For the opportunity Nikon D600 body review many thanks to Ivan Berdnik.
Nikon D600 review
Nikon D600 is the first full-length amateur Nikon digital SLR camera. Prior to this, all full-frame CZK belonged only to a professional level. Nikon D600 is 'Full Frame to the Masses!'. The difference between the size of the matrix for type cameras APS-C Nikon DX and the size of the matrix for type cameras APS Nikon FXwhich the Nikon D600 belongs to is approximately 2.25 times. And believe me, in many cases matrix size really matters. True, a full-format camera requires only Fx lenses.
This is how the Nikon D600 camera looks from different sides without a lens (body) and with a lens 24-85 (kit)
The Nikon D600 has a 24,3MP sensor. This is a good indicator for a full-frame camera, I believe that about 20MP for full-frame cameras is quite enough for almost any photo task, and for those who need to print posters there are monsters. Nikon D800, Nikon D800E and digital backs. If you are a miser and count all the pixels in the resulting image from the Nikon D600, then you can count 24.160.256 pixels, which allows you to reproduce a photo of 6016 by 4016 pixels.
Example photo on Nikon D600
In the spring of 2013, Nikon already has 5 cameras with 24MP and two cameras with 36MP.
- Nikon D3X - 24.38.553 pixels
- Nikon D600 - 24.160.256 pixels
- Nikon D3200 - 24.064.000 pixels
- Nikon D5200 - 24.000.000 pixels
- Nikon D7100 - 24.000.000 pixels
Example photo on Nikon D600
Before the release of the D600, only the Nikon D24x had a full-frame 3MP sensor, which, by the way, is already damn old, but the price of which does not fall at all. For me, the number of megapixels is practically not important. Personally, I’m even offended that manufacturers are increasing their number, and the noise level at high ISOs remains practically unchanged. Megapixels are not always as good as marketers assure, you can read more details in the section Battle of Megapixels.
Example photo on Nikon D600
Nikon D600 can work on ISO 100 to 6400 units and expand the value to Lo1 (equivalent ISO 50.) and up to Hi2 (equivalent ISO 25.600.) Here is the original example on ISO 6400 (noise reduction function is on). It's a sin to complain about the performance of the Nikon D600 at high ISO. The D600 has a lower level and a slightly different type of noise than my old lady Nikon D700.
Example photo on Nikon D600
With noise levels at high ISOs, the Nikon D600 is fine. True sorry that the Nikon D600, D800 and D800E have an ISO 6400 ceiling, older cameras could work at this value Nikon D700 и D3... It turns out that the pixels were added to the new cameras, but the ISO was forgotten. Only two models remain more efficient cameras in terms of high ISO for 2013 - Nikon D3s и D4that have a ceiling of ISO 12.800.
Example photo on Nikon D600. Measurement exposure in difficult conditions does not fail.
Nikon D600 uses the updated Nikon Multi-CAM 4800 focus sensor, this is an upgraded Nikon Multi-CAM 4800DX sensor, which can be found in Nikon D7000 и D5200. The camera uses 39 focus points, 9 of which are cruciforms. Unlike Nikon D7000 The new D600 can work with lenses with aperture up to F / 8.0. In practice, this means that the Nikon D600 focuses better in poor lighting conditions than D7000, D5200. I really don't like small viewfinder coverage with focus points. All the focus points of the Nikon D600 are in the center, which is not surprising, because here is just a modified focus system from a cropped camera. You can see more details about focus modules and their comparison here.
Sample photo on Nikon D600
Many users have a choice between three Nikon D600 cameras, D700, D800 (E), such a plate may clarify the choice a bit:
| D600 | D700 | D800 (E) | |
| Pixels | 24MP | 12MP | 36MP |
| Native shooting speed k / s | 5,5 | 5 | 4 |
| Maximum possible speed k \ s | 5,5 | 8 | 6 |
| Number of Focus Points | 39 | 51 | 51 |
| Cruciform sensors | 9 | 15 | 15 |
| Focus Sensors at F / 5.6-F / 8.0 | 33 | 0 | 15 |
| Focus Sensors at F / 8.0 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| ISO | 100-6400 | 200-6400 | 100-6400 |
| Maximum high ISO | 25600 | 25600 | 25600 |
| Maximum low ISO | 50 | 100 | 50 |
| Minimal excerpt | 1 / 4000s | 1 / 8000s | 1 / 8000s |
| Sync speed | 1 / 250s | 1 / 320s | 1 / 320s |
| Chassis | Part from M. alloy | Magnesium alloy | Magnesium alloy |
| Memory cards | 2 X SD(HC, XC) | 1 x CF | CF+ SD(HC, XC) |
| Video | 1920 x 1080 | no | 1920 x 1080 |
| Display | 3.2 in | 3 in | 3.2 in |
| Dots on display | 921000 | 921000 | 921000 |
| Viewfinder Coverage | 100% | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder Zoom | 0,7h | 0.72x | 0,7h |
| Weight with battery | 850g | 1075g | 900 |
| RAW Buffer (FX Mode) | 15 | 18 | 16 |
| HDR | Yes | no | Yes |
| RAW | Compression only | Without compression | Without compression |
| Measurement exposure | 2016 pixels | 1005 pixels | 91000 pixels |
| Shutter | 150000 | 150000 | 200000 |
For myself, I see no reason to switch from Nikon D700 on Nikon D600. Some may need video in the D600 and slightly more RAW processing due to better DD and lower noise. If the choice is the first full-frame camera, then, in my opinion, the D600 is an excellent option. When it comes to dynamic range, color depth, etc. in modern full-length cameras, I advise you to look here.
Sample photo on Nikon D600
Despite the fact that the Nikon D600 camera has as much as 24 MP, with any RAW quality setting frame buffer, puts 15 frames in FX mode, 22 frames in DX mode. If you shoot in JPEG and turn off all the additional functions of software image enhancement, then 28 JPEG L frames in FX mode and 46 frames in DX mode are placed in the buffer. The buffer readings are just great for an amateur camera. The only negative is the inability to use a RAW file without compression. RAW is available with 12 or 14 bit color depth and with conventional or lossless compression.
Sample photo on Nikon D600
The maximum shooting speed in any mode (with and without a booster) is 5.5 frames per second. This is enough for any type of shooting, it may not be enough for reporting, but the D600 is not a reporting camera.
Sample photo on Nikon D600
The Nikon D600 has a nice viewfinder with 100% lens field of view and 0.7x magnification. It was pleasant enough for me to work with such a viewfinder, it is much more for the 'peephole' of amateur cameras like Nikon D3200, D40. In general, it is very pleasant to work with the camera. Settings and buttons are not very different from Nikon D7000. Dealing with the camera is not difficult.
Sample photo on Nikon D600
Nikon D600 has a built-in focus motor, you can use any lens without a focus motor, for example, such inexpensive legendary lenses as Nikon 85mm F1.8D AF Nikkor и Nikon 70-210 F4 Nikkor.
Sample photo on Nikon D600
From the pleasant moments in the Nikon D600:
- Measurement exposure performed using 2016 pixel like u D7000, D7100, D5200. About measurement exposure can read here.
- Function auto ISO works very well, the camera can automatically adjust the desired shutter speed depending on the installed lens.
- Two locks on the camera control wheel. This is very convenient, it really helps to avoid accidentally changing the shooting mode. I really missed such a thing on my old Nikon D90.
- Full HD video 1.920 x 1.080 30p, recorded in MOV format with the H.264 codec. Attention, sound recording is performed using a monaural microphone. You can buy an external stereo microphone for the camera. Video has a common problem with auto focus quality. Also, the Nikon D600 is not able to control the aperture value when shooting video. If full control over all the parameters when shooting movies is important, then you will have to look to the side Nikon D800.
- Support for older lenses AI-S type and any other lenses that can only be mounted on the camera.
- Two memory card slots SD (SDHC, SDXC, UHS-I). You can set up various methods of working with cards as your heart desires.
- System for cleaning the matrix from dust.
- Nikon D600 supports remote control of external flash units. I am a big fan of the system Nikon CLS
- Of course, the Nikon D600 supports high-speed 'FP' sync with external flash units. By the way, if you are looking for an extra flash, here my recommendations.
- A large 3.2-inch display, however, recently the number of dots in the new Nikon cameras has not changed and remains equal to 921,000. The display is the same as Nikon D800,D800E, D4.
- The case is half made of magnesium alloy, very similar to the case Nikon D7000.
- The camera has an additional monochrome display with which it is very convenient to control the camera and change the basic settings.
- USB, HDMI, Microphone in, 3.5mm headphone jack
- Battery EN-EL15, same as Nikon D7000, D7100, D800, D800E. Holds a charge well.
- Programmable buttons U1 and U2, which can be configured for different tasks.
- The camera supports automatic vignetting correction.
- Electronic level.
- Active D-lighting, bracketing exposure, ADL bracketing, bracketing white balance and HDR function
- Fine tune focus
Sample photo on Nikon D600
What I did not like:
- The center button is not programmable for instant zoom. After Nikon D700 Without this feature, I’m extremely uncomfortable working with the Nikon D600. It seemed a trifle, but it seriously ruined my nerves.
- Not the entire body is made of an alloy of metals. The front part is made of polycarbonate.
- Minimum excerpt 1/4000 s shutter Many inflate with '1/4000s' great trouble. But it’s not so scary, for example, Nikon D600 can dose using ISO 50 (Lo 1) and 1/4000 seconds as much light as Nikon D3S at ISO 100 (Lo 1) and 1/8000 seconds. By the way D1H can work with shutter speed in 1 / 16.000 seconds:).
- When shooting video, you cannot control the aperture value. So far only Nikon D4, D800, D800E can afford full control when shooting video.
Example on Nikon D600
Personal experience
Nikon D600 is not so small and light as many people write about it. The camera is much larger than crumbs like D5100 or D3200. In general, the Nikon D600 is an excellent amateur camera, it is a pity that the Nikon D600 does not use 51 focus points as on older Nikon cameras, it is also a pity that not all of the camera body is made of metal alloy. But, of course, for that kind of money just cannot get a copy Nikon D4 in the housing from Nikon D7000 :). And Nikon added fuel to the fire, which covers a person’s head when choosing a camera. To new Nikon D7100 installed the updated module at 51 focus points, now many will puzzle over what to buy - Nikon D7100 or Nikon D600. I am often asked to indicate approximate prices for a particular photo equipment, Nikon D600 is still the cheapest Nikon full-format CZK:
Example on Nikon D600
By the way, I personally wonder what is better when working with poor lighting, the updated focus module on the Nikon D600 or the good old module on Nikon D700, D3, D3s, D300, D300s. Personally, I am more inclined to the latter. During the time that I had the D600, I did not feel any serious differences in focusing accuracy when working with high-aperture optics. You can leave your ideas in the comments.
Example on Nikon D600
A popular resource for comparing cameras snapsort gave the Nikon D600 the maximum number of points - 100 out of 100. Attention: they say that the Nikon D600 has serious problems with the contamination of the matrix (video problem review) Most likely for this reason, on October 8.10.2013, XNUMX, Nikon released a new camera. Nikon D610 to replace the D600, in order to remove the poor reputation of the latter due to problems with the contamination of the matrix.
Prices for modern Nikon cameras in popular stores can look at this link.
UPDATED
Examples of photos on MC ZENITAR-N 2,8 / 16 FISH-EYE and camera Nikon D600 with readers of Radozhiva shared by photographer Alexander Plekhanov.
Comments on this post do not require registration. Anyone can leave a comment. Many different photographic equipment can be found on AliExpress.
Conclusions
Nikon D600 - very good amateur full frame cameraYou can easily get normal quality photos without external flash in poor light conditions. Perfect for advanced amateurs and professionals. And even for beginners in the camera it will be easier to understand. I recommend.
Material prepared Arkady Shapoval. Training/Consultations | Youtube | Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Telegram
Yes, there is such a function! Settings will not be remembered for a single lens!
Thank you!
Good night everybody. The other day I wanted to buy this model of the device, after reading you ... the handles went down at the “seams”: (And I also wanted to purchase a 70-200mm 2.8 lens for it. Now I’m thinking.
Liliana, if you have read horror stories about dust-oil on the matrix, you are afraid to take the D600, so wait half a year and buy yourself a D610! I think during this time the people will run it in and you will have a full picture! And the price, I think, is normalizing! Although I see that our Ukrainian traders, even with the advent of the D610, do not particularly drop the price of the D600 :)
I myself am the owner of the D600, took in September 2013! Having read the mixed posts on various forums and blogs, I decided to buy! Already fotik passed 3K frames! The flight is normal, I don’t see the oil on the matrix at point blank range, I saw a couple of particles of dust on F / 22, this is a natural phenomenon Fotik is not a sealed type of equipment! Buy yourself a good prof. photo pear and do not be lazy to use it and you will be happy !!
I read thanks for the tip, I’m going to buy d600 myself and have also read about oil (I think it's just urban legends, since a friend already had d600 with 10k running but butter only on bread. There would be more decent reviews from users and not from marketers
You can also pay attention to the direct competitor Canon 6D + 24-105mm, the sensor size is the same, optics are cheaper the quality of the pictures is comparable.
6D has two big problems for its price: an autofocus module and one memory card (
These are not big problems, but very relative features, whether or not they are disadvantages depending on preferences (like the built-in flash).
And Arkady MANY THANKS for the work. Eyes open after reading :)))
I will support Vladimir,
excellent camera, no oil, dust particles are and will be :), but where are they not?
"Killed" :) the number of BB settings, for each type of 6 options in each direction.
ARKADY MUCH THANKS, partly due to his review took the D600.
Colleagues, here I was puzzled by the purchase of additional. battery for D600! It is clear that the original is the best option, but something 700 UAH. to give for it, and even more so additional well, there is no desire! On the internet I see a bunch of analogs and relatively inexpensive, but what exactly to take, I can not decide! G… I don’t want to buy it so that it’s useless! Please advise. Yes, there is also such a moment: there is a Meiki booster for 600, original. The battery lives in it and shows everything correctly, but how will the Chinese counterparts behave?
I bought AcmePower EN-EL15 as a spare. Surprisingly, the charge holds perfectly. I shot 700 frames at a time and the camera still showed 51% (I don’t know how much this information could be believed). I don’t know how long it will live. By weight, several grams lighter than the original.
Vladimir, en-el 15 has long been staged, the analogs (as they say in one large forum) are divided into 2 groups, some almost immediately lose the maximum charge capacity% by 20, others hold on for a year and a half, and only then begin to lose capacity.
the analogue purchased as additional battery on the D5100 has been living for the 3rd year and feels great :)
I'm waiting for d600 I will test.
guys do not carry Sonya’s bullshit original battery 800 UAH after 2 years instead of 120 minutes became 80 minutes. after 300 UAH 320 minutes after four years 320 minutes. Sony Pro video camera original battery 320 minutes after 800 hours. After 16 hours more than 999 minutes 5 years the same. With Nikon cameras original battery 1030 mAp 300-500 UAH. non-original battery 100 UAH 1800mAps. judge for yourself three times cheaper and the capacity is two and three times longer and the service life is three times longer why? I don’t know myself, the camera manufacturers are used to tearing money for battery as spare parts for cars.
Ordered the original EN-EL15 - 600 UAH! Tomorrow he will come, I'll go and see, I'll try it! If you fooled, he will go back at their expense! I studied the original-non-original question for a week, so you can break your head! There are many fakes for the original, although it is difficult to distinguish in appearance! And I was also surprised that there is such a range of prices for the original, from 600 - to 1000 UAH! And there are "originals" and for 300 UAH. !!
BUY A BRAKE FOR 500GRN THREE BATTERIESЇ TWO TIMES BIG ЄMKISTU YAKI SERVICE BEFORE ORIGINAL
For insults added to the blacklist.
Roma !! The brake is clearly you, more than 3 pcs. for 500 UAH ce for lohiv yak Roma :)))
The EN-EL15 original arrived yesterday! Appearance, stickers and a hologram with notches exactly like what is in the kit! SONY is written on the battery in one place! The fotik battery is defined as native, it shows everything correctly both on the fotik and on the booster !! Recommend!!! I bought Kiev in the "Plantain" internet store! Their price is 574 UAH!
After rereading all forums, reviews, analytical articles (including about oil and dust) in advance, I bought a D600 with a NIKKOR 34-120 N lens to replace the canon d550 with an L-lens 24-105. Traveling by car, he shot more than 50 thousand frames in different extreme conditions. Oil never noticed. Dust particles appeared sometimes. It is treated classically and simply by blowing in a clean room with a rubber bulb (according to a folk enema). The quality of the picture is amazing. White balance, real color reproduction. Detail song! Autofocus lightning, practically no misses. I switched to NIKON with Canon and I do not regret it. He drew attention to foreign tourists, there are especially many of them on the island of Olkhon (Lake Baikal). Almost everyone uses Nikon devices.
Took the other day for my wife NIKON D610 + Sigma AF 35mm F1.4 DG HSM + docking station
Guys tell me in the setup d610 + sigma 35 which is better to set
1 in the area of center-weighted measurement, what value? or leave the middle one?
2 what is better to set or disable in the control of vignetting?
3 I heard that for sigma they recommend AF-S at the center point, I'm used to something like AF-C at the center of t
Yes, I forgot to ask - no one will share the presets for ACR from Katashev?
Urgently need to sit down from Kartashev
a month ago, the D600 took everything up to par, I don’t see the sides.
Arkady, please advise:
it's time to change my Nikon d-90. There are already two glasses on the FF, so the list is narrowing. What kind of carcass would you purchase without the D700? D600 (610) or D700? It’s scary to take the D800 with its weight. It’s a little expensive for me. Until)))
Wedding Practice Appliance. Thank you
Everything, the question is not relevant, because. you can't buy a new seven hundred ...
Here either take the D600 or wait for the release of a new device in the upper class segment, because. for a long time they did not let out the like ... (800 not counting)
WAIT ... FOR A NEW SEGMENT ...
Arkady, hello. I have been looking for a specialist for a long time, but so far no one has said anything sensible on my questions. Your descriptions and tests inspire you to choose the D600 or D610. I have a Nikon D7000 as a spare and a Nikon D7100 in my hands, there is no special need for a full frame, it suits the DX. Actually, the questions:
1. What is better in terms of picture quality (saturation and detail) JPEG? D7100 or D600 / D610?
2. In terms of noise at high ISOs, which behaves better? And how much better?
3. According to the autofocus system, which is better? What focuses more accurately and faster?
4. In low light conditions, what behaves better without a flash?
5. Should I even think about replacing the D7100 with the D610?
About myself I will say that DX and FX do not matter. I'm not worried about prices, i.e. not fundamentally at all. I photograph weddings and children, I don't use tracking autofocus at all. Lenses: Nikon 50 1.4G, Nikon 18-105, Nikon 16-85 and 20 2.8. Waiting for your reply.
1. RAW from the d600 lasts better than with the d7000, had the opportunity to shoot a couple of weddings on the d7000 and d600, therefore, in general, I consider the picture quality to be the best for the d600
2. At high ISOs, at least twice the size of a full-frame
3. I did not see much difference between the d7000 and d600. The speed of the lens is more dependent
4. Of course, a full-format is better seen, primarily because of the real work at high iso
5. It is up to you
As for the crop, I disagree, my conclusions are described here - https://radojuva.com.ua/2013/05/the-crop-identity/
Thanks. And in comparison with the D600 c D7100 what's the difference? Or that D7000 and D7100 are the same quality?
d7000-d7100 for home shooting will still work (and even then if you are tight in money or use it once every five years), but shooting people for the grandmother on a crop is a complete bullshit!
By the way, I don’t shoot for grandmas, I just like it. I get pleasure nipadetski))
Do not compare the d7000 and d7100, even if they are from the same line. The similarity of management is not everything. It would be more correct to compare the D7000 with the d5100 because both sensors have 16 megapixels. The D7100 rather needs to be compared with the d5300 because the matrices are the same and both have no low-pass filters. Ergonomics is generally a different area, everyone’s hands are different. When I chose from d610 and d7100 I almost lost my mind, was torn between the picture and ergonomics. D610 was sitting in my hand like a glove, and the shutter was running ants on my back, and the D7100 shone with such detail that I decided to prefer the quality of the picture, and my hands would get used to it over time. Again d610 iso before d7100 out of competition. Well, d7100 does not like high iso. I had to compare at what time of the day I shoot more often, 70-85% of all pictures came out in the morning and in the afternoon, so the high ones are not so relevant. Here is the conclusion by itself and formed. I’m generally silent about the price.
I just used D300s before, I think it's a professional camera, but D7100 is much better, but not a pro ... why? I would not say that with a crop to shoot a complete bullshit, it's all in the hands of the photographer ... Why is the D600 better than the D7100, except for FF? What settings are different? Thanks.
Stanislas
at 610 - 600 there is a large matrix (like in 800) ff - on this, many glasses realize themselves to the fullest, the quality and capabilities of FF are not attainable for the crop - OF course, HANDS AND HEAD also play not the last role, but it is better not to remember about D300s !! !
Thank you :)
Arkady, I really like your articles! Keep it up. There is another question, perhaps off-topic, but ... the SB-700 flash remotely works due to what, a radio signal or a light catcher? If from the latter, then the flashes of other cameras will interfere with her, i.e. will they set it on fire? At what distance can it be set on fire?
And the second question, is there a 50mm 1.4G Nikkor, which optics from zooms (budget) can I get from Nikon for weddings, children's photography, etc. so as not to become poor in money and the quality was excellent? Thanks.
Kmtati, the D600 works great with cropped lenses. At the same time, he selects the DX image area, very conveniently. At the same time, the pictures are no worse than on the crop, maybe even better. Well done, provided. Oil by the way did not appear for 5500 frames, should it even appear?
from the light catcher. distance is determined not only by the distance, but also by the brightness of the surrounding light, i.e. “Ratio of command impulse to ambient light darkness”.
in principle, they can work, it depends on the situation, which cameras, whether they use the same nikon-control system, which mode was selected for the flash itself. But in the simplest case - yes, even an ordinary soap dish can set fire.
oil does not appear.)
The Nikon D600 is in excellent condition with a mileage of 12400 for only $ 1000 in the secondary market. It’s a reasonable price, given the reputation of the defective product and the price of the new Kenon 6D at about $ 1500 with taxes.
However, buyers want to buy the D600 no more than $ 800. :)
http://vmirefoto.blogspot.ca/2014/01/nikon-d600-12400-1000.html
Good afternoon.
I decided to check the d610 for back focus by removing the text of the book at an angle,
distance of 50-70 centimeters, lens AF-S 50
discovered smear from cotton mirrors. It is especially manifested at 1 / 50-1 / 60. Almost completely disappears to 1/160
Because of this lubrication, the d3100 sensation better removes.
Of course, if you turn on the mirror pre-lift everything changes, but this is wildly inconvenient for shooting :)
Quiet shutter mode saves a few more
If anyone is interested, I can post a photo.
grease from cotton just manifests itself at short exposures, in the case when the vibration from the cotton does not have time to decay and the fluctuations are comparable in time to exposure. the longer the shutter speed, the less grease is from the clap of the mirror, but the greater is the movement from tremor (trembling) of the hands, pressing the start button.
Filmed with a tripod, with a remote control. Hand shake is ruled out.
in any case, physics is physics. the longer the shutter speed, the less impact the short-time vibrations have.
you need to look for - what in your case gave a vibration comparable to exposure
http://vmirefoto.blogspot.ca/2013/12/sony-a7r-vs-nikon-d3-vs-sony-nex-7.html
I would like to add a few words from my experience regarding oil and dust on the matrix of the D600. Having bought this camera, I checked everything. The matrix was clean. I put Nikkor 24-70 / 2,8 on the camera and operated for about 8 months without removing the lens at all. After 8 months, some kind of rubbish appeared on the matrix in the form of black dots in the images in the upper right and left corners. Because the camera was bought from an authorized Nikon dealer with a guarantee, took it to the Nikon service center .... also official. They looked there and said that the case was not guaranteed. The rubbish appeared during the operation. Like, it is necessary to handle the equipment more carefully. This conclusion offended me. Of course, I was disappointed in the service. But, on reflection, I bought a set for cleaning the matrixes of cameras and perfectly cleaned the matrix myself at home. Since then I have no problems. I understood only one thing: THE SALVATION OF THE DROWNING WORK OF THE HANDS OF THE DROLLING ITEMS!
many, in principle, are not happy with the situation when you buy a new camera for $ 1500 and you need to clean it only because Nikon made a defective camera.
many do not want to risk their personnel - who knows when the oil will once again be on the matrix? so they buy Kenon 6D (for 1400 dollars) or there Sony A7.
http://vmirefoto.blogspot.ca/2014/02/nikon-usa-nikon-canada-nikon-d600.html
Nikon USA and Nikon Canada will fix Nikon D600 cameras with dust / oil on the sensor for free even after the warranty ends.
Maybe Nikon Russia / Ukraine will do the same?