answers: 27

  1. Yarkiya
    03.08.2014

    Focuses fast?

    Reply

  2. Eugene
    03.08.2014

    Wait a minute! That is, her aperture does not fall at a macro of 1: 1?

    Reply

    • Yarkiya
      03.08.2014

      Especially do not rejoice, the flu will be so small on a completely open diaphragm that you will immediately want to cover it.

      Reply

      • Vasily Artamonov
        03.08.2014

        I only have one without the letter “D”, I bought it especially for macro photography. The DOF is really very small, you have to cover the aperture up to 8-16. Even with macro photography, autofocus can not focus on something for a long time, it moves back and forth, or focuses in the wrong place, so you have to assign a focus point yourself or switch to manual focusing.

        Reply

      • Sergei
        04.08.2014

        So in macro photography, manual focus is almost always used!

        Reply

      • Eugene
        03.08.2014

        This is understandable. But the fact itself ...

        Reply

  3. fotika
    03.08.2014

    easily.

    Reply

    • Alexander Trekhsotkovich
      03.08.2014

      Thank you very much, we are waiting for reviews from Arkady of these chic glasses) especially the 70-200mm 2.8 VRI and 135ki.

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        03.08.2014

        Oh, yes, we got along when users tell me what to review, and the fact that different equipment requires different amounts of time - nobody cares. Actually, I took the modifications of versions for reviews only because I'm damn busy now, and so you and a review with descriptions of differences and even a photo. There will be time, we will make reviews of "complex" instances.

        Reply

      • zengarden
        03.08.2014

        This store should pay you for the work - after your reviews, the lenses are quickly sold :)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        03.08.2014

        A paid review - in this case, a dishonest review :) we know where it will lead if we put it on the conveyor :)

        Reply

      • Mr.G
        03.08.2014

        I agree, objectivity is reduced, motivation in the form of money is harm! That's when they give glass at the expense of payment - this is normal :).

        Reply

      • fotika
        03.08.2014

        I wanted to write about the same thing, but was afraid. here you don’t know what to expect, like a minefield.

        Reply

  4. Alexander Trekhsotkovich
    03.08.2014

    Arkady, personally, I’d be happy to wait for these reviews for at least a year, I in no case will point you out or rush you. I just noticed that the assortment of the fotika store has these glasses that are interesting to many people. All the best to you and plenty of free time.

    Reply

  5. Exhausted
    03.08.2014

    Interest and salivation are significantly reduced when you see the price tag for this (70-200 2.8) lens. Well, the world is so arranged — Caesar’s cesarean, locksmith’s locksmith.

    Reply

    • Alexander Trekhsotkovich
      03.08.2014

      That's for sure :) and when you see the price tag of 70-200 2.8, then you start to praise your old 80-200 2.8 :)

      Reply

      • Roman
        09.08.2014

        Colleagues, purely for the sake of interest: drag in a backpack for a couple of days at least 70-200 / 4 with other equipment. Then estimate that 70-200 / 2,8 is both heavier and more ... and the camera should be put in a backpack bag without removing the optics, etc. etc. And it's not just the price tag.
        Purely IMHO, no more

        Reply

  6. Jackie
    03.08.2014

    The extreme dog on the right in the middle row turned out to be generally bombing, although now put on the model on the podium :)

    Reply

  7. Sergey
    04.08.2014

    Arkady thanks for the review. Site radojuva is one of the most interesting on the Internet, I look forward to new reviews, lenses. Thanks to you, I bought a DSLR and took a photo. RESPECT AND RESPECT.

    Reply

  8. anonym
    05.08.2014

    And I spread joy to the people. I advise you to read the familiar teapots, everyone is very happy to have such a clear and interesting site))

    Reply

  9. Anatoly
    09.08.2014

    I introduced all my friends in absentia to “Radozhiva” and Arkady, in the group “Nikon” I often advise you to go to “Radozhiva”, my friends are very glad to meet you. Thank you Arkady for everything, and tolerance and understanding. KhMAO-Yugra Anatoly.

    Reply

  10. M
    10.02.2015

    > In turn, there is another, newer model - Sigma 50mm 1: 2.8 DG Macro EX (without the letter 'D' in the name), it differs from Sigma 50mm 1: 2.8 DG Macro D EX (from this review) only in that , which changes the minimum F-number when the focusing distance is changed.

    The same model. The letter D was no longer indicated, because all the models began to transmit the distance (and because the "Nikon" stopped). I won’t tell you about the aperture ratio, but it will simply fall in fact when the “trunk” is pulled out;

    Reply

  11. kotofei
    15.07.2019

    Request to transfer archives to a more correct storage. thanks

    Reply

    • Vitaly N
      15.07.2019

      Announce the entire list please ...
      Maybe the language is not correct?

      Reply

  12. Gennady
    19.09.2019

    who knows, does it make sense to buy it or can I use Tessar or Helios 44m-7 with rings? Will there be a big difference?

    Reply

  13. Dmitry Kostin
    05.05.2024

    I bought a later version of this lens for a vacation trip in February of this year.
    In Q mode on the Nikon DF, it constantly began to swear at the FEError error or something like that.
    In the normal S time-lapse mode, there was nothing like this.
    In addition to producing an error, the camera tried to overexpose the frame by increasing the shutter speed.
    I didn’t understand this behavior and started shooting in S mode.
    One more thing - when approaching the subject, somewhere up to 45-50 cm, the lens itself begins to close down to 3.2-3.3, even though I was shooting in aperture priority mode and it was set to 2.8. There were also some other oddities, which is why I sold it recently.

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer