The stock is over. Winner: Igor, the prize has been delivered to the right address. Unknown lens turned out to be Industar-29 2.8 / 80
Promotion from Radozhiva
The essence of the action was: determine with which lens the photos were taken below.
Terms and Conditions: in the comments to this article, you need to specify the lens on which everything is shot. Be sure to justify your conclusion in a few words... Also, do not forget to indicate your e-mail, which will be used to contact the winner. The promotion lasts until 20.09.2012/20.09.2012/XNUMX. If no one has identified the lens by XNUMX, then I will start giving hints in the comments until the winner is determined.
First who guesses the lens following the rules, gets the lens Vega-11U 2.8 / 50mm for Nikon for macro photography. Delivery in Ukraine by New Mail (warehouse). Participants from other countries can simply participate.
In previous promotions, I gave too many tips, this time the promotion has a time interval. Waiting for your bright thoughts.
So, the photo (modified for publication in Lighroom):
1
Raindrops on the leaves
2
After the rain
3
Flower after rain
4
Flowers and bee
5
Flowers
6
Flowers close up
7
Flower and bee
8
Flowers of my city
9
Boke
10
Autumn leaf
11
Wood and iron
12
Leaves. Clearly visible bokeh
13
Autumn in the yard
14
Autumn and flowers
15
Autumn and flowers 2
16
Close-up
17
Flowers
18
And more flowers
19
More colors
20
Viburnum after rain
21
Photographer Assistant
22
The second assistant came
23
Photographer assistant looking for trigger
24
The photographer's assistant lost the second camera ...
25
In the
26
Nature
27
Wild grapes in autumn
28
Sweet wild grapes
29
Grapes
30
Grapes in autumn
Here is a list of all the incorrect options that were sounded in the comments:
Jupiter-37A 135mm F3.5
Nikkor 50mm 1.4G
Pentacon auto 1.8 / 50
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 Carl Zeiss
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 ausJena
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2.8 / 50
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 50mm T
Vega 11u 2.8 / 50
helios-81H 2/50
WORLD 24n 2/35
Petri C. Auto 55 mm f / 1.4
Nikon 85mm F / 1.8D AF Nikkor
Nikon 24-85mm f / 2.8-4D AF IF Nikkor
Zonnar 50-85mm
d90 F2.8 85
Jupiter-9 2/85
Nikon 85mm F / 1.4
XM F Porst Color Reflex 1: 1.6 / 50mm UMC
Canon 50mm f / 1.8
Canon 85 / 1.8
EF 50 mm f / 1.0 L USM
50mm f / 1.4 USM
EF 50 mm f / 2.5 Compact Macro
Canon EF 50mm f / 1.2L USM
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.8 II
Nikon 85mm f / 1.4D AF Nikkor
Zenith 1.7 50mm
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC
Industar 50-2
Industar 50U
Industar I96U
world 69
Jupiter-6 180 / 2.8?
telezenitar 135 / 2.8
Emitar / s 4,5 / 80
Nikon 50mm f / 1.2
Carl Zeiss Distagon T * 35mm f / 2.8
Nikon Nikkor-S Auto 1: 1.4 f = 50mm
MC Arsat H 2.8 / 100
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 35/2
World 1 37 / 2.8
Industar-26 (m)
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 55/1.2
Nikon 70-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor
Nikon 50mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor
Vega 12-B
Helios 77-M4
Nikkor AF 24-85mm f / 2.8-4 D IF
Nikkor 85 1.4d
tair-11 / tair-11a
Nikon 24-120mm
wave-3 80 \ 2.8
Asahi Super-Takumar 50 mm f / 1.4
Optik Gorlitz Oreston 50 mm f / 1.8
Tair 3FS F4.5 300 mm
MS Wave 1.8 / 50
Nikkor-S 50 mm f / 1.4
helios 44-2
Era 6? 50 / 1.5
yashinon 50 / 1.4
Baltar 100mm f2.3
Vivitar 50 / 1.7
wave3
LOMO-OKS1-100-1
LOMO-OKS1-150-1
Yashinon-DX 1: 1,7 f = 50mm
Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0
Nikkor DX 55-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S.
Nikon 105mm F2.0DC
Nikon 70-200mm
Nikon 50mm f / 1.8
Nikkor 24-70mm f / 2.8
kaleinar 5 n or kaleinar 3
Nikon 24-120mm f / 4G N
MAMIYA / SEKOR 200 / 3,5
Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 4/135
ОКП1-100-1 1.8/100мм
Elicar V-HQ macro 90 / 2.5
Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f / 2.8G IF-ED
nikkor 35 1.8gdx
Helios-40-2
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
Although there is no helios twists bokeh, but here it’s even. Similarly, my NIKON AF 24-85 mm f / 2.8-4D IF draws, and the macro seems to be similar. Guessed?
Do not guess.
Thoughts are like that.
All the photos show that there is only one shooting angle - this is a fix. 50mm, FF camera.
The depth of field in photos 10, 12, 30 is the smallest, at the 10th it seems generally negligible (macro from an acute angle?) - aperture ratio 1.8-2.8.
The bokeh is soft, beautiful at an open aperture (30) and very strange at a closed aperture (8,9), peculiar, like a signature - your lens is yours.
This is the Vega-11U 2.8 / 50mm on the Nikon d700.
Looked at another review. According to the drawing, he. But what about a fixed focus?
Probably not him ...
Vsyo, it seems we are at a dead end ... Maybe MC EUROPA-15N? (Purely at random, since you wrote that her review would be something unusual.)
No, I won’t make Europe.
Yes, I don’t know what to offer) Perhaps this is an old model of the lens “Era-6” 50 / 1.5 very sharp glass
As nonsense, the lens from the UPA enlarger
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC Bokeh and aperture, focal length, everything fits under it. I have already expressed this version and am returning to it again. Personally, I did not work with the lens, but on the examples of your photo experiments, there is a clear resemblance to this model.
If you look at all the answers, then a planar scheme variant suggests itself and I can assume that it could be yashinon 50 / 1.4
Baltar 100mm f2.3 as an option)
I see you are very well stay tuned for Radozhiva. But this is not him.
Yak version wave3, the bokeh pattern is even more similar, the presence of the back of other details, the sharpness may be tied to the given asset, but the alert is focal, as for me there is less than 80mm. the same dirka will be built more than 2,8 ... And even more than a few zenitars 50 by 1,7 ale I know the same FR ...
It is even similar to my Jupiter 37A. Malunok is podbny, bokeh is also, and there is the ability to “grab” a bird or a kitty))).
Tse Yashinon-DX 1: 1,7 f = 50mm it’s so easy to build ... Boke is also twisted. I plus 6 lєpєstkiv diaphragms (seen in 4 photos)
As already mentioned here, the telephoto lens is very fast.
I also think that it has a multi-petal aperture judging by the bokeh. I think that not all photos were taken in the open, but nevertheless the bokeh is round, which means a high-quality aperture.
Of these lenses, I came across a cinema lens LOMO-OKS1-100-1.
Or is it LOMO-OKS1-150-1. On the Internet on sale, he is more common.
On my thought, the price is on Gelios 81N. I myself am so reproachful, for that the difference is such and that it gives the object, the bokeh is accurate.
The fact that everything is centered on the same Vega-11U object, marveling at your review from the photographs of drops and sharpness, as well as giving the object - everything is possible.
Well, for whom do you take me, take pictures for a gift. This is not a Vega-11U and not any other zoom lens.
I was so lucky to see such a beautiful boke and such a crazy little DOF on the Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0 (but, perhaps, your f2)
=)
A very small DOF and a very blurred background suggest that it was shot with a telephoto lens. As an option, Nikkor DX 55-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S.
I think that Nikon 105mm F2.0 DC. I chose it because I myself have one, well, and the lens is not bad, it takes good quality.
Such photos, just a peek, all at a glance and clarity and color, such a camera and I want.
I know a lot of lenses very well, but judging by the quality, I tend to one and this is Nikon 105mm F2.0 DC, I have no other options, I am 100% sure.
Not a bad article, most of all I emphasize the good attitude of the site for nature, and the illustration helps him in this!
for some reason it seems to me that this is one of Industar. The Tessar scheme seems to be in optics
Internal focusing, excellent “portraiture”, quite sharp.
That's for sure - Nikon 105mm F2.0 DC!
So only Nikon 105 mm will be able to remove the leaves of nasturtium and flowers of cosmos. Taking pictures of plants is a special art! And the kitty is so good! I have him (Nikon) and I am so happy with him!
This is a manual 100%
it seems to me a zoom (I am not friends with intuition), therefore it’s a fix
focal approximately 55
crop 100%
and not on d200 d300
hole covered for stop
little petals
backlight holds poorly, i.e. without enlightenment
it is not huge, the built-in flash does not block =)
and this is M42, all focusing is 1-2 meters.
this is not a planar, this is tessar.
not from the enlarger
without a chip.
hell knows what it is =)