The stock is over. Winner: Igor, the prize has been delivered to the right address. Unknown lens turned out to be Industar-29 2.8 / 80
Promotion from Radozhiva
The essence of the action was: determine with which lens the photos were taken below.
Terms and Conditions: in the comments to this article, you need to specify the lens on which everything is shot. Be sure to justify your conclusion in a few words... Also, do not forget to indicate your e-mail, which will be used to contact the winner. The promotion lasts until 20.09.2012/20.09.2012/XNUMX. If no one has identified the lens by XNUMX, then I will start giving hints in the comments until the winner is determined.
First who guesses the lens following the rules, gets the lens Vega-11U 2.8 / 50mm for Nikon for macro photography. Delivery in Ukraine by New Mail (warehouse). Participants from other countries can simply participate.
In previous promotions, I gave too many tips, this time the promotion has a time interval. Waiting for your bright thoughts.
So, the photo (modified for publication in Lighroom):
1
Raindrops on the leaves
2
After the rain
3
Flower after rain
4
Flowers and bee
5
Flowers
6
Flowers close up
7
Flower and bee
8
Flowers of my city
9
Boke
10
Autumn leaf
11
Wood and iron
12
Leaves. Clearly visible bokeh
13
Autumn in the yard
14
Autumn and flowers
15
Autumn and flowers 2
16
Close-up
17
Flowers
18
And more flowers
19
More colors
20
Viburnum after rain
21
Photographer Assistant
22
The second assistant came
23
Photographer assistant looking for trigger
24
The photographer's assistant lost the second camera ...
25
In the
26
Nature
27
Wild grapes in autumn
28
Sweet wild grapes
29
Grapes
30
Grapes in autumn
Here is a list of all the incorrect options that were sounded in the comments:
Jupiter-37A 135mm F3.5
Nikkor 50mm 1.4G
Pentacon auto 1.8 / 50
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 Carl Zeiss
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 ausJena
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2.8 / 50
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 50mm T
Vega 11u 2.8 / 50
helios-81H 2/50
WORLD 24n 2/35
Petri C. Auto 55 mm f / 1.4
Nikon 85mm F / 1.8D AF Nikkor
Nikon 24-85mm f / 2.8-4D AF IF Nikkor
Zonnar 50-85mm
d90 F2.8 85
Jupiter-9 2/85
Nikon 85mm F / 1.4
XM F Porst Color Reflex 1: 1.6 / 50mm UMC
Canon 50mm f / 1.8
Canon 85 / 1.8
EF 50 mm f / 1.0 L USM
50mm f / 1.4 USM
EF 50 mm f / 2.5 Compact Macro
Canon EF 50mm f / 1.2L USM
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.8 II
Nikon 85mm f / 1.4D AF Nikkor
Zenith 1.7 50mm
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC
Industar 50-2
Industar 50U
Industar I96U
world 69
Jupiter-6 180 / 2.8?
telezenitar 135 / 2.8
Emitar / s 4,5 / 80
Nikon 50mm f / 1.2
Carl Zeiss Distagon T * 35mm f / 2.8
Nikon Nikkor-S Auto 1: 1.4 f = 50mm
MC Arsat H 2.8 / 100
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 35/2
World 1 37 / 2.8
Industar-26 (m)
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 55/1.2
Nikon 70-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor
Nikon 50mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor
Vega 12-B
Helios 77-M4
Nikkor AF 24-85mm f / 2.8-4 D IF
Nikkor 85 1.4d
tair-11 / tair-11a
Nikon 24-120mm
wave-3 80 \ 2.8
Asahi Super-Takumar 50 mm f / 1.4
Optik Gorlitz Oreston 50 mm f / 1.8
Tair 3FS F4.5 300 mm
MS Wave 1.8 / 50
Nikkor-S 50 mm f / 1.4
helios 44-2
Era 6? 50 / 1.5
yashinon 50 / 1.4
Baltar 100mm f2.3
Vivitar 50 / 1.7
wave3
LOMO-OKS1-100-1
LOMO-OKS1-150-1
Yashinon-DX 1: 1,7 f = 50mm
Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0
Nikkor DX 55-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S.
Nikon 105mm F2.0DC
Nikon 70-200mm
Nikon 50mm f / 1.8
Nikkor 24-70mm f / 2.8
kaleinar 5 n or kaleinar 3
Nikon 24-120mm f / 4G N
MAMIYA / SEKOR 200 / 3,5
Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 4/135
ОКП1-100-1 1.8/100мм
Elicar V-HQ macro 90 / 2.5
Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f / 2.8G IF-ED
nikkor 35 1.8gdx
Helios-40-2
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
For some reason, it seems to me that the optical scheme of this lens is Tessar or Planar.
At first I was inclined to think that it was Industar-26 (m). but the nature of the boke is different sort of.
if you look at photo number 10, you can see that the depth of field is very small and the background does not just blur, but blows away completely. I suppose it could also be Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
My Options:
OM Zuiko 35/2
World 1 37 / 2.8
Industar-26 (m)
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
oh forgot another OM Zuiko 55 / 1.2
I found photographs from 70-300 stable. It is not paradoxical, but at the long end (300mm) the photos are very similar to the examples in the action.
Latest Verdict Nikon 70-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor
but for an hour there is not a whale object from a kenon
not :)
I am very similar to the Nikon 50mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor, with open aperture
Vega 11-U. Since this is a prize, it means photos taken by him. I could be wrong, just logic)))
Not sure, but the focal length and nature of the bokeh is similar to Vega 12-B.
I think Helios 77-M4
Nikkor AF 24-85mm f / 2.8-4 D IF
Nikkor 85 1.4d
I think this is Jupiter-37A 135mm F3.5
seems to bokeh
Jupiter-37A has been called many times. In order not to repeat the mistakes anymore, I will give a hint that this is not Jupiter-37 and not any other Jupiter or Sonnar.
by the nature of the blur, it seems to me that this is tair-11 or tair-11a
maybe Nikon 24-120mm?
Which is F4?
well i thought on this one https://radojuva.com.ua/2012/06/obzor-nikon-24-120mm-f3-5-5-6g-ed-if-af-s-vr/
bokeh seems
with a similar aperture and a similar blur can be wave-3 80 \ 2.8 or industrial-29 80 \ 2.8
probably I-29 80 \ 2.8, more like an eagle eye
maybe it's Jupiter 37a or Helios 81H ????
Nikkor 24-85mm 1: 2.8-4D?
I mean, the Asahi Super-Takumar 50 mm f / 1.4 looks like bokeh. i focus is similar (:
Also Meyer-Optik Görlitz Oreston 50 mm f / 1.8 (:
I’ve thought about it now with the XM F Porst Color Reflex 1: 1.6 / 50mm UMC from your recent reviews, б similarity in bokeh картинка the picture in front of you is similar (:
Not a bit like.
Tair 3FS F4.5 300 mm may be wrong but shooting on a long one is for sure)
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC, I believe that this is this lens, because of the excellent sharpness, as for a fixed lens, and the bokeh that it gives can be confused only with Helios 81.
No, really, I've been reviewing these photos for the third day and my heart is not in place. I look at the bokeh, and my brain accurately points to the Helios 81-H. Only he can draw like that, though the sharpness is confusing, although this may be due to the fact that the diaphragm on my Helios does not work for me, and therefore there is absolutely no depth of field. In general, given the color rendition and fabulous bokeh in the 9th photo, I can argue that this is my favorite Helios 81-N. Yes, and the cat in 21 photos, already shining, which speaks about his beautiful aperture, even on a cloudy day. This is my last word, thanks Arkady for fun puzzles.
Not at all, after the 20th, the action will be more fun. I see, many people write about Helios-81N, but it's not him. Sharpness is slightly added when publishing, which is indicated in the terms of the action (when reducing the size of the photo, usually sharpness automatically increases).
Will wait. In general, Arkady at my personal discretion, your site is already slowly going beyond its originally conceived framework. Yes, and a lot of material has accumulated, you couple think about the book any magazine from Radozhiv. Yes, and on the site you can enter a little corner for those who studied on your publications. They say we will judge your work, and you will give us your verdict.
Books are on the shelf, the blog is constantly updated and attracts interest. Also, few people notice that all the materials on the site are also being updated, remade, supplemented, modernized. But thank you for the idea.
It is possible that this is from the “wave” series there is an old MC Volna 1.8 / 50 lens, it is made very high quality and gives a similar result as in your pictures
Having thought, but maybe Nikkor-S 50 mm f / 1.4? (: It seems that it seems to be similar (:
Maybe helios 44-2?
I see people went into a stupor. This is not Helios, and not any of the lenses built according to the Biotar scheme.