Lens overview INDUSTR-29 1: 2,8 F = 8cm P by Rodion Eshmakov here.
|
|||||
Overview of Industar-29 2.8 / 80Comments: 54, on the topic: Overview of Industar-29 2.8 / 80Add a comment |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Overview of Industar-29 2.8 / 80Lens overview INDUSTR-29 1: 2,8 F = 8cm P by Rodion Eshmakov here. Comments: 54, on the topic: Overview of Industar-29 2.8 / 80Add a comment |
|||||
|
|
|||||
Copyright © Radojuva.com. Blog author - Photographer in Kiev Arkady Shapoval. 2009-2024
Interestingly, but Yevtifeev criticized him. Like, the sharpness is not enough, and the contrast is not the same. Difference of instances?
There was a difference between the copies in the I-29. I had the opportunity to try 2 copies, so one really was a little sharper and more contrasting. But my personal opinion: Salute S is far from Hasselblad and Industar 29 - it will be worse than Biometar. Therefore, at one time I changed them to “Kiev 60” from “Wave 3 MC” and was very happy about it. Wave 3 is both sharper and more contrasting and the color rendition is brighter. Probably Arkady has a rather successful copy of the I-29 in his review. When I looked at the photo from the review, I simply could not believe my eyes, although I recalled the stories of the “photo-axes” about the wonderful salutovsky staff. But back in 1986 - I personally did not find confirmation of this, probably there was not enough experience.
2 Arkady.
Do something with quotes in the comments, for example, replace everything with the upper double 'American', otherwise your eyes run up (post by Igor_K) - apparently 'Christmas trees' are not friendly with some punctuation marks (periods and dashes).
I tried two copies, both seemingly perfect. Both are equally soapy, terribly soapy in the open.
Obviously, on the large-pixel D700, I almost do not care about the resolution of the lens, but on modern cameras, using the I-29 is unjustified.
For a similar picture, you can refer to the I-26M or I-58U.
Industar-29 2.8 / 80 1966, all ushatan, wild backlash but lenses in beats. condition. Bought for 1500 p. after your review. I do not regret
Good afternoon!
I’ll add my 5 kopecks, I have a collector’s copy with an M42 shank for bayonet B.
Everything is factory with the original back cover on the M42.
It seems to understand what’s the matter, the Salyut bayonet mount, three wide opening carvings similar to a helicoid, an adapter for M42 is made on it, apparently in the factory, everything is very believable. There is no Pentagon mount (for some reason I was sure it should be), mount B (Salute 88)
Share your impressions. It is very interesting what he is like at work ...
A wonderful lens, it paints gently, it shoots portraits very well, it has excellent bokeh, the aperture is round, it costs a penny))
A good overview of INDUSTAR-29 1: 2,8 F = 8cm P here https://radojuva.com/2020/09/industar-29-2-8-f-80mm-p-arsenal/