answers: 131

  1. Rinaldo
    20.10.2016

    Hello. I got this unit almost for nothing. But the trouble at the long end is terribly soaping. They say that they didn’t drop it. What could be the problem. When covering the diaphragm, the picture improves a bit. Can this defect be eliminated. Or the game is not worth the candle. Otherwise, the working lens .In manual focus is also soap.

    Reply

    • KalekseyG
      20.10.2016

      I do not repeat twice, do not repeat twice.

      Reply

      • Rinaldo
        20.10.2016

        Well, it happened. From a mobile phone I wrote the connection slows down. I thought that they did not publish it!))) Well, what kind of people are you? I ask for help and you! ((((

        Reply

      • KalekseyG
        20.10.2016

        my not great, but experience, suggests that someone unscrewed the front lenses and screwed poorly. and then yourself or a specialist like Radion

        Reply

      • Rinat
        04.11.2016

        Regarding Nikon 70-210. I wore diagnostics to the service for a long time. Well, the masters just went pipets now. They couldn’t do anything about adjustment and calibration, etc. the infinity until the end of the icon was screwed up and bit a bit at the end. So the lens was dropped and, as you said, the focusing lenses. One lens came off its seat and got distorted because of this half of the image focuses the other soap and vice versa. Delov repair 15 min unscrewed w with a caliper, the ring holding the lens got to the second lens that distorted. Well, and put it in place. I collected everything and works wonderfully and sharply Pts sharply. So Thanks for the advice helped!)))))

        Reply

  2. KennethesorO
    10.02.2017

    Hi! buy viagra pills online excellent website.

    Reply

  3. Maria
    28.07.2017

    on the D3200 is it worth taking or not?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      28.07.2017

      Not worth it. Better 55-300

      Reply

    • Michael
      05.08.2017

      Do not be shy. Try and test. And then draw conclusions. The picture from the object is good!

      Reply

      • Nicholas
        23.02.2020

        I just like the lens and the fact that you can take pictures with high quality and 70 mm and 210!

        Reply

  4. willow
    03.12.2017

    shot through a dirty window, the tripod was a stool on the bed)))

    Reply

  5. Igor
    20.01.2018

    Sharpness on the D7100 is not like

    Reply

  6. anonym
    19.03.2018

    Hello. Tell someone, is it worth taking it for 2500r if autofocus does not work? Actually, I don’t have a screwdriver (5100). With his hands, is he normally focusing?

    Reply

    • Ivan
      03.04.2018

      Over 2500, definitely not. Cookies autofocus for crop with a weak for 3-4 and there will be those happiness. Optically new is better.

      Reply

  7. Victor
    12.06.2018

    Thanks to the author of the review. We purchased 70-210 1: 4-5,6 on Ebay, cost $ 55 with delivery. Our second lens for the first SLR (D90, also thanks to the review from this site). Still to come).

    Reply

  8. Irina
    23.08.2018

    Good afternoon.
    Should I take this lens on the Nikon D5200?

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      23.08.2018

      Autofocus will not work.

      Reply

  9. Stanislas
    17.09.2018

    Hello! On Nikon d3100 worth taking?

    Reply

    • Pokemon
      18.09.2018

      Stanislav, this is a non-motorized screwdriver lens.
      There is no screwdriver on your camera.
      Have to focus manually.
      It is not very difficult when you are shooting something from a tripod and slowly.
      But when there is no tripod, then using any manual lens and trying to focus on focal lenses above 120-130mm will be a problem - there will be a lot of defects.

      Reply

      • Pokemon
        18.09.2018

        I meant “a lot of waste” - shooting in conditions of illumination far from ideal, shooting and focusing “hand-held”. Your camera is lightweight, the lens will outweigh it - you will have to balance the weight while trying to focus accurately.
        Better look at the motor Sigma 70-300 with a stabilizer, as in this review:
        https://radojuva.com/2017/06/sigma-dg-os-70-300mm-4-5-6/

        Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      18.09.2018

      Not worth it. Something marked AF-S, AF-P follows for Nikon D3100

      Reply

      • Vitaly N
        18.09.2018

        AF-P is not supported by the D3100.

        Reply

  10. Andrei
    17.11.2018

    I saw a review with you at 70-210 * 4
    But did you manage to compare them?
    Will there be newer versions, or also soapy?
    Is drawing weaker substantially?
    Thank you

    Reply

  11. Nicholas
    25.01.2019

    I thought for a long time what to buy for the addition to the whale 18-55, read the comments and took the line 18-70 and Nikon AF Nikkor 70-210mm 1: 4-5.6. The first is good, but sometimes it’s overkill with colors, especially with red. The second, so that someone does not say that this is old, but I am happy as a boa constrictor! Portraits, events are excellent! Such a cool color rendition was not long, the last time I shot with such quality on a film correspondent Nikon! I’ll master a little bit of amateur digital camera, try a professional camera. It was just a break of 20-25 years. when I gave up photography, but again I wanted to shoot.

    Reply

  12. Stanislas
    19.02.2019

    I bought such a lens Nikon AF Nikkor 70-210 1: 4-5.6 for a trip on vacation because I needed a telephoto lens. The lens is sharp at all focal. The picture is very beautiful, especially portraits with a blurred background. I was satisfied with the lens. Now I do not use it. Given its beautiful picture, sharpness, it was produced only in Japan and the cost is that it has no competitors. If anyone needs it, I can give it for not expensive. Call 097-147-10-05.

    Reply

  13. Alexander
    26.02.2019

    And the lens came to me. And about the charm and about the beautiful picture I completely agree. And sharpness quite suits me. I tried on Nikon D300s and D700. For your money (about 50 bucks) a great option. It can be used as a portrait.

    Reply

  14. anonym
    14.06.2019

    Good day!
    Tell me, which lens is better than 80-200 f4 nikkor or subject?

    Reply

    • Igor
      24.06.2019

      Your question has a lot of "unknowns".
      What is “80-200”?
      If autofocus 2.8, then the question is not correct due to the price difference of 3-7 times depending on the version (MK-I, II, III, etc.). Naturally 80-200 2.8 is better and on radojuva it has been discussed more than once.
      If 80-200 4,5 then it is not autofocus and that’s it.
      But if you have an entry-level camera, then the "subject" and all the other "screwdrivers"
      the lenses will not have autofocus and will significantly outweigh the device giving an endless movement. Take the zoom-DX with a stub (Sigma 500-200, Nikkor 70-300, etc.).
      BUT - if the camera is with a motor, then yes you must choose according to the budget.
      I have 70-210 4-5.6 as in the review and I am delighted with the portraits that this glass draws.
      I went to buy 70-210 f4 and on the way I stopped to see the “subject”. I strapped it to the camera to try it and immediately gave the money to the seller!
      Plastic, color, detail and ease of use in a reliable and very compact package.
      I am satisfied and advise, since the price of $ 65 pays off with more than pleasure from the shooting.

      Reply

    • Igor
      24.06.2019

      Sorry, I didn't notice “f4”)
      Manual focus, 1981. In my opinion "subject" is definitely more interesting

      Reply

      • anonym
        25.06.2019

        Thank you

        Reply

  15. Makunochimaster
    02.08.2019

    Tell me, does this lens have a better picture than AF 75-300 and AF 70-300 ED?
    Will it be so much better to neglect 300mm?

    Reply

  16. Olga
    03.08.2019

    I love this lens. Very beautiful portraits. Perfect. I love to shoot him on the street.
    But! Something happened with the focus ring. It suddenly began to block at 10 meters, it does not go any further. At first I sinned that I put it on the D750, but he already worked with it without problems. just once something went wrong. For in the removed state, the ring also does not go further than 10 meters. Repair or hands are crooked?

    Reply

    • Max
      07.06.2020

      Disassemble and clean

      Reply

    • Max
      07.06.2020

      Another option - if you understood it, then it was not assembled correctly. You need to properly twist the focusing unit (the last part at the end).
      Maybe this video will help https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQl6KlkSHTg

      Reply

  17. Vyacheslav
    05.01.2020

    Question! Who can tell me the brand of the original lens hood? Chinese blends are all short and do not give the desired effect. The lens is afraid of backlash.

    Reply

  18. Guest
    11.03.2020

    Nice lens for a ridiculous price. I really like his drawing and color rendition, some kind of atmosphere is created. For portraits in sunny weather, that's it. I tried to shoot them at d7000, constant mistakes. But with the d300 everything is fine. There was an unpleasant moment that he ... spontaneously figured out) the bolts unscrewed and the lenses fell out) nothing, since they had done it reliably before) I inserted everything, screwed it on and removed it again)

    Reply

  19. Max
    07.06.2020

    Useful infa for the owners of Nikon AF Nikkor 70-210mm 1: 4-5.6
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQl6KlkSHTg

    Reply

  20. Dmitriy
    31.01.2021

    Having 70-210 4-5.6 D, I like it very much on the D50, it can be seen at 6MP, because it was developed for film cameras, the portlets are also good from it.

    Reply

  21. Valery
    01.02.2021

    I really like the lens, it draws a proprietary Nikon picture. I bought it for 1800 hryvnia for d7000 to the existing Tamron 17-50 f2.8 and Nikon 50 1.8g. It is a pleasure to shoot outdoors during the day - in the park, walking with your child. Perfectly focuses, minimum of marriage when shooting. Universal focal points for the street. I shoot in M ​​mode. I also wanted to buy Nikon 85 1.8D or Tokina 50-135 2.8 from high-aperture and focal points, probably interesting. Do you think it is worth bothering with a purchase or just a bunch of existing lenses?

    Reply

    • Victor
      01.02.2021

      It is better to limit yourself to the already existing bundle, or even better, after a while, buy in addition to q7000 - q700, and see what 70-210 is actually capable of.

      Reply

      • Valery
        01.02.2021

        Thank you.

        Reply

  22. Dmitriy
    30.03.2021

    I like this lens on the 6MP matrices of old Nikon cameras, the picture and drawing are soft and pleasant to the eye, I did not impress on the D700 and D7000, this lens is from film cameras and you can see it will open up in full at 6MP.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.03.2021

      Pixel density d700 lower than older 6MP crop

      Reply

    • Victor
      30.03.2021

      This lens needs just a d700 to open up. On the crop, the drawing is definitely not the same, and on the seven hundred in sharpness it will obviously be better (for some reason, Arkady has already written above)

      Reply

  23. viT-1
    29.04.2021

    If I hadn't been chasing the compactness of lenses (http://vit-1.blogspot.com/2021/02/tele-zoom-nikon-fullframe.html),
    then, in terms of the transmitted picture and micro-contrast, in relation to the price and weight of the lens, this, together with 28-105 / 3.5-4.5, would probably be the best tourist double-kit. As a result, for trips where it is possible to recharge the batteries every day, I chose the m4 / 3.

    My pictures on 70-210 D (with a red question in the photo frame): https://vit-1.livejournal.com/415835.html

    Reply

  24. Olga
    08.06.2021

    Is the d3200 suitable for Nikon?

    Reply

    • Victor
      08.06.2021

      Ok, but you'll have to focus manually.

      Look for 55-200 or 55-300 for your camera.

      Reply

  25. Kirill
    01.03.2022

    Good afternoon! I bought this lens, I use it on the d300 (I'm not a pro). Got an fEE error. In your review, I read that the aperture ring should be set to 32 and it will automatically lock. Set, the error is gone, but for some reason the ring is not blocked, i.e. it’s easy to knock it down again, don’t tell me, maybe I’m doing something wrong, or is there something wrong with the lens?

    Reply

  26. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer