answers: 304

  1. Dima
    31.05.2022

    Does it make sense to change 18-105 to this one? I don't like 18-105 on d5100 (

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      31.05.2022

      it makes no sense, it’s better to look for Sigma / Tamron 17-50 / 2,8 with a stub

      Reply

      • Dima
        13.08.2022

        Changed 18-105 to this one, found an almost new one. Heaven and Earth. Very satisfied. 18-105 is just a big piece of useless garbage. All the same, the glass, although old, but its class makes itself felt.

        Reply

      • Victor
        13.08.2022

        I agree, I also like 18-70 more than 18-105.

        Reply

      • Dima
        09.09.2023

        After using the lens for a while, I realized something else) Overall, it’s not bad at all. What bothered me much more was its very strong hare-likeness and rather bad geometry.
        He catches hares even in the most seemingly harmless situations where the 18-55 (Canon) was calmly filmed. Well, the geometry, the lower right corner seems to fall to the right at certain angles. This usually happens with extra-wide ones, but here it’s only 18 mm) It will be very interesting to find 16-85 and compare it with it...

        Reply

  2. Nelson Parra
    17.06.2022

    Excelente lente, a pesar de los años funciona perfecto, junio 2022, cómodo silencioso, se puede enfocar en enfoque automático genial

    Reply

  3. Dima
    13.08.2022

    One thing I don’t understand is why the misunderstanding 18-105 is still being produced without any updates, but this one was discontinued? Weight, size picture everything in it is excellent. Add a stub and improve dust protection (like sigma) and a bmba lens like a shuttle for crop.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      13.08.2022

      You mean no updates? But what about 18-140?

      Reply

      • Dima
        13.08.2022

        This is a different glass) That would be 18-70 of the second version, for example ... It is ideal in size for small cropped cameras.

        Reply

    • B. R. P.
      13.08.2022

      Manufacturers do not set themselves the task of releasing a “bimba”, only to get more profit.

      Reply

    • Oleg
      13.08.2022

      Marketing. 18-140 at 70mm 5.6 will be. Nikon 16-80 F2.8-4 is his heir, better late than never. Canon doesn't have that.

      Reply

      • Arkady Shapoval
        13.08.2022

        About 16-80, absolutely erroneous opinion
        A 18-140 direct development 18-105
        Staff member 18-135 was replaced / supplemented by 18-105, and that, in turn, 18-140.
        Model 16-80 belongs to the professional line and is an addition to 17-55 / 2.8, repeating the popular full-frame counterparts 24-120 / 4

        Reply

      • Oleg
        13.08.2022

        I agree, not amateur

        Reply

      • Victor
        13.08.2022

        16-80 is more likely the heir to 16-85, somewhat improved, as evidenced by the gold ring (but not a direct replacement for 17-55, for which Nikon has not yet released an update and most likely will not release it anymore)

        Reply

  4. Dima
    27.07.2023

    d5100 and 18-70

    Reply

  5. Dima
    27.08.2023

    d5100 and 18-70

    Reply

  6. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer