For provided by lens Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y) huge thanks to Bogdan.
The Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* is currently one of the best 135/2.8 lenses available. I reviewed the AEJ version . You can find versions of the Carl Zeiss 135/2.8-3.5 lenses here.
To take the pictures I used Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* on Canon EOS cameras using a C/Y-EOS adapter.
Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * made in Japan, weighs almost 600 grams, almost all of metal, very pleasant to the touch. Has a built-in metal telescopic hood. In the installed position, the hood holds normally and does not sink back.
I noticed that several lenses have unblackened chamfers ( see image ), which should result in a decrease in contrast. For a lens of this class, this is a bit odd.
The Sonnar 2.8/135 uses a special T* coating on its lenses , allowing the lens to handle strong light sources comfortably. The filter thread diameter is 55 mm.
The focusing ring is very wide, rubberized, and rotates 180 degrees. Focusing is easy and pleasant. It's just a shame that the minimum focusing distance is a whopping 1.6 meters, and the maximum magnification is about 1:12. For example, the Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Sonnar 3,5/135 with an Exakta mount and the MC Sonnar 3,5/135 Carl Zeiss Jena DDR have a maximum focusing distance of only 1 meter.
The aperture consists of only 6 blades (this is not like the Pentacon 2.8/135 with 15 blades), and at f/4 and f/5.6 the blades form serrated edges (resembling a circular saw). At f/16 and f/22, the blades form an uneven hexagon :(. Cameras with a Contax/Yashica bayonet mount have automatic aperture control (a 'blinking' or 'jumping' aperture device). The aperture control ring is rubberized—a small, but nice touch . There's also a depth-of-field scale and an infrared shift mark.
The lens produces good image quality, with pleasant bokeh (only at f/2.8), contrast, and color rendition. Distortion, chromatic aberration , and vignetting are minor concerns. I can't say there's anything unique about the image; the Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* (C/Y) simply does its job well.
Here's a link to the archive with the originals —555 MB, 46 photos in RAW format from a full-frame Canon 5D camera.
The Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * has 5 elements in 4 groups in its optical design, usually referred to as 'Ernostar', it differs from the 'Sonnar' design used in Soviet long-focal Jupiter lenses (4 elements in 4 groups).
A comparison of the Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 T* (C/Y) with the MC Jupiter-37A 3,5/135 can be found here . You can also check out reviews of its older siblings – the Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Sonnar 3,5/135 with its native Exakta bayonet mount and the Carl Zeiss Jena DDR MC Sonnar 3,5/135 in a black body with an M42 thread. It's a shame there aren't any affordable autofocus 135-m lenses with apertures around 2,8-3,5 anymore.
Catalog of modern Carl Zeiss lenses can look at this link.
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment.
Conclusion
Carl Zeiss Sonnar 2.8 / 135 T * (C / Y) is a good 'working' lens :)
This material was prepared by Arkady Shapoval . The greatest support for the site is if you use links on this site, such as Amazon , when purchasing anything . It costs you nothing, but for this site, and therefore for my family, it's the main source of support.








Arkady please review 140 / 2,8 Carl Zeiss.
I have more questions than comments: Are there any craftsmen who rearranged the native shank on the m42, the question is, so to speak, “selfish”. I have Sigma SD-10, SD-15 cameras, I have no family lenses, the Art series is expensive- I want to get by with a little blood and buy Japanese Contax / C. Zeiss T * and rearrange to m42, and use on the camera using the M42-SA adapter. There are practically no adapters from other systems to Sigma.
I do not consider new versions of ZS (m42 mount), it's dumb!
PSSigma is so clearly not popular in Ukraine that even Uv.Arkady has no reviews of Sigma cameras.
Sigma on Foveone and in the Russian Federation is not particularly popular.
There are no lenses. Batteries and boosters / battery packs cannot be found.
I have an ef mount, most likely the lens was redone earlier, but I'm not sure about it
Yes, he is a magic lens! On the open course. I have the most beautiful works, everything is with him. Bokeh gives wonderful on the open. Astrophoto is clear in the open, no distortion! Against the sun - yes it is easy. Enlightenment T * is very good ..
Please tell me what kind of lens this is, Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar 2-2,8/7,1-51 T*, can it be used?
It looks like it comes from a movie camera with a sensor format no larger than 1", or rather less. At best, it will cover a Nikon 1 type matrix.