used state. and did not bother.

      • Gregory

        Arkady, thanks for the answer.
        VR (1) has been out of production for a long time and it's not easy to find them in decent condition for an adequate price.

  • Sergiy

    Knowing people to tell me more beautifully the Tamron 70-200 2.8 I can’t reach 70-200 2.8; I can’t reach 70-200 2.8. It’s useful for fun photo sessions.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      Native 80-200 MK3 just right.
      Sigma 70-200 there were several iterations, depending on which one you find.

      • Sergei

        Sigma 70-200mm 1: 2.8 II Macro APO DG EX HSM

  • Sergei

    Does it look fresher?

  • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№

    Good day. Will the Canon 650D produce the same beautiful and juicy photos? )) Or just in ff?

    • Michael

      There will be, the main thing is the hands are straight and you often cannot distinguish from FF frames.

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№

        So, what about the Canon 70-200 4 IS?

  • Alexey

    Arkady, thank you very much for the useful review!
    I choose between the new Sigma (from this article) and the used Nikkor 70-200mm f / 2.8G ED VR AF-S, which is already 4 years old. Same price.
    Can you tell me how obsolete the Nikon model will be better than the new Sigma? Or worse?
    Hiring a Nikon D7100.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      I would take my own. And this sigma is far from new :)

  • anonym

    https://se7en.ws/proizvoditel-nazyvaet-obektiv-sigma-70-200mm-f2-8-dg-os-hsm-sports-novym-flagmanom/
    on a new sigma sport
    longer and heavier ... expected))

  • Alexander

    Hello everyone. I seem to have the oldest version without a stabilizer for kenon. At 5D, it gives amazing sharpness on the open and on all focal. Here is an example https://flic.kr/p/24TrJak
    Good photos to all

  • Sergei

    Good day, Arkady! I select a fast lens 70-200 1: 2.8 for myself. As a rule, the budget dictates its own. I bow to Tamron 2017. On the site http://www.the-digital-picture.com when comparing lenses, I came across a Sigma 70-200mm f / 2.8 DG OS HSM sports lens. Very comfortable for the price. In principle, I did not consider sigma, but after familiarizing myself with (https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=1116&Camera=979&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=1393&CameraComp=979&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0) became thoughtful. The quality of the test photos seems to be comparable to the top ones from Nikon, or maybe even better. The truth is there for Canon. It is interesting to know your opinion on this optics. The review does not say anything about "sports", or it is the same thing with the lens given in the review. Thanks.

    • Arkady Shapoval

      S is a newer lens, good. I advise him.

Add a comment

Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2023

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2014/08/sigma-70-200-2-8-apo-dg-hsm-ex-os/comment-page-1/?replytocom=433681

Versión en español de este artículo https://radojuva.com/es/2014/08/sigma-70-200-2-8-apo-dg-hsm-ex-os/comment-page-1/?replytocom=433681