According provided by lens MC Pentacon Prakticar 1: 1.8 f = 50mm many thanks to Ivan Levoy.
MC Pentacon Prakticar 1: 1.8 f = 50mm is like two drops of water similar to Pentacon Auto 1.8 / 50 Multi Coating. I will not do a detailed review, since all the basic properties of the lens are described in Pentacon Auto 1.8 / 50 Multi Coating review.
Optically Auto Revuenon 1.8 / 50 Multi Coating, Pentacon Auto 1.8 / 50 Multi Coating и Meyer-Optik Görlitz Oreston 1.8 / 50 no different from the lens from this review.
My copy was redesigned for Nikon F mount, the ability to focus to infinity is preserved. Pentacon Prakticar 1.8 / 50 is interesting for its rubberized focusing ring, which rotates 360 degrees and a minimum focusing distance of 33 cm. The image quality is at a high level. The lens has interesting bokeh.
The parameters shown in the photo gallery:
Everything is filmed on Nikon D700 using protective filter Hoya 49mm UV (0) Japan. On-camera JPEG L ('optimal quality' compression). Functions: vignetting control, ADL, noise reduction at long exposures, noise reduction at high ISOs were turned off. All shot in Picture Control mode SD (standard mode): contrast correction - 0, brightness - 0, saturation - 0, hue - 0, sharpness - position 5 between 0 and 9. Used white balance 'Mainly cloudy'. The size of the photos was reduced to 3 MP. How to use old lenses on modern Nikon cameras read here.
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.
Conclusions:
MC Pentacon Prakticar 1: 1.8 f = 50mm is another fast XNUMXmm lens. The lens has many clones.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
A decent option (clone), the picture and bokeh really liked. It looks like Helios-81N and the design and pattern.
Thanks for the review. Bokeh is interesting.
It’s a pity that the rear end remains behind the scenes, it would be no less interesting to watch it
Question to Arkady:
In your opinion, which lens is better than the MC Pentacon Prakticar 1: 1.8 f = 50mm or the CZJ MC Pancolar 1: 1.8 f = 50mm?
And anyway, can you see any difference between them? ..
I am facing a lens choice, which one to choose?
MC Pentacon Prakticar 1: 1.8 f = 50mm
or
Helios 81H
Reviews of both watched. Love the Pentacon bokeh.
It remains to decide what.
I have a Canon 550d
Everyone who wants to take off a photo of the shank. Although this is a regular (Chinese) adapter M42 / Nikon. Pentacon liked more.
Is the adapter wound onto the bayonet or the bayonet itself is removed and is there an adapter instead?
Arkady, tell me how to remake it for Nikon F while maintaining infinity?
Tell me how different is this lens from Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f / 1.8D?
Can Pentacon replace Nikon's lens? thanks
The main difference is automatic focusing. Cannot replace.
Thank you, but in the quality of the photo (sharpness, color saturation, etc.) is much inferior to Nikon? I'm new to this business, so excuse me, perhaps, for a naive question
Altogether inferior. Modern lenses are much better in almost every way.
What adapter is needed to install this lens on a Canon?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/PB-EOS-for-Praktica-PB-Lens-To-Canon-EOS-EF-Adapter-7D-5D-600D-500D-MNT/172320389650?_trksid=p2047675.c100009.m1982&_trkparms=aid%3D888007%26algo%3DDISC.MBE%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D20131227121020%26meid%3D3a43e6658cb04aee8fede6737669bf27%26pid%3D100009%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D2%26sd%3D321121641144
http://baraholka.onliner.by/viewtopic.php?t=18877321
I sell such beauty. Who cares, write)
I understand that looking at the 10th river past, but having rubbed a German article on the tsikava. It appears that with high reliability this lens was manufactured at the Ontreprinderea Optică Română (IOR) in Bucharest. However, this topic has received little research.
Posilannya for the article:
https://zeissikonveb.de/start/objektive/wechselobjektive-1980er/feinoptisches-werk-goerlitz/
Statttya may be tsikava. What did the Rumunis prepare?