answers: 20

  1. Alexander Trekhsotkovich
    24.07.2014

    The lens is garbage judging by your photos Arkady. But the review is super, as always, keep it up. But judging by the number of lines in the review, Arkady needs to get ready for flogging) Right now, an audience dissatisfied with the reviews will catch up)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.07.2014

      Now pull up Zero and bans someone for a flame :)

      Reply

  2. Alexey
    24.07.2014

    Alexander, you’ve already decided .. The lens is garbage, as you said, but do you need more lines about it? Where is the logic?)) Specifications are given, operating impressions too, test photos are available. You, sorry, what the hell do you need?))

    Reply

  3. Jackie
    24.07.2014

    The nut in the penultimate photo, IMHO, does not look kosher, although I really liked the photo with rowan bokeh. By the way, for the first time I hear about the manufacturer Cimko, but I wonder why the letters MS are green, although the enlightenment, judging by the photos, is yellow? Illogical :)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.07.2014

      Yes, I just pointed out that the nuts are on the face. A rowan without nuts, as shot at F / 2.8, on the fully open diaphragm, the hole in the fixes is always round. As for letters, the color of enlightenment and letters are not connected in any way, it's just the design of the lens.

      Reply

      • Jackie
        24.07.2014

        Yes, yes, I mean that on an open aperture in photographs the “back” picture is pleasing to the eye, but with a closed one - not much ... And for the letters I just had to by the way :)

        Reply

  4. Yuriy75
    24.07.2014

    I do not agree with the previous speaker, judging by the photo the lens is a strong middle peasant, but does not shine; in the above photos, even the flaws indicated by the author do not hurt the eyes. If the price of glass is $ 20-30, then everything is not even bad. Respect to the author! As always on the level!

    Reply

  5. androkin
    24.07.2014

    In appearance and design, this is an exact copy of the HANIMEX MC 1: 2.8 f = 135mm lens. There are no enthusiastic reviews about him, but in general the lens is not bad. With a polar and starting from aperture 4, it pleases with good photos.

    Reply

    • nukemall
      30.07.2014

      Hanimex is a reseller trademark that sold dozens of different 135 / 2.8 lenses from different manufacturers.

      Reply

  6. Oleg
    24.07.2014

    My Tair-11 is also chromate on an open diaphragm. Well, at least sometimes seen. And so I looked at the photo, no better and no worse than our domestic optics of the 80s! Even at heart it became pleasant. Well, here in the test Nikon D700 !!! The camera itself is gorgeous. I liked the photo examples.

    Reply

  7. Yarkiya
    24.07.2014

    Strange, the company on the network does not google, but on ebee pieces 30 of these are sold. Specifically, 135tok three, and the remaining zooms and a pair of widths 24 and 28 mm. The zooms are all trombones alike.
    The review is good, the lens is mediocre. It’s clearly not worth the passionate comment.

    Reply

    • anonym
      25.07.2014

      Everything is googled perfectly, even Cimko cameras give out. Google probably doesn’t want to show goyant things to Jews)

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        25.07.2014

        For the flame blacklist for 300 years, I hope you understand me. Dear Anonymous :)

        Reply

  8. anonym
    25.07.2014

    For me, Jupiter is more interesting, albeit a 3,5 hole, but for that, with a cool result immediately open

    Reply

    • anonym
      27.07.2014

      And for me, the Nikon 200mm f2 is more interesting, albeit a 2.0 hole, but for that, it’s immediately cool to open

      Reply

      • Lynx
        28.07.2014

        no. 200 mm on the crop is already too much for most tasks, and a shortfall for the rest.

        Reply

      • Alexander Trekhsotkovich
        29.07.2014

        Lynx do not tell. For example, I use Nikkor 300-80mm f200D MK-III on my D2.8s (s-male) and I do body and waist with chest portraits exclusively on a focal 200mm at aperture 2.8. And boke I think this only makes it better, and the depth of field zone is growing and two, three people easily fall into the depth of field. For example, a portrait at 200mm f2.8 http://www.pekarskas.com/#!untitled/zoom/c1u2e/image1qib and people feel more relaxed when I am so far from them, they cease to be shy and begin to show feelings, which was not the case with the poltnik and the 85th.

        Reply

  9. movritsio
    26.07.2014

    There is something in this lens, interesting. Judging by the photo. Although it may be only a specific instance is different ...

    Reply

  10. nukemall
    30.07.2014

    There was already a review of his relative under the Focal trademark. Why “review” the same lenses that differ only in their inscriptions?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.07.2014

      And there are samples on the crop, and here on ff, just more carefully :)

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer