answers: 47

  1. Eugene
    04.08.2014

    Strong baby and how to remove!

    Reply

  2. 10111
    04.08.2014

    I have one. Somehow, after fixes, it’s not at all impressive, and in terms of quality compared to the same 50 / 1.4 it is very mediocre. Plus only in the chip and autofocus, well, the focal ones are convenient.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      04.08.2014

      funny, with fixes to compare.

      Reply

      • 10111
        04.08.2014

        There are great zooms, there are bad fixes.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        05.08.2014

        Well, name at least one Nikkor autofocus prime in the 35-105 range, which will be worse than 35-105 / 3,5-4,5 at the same apertures. There is no such thing, therefore there is no need to compare.

        Reply

      • Andrey Dolzhenko
        05.08.2014

        You need to get a Tamron 24-70 review. :)

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        05.08.2014

        Send.

        Reply

      • Andrey Dolzhenko
        08.08.2014

        I’m far from the Smolensk region. Is it really that everyone in Kiev will give? :)

        Reply

  3. Jackie
    04.08.2014

    Funny, in the photo of people through the passage, not a single person seems to have cut through the photographer with the camera.

    Reply

    • Oleg
      04.08.2014

      Yes, this is not Tair-3 from the previous review, wherever the photographer would have glances already on the way to the transition))

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        04.08.2014

        I shot with Tair-3 with another person who was shooting with some kind of zoom next to me, and everyone immediately understood that they were just freak photographers and no one said anything.

        Reply

      • Michael
        05.08.2014

        In our cattle-town, it’s not going to shoot passers-by like that, by the cabbage soup it’s easy to get, even without a camera you’ll remain. If someone with a large camera passes, or somewhere they shoot, with softboxes, plates, etc. then they look at it so if Spielberg would come here to shoot a movie))

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        05.08.2014

        Zomg TEH DRAMA

        Reply

      • Yarkiya
        05.08.2014

        I take a big risk, but still ask, Petropavlovsk? :))

        Reply

      • Alexander Trekhsotkovich
        05.08.2014

        Yarkiy you guessed it))) There is such a thing in our city too. I once took pictures with an assistant with a photo umbrella, so there passers-by crowded and pointed their fingers at us and said "look photographer !!!" And if you go out at night, you can return home without a camera) This is not Europe))) This is a former scoop, here the main law is “the strongest survives” that is why I regularly go to the gym.

        Reply

      • Vyacheslav
        11.08.2014

        I shot several days in Lviv. In the evening and at night. With a tripod. I became impudent in the middle of an intersection. He shot people at point blank range. Zero reaction, even from drunk. Drivers simply circled, did not even signal.

        Reply

      • Jackie
        05.08.2014

        What kind of city is this hellishly intolerant of photographers, where you can stay without a camera for a photo? I really wanted to go there, take the photographer’s survival course in extreme conditions :)

        Reply

  4. Sergei
    04.08.2014

    “A super budget versatile lens for Nikon DX full-frame cameras”
    Probably it would be necessary to "super-budget version of the universal lens for full-frame Nikon FX cameras"
    I bought myself after your recommendation 28-105 and I'm not happy (though on the d300). Thanks for your hobby and sharing your results with us!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      04.08.2014

      Fixed

      Reply

  5. Yarkiya
    05.08.2014

    You write “For example, the modern Nikon 18-55mm 1: 3.5-5.6GII VR II AF-S DX Nikkor stock zoom with manual focus allows you to get a much higher magnification - 1: 2.8.”
    How to calculate this coefficient? Is there any formula?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.08.2014

      Maybe there is, usually indicated in the TX. You can calculate it yourself by photographing a ruler on an MDF and dividing the number of centimeters that fell into the frame by the physical size of the matrix.

      Reply

      • Yarkiya
        05.08.2014

        Thanks Arkady, about the line is a well-known thing, I thought maybe there is some kind of super-duper-duper on the floor of the calculation page. :))

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        05.08.2014

        Probably there is, but because of the “Focus Breathing”, which is different for each lens, it will be difficult to accurately calculate by MDF and focal length.

        Reply

      • Roderick
        27.03.2015

        So which of the two is still better in image quality-28-105 / 3.5-4.5 or 35-105 / 3.5-4.5?

        Reply

  6. Vladislav
    03.06.2015

    This review describes the 2nd version, in two adjacent 1st and 3rd, I wonder what my lens is: 2+ or 2nd restyling or transitional ....... :))))) Fully fits the description to the 2nd version, with a few exceptions: at the end there is a letter D. What thoughts will you have about this?

    Reply

  7. Vladislav
    03.06.2015

    Arkady serial do not see where he is? The lens was acquired only yesterday.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      03.06.2015

      On the diaphragm ring, there are inconspicuous numbers. If not there, just inspect the entire lens carefully, the serial number must be mandatory :)

      Reply

  8. Vladislav
    03.06.2015

    Found !!!!!!!! ;-)))) 3053206

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      03.06.2015

      Then you have exactly the same as in this review, MK2, and someone just drew the letter D and added it more expensive to you. To make sure that the letter D should not be, take a picture and look at the parameters of the focusing distance, for example, with this tool http://regex.info/exif.cgi I'm sure there will be either zero or some kind of delusional number :)

      Reply

  9. Vladislav
    03.06.2015

    On Sat700 the distance is confirmed….

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      03.06.2015

      Ahaha, this is not it. Do as I say.

      Reply

      • Vladislav
        03.06.2015

        Make: Nikon Corporation
        Model: Nikon D700
        Strip Offsets: 116608
        Orientation: Normal
        Samples per Pixel: 3
        Rows Per Strip: 120
        Strip Byte Counts: 57600
        XResolution: 300,00
        YResolution: 300,00
        Planar Configuration: 1
        Resolution Unit: Inch
        Software: Ver.1.01
        Date Time: 2015: 06: 03 10:52:26
        artist:
        Sub IFDS: 174228, 174348
        Reference Black White: 0/1, 255/1, 0/1, 255/1, 0/1, 255/1
        Copyright:
        EXIF OFFSET: 600
        Exposure Time: 1/60 SEC
        FNumber: F4,5
        Exposure Program: Aperture Priority
        ISOSpeed ​​Ratings: 400
        Date Time Original: 2015: 06: 03 10:52:26
        Date Time Digitized: 2015: 06: 03 10:52:26
        Exposure Bias Value: 0 EV
        Max Aperture Value: F4,3
        Metering Mode: Multisegment
        White Balance Presset: Auto
        Flash: On, strobe return, forced
        Focal Length: 105,00 mm
        Maker Note: "Nikon"
        User Comment: Not Possible to Define
        Sub Sec Time: 97
        Sub Sec Time Original: 97
        Sub Sec Time Digitized: 97
        Sensing Method: OneChipColorArea
        File Source: "."
        Scene type: "."
        CFAPattern: ""
        Custom Rendered: Normal Process
        Exposure Mode: Auto Exposure
        White Balance: Auto
        Digital Zoom Ratio: 1/1
        Unknown: 105
        Scene Capture Type: Standard
        Gain control: low gain up
        Contrast: Normal
        Saturation: normal
        Sharpness: Normal
        Photometric Interpretation :: Not Possible To Define
        New Subfile Type: 1
        Image Width: 160
        Image Length: 120
        Subject Distance Range: Unknown
        GPSINFO: 174208
        Date Time Original: 2015: 06: 03 10:52:26
        TIFF / EPStandard ID: 1, 0, 0, 0
        Type of Image: Nikon Raw
        Bits Per Pixel: 12

        --- Additional section ---

        ISO Speed: 400
        Quality: Raw
        White Balance Presset: Auto
        Focus Mode: AF-C
        Flash setting: normal
        Auto Flash Mode: Optional, TTL
        Fine Tune White Balance: 0, 0
        AE Bracket Compensation: 0/6
        Lens Information: 35 - 105mm F / 3.5-4.5
        Flash Used: Fired (External Flash)
        Bracketing Mode: Not Ussed
        Auto Bracket Release: Manual Release
        Noise Reduction: Off
        Total Number of Shutter Releases: 28442

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        03.06.2015

        Well, “Subject Distance Range: Unknown” - “distance to the object: unknown”, wash off the letter D and accept.

        Reply

      • vlad
        22.05.2018

        Arkady good evening. Tell me how much the exposure of 35-105 μ2 will be incorrect (considering that the lens does not transmit the focusing distance to the camera) They offered me this lens, cameras (nikon d300s and nikon f801s - American) in excellent condition, cheaply in excellent condition ??? with flash in TTL mode, as I understand it will not be a miracle either ?? Thank you in advance for your answer (I know you are a very busy person and you cannot always answer) Sincerely, Vlad.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        22.05.2018

        In TTL + BL mode, it will be good, only in normal TTL (i-TTL), or with non-native flashes.

        Reply

      • vlad
        24.05.2018

        Thank you very much for your help !!! your regular reader. Regards, Vlad.

        Reply

      • Valentine
        22.05.2018

        Vlad, I used some non-D lenses together with native and non-native flash in TTL mode. The misses in the exposition were not private, so this did not give any serious problems. I then shot in jpeg, and for this reason I discarded 10 percent of the material, no more. And I would shoot in raw, then almost everything would be working. I don’t know this particular lens, but if possible, try it before buying. Even from the histogram it will become clear how much the lack of distance transmission to the camera can complicate your life. Please note that some native bursts automatically turn on TTL + BL when the metering on the camera is set to matrix or center-weighted (they have pure TTL only for spot metering). Try TTL + BL and just TTL.

        Reply

      • vlad
        24.05.2018

        Thank you so much for the help !!! I'll try of course. I have a nikon sb-700 flash? I hope there will not be too many mistakes. Thank you for your help !!!

        Reply

      • vlad
        24.05.2018

        Thank you so much for the help !!! I'll try of course. I have a nikon sb-700 flash? I hope there will not be too many mistakes.

        Reply

      • The Hedgehog
        03.06.2015

        The world is cruel …

        Reply

      • Jury
        03.06.2015

        if you look closely, you can see that the letter is finished. The first time I see this, how much more expensive can you sell a lens so that you are not too lazy to finish painting the letter?

        Reply

  10. Vladislav
    03.06.2015

    Someone smacked into a pancake ....: (((((And on the other hand: clean glasses, no dust particles inside, cosmetics for a solid five, I think it's okay for 70 “green” rubles!;))))

    Reply

  11. Vladislav
    03.06.2015

    Arkady once again thank you so much for your reviews !!!

    Reply

  12. Oleg
    04.06.2015

    Today I bought this lens (specifically MKII) as a "plug" for Nikon F5 ... only paid for the carcass ... Initially I was going to sell the lens ....
    Both the camera and the lens are “made in Japan” ...
    Let me, I think, I'll test it ...

    And I liked the lens ...
    Recommended 28-105 I have ... with him and compared ...
    They seemed different to me ... I'll leave both! (They don't ask for bread, but only "go for a walk with them ..."

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer