answers: 42

  1. Sergei
    26.07.2018

    Arkady, thanks for the review, everything is fair. I use the version of MS. It’s hard to focus with an open aperture even through the Sony electronic viewfinder. I want to note that the resolution in the center of the frame is higher and therefore the combination of the average format of this lens and the crop factor of 1,5 gives a pretty good result.

    Reply

  2. York
    24.10.2018

    I never understood why to put a non-format ... SF-glasses are designed for SF, on a narrow frame we get a loose, sluggish, bespontovoy picture. Jedem das seine, each format has its own glasses.

    Reply

  3. Gonfire
    15.11.2018

    In the Soviet Union there was still a very interesting lens industrial 29 2.8 / 80

    Reply

    • Rodion
      16.11.2018

      There is a review on it, though not very objective - due to testing on a camera with a large pixel, it was concluded that the lens was sharp on a small format. In reality, the resolution is only enough for these 12 megapixels of old full-frame small-format DSLRs ...
      Industar-29 is much more good in appearance than good optically. Therefore, I put the old Zeiss Tessar 80 / 2.8 from 1939 in the body of such a lens with bad lenses - the result turned out to be not only worse, but, perhaps, much better than the original lens.

      Reply

      • Peter Sh.
        16.11.2018

        Radion, what does the lens do not allow the matrix? With examples, if possible.

        Reply

  4. Load more comments ...

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer