answers: 42

  1. Felix
    19.05.2014

    350d has already left the ranks of honorary observer: D

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      19.05.2014

      No, he's just waiting for the EF-S optics :), and in the previous review he was also an “honorary” model on which Zeiss 135 / 2,8 was drawn :)

      Reply

  2. Nick
    19.05.2014

    MDF 7 feet, just a scale in meters - green.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      19.05.2014

      Fixed

      Reply

  3. Yuriy75
    19.05.2014

    It reminds of the Soviet Granite - 11N, the constructive is excellent, but the rest is a problem ... A device for photographers-bodybuilders :). Many thanks to the author for the review! One word of a professional, even from an unimportant technique, pulls out excellent pictures!

    Reply

  4. Oleg
    19.05.2014

    Something your model disappeared somewhere?) For a long time it is not visible in the pictures)

    Reply

    • THE
      20.05.2014

      Oleg, why? :) Seals are in almost every review;)

      Reply

      • Oleg
        20.05.2014

        that there was another kitty))

        Reply

      • Jura ^ __ ^
        29.06.2014

        when a million female poses are tragic nature. Kitska is cool! I’ve thrown to the jock ^ __ ^

        Reply

  5. Vyacheslav
    20.05.2014

    I used the same one - with Olympus OM mount. In addition to what was said in the review, my copy was very yellow in the picture. The light is really a problem.

    Reply

  6. Artem
    20.05.2014

    Uv.podskazite budget telephoto in case of hunting fishing, so that you can captivate wildlife, birds, etc.! I am a fan of the carcass of Kenon 600, in the set there are 2 portrait portraits of macro rings, the width is short and the TV set

    Reply

    • Pastor
      20.05.2014

      On my own I would recommend Canon 55-250. A decent stabilizer, a sharp picture for a zoom, a good spread of focal lengths. And most importantly - a ridiculous price in the region of 5 thousand. For hunting and birds during the day - the very thing. It’s not a pity to break or lose) In any case, not as sorry as an elk for 20 thousand.

      Reply

      • anonym
        20.05.2014

        And from the shovel sample? Mto 1000 or Tahir ??

        Reply

      • Oleg Muravitsky
        20.05.2014

        ARSAT M 80-200 / 4,5 you can see how my friend is selling this one now. Or an early version of it - Granit-11. The price of the issue will be in the range of 300-600 UAH, depending on the state

        Reply

    • Oleg
      20.05.2014

      Well, it depends on the budget the simplest telephoto canon-55-250. Well, of course it's better
      station wagon canon-18-200

      Reply

  7. Oleg Muravitsky
    20.05.2014

    “It's great that the lens has a fully internal zoom - nothing moves when the focal length is changed. It is also great that when focusing and when changing the focal length, the rear lens remains stationary. The only pity is that when focusing, the entire front part of the lens rotates and goes forward. "
    That is, the design is similar to the ZOOM ARSAT M 80-200. In principle, there is nothing wrong with the rotation of the front lens - the polarizer is not particularly in demand on the telezoom.

    Reply

  8. Vladimir
    20.05.2014

    Arkady, this is Ray (where ?! and here - https://radojuva.com.ua/2014/01/page-3700/) She doesn't smile at all!
    Your K.O.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.05.2014

      Yes, Ray sometimes looks in the comments on Radozhiv and cannot smile (

      Reply

  9. Exhausted
    20.05.2014

    Arkady, did I understand correctly that the lens hood was not used when shooting?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      20.05.2014

      Not used.

      Reply

  10. Alexey de Paris
    19.03.2018

    Good afternoon, thanks for the review. How long no one wrote about this lens! Yesterday I had the opportunity to make a couple of test shots at the photo exhibition. The quality of the test I tested did not suit me. Filmed on the D600 at full open and against the light.
    focal maximum, focus on the counter

    https://yadi.sk/i/5M4MrC6D3TXFEH

    Reply

  11. Nicholas
    13.12.2018

    Arkady, hello. Tell me, please, can the Vivitar 85-205 mm 1: 3.8 AUTO ZOOM 58 mm lens on NIKON B 3100 have infinity? Thank you in advance.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      13.12.2018

      For infinity, you need an M42 adapter with a lens. I advise you to abandon the use of an adapter with a lens and lose infinity

      Reply

  12. Athanasius
    07.02.2019

    All reviews are the same and not interesting ... What do you want from a lens made God knows when, he does not like flare, and almost every lens up to 90g does not like flare and does not hold backlight plus catches hares.
    Better talked more about sharpness on all ranges and across the entire field of the frame and more frames with portraits to evaluate bokeh

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      07.02.2019

      Not interested - don't read it.

      Reply

  13. Sergiy Kobzar
    22.01.2020

    Luxurious object, especially fond of those who arrive for me for 400 UAH)
    Photo below

    Reply

    • Sergiy Kobzar
      22.01.2020

      .

      Reply

    • Sergiy Kobzar
      22.01.2020

      ,

      Reply

  14. Volha
    02.06.2021

    Hello. Thanks for your review. Tell me, how will it behave on crop1.6? What is the focal length? I want to put it on Canon EOS-m10. Do you need an M42 adapter with a lens? Or a simple one without a lens will do? Thank you.

    Reply

    • twm
      02.06.2021

      @Volha
      Multiply the focal factor by the crop factor of your system, i.e. by 1.6. The EF-M is a mirrorless system with a short flange distance of 18mm and therefore does not require a lens for most ancient lenses.

      Reply

    • Victor
      02.06.2021

      This will be focal, 75-205, nothing needs to be multiplied.

      Reply

    • twm
      02.06.2021

      @Victor
      The person is clearly trying to ask about the EGF (respectively, to get an idea of ​​the viewing angle)

      Reply

      • Specialist
        02.06.2021

        @twm The person is clearly not sitting on the FF, he would know, I suppose, what kind of EGFs on his crop are obtained. Volha, the same mm on this lens will be as you are accustomed to on the crop, nothing will be multiplied.

        Reply

      • Victor
        02.06.2021

        I also did not see where he is clearly trying to ask about the ether. Perhaps he needed to understand that a 75mm focal length would correspond to 75mm on a native ef-m lens (for example, set at 18-150 zoom) without any multiplication or recalculation.

        Oh well.

        Reply

      • twm
        04.06.2021

        I agree, my mistake. I was too clever: to correlate the focal kit zoom and this lens (and any other) - no recalculation is needed for this.

        Reply

  15. Vladimir
    19.01.2022

    Hello. I bought my son the same lens (he has a Sony alpha 6000), and bought a PK-NEX adapter. But he doesn't fit. It’s great for the camera, but not for the lens, it dangles. Please advise what adapter is needed? Thanks in advance.

    Reply

  16. Fay
    27.05.2022

    I have this lens. How much should I charge because I want to sell this lens.

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      27.05.2022

      About $25-35.

      Reply

  17. Pedro
    16.01.2023

    good morning. Does anyone know give me a link or the adapter model for a Nikon D200 ? Thank you very much.

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      16.01.2023

      This article has links to adapters. Use google translate and read it.

      Reply

  18. Andrea
    01.03.2023

    Can someone tell me how to take the thing off to connect to the camera?

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      01.03.2023

      What thing?

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer