answers: 26

  1. Anatoly
    13.09.2012

    Apparently, tear the lens out of the discharge and throw it out. Yes, and the design is not the most convenient. But still, the experiment was a success and another lens settled on your blog Arkady.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      14.10.2012

      Yes, not the best lens.

      Reply

  2. Alexander
    17.09.2012

    on the photohistory it was like this for Vega-5U: “Working distance - 83 +/- 1 mm, light transmission coefficient - not less than 0,6.”

    PS I really like all the materials on your site.

    Thank you.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      14.10.2012

      The working distance is really very large.

      Reply

  3. Alexey
    19.06.2013
    • Andrii
      28.04.2015

      CLASS !!!!!

      Reply

    • anonym
      05.03.2016

      He is not bad at reading text from bottles)

      Reply

  4. Sergei
    23.02.2015

    Hello! I have a Nikon D3200 standard set of macro rings, I just can’t achieve focus on the macro with this lens. Please tell me what distance should be from the matrix to the lens in order to focus on the macro! Thank you in advance

    Reply

    • Valera
      24.01.2016

      “Macro” is a loose concept. The greater the distance (from the matrix to the lens) - the closer the focus (subject) - the less DOF ​​- the worse the aperture - the less fun.

      Reply

    • anonym
      05.03.2016

      You need 2 sets of rings.

      Reply

    • anonym
      05.03.2016

      Focus is about 20 cm. When added, it becomes even smaller.

      Reply

    • anonym
      05.03.2016

      By the way, the M42 adapter to Nikon with a lens.

      Reply

  5. Rodin
    06.04.2015

    Yes, like the norms of glass - I liked the pictures, although it is a bit dark. The bokeh is harsh.

    Reply

  6. Evgeny_d60
    23.10.2015

    Thanks for the work done! Such lenses are periodically sold, it is interesting to know about their qualities in advance

    Reply

  7. anonym
    01.01.2017

    700 is back in business. Happy New Year!!!

    Reply

  8. Eugene
    07.01.2017

    "Vega-5U 4/105 will damage the mirror"

    But what if there is no mirror? (Gh4)

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      07.01.2017

      Damage the bayonet shaft and / or shutter and / or sensor. The rear protrusion is too large for a conventional adapter M42-Micro 4/3.

      Reply

  9. Mihailo
    01.09.2022

    I want to share (in my opinion) a positive experience. I wanted to play with macro photography for the poor. I bought used D3200, m42 adapter (without lens), two sets of macro rings, Vega-5u. There was also an external flash, a cheap tripod, it is very difficult to shoot macro without a flash and a tripod because of the small working distance, the hand trembled - the ant or the flower is no longer in focus. However, with due skill, the result exceeded expectations (I thought that nothing would come of it without buying an expensive macro lens). In post-processing, you need to compensate for the low initial contrast, and that's almost all. The main thing is to choose the length of the flash, make the aperture smaller. It's a pity the site does not allow you to upload a file more than 2MB, I had to cut the quality.

    Reply

    • B. R. P.
      01.09.2022

      flash length? Unfortunately, diffraction and “contrast compensation” gobbled up all the quality (technical).

      Reply

      • Mihailo
        01.09.2022

        “Flash length”))) Excuse my French, I picked up the camera a month ago for the first time and I don’t know the terminology yet. Is the duration correct? I would love to try to photograph in natural light, but the lens is very dark ... And when the sunlight is bright enough, it is difficult to choose the angle so that the backlight does not make everything completely faded. Can you tell me some old lens similar, but with a larger aperture? More precisely, a lens with a sharp picture is already obtained at aperture 4-5.6, on veg you have to reduce the aperture almost to the stop.

        Reply

      • Mihailo
        01.09.2022

        And it’s also completely unclear how to adapt (and which) hood here. There are no threads for filters on this glass.

        Reply

      • Sergei
        01.09.2022

        The situation is complicated by the fact that the Vega-5U is designed for a large frame of the 6 x 9 cm type and is intended for a photographic enlarger. Therefore, this lens creates a lot of stray side rays of an extra image, which drastically reduces contrast. In addition, its internal blackening is far from ideal.
        I advise you to actively use home-made diaphragms inside extension rings - light cutters made of black rubber, plus possible additional blackening of the walls of the rings.

        https://www.penta-club.ru/forum/topic/158268-%d0%be-%d0%bf%d0%be%d0%bb%d1%8c%d0%b7%d0%b5-%d1%81%d0%b0%d0%bd%d1%82%d0%b5%d1%85%d0%bd%d0%b8%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d0%bf%d1%80%d0%b8-%d0%bc%d0%b0%d0%ba%d1%80%d0%be%d1%81%d1%8a%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%ba%d0%b5/

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        01.09.2022

        Correct pulse power. For macro, aperture does not play a special role, because the aperture still has to be closed and you can’t get away from additional lighting. You have 24 mph and crop, diffraction sets in quite early, already 5,6 is critical, but the flu will be small, so you need to cover it. On flowers, like yours, there is no point in closing more than 8, if you need an even smaller scale and, accordingly, a large flu, you will need a larger aperture closure and a powerful additional. lighting + ISO boost. In addition, at small scales, the aperture ratio of the lens drops additionally. Macro and especially lighting in macro is a separate, big topic and you can’t tell in a nutshell. It will take a serious study of the materiel.

        Reply

      • B. R. P.
        01.09.2022
      • Mihailo
        01.09.2022

        Thank you all very much, a lot of useful information. I'll go read.

        Reply

      • Aleksey68
        01.09.2022

        nikkor 105mm 2.8d micro - very sharp already with the open, and even at 5.6 and even more so.

        Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer