answers: 54

  1. Georgy
    05.04.2013

    And I’m ponra. Well chromatite, but at 50 / 1,4 chromatite on open.
    The dog went well, and the sprouts are also good!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.04.2013

      I liked the key. Chromatitis is very strong.

      Reply

      • Georgy
        05.04.2013

        The monocle key is somewhat reminiscent of a pattern.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        05.04.2013

        Yes, it does. Just once I read the name of the lens, I was attacked by a 5-minute fit of laughter. “What are you shooting with? I shoot at "MP RSFSR GLAV UCH TEKH PROM Plant No. 6 F = 7,7cm"

        Reply

      • D.
        04.07.2014

        Zhzhote))))

        Reply

  2. SergeyF
    05.04.2013

    I connected the lens to the Canon IXUS 1000HS soap dish from the MANTIS stereoscope ... the pictures were very high quality))
    example - http://fandikov.gallery.ru/watch?ph=Ftj-eudJt (Kalachik flower)
    http://fandikov.gallery.ru/watch?ph=Ftj-eudW2 (chip)
    http://fandikov.gallery.ru/watch?ph=Ftj-ewzP9 (chips on a match)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.04.2013

      Not bad happened.

      Reply

      • SergeyF
        05.04.2013

        it’s a pity that you cannot take it out of work))

        Reply

    • Stepan
      10.04.2013

      ) Це not chіpi on syrniku, ce SMD resistors. Wanting in the photo is not vlivyє. That's so for the ignorant rosette)

      Reply

      • SergeyF
        11.04.2013

        all resistors, diodes and capacitors of this size are called chips)
        ... but if you wish, I can decipher the denomination))

        Reply

  3. Levani
    05.04.2013

    ololo :-) saw this, at a flea market for five rubles a bucket :-) :-)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.04.2013

      Well, you need to buy Soviet lenses in buckets - according to the theory of probability, there will be one good copy in a bucket :)

      Reply

  4. Dmitriy
    05.04.2013

    Good time!
    The question is not the topic, I want to buy 2 fixes, 28 f / 1.8, and 85 f / 1.8, and so - is there any point in leaving 50 f / 1.8 ?????

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.04.2013

      Yes, let it be fifty dollars.

      Reply

      • Dmitriy
        05.04.2013

        I just think that 85 will completely replace it for me, and 50 I thought of selling it, since there is a buyer for it 50 1.8g

        Reply

      • anonym
        05.04.2013

        Thanks!!! All the same, let there be a set of 28, 50, 85)))

        Reply

    • Okulov Dmitry
      05.04.2013

      “The question is not the topic, I want to buy, 2 fixes,” Please do not litter the topic with your comments.

      Reply

  5. Michael
    05.04.2013

    Radojuva L Lens :) You can patent;)

    Reply

  6. Igor
    05.04.2013

    Arkady! Stop using drugs. Even the lungs. And sleep at night. And if you smoke, call, we'll laugh together. Wow ..., your division ...

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      05.04.2013

      Good :)

      Reply

  7. Ayrat
    05.04.2013

    For some reason, this time your experiment with non-camera lenses was hooked. A really interesting effect is obtained. It clings.

    Reply

  8. Razor
    05.04.2013

    And I liked the leaves.

    Reply

  9. Oleg
    06.04.2013

    and I liked the name

    Reply

  10. Ivan
    06.04.2013

    Really interesting pictures turned out, not boring

    Reply

  11. ontebeoteg
    06.04.2013

    Attention! Soon on Radozhiva !!!
    A review of the door peephole and examples of frames in conjunction with the D800. Do not miss!
    ))))

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      06.04.2013

      Well, for some reason, a homemade door peephole and on 1DX - only hardcore :)

      Reply

  12. nukemall
    06.04.2013

    If you blacken the insides and ends of the lenses, such filmoscopic triplets are quite good. I can say that the "Triplet-5" 100 / 2.8 from the "Peleng" overhead projector is no worse than the notorious Meyer Trioplan, which is now in great fashion.
    About the alteration of "Triplet-5" 100 / 2.8 - http://nukemall.livejournal.com/51555.html
    Examples of snapshots from it - http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/stratienkoi/album/189988/

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      06.04.2013

      Thanks for the link. You do not know what relative aperture this Glavuchtehprom has?

      Reply

      • nukemall
        06.04.2013

        If it has only two lenses (it is somehow not very clear written), then this is generally a lens according to the "Periscope" scheme, relative aperture f / 3. And if there are three lenses, then f / 2.8, at least most filmsoscopic triplets are like that.

        Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        06.04.2013

        Yes, exactly two - this can be seen in a disassembled state. Like a lens without gluing, but simple.

        Reply

      • nukemall
        09.04.2013

        Well, then this is a "periscope", the simplest lens that was shot at the dawn of photography. If you blacken the ends of the lenses, mate the insides and insert them into the case from Helios-44, you will get a fashionable “portrait soft-aplanat”, nowadays those who want the strange are buying for 300-500 dollars.

        Reply

  13. Igor
    06.04.2013

    Wow ... ..And I really, really liked it ... very, very unusual and uncommon picture for today ... just the same very well fits the word "psychedelic" GLAVUCHTEHPROM Plant No. 6 ZE BEST !!!!!

    Reply

  14. Novel
    06.04.2013

    Arkady, you are a maniac)!
    If it is interesting, do a pinhole camera test pliz
    Good luck!

    Reply

  15. Novel
    06.04.2013

    I apologize if my comment above is considered offensive. In fact, I want to express my gratitude to the author that he does not get stuck in the mouth and praise the latest super developments of Nikon and other business offices, but is in search, as befits a creative person.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      06.04.2013

      Everything is fine, everyone understood each other.

      Reply

  16. Victor
    06.04.2013

    And I really liked the bokeh. I think it's perfect! =)

    Reply

  17. Igor
    07.04.2013

    Arkady, the tenth photo is really cool. You can print in the most fashionable and glossy magazine. Super Respect !!!

    Reply

  18. Irina
    07.04.2013

    The lens is valid !!!

    Reply

  19. Paul
    07.04.2013

    I have such a filmoscope, only after repair I can’t find it, as I find it, I’ll also try to make fun of it))

    Reply

  20. Igor
    07.04.2013

    Pavel, when you find your filmoscope, please see its year of release ... (they say that somewhere in the 50s)))

    Reply

  21. Alexey
    12.04.2013

    Now I twist this miracle in my hands and figure out how to add it)))

    Reply

  22. Michael
    26.06.2013

    An interesting article turned out. Thanks to Arkady.

    Reply

  23. anonym
    13.02.2014

    It’s interesting, and what pictures will be obtained on the lens from a movie projector ???)))

    Reply

  24. alexey_laa
    24.07.2014

    I tried to install on my Lumix G3 the lens from the Etude 2C slide projector: https://twitter.com/alexey_laa/status/367696901434404865 Photos were “blurred”. The brighter the scene, the more “blurring”. I understand that this is due to the scattering of light in the lens, the scattered light creates a continuous illumination of the image.

    Reply

  25. Peter the Great
    26.12.2014

    so projection glasses should be used backwards, the light goes back to front and not vice versa

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      26.12.2014

      For shooting, they are used in their normal position.

      Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer