Review Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y)

For provided by lens Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y) huge thanks to Bogdan.

Review Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y)

Review Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y)

The Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* is currently one of the best 135/2.8 lenses available. I reviewed the AEJ version . You can find versions of the Carl Zeiss 135/2.8-3.5 lenses here.

To take the pictures I used Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* on Canon EOS cameras using a C/Y-EOS adapter.

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * with extended built-in telescopic hood when focusing on MDF

Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * made in Japan, weighs almost 600 grams, almost all of metal, very pleasant to the touch. Has a built-in metal telescopic hood. In the installed position, the hood holds normally and does not sink back.

I noticed that several lenses have unblackened chamfers ( see image ), which should result in a decrease in contrast. For a lens of this class, this is a bit odd.

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

The Sonnar 2.8/135 uses a special T* coating on its lenses , allowing the lens to handle strong light sources comfortably. The filter thread diameter is 55 mm.

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

The focusing ring is very wide, rubberized, and rotates 180 degrees. Focusing is easy and pleasant. It's just a shame that the minimum focusing distance is a whopping 1.6 meters, and the maximum magnification is about 1:12. For example, the Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Sonnar 3,5/135 with an Exakta mount and the MC Sonnar 3,5/135 Carl Zeiss Jena DDR have a maximum focusing distance of only 1 meter.

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

View Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

The aperture consists of only 6 blades (this is not like the Pentacon 2.8/135 with 15 blades), and at f/4 and f/5.6 the blades form serrated edges (resembling a circular saw). At f/16 and f/22, the blades form an uneven hexagon :(. Cameras with a Contax/Yashica bayonet mount have automatic aperture control (a 'blinking' or 'jumping' aperture device). The aperture control ring is rubberized—a small, but nice touch . There's also a depth-of-field scale and an infrared shift mark.

The notches in the bokeh that appear on the F 4 and 5.6 apertures

The notches in the bokeh that appear on the F 4 and 5.6 apertures

The lens produces good image quality, with pleasant bokeh (only at f/2.8), contrast, and color rendition. Distortion, chromatic aberration , and vignetting are minor concerns. I can't say there's anything unique about the image; the Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* (C/Y) simply does its job well.

Here's a link to the archive with the originals —555 MB, 46 photos in RAW format from a full-frame Canon 5D camera.

The Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * has 5 elements in 4 groups in its optical design, usually referred to as 'Ernostar', it differs from the 'Sonnar' design used in Soviet long-focal Jupiter lenses (4 elements in 4 groups).

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T *

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * on the CZK

A comparison of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* (C/Y) with the MC Jupiter-37A 3,5/135 can be found here . You can also check out reviews of its older siblings – the Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Sonnar 3,5/135 with its native Exakta bayonet mount and the Carl Zeiss Jena DDR MC Sonnar 3,5/135 in a black body with an M42 thread. It's a shame there aren't any affordable autofocus 135-m lenses with apertures around 2,8-3,5 anymore.

Catalog of modern Carl Zeiss lenses can look at this link.

Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.


Conclusion

Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y) is a good 'working' lens :)

This material was prepared by Arkady Shapoval . The greatest support for the site is if you use links on this site, such as Amazon , when purchasing anything . It costs you nothing, but for this site, and therefore for my family, it's the main source of support.

Add a comment:

 

 

Comments: 65, on the topic: Overview of Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y)

  • Alexey

    Arkady please review 140 / 2,8 Carl Zeiss.

  • Alex m

    I have more questions than comments: Are there any craftsmen who rearranged the native shank on the m42, the question is, so to speak, “selfish”. I have Sigma SD-10, SD-15 cameras, I have no family lenses, the Art series is expensive- I want to get by with a little blood and buy Japanese Contax / C. Zeiss T * and rearrange to m42, and use on the camera using the M42-SA adapter. There are practically no adapters from other systems to Sigma.
    I do not consider new versions of ZS (m42 mount), it's dumb!
    PSSigma is so clearly not popular in Ukraine that even Uv.Arkady has no reviews of Sigma cameras.

    • Pokemon

      Sigma on Foveone and in the Russian Federation is not particularly popular.
      There are no lenses. Batteries and boosters / battery packs cannot be found.

  • Alex

    I have an ef mount, most likely the lens was redone earlier, but I'm not sure about it

  • Egor

    Yes, he is a magic lens! On the open course. I have the most beautiful works, everything is with him. Bokeh gives wonderful on the open. Astrophoto is clear in the open, no distortion! Against the sun - yes it is easy. Enlightenment T * is very good ..

  • Ilya

    Please tell me what kind of lens this is, Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar 2-2,8/7,1-51 T*, can it be used?

    • Rodion

      It looks like it comes from a movie camera with a sensor format no larger than 1", or rather less. At best, it will cover a Nikon 1 type matrix.

Add a comment

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Copyright © Radojuva.com. The author of the blog is Photographer Arkady Shapoval . 2009-2026

English-version of this article https://radojuva.com/en/2014/05/carl-zeiss-sonnar-2-8-135-t-valentine/

Versión en español de este artículo https://radojuva.com/es/2014/05/carl-zeiss-sonnar-2-8-135-t-valentine/