answers: 986

  1. Konstantin
    15.11.2017

    It seems to me that the resolution on the D7100 is greater, the center of the frame is not very bad at influx of magnification, so the matrix allows, it remains that the edge lens does not pull.

    Reply

  2. Hassels
    13.01.2018

    and as always brain EGF)))))

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      13.01.2018

      Fixed

      Reply

      • R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
        25.12.2018

        Arkady Good afternoon. My first d5100 camera without a focus motor. Now I changed to d7100 how to use the built-in motor correctly, how to properly wear and remove lenses so as not to damage the motor. On af-s lenses, you need to hide a screwdriver before removing or putting on the lens and in what position to put it when working. And how to wear or remove AF lenses? Will the AF-S screwdriver damage the lens if the screwdriver is extended during operation. And vice versa, will the screwdriver break in the extended position using AF-S optics? Thanks for the early ones.

        Reply

      • SashOK
        19.01.2019

        Let me answer, because others are silent.
        If I understood the question correctly, then there is no need to think about it at all and nothing needs to be hidden. The screwdriver itself will be in the right place when attaching (or removing) the lens. The main thing is to put on and take off this lens correctly and not go there with your hands. And if the lens is the only one and you are just a photo amateur, then there is nothing to shoot and climb there ...
        And how the lens is removed and put on is well described in the instructions for the camera (have you read it?)
        I do not think that anyone on this (or any other) site will tell it better than the manufacturer.

        Reply

  3. neo
    21.03.2018

    Arkady, we need a second camera and there is a dilemma.
    Or take the D7000 for $ 350-400 with a mileage of 15-25 thousand after amateur use with whale glass in the load after amateur owners, or take the d7100 for $ 550-600 with the same mileage. They say that the D7000 has a problem with AF - and for some reason on high-aperture glasses there is a drift into the green (like on the D800), and also, like a shake. Should I pay extra for the D7100?
    There is little money and the toad croaks. The second camera is needed to replace FF for something not very important. Because ff old and I take it. Will there be a difference on glasses of type 35 / 2D, 28-105 / 3-5-4.5D and old Sigme 28-70 / 2.8? The glasses are old and soapy ... I know. But I don't want to put something expensive on a replacement camera.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      21.03.2018

      My advice is this - do not spare a full-frame camera and use it everywhere and always. It is better for this money (or even much less) and then change the failed assembly (shutter or mirror or whatever). Some cameras can unexpectedly run half a million safely. Set yourself up psychologically that the camera should work constantly.
      If we talk about the difference, then the difference will and will be noticeable.

      Reply

      • neo
        21.03.2018

        Those. in the picture and in the AF / metering module, the d7100 is noticeably better than the d7000 and is this difference worth the money spent?
        But what about the small pixels on the d7100?

        Reply

      • Vitaly N
        21.03.2018

        Get used to quickly hold tight and gently press the trigger. Plus shutter speed can be slightly reduced.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        21.03.2018

        Once again - no need to look for new adventures, but to shoot with your favorite camera. If initially some camera did not suit, then there was no need to put it out in the proposed options. There are a lot of factors here, a lot. nobody knows what you are shooting, what you are paying attention to, etc.
        In general, d7100 is better than d7000. Whether it is worth overpaying is up to you.

        Reply

      • neo
        21.03.2018

        Ok, thank you!
        I will look at the situation.
        The second camera is needed, because need a camera, which is not very a pity if suddenly the police / special forces pinched at a rally. Rally rented. Need fast and accurate AF. Rate of fire is not particularly needed. Need an accurate BB with Nikkor. Preferably the lack of movement.
        I shoot on the street (smile) and mostly during the day.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        21.03.2018

        Then take the simplest one, in which case you can finish it. D90 and d7000 just right. And in case of emergency again take your favorite camera.
        I used to bother with different cameras and there were situations when troubles helped me (when one of them crashed, I could calmly finish the other). But now I try to work always alone, the second just as a spare, it can be any. Any camera, with due skill of the photographer, will help to shoot the shooting.
        Thoughts on this here.

        Reply

  4. Jacob
    01.04.2018

    I have a cropped camera, and the TAMRON SP 70-200mm F / 2.8 Di VC USD G2 full-frame lens. Will the effect of the 1,3X crop mode be with him?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      01.04.2018

      Be.

      Reply

  5. Jacob
    01.04.2018

    Thank you, Arkady, for the prompt and comprehensive :) answer!

    Reply

  6. Jacob
    05.04.2018

    Yesterday I bought a D7200. And I did not see the need for a 1,3X framing mode. I tried to remove one object in it and in 24x18. Then I cut identical fragments from both formats and they turned out to be exactly the same size in pixels. Those. You can shoot everything 24x18 without bothering, and then crop as you like. And the extra frame in the series means practically nothing to me.

    Reply

    • lech
      14.04.2018

      Actually digital zoom.

      Reply

      • Vasya
        23.04.2018

        The point of cropping is that the rate of fire increases. Well, more frames go into the buffer.

        Reply

  7. Vitkor
    16.04.2018

    Hello. Can you tell me if the difference in the final image quality between the d7100 and d5300 is strong? Now I have a second device in my hands, but the presence of a screwdriver is very attractive. How much will I lose if I purchase it instead of the d5300?

    Reply

    • Michael
      17.04.2018

      Lose mostly whistles greatly facilitating the shooting process. The difference, if any, is only when shooting in JPEG.

      Reply

    • Valentine
      17.04.2018

      You don’t lose much, but you may not gain anything. D7100 is an advanced device, but you need to understand and be able to use all this. Often the D5200 / D5300 or D3300 / D3200 model is more than enough. According to a screwdriver, there are suspicions that I want to buy an inexpensive 50mm 1.8D. In principle, you can take about the same money with the built-in motor Yongnuo 50mm F1.8, with about the same result.

      Reply

    • Sergei
      27.06.2018

      There were two devices on hand at the same time, these are the D5300 and D7200. Unfortunately, the D7100 did not own, so the review can be considered incorrect, but still.
      1) 7200 sharper, I noticed during operation: when I looked through the photo, I could accurately tell from which carcass the photo was. Plus I spent an experiment: I attached an 5300-18 lens to 140, and to 7200 18-200 and at full zoom I photographed the opposite balcony with linen. Bottom line: at 5300 the company could not read the T-shirt, but at 7200 with ease. Then I swapped the lenses. Bottom line: I could not read the firm on both. At 5300, it's like interpolation up to 24MP.
      2) Next, autofocus: at 5300 there are much more misses and, sometimes, it stupidly cannot hit. For example, on 5300 the Nikkor 35 mm f1.8 dx lens, on 7200 sigma 18-35mm f1.8 set at 35mm. Focusing on the center point, open. Photographing a brand of TV hanging on the wall. 5300 hits the wall only, 7200 hits exactly the brand. I change lenses - the same thing.
      3) Next, the viewfinder. Damn, well, after 7200 to 5300 I do not want to watch.
      4) Management. Two wheels and a monochrome screen decide on any. It’s like a car with basic equipment and complete. Plus, at 7200, when viewing a photo, you can assign a center key to a 1: 1 scale in order to see focus, shake, etc. At 5300 figs, click the magnifying glass until blue. At 7200 it is easy to turn on burst shooting, or a timer. At 5300 you have to climb the menu forever. And so in everything.
      5) Minimum shutter speed 1 \ 8000. Basically, of course, it is not needed, but if there is a good lens, for example, a sigma 50mm f1.4 art (in no case an old horror), then in the sun, hunting is to shoot in the open. Sometimes, of course, 1 \ 8000 is not enough, but very rarely, which can not be said about 1 \ 4000 to 5300. For bad lenses, it is not important, since there will be soap in the sun in the open.
      6) High speed flash sync. It’s nice to have such a function in stock.
      7) Screwdriver. Screwdriver lenses are sometimes very cheap to sell, but I want to try))) I picked up all sorts of widths and makriki.
      8) Shutter sound. After 7200, 5300 sounds like plastic.
      9) Battery. One 7200 battery is almost two 5300 batteries, including the operating time.
      10) Management of Nikon cls native flashes. Before the acquisition of synchronizers used constantly.
      11) There is an opportunity to buy a handle. Yes, it increases the size and weight, but it’s a convenient thing when you shoot directly.
      In short, I sold 5300 to hell with dogs and 18-140 there. Draw conclusions

      Reply

      • lech
        22.07.2018

        Very informative. Here we must take into account that 5300 is 100% amateur (which is declared by the manufacturer). 7100 - with the habits of a professional. I think about 18-140 you got excited. This glass is considered one of the best. 18-200 is more versatile, but also heavier and the trunk climbs out.

        Reply

      • Sergei
        06.08.2018

        In defense of 18-140, I can say that it is more convenient to twist the zoom, since the site is simply huge.
        Will the trunk climb out by weight? Or just when zooming out? So, with a zoom of 18-140, he also climbs. Plus, I remember with horror his motor)) Really, how many glasses I have now and how many were - none of them had such an unpleasant sound. Even a screwdriver buzzes much nicer

        Reply

      • Alexander
        09.12.2018

        I read more than once that 18-140 is one of the best ... Is this marketing such ...? Why is it better and how can it be better for such a price ...? It's just that Nikon set such a low price for him and shouts at every corner that it is the best ...? Today I read about Sergei's experiment and remembered my own experiment ... What did this happen quite by accident and well, what happened, otherwise the irreparable could have happened ... Last year, having 18 -140 and 18-200, I thought that two zooms were superfluous and maybe sell one ... Well, I attached an 7100-18 to the D200 and snapped some box with inscriptions at a distance of 200 meters for 5mm ... Then I attached 18-140 and took a picture of the same box at 140mm from the same distance and was horrified ... From 18-140 soap soap, and at 18-200 clearly ... I put on again 18-200 on the D7100 and took a picture of the same box, but already by 140 mm, everything was also clear ... I put on again 18-140 mm and again shot from different distances and on different focal points - a little soapy ... If there is no small text, then it seems normal ... And I realized that 18-140 is even worse than 18-105 ... I tried 18-140 on the D7000 and now it is much better and there is practically no soap ... The conclusion is unambiguous ... 18-140 does not resolve the 24MP matrix, but 18-200 perfectly resolves ... It would seem that this should not be, because 18-140 was done when it was already 24MP, but 18-200 was done when it was not yet ... The conclusion is disappointing ... Nikon, claiming that 18-140 allows large matrices, turns out to be deceived ...? I don't know what Nikon thought when he stated this, but the fact is obvious ... And I sold this 18-140 after that, because its quality is lower than the baseboard ...

        Reply

  8. Valery
    18.06.2018

    Good afternoon! There is an obsession with buying a new nikon d300s ... (I myself am very surprised, but we still sell it in one online store) At a price it is $ 100 less than the price of 7100. The most important question !!! Is it worth it? And also, since I take pictures only in Jpeg and do not process photos, what's the difference in the quality of the picture ??? I've read a lot about the pros of one or the other ... so it's not worth answering about it .. Only about the final result of the photo in JPEG. Will I notice the difference, say, after nikon d3200? And which way?

    Reply

  9. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    20.07.2018

    Good day! Maybe not the topic, but I don’t know where to look! A crack appeared on the camera body (where the strap is attached, near the additional screen). Interested in the question, the eye itself is attached to the body or top panel, I'm afraid it will come off! Thank you!

    Reply

  10. Julia
    02.08.2018

    Tell me, is it better for a beginner to take the D7100 or is it still the D700? I can not decide. I plan to do this professionally over time.

    Reply

    • Pokemon
      03.08.2018

      These are two different in level cameras.
      Professionally, you can do this when you physically complete one of them.
      Therefore, do not worry, and take the D7100. The matrix is ​​newer, DD is wider than that of a pensioner D700.
      Yes, this is not a full-frame camera. But finding live D700s with mileage of about 50 thousand frames or less is very difficult. It was not easy even 3 years ago, and now even more so.
      An excellent AF system with the D700 will not come in handy for a very long time, so your first camera may well be the used D7000 from a flea market. For a novice photographer, her capabilities or the D7100 are more than enough for the eyes. During this time, save up money, buy good lenses, gain experience and go to the full frame.

      Reply

  11. Novel
    03.08.2018

    https://tehnobzor.ru/foto-video/nikon-d7200-obzor-fotokamery/ This review presents a picture of a comparison of additional displays Nikon D7200 and Nikon D7100. About reducing the information content of additional. display in the Nikon D7200 model, you can find some general information, which is read visually from the picture. But how informative the Nikon D7100 display is is not entirely clear. A question for specialists or owners of this model: "The area shown in this figure is not active, is it fully used in Nikon D7100?" or “The active zone shown in the figure is the maximum additional information. display for this model? ”.

    Reply

    • Sergei
      08.08.2018

      Weird question. On the D7100, functions corresponding to all inactive icons are present, why not show them? Of course, they all work and are displayed. The display of the D7200 is also actually clogged with icons tightly, but it is simply not shown in the figure. Well, of course, 7200 sawed a lot of useful icons

      Reply

      • Novel
        08.08.2018

        Sergey, thanks for the answer.

        Reply

  12. Natalia
    16.08.2018

    Good evening!
    I am very pleased with your site, because I’m constantly looking for and wrapping all the important information on my mustache. Thank you so much for your diligence.
    At the moment I have a nikon d3100 and an af-s 50mm 1,8g lens. But, I understand that the technological capabilities of the device are not enough for me. I’m thinking about buying a new one in the future. But before me is a dilemma. Stop at 7100, and continue to use your fifty dollars with pleasure, or switch to ff, which of course you will also need to buy lenses and this will fly into a pretty penny.
    Since I do not engage in professional photography, this is more of a hobby, which will probably be profitable sometime, then probably buying a d7100 will be a more reasonable solution. Yes, and with a screwdriver, you can save on future lenses.
    What would you advise?
    I thank you in advance for your reply.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      16.08.2018

      A fifty dollars will work on a full frame, but you can take any budget lens as a universal, like old people, such as 28-105 or 28-200, they can be found for $ 100, or some kind of simple 50- 28 / 70-3.5. If you take the d4.5 / d610 + 600 / 50g + some kind of station wagon, in many ways it will be better than the d1.8.

      Reply

      • Natalia
        16.08.2018

        Thank you very much.

        Reply

    • Anatoly
      24.11.2018

      “And with a screwdriver it will be possible to save money on future lenses” (c)
      Do I understand the savings?
      In the sense that it is more profitable to overpay for a carcass of 300 dollars, then to save 10-15 dollars on a lens without a motor?

      Reply

      • Pokemon
        25.11.2018

        The difference between lenses with a motor and without a motor, if you look at the old screwdriver lenses, can reach not more than $ 10-15, but more. In addition, lenses without a motor are more reliable than motor lenses and can work in more extreme temperature conditions.

        Reply

  13. Vladimir
    30.08.2018

    Hello Arkady! I would like to know your opinion about the Nikon D300s and Nikon D7100. I wonder if there is a difference in the quality of pictures taken in the same conditions. I have a dilemma: I already had a D7100, I sold it in connection with the transition to a full frame. Now I turn to the crop. I really like the quality of images on the D7100, but not very constructive. I want to buy D300s on Avito. Tell me, the quality on the D300s is different from the D7100. Thank you in advance for your reply.
    Sincerely, Vladimir.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.08.2018

      Good day. Yes, it’s different, the d7100 is significantly better.

      Reply

      • Vladimir
        31.08.2018

        Many thanks! I thought so.

        Reply

    • BB
      23.09.2018

      Tell me, why go from FF to crop?

      Reply

  14. Nadezhda
    06.10.2018

    Good day to all.
    Over the years 6 used d3000. And now it seems to me that it's time to grow.
    The D7100 attracted a little more features and a separate screwdriver, because you can buy old good lenses at a lower price.
    Could you tell me if it is worth it? Or maybe take something else.
    I plan to give 30k to the carcass, but this is used.
    I am just a student and there is no opportunity to buy expensive equipment, but there is a desire to grow up a little.

    Reply

    • Michael
      06.10.2018

      If you don't have enough money, you can 7000, or 7100-7200 standing cameras

      Reply

    • UstasFritZZZ
      16.11.2018

      30k is it in what currency? For if hryvnia, then take D7500, for 23k you can take a new one. And so - 7200 is better than 7100, strive for it.

      Reply

      • Anatoly
        25.11.2018

        D7500 is worse than D7100-D7200
        The D7200 is generally the leader in all respects today (see the statistics on the DRL) - ahead of even most full-frame ones.

        Reply

    • Anatoly
      25.11.2018

      “The D7100 attracted a little more opportunities and a separate screwdriver, since you can buy old good lenses at a lower price.” (C)
      Is this a basic fact that outweighs the benefit of the D7100-D7200?

      I understand correctly your incentive for wanting D7100 - To overpay $ 300 for a carcass now to be able to save a couple of times later for $ 10-15 on lenses without a motor?

      Reply

  15. Andrei
    21.11.2018

    Hello.
    So I bought this camera with my hands in excellent condition.
    But there is a suspicion that the seller deceived me a little, saying that everything is just perfect.
    In general, ABW didn’t work for me at all, it turns yellow and orange in a terrible way. It seems like nothing on the street, but I really don't like the room with a flash on the ceiling, especially people.
    I will show examples with Sigma 17-50 f2.8 lens with D7100 and D90 (normal WB)
    RGB-3586 DSC-4057
    All settings are the same and default.
    And the multi selector on the D7100 then scrolls through the menu and enlarged photos in viewing without lifting a finger, then no, only by pressing.
    So did I get a bad copy, or is it the way it should be?
    Thank you.

    Reply

    • Denis
      21.11.2018

      try spinning the twist front and back, so you can also flip frames / switch between recognized faces in the photo
      Is the flash Chinese or native? I have SB-800, everything is fine. I didn’t like Yongnuo

      Reply

    • Denis
      21.11.2018

      by the way…. known glitch that when Sigma 17-50 is installed, it is on d7100 that something is wrong with looking at the photo, it freezes

      Reply

      • Andrei
        22.11.2018

        Damn, I didn’t.
        I sold it. Now I regret it. The condition was just ... the store is worse)))
        Thank you.

        Reply

      • Andrei
        14.12.2018

        Well, the d90, though old, but in terms of colors and lights creates a more correct picture, although sometimes there is not enough contrast.
        Compared d90 and d5200.
        Approximately the same errors as in your examples.
        On the same settings of the camera and flash (all in the manual), I compared the photos and saw the same result as you had on the d7100. I think in this case, it’s not a Sigma lens, because for an example on both cameras I used Nikon 17-55 2,8.
        As a result, photos from d90 seem unsaturated in my opinion, and at 5200 they seem to be oversaturated. The sharpness of a ringing 24 megapixels in comparison with 12 does not give either.
        Somehow, I did not see the middle ground. It goes without saying that global post-processing will fix everything and sharpness incl.
        But the essence of the experiment was to get an initially more correct picture. It seemed to me the most correct on d610 and 17-55 2.8
        At the output, d90 is low-contrast, does not yellow at all, d5200 is very very warm (yellow), the 610th yellows but much less (it is close to the golden mean).
        By the way, the Nikon SB600 or 700 flash was not exactly remember (I think no difference) sent to the ceiling (white matte).
        It is unfortunate that I do not have the opportunity to compare the d7100 or 7200. It would be more informative, and I myself would have known to leave 17-55 or dive headlong into the full frame.
        Maybe someone has such a bunch, I would be glad to see examples.

        Reply

      • Andrei
        14.12.2018

        By the way, I’ll add, for general information, that the TTL mode on the SB600 in the d90 and d5200 works differently, and it is noticeably naked, the d90 is very correct and light card, there is not enough light for 5200. All on the same settings. Why is the 5200th processor so disordered (perhaps the algorithm is built so that the number of apertures according to ISO is higher), and in order to get the same light, you need to set the flash in manual mode.

        Reply

      • Andrei
        26.12.2018

        I also noticed from the flash (SB-910) that everything was always and without any problems on the D90, even with the darkening 18-105, and on the D7200 there were constantly oversights in the TTL and even with the Sigma 17-50 f2.8.
        So what to do, sell an almost new device (3500 frames) and use the D90? It seems to me something completely toy after the D7200. How much I do not force myself to come to terms with yellow yellowness, I just can’t do it, it’s impossible to straighten my eyes and infuriate me.

        Reply

      • Michael
        26.12.2018

        Rather, change the matrix metering to another. For many cameras, matrix metering gives an oversight, saves light and works well only in conjunction with ADL.

        Reply

    • Anatoly
      25.11.2018

      “And the multi selector on the D7100 either scrolls through the menu and enlarged photos in the view without lifting your finger, then no, only by pressing.” (C)
      Also on the D7100 was exactly the same.
      Then after it disappeared (it became possible to scroll normally in the photo) - I suspect, after turning on LiveView (there I zoomed and returned to the list of photos and for some reason it became normal to scroll)
      That is, it has passed

      Reply

    • Anatoly
      25.11.2018

      On the issue of Auto White Balance - check if Auto2 is worth it (with warmed shades)
      Change to Auto1 (Normal) - may be fixed

      Reply

    • Koba
      05.01.2019

      in the picture with the D7100 the focus is lost, the picture with the D90 is sharper, even if you resize it to the size of the picture with the D7100, then it exceeds it. Or maybe the sigma lens could not resolve the matrix from the D7100?

      Reply

  16. Alexander
    26.11.2018

    Arkady, good afternoon ... I had a problem on the D7100 (the camera is 3 years old and I think it was from the moment of purchase, since I just tried it now), the camera does not control the external flash Sb910 remotely ... And I reset and updated the firmware and checked all the settings ... And at the same time, my second camera D7000 of the same Sb910 operates normally ... As a result of experiments, I found out that in the D7100 camera the built-in flash in CMD mode at any settings for the built-in flash (TTL, manual or dash) always works the same - as in manual mode it blinks on 1/128 power and does not give out control impulses ... I live not close to the Moscow service center and wrote to them about this problem, the answers I received were such that it felt like they had heard about the CLS system for the first time ... I understand that this is most likely , a software problem, but I updated the firmware to the latest one, did resets both cameras and flashes and the result remained the same ... Maybe this is still something I don't understand, not a malfunction ...? What do you think about this ...? Or maybe some of the site users have come across this ...? Please tell me ...

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.11.2018

      I have not encountered, it is difficult to accurately tell what exactly the problem

      Reply

      • Alexander
        26.11.2018

        So I haven't found information about this anywhere on the Internet ...

        Reply

    • Jury
      29.11.2018

      the same nonsense was on d800, moreover, sometimes he controlled the flashes on the CLS, and sometimes not, at first he sinned on the flashes, and then he noticed that if there was no control, then there was no mark in the info in the photo that the flash had fired in the CLS. And also the built-in flash sometimes overexposed the frame. At the same time, C5pro managed these same flashes easily, always and in 100% of cases. I could not even solve the problem with the service software - I made a complete reset of the camera, after the reset, even all languages ​​appeared, except for English and Japanese, which were originally, but the problem with the CLS and photo overexposure with the built-in flash did not go away. I sold flashes and bought others - with a built-in radio channel and a radio synchronizer for them. Well, I never used the built-in one, I drew attention to the problems with overexposure by chance, when I was dealing with the problems of the CLS. The radio channel is many times more convenient, especially if the receiver is built into the flash. Nikon hung some glitches in the CLS.

      Reply

      • Alexander
        02.12.2018

        Yes ... And it's interesting that the support service doesn't seem to know about these glitches ...

        Reply

  17. Alexander
    26.11.2018

    Yes, and in addition to my previous note about the problem with the remote control of an external flash with a D7100 camera ... The built-in flash often overexposes the frame in any mode (PASM) ... The lenses are my own ... And at the same time, my second D7000 camera never overexposes on my relatives lenses, neither on Tamron, nor on Sigma ... I'm already thinking - why I bought it ... The further into the forest - the worse Nikon makes cameras ...

    Reply

  18. Andrei
    29.11.2018

    Hello, tell me please, I recently took the d7100, I read a bunch of everything, but I still could not figure out the problem, but here's the thing:
    When focusing, there is no sound, I turn it on in the settings on the screen there is an icon, the mode is Af-S, Cl, Ch, but alas, it doesn’t appear, there may be a malfunction, although there is a squeak when setting the sound itself, but when photographing there isn’t, please help sort out!

    Reply

    • Alexander
      02.12.2018

      Check the F4 menu option, there should not be “AF lock” for autofocus to work from the shutter button ... And second - check if you have disabled autofocus either on the camera or on the lens ...

      Reply

      • Andrei
        06.12.2018

        Unfortunately:(

        Reply

      • Alexander
        06.12.2018

        Did not help…? Something Nikon messed up in the D7100 specifically ... My CMD mode does not work and RPT does not work - multiple flash ... By the way, the CMD mode works on my D7000, but RPT does not work either ... I wrote to them in support, they rested like rams, in service, in service ... And I do not live in Moscow - not a dipped beam ... If this is the case, then there are jambs in the firmware ... And what, no one knows about this ...? I don’t believe it ... And also the repair is paid, since the warranty has already ended ... And why should I pay for their jambs ...? I found a way out differently - in the room you can remotely ignite the flash in SU-4 mode in manual mode ... Well, if you really need TTL, you will have to buy a radio synchronizer, for example, Yongnuo yn-622n ... Well, if you use the flash on a bracket on the side of the camera, then it's better just a lace, because especially on the street, this CLS will probably mow anyway ...

        Reply

      • Andrei
        07.12.2018

        Fuh, thanks, cured!

        Reply

  19. Andrei
    07.12.2018

    People, do not take it by the hand., Help who can, with the profile settings, or what is the task there, due to the fact that when I take portraits, the photos are not sharp, flat, the dynamic range is not significantly visible, more soapy, with shutter speed everything is in order, not lower than 1/60, I control the aperture and ISO, please tell me about the settings, how many I have not read, reviewed, but ...

    Reply

    • Alexander
      08.12.2018

      And what was ...?

      Reply

      • Andrei
        10.12.2018

        In autofocus settings

        Reply

  20. Vladimirov
    21.12.2018

    Nikon D7100 camera. I dumped the photos on my computer and found that some of them are not in the order of numbering (for example:… 83,… 84,… 86,… 85), and 16 frames in a row were not recorded on the card at all?
    Tell me what the failure is and how it can be fixed.

    Reply

    • Alexander
      25.12.2018

      See how file sorting is enabled in the program in which you are viewing these photos ...

      Reply

  21. R'RёS,R ° F "RёR№
    25.12.2018

    Hello. Please tell me who has experience using non-native batteries. Which company is better to choose an extra battery?

    Reply

    • namesake
      02.01.2019

      I bought on ebee for $ 30 the type of original Akum, with a gallogram sticker, etc., as a result of Chinese garbage, it holds 2 times less than the used original.

      Reply

    • Koba
      05.01.2019

      over the past 12 years, I have only used non-native Chinese, only from normal manufacturers. They work better than relatives and last longer, you need to look at the container. On my Nikon D3s I also bought a new Chinese one and works like a clock. Almost all batteries in the world are manufactured in China (although factories have survived in Japan and Korea!), And in this case, the Chinese have reached almost 100% of the level. But you don't need to take the batteries collected by the boys in the vicinity of Shenzhen ...

      Reply

  22. Vitaliy Vladimirovich
    03.01.2019

    My old Nikon 7100 seems to have started to take, mileage 100k, 18-140, visited everywhere. Two problems drew up:
    1. often mistaken in focus - the main aperture is 5.6, 2 frames out of 10 stops will not be sharp.
    2. focusing slows down, that is, here's the moment, I press the shutter button and…. we think ... the frame is gone, bang is removed, sometimes hangs for 2-3 seconds. This is not always there, but often. Pisses me off to horror, I threw off the default settings, I turned off all the buns, I tried it with different focus modes, the card was 32 GB. 95 mb. I tried it on 16, it did not help, the same problems, and that's it. Can I reflash it or your options :)

    Reply

    • Pokemon
      03.01.2019

      Try another lens.
      Try another flash drive.
      Update firmware to a more recent one.
      If all of the above does not help, bring it to the service.

      Reply

    • Koba
      05.01.2019

      surprisingly, my old D5100 shot 480000 only in my hands, and still they are being robbed by everyone who is not lazy. Have you tried rebooting the camera, or updating the firmware? Maybe something went wrong in the program, and not in the hardware?

      Reply

  23. Yuri
    10.01.2019

    Hello Arkady! Thank you for your work and a wonderful site that I have been visiting for several years :) I want to ask for advice? I am the owner of the Nikon D90 camera, I previously shot on the D3000, now I have a desire to change the camera to either the D7100 or the old D700, I really want the FF, but I doubt the choice, since the 700 has already become old. From the lenses there is auto focus 50mm F1.8, Chinese 100 mm F2.0 and sigma 17-70 mm. What do you recommend in this choice?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      10.01.2019

      In many ways, the old d700 will be better than the d7100, but the choice is always difficult. It’s better to save money and take d600 / 610 / d3 / d3s

      Reply

      • Yuri
        10.01.2019

        Thanks for the answer! The choice is difficult when you want a full frame, but not enough money :) there are also not enough focus points, frame resolution and sharpness. Most likely I will follow your advice and switch to the D610, the main thing is not to break prematurely and not to buy the D7100 :)

        Reply

  24. Sergei
    07.02.2019

    But where is the review on the d7200 ???
    it would be very interesting to read ...
    I now have d90, it seems like I grew up with her. I want something better, but not a super-pro either ... and money plays an important role.

    Reply

    • Alexander
      14.02.2019

      I am the owner of d7200. In my subjective opinion, this review is practically about him. Besides, of course, the d7200 has a really wide DD. This is especially felt when processing contrasting scenes in Lightroom. It would seem that the sky is knocked out, “everything is gone, the client leaves, the plaster is removed” (C). But no. A slider to the left - and a miracle: texture and even color appears. I personally do not need buns with wireless communication, gps would be more interesting. Before that there was d5100. (before him there were still budget Nikon) and now there are still. I don't see much difference in the picture jpg, intra-camera, made with the same settings, from one point, with one lens, at first sight. A very noticeable plus in the d7200 is focusing without autofocus illumination in “bad” conditions.
      I don't see any sense in a crop on a crop. Burst shooting speed is not important to me, and it is extremely inconvenient to compose video on “crop in crop” without darkening the frame.
      It is inconvenient for me to decide the placement of programmable buttons for ISO. Even the d5100 was more convenient.
      This is an amateur impression.

      Reply

      • Alexander
        15.02.2019

        I will clarify the phrase "and it is extremely inconvenient to compose video on" crop in crop "without darkening the frame". Composing a frame on a crop without shading is extremely inconvenient. Especially going from viewfinder to live view for video shooting

        Reply

  25. Peter
    28.03.2019

    Hello, tell me what to choose, nikon d7100 or d7000? I photograph a lot of nature and people. Now I generally photograph on the Canon 600d. There is no money for a full frame) and another question, is the absence of a low-pass filter a problem or not?

    Reply

    • Alexander
      28.03.2019

      I also face such a choice. I know about all the pros and cons of both cameras. Interested in the opinions of those who owned these two cameras

      Reply

    • Michael
      28.03.2019

      The lack of an AA filter is not a problem. With this pixel density, the vast majority of the photo will not be moiré, and the photos themselves will be slightly better detailed.

      Reply

      • Peter
        28.03.2019

        I also read that there are problems with the white balance? I photograph mainly in RAW and processing in the lightroom, I think there shouldn’t be any problems with this?

        Reply

      • Novel
        28.03.2019

        Raw grabs data as is. White balance is the result of manipulating RAW data based on how correctly the color temperature of the light was determined by the camera. So fix it yourself as needed.

        Reply

  26. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer