answers: 26

  1. Denis
    07.05.2014

    I wanted to buy a similar adapter for my NEX-3. First of all, I was interested in the possibility of working with the aperture, it makes no sense to rely on autofocus, and manual focusing on these cameras is a pleasure with picking or increasing the focusing area.

    Reply

  2. anonym
    07.05.2014

    when such appear between nikon and canon ???
    and so that it has a screwdriver for autofocus Nikon optics)
    eh dreams) ...

    Reply

    • Denis
      07.05.2014

      Yeah, and immediately Speed ​​Booster to turn the cropped matrix into a full frame))
      With Nikon mirrorless optics, it’s a little easier, although at least adapters with a diaphragm lead are available, you can manually change the diaphragm.

      Reply

  3. anonym
    07.05.2014

    what is the motivation behind the choice of different working lengths from different manufacturers?

    Reply

    • Oleg
      07.05.2014

      Interest Ask? For example, on Nikons, the ability to focus on infinity on Soviet optics is lost, and for me it was an argument in favor of Kenon, something that was inherited and simply fun: holding two eras in one hand. I think this is just marketing. That case when competition is not good. But I don’t know the exact answer

      Reply

      • Eugene
        08.05.2014

        But in my opinion this is nonsense: to abandon Nikon only because it is not fully compatible with Soviet lenses. It's like giving up Toyota, just because VAZ parts are not suitable for it. Well, what, like a lot of grandfather left in the garage. Do not throw it away! And the link between generations ...

        Reply

      • Alexey
        08.05.2014

        Yeah, the Internet has already become famous for idiocy.

        Reply

      • Rostovr
        08.05.2014

        In addition to sovetskoy optics, there is a bunch of old imported ones, for example, those tseysses. Nikon here is just like plywood over Paris ... For the sake of fairness, we can say that the old nikkors are quite normal. But all the same for canon there are more options, versatility is a plus, not stupidity. Be more correct in expressions.

        Reply

    • Denis
      07.05.2014

      I think technological calculations are at the design stage. Nikon's segment is old, as calculated, it remains, there is no general standard in this regard. Kenon, for example, is younger, and perhaps this has reduced the length. Or maybe they did it for marketing purposes so that Nikon and not only optics would fit))

      Reply

  4. Oleg
    07.05.2014

    Main takeaway - shoot with non-autofocus optics with fully mechanical control

    Reply

  5. Pastor
    08.05.2014

    Interesting thing. True, the price from 200 to 400 dollars is a little scary, but for those who decided to "decrease" and changed the Canon DSLR to Sony mirrorless, and at the same time left half a dozen Canon lenses in stock, this money will seem scanty. And in general, there are more glasses for Canon, which means when buying a Sony you can watch not only native lenses, but also a bunch of Canon lenses. In my opinion, this is gorgeous!

    Reply

    • Dmitry K
      08.05.2014

      In general, a strange tendency in our town has been outlined - on the Internet, they sell DSLRs and screwdriver lenses marked "switched to mirrorless". The people are apparently tired of bricks

      Reply

      • anonym
        08.05.2014

        I would love to buy a 50 1.4 screwdriver

        Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        09.05.2014

        working diaphragm 50 1.4d starting at 2.8

        Reply

      • Antonio
        07.04.2017

        I have the very first 50 1.4 AF Nikor - oh, how wrong you are about the working aperture, I don't like the backlight because of the old enlightenment, but otherwise the lens is chic and fully working across the entire f-number range, especially the bokeh at 1.4 is gorgeous, just more necessary be able to choose lighting, old lenses are more sensitive to this.

        Reply

  6. Sandy
    08.05.2014

    The standard whale from the canon, as for me, showed itself quite well.

    Reply

    • anonym
      09.05.2014

      18-55stm is very good, but of course there are drawbacks: the design is rather flimsy, it is chromate in the corners and there is an excess of contrast.

      Reply

  7. movritsio
    09.05.2014

    Chago argue about cameras and compatibility? I have a Nikon system and there are some Nikkors, but I will buy 5D Kenon. And Nikkorov’s lenses are pigmented.
    Thanks to Arkady for the review. The adapter is really unique. Iris control, etc.

    Reply

  8. anonym
    12.05.2014

    For some reason, no one writes how gluttonous this adapter is. I used a king chip adapter, without automatic functions and in manual mode, the charge decreased before my eyes, 3 hours passed, the battery was 0%, I took no more than 100 shots, is, autofocus, disabled ... And how interesting does this behave? Sony a7 camera.

    Reply

  9. David Kutalia
    08.09.2014

    Thanks for the interesting review. May I have a question? I have a SONY A7 camera and Metabones EF-E-mount adapter. There is practically nothing to add to the problems with CANON lenses that you listed above, everything is exhaustive. Yes, the adapter is good, there are also disadvantages, as in life. I installed a new PETZVAL 1: 2.2 / 85mm through this adapter: the camera began to “wake up” for a long time and the shutter button did not work for a long time, even through the native remote shutter release. The shutter function “no lens” is naturally enabled. What do you advise to do?

    Reply

  10. David Kutalia
    08.09.2014

    Thank you, I found the answer to the problem http://www.getdpi.com/forum/sony/43130-speed-booster-nex-15.html: “NB if anyone gets a Petzval and mounts it onto an electronic adapter, it will short out the contacts !, which in this case prevented the shutter from releasing. Putting a bit of insulating tape resolves this issue ”. I insulated the back of the lens from the adapter pins with adhesive tape and everything worked fine. Please forgive me for disturbing you. :-))

    Reply

  11. Sample name
    28.07.2015

    This adapter, as well as ALL adapters at the moment (commlite, metabones, fotodioX), such as Canon EF-Sony-E, give LIGHT flare due to the peculiarities of the coating inside the adapter. Be careful.

    Reply

  12. Sample name
    28.07.2015

    Be *

    Reply

  13. Kirill
    01.11.2015

    I decided to try a new perversion and bought a Canon 70-200 F4 L and a Sony NEX 3N. The bundle plows with an analog adapter from Commlite. Autofocus is dull and slow, jerking the lenses back and forth across the full scale before confirming focus. I thought the problem was in the camera, I tried the lens on the alpha6000 and A7R in the store - the same thing, but it jerks faster. I really like the color that this bundle gives, the picture is sharp, silent, some kind of "postcard", vital. Chamber jpeg does not need to be finished with a file in editors, unlike Kenon cameras, in which the BB and the color are simply deranged and lives their own life

    Reply

  14. Edward
    16.04.2018

    ihmo idea is just perfect
    to cross the best and most versatile, and not expensive optics park for Canon - with carcasses from the best matrix manufacturer (Sony - Nikon - also uses their matrices)

    the only question is autofocus speed - for different carcasses and different lenses

    (Nikon also has wonderful optics - but Canon began to introduce ultrasonic motors and stabilizers for decades, which has now led to the fact that their optics, in general, are more universal)

    about a universal autofocus adapter for Nikon - I don't believe that it will appear in the foreseeable future, since the Nikon bayonet is much more complicated - the same screwdriver, several types of aperture control, etc.
    if it appears it can cost as much as the carcass of the a7 series

    Reply

  15. Sergos
    19.04.2018

    and I bought \ fotga \ at 12 pa3 cheaper and I'm very satisfied -70-200 f4l- canon works fine only the native 70-200 f4 sony is much sharper \ what I was convinced of on 7r - it's not for nothing that sony hurts the price

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer