The stock is over. Winner: Igor, the prize has been delivered to the right address. Unknown lens turned out to be Industar-29 2.8 / 80
Promotion from Radozhiva
The essence of the action was: determine with which lens the photos were taken below.
Terms and Conditions: in the comments to this article, you need to specify the lens on which everything is shot. Be sure to justify your conclusion in a few words... Also, do not forget to indicate your e-mail, which will be used to contact the winner. The promotion lasts until 20.09.2012/20.09.2012/XNUMX. If no one has identified the lens by XNUMX, then I will start giving hints in the comments until the winner is determined.
First who guesses the lens following the rules, gets the lens Vega-11U 2.8 / 50mm for Nikon for macro photography. Delivery in Ukraine by New Mail (warehouse). Participants from other countries can simply participate.
In previous promotions, I gave too many tips, this time the promotion has a time interval. Waiting for your bright thoughts.
So, the photo (modified for publication in Lighroom):
1
Raindrops on the leaves
2
After the rain
3
Flower after rain
4
Flowers and bee
5
Flowers
6
Flowers close up
7
Flower and bee
8
Flowers of my city
9
Boke
10
Autumn leaf
11
Wood and iron
12
Leaves. Clearly visible bokeh
13
Autumn in the yard
14
Autumn and flowers
15
Autumn and flowers 2
16
Close-up
17
Flowers
18
And more flowers
19
More colors
20
Viburnum after rain
21
Photographer Assistant
22
The second assistant came
23
Photographer assistant looking for trigger
24
The photographer's assistant lost the second camera ...
25
In the
26
Nature
27
Wild grapes in autumn
28
Sweet wild grapes
29
Grapes
30
Grapes in autumn
Here is a list of all the incorrect options that were sounded in the comments:
Jupiter-37A 135mm F3.5
Nikkor 50mm 1.4G
Pentacon auto 1.8 / 50
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 Carl Zeiss
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 ausJena
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2.8 / 50
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 50mm T
Vega 11u 2.8 / 50
helios-81H 2/50
WORLD 24n 2/35
Petri C. Auto 55 mm f / 1.4
Nikon 85mm F / 1.8D AF Nikkor
Nikon 24-85mm f / 2.8-4D AF IF Nikkor
Zonnar 50-85mm
d90 F2.8 85
Jupiter-9 2/85
Nikon 85mm F / 1.4
XM F Porst Color Reflex 1: 1.6 / 50mm UMC
Canon 50mm f / 1.8
Canon 85 / 1.8
EF 50 mm f / 1.0 L USM
50mm f / 1.4 USM
EF 50 mm f / 2.5 Compact Macro
Canon EF 50mm f / 1.2L USM
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.8 II
Nikon 85mm f / 1.4D AF Nikkor
Zenith 1.7 50mm
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC
Industar 50-2
Industar 50U
Industar I96U
world 69
Jupiter-6 180 / 2.8?
telezenitar 135 / 2.8
Emitar / s 4,5 / 80
Nikon 50mm f / 1.2
Carl Zeiss Distagon T * 35mm f / 2.8
Nikon Nikkor-S Auto 1: 1.4 f = 50mm
MC Arsat H 2.8 / 100
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 35/2
World 1 37 / 2.8
Industar-26 (m)
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 55/1.2
Nikon 70-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor
Nikon 50mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor
Vega 12-B
Helios 77-M4
Nikkor AF 24-85mm f / 2.8-4 D IF
Nikkor 85 1.4d
tair-11 / tair-11a
Nikon 24-120mm
wave-3 80 \ 2.8
Asahi Super-Takumar 50 mm f / 1.4
Optik Gorlitz Oreston 50 mm f / 1.8
Tair 3FS F4.5 300 mm
MS Wave 1.8 / 50
Nikkor-S 50 mm f / 1.4
helios 44-2
Era 6? 50 / 1.5
yashinon 50 / 1.4
Baltar 100mm f2.3
Vivitar 50 / 1.7
wave3
LOMO-OKS1-100-1
LOMO-OKS1-150-1
Yashinon-DX 1: 1,7 f = 50mm
Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0
Nikkor DX 55-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S.
Nikon 105mm F2.0DC
Nikon 70-200mm
Nikon 50mm f / 1.8
Nikkor 24-70mm f / 2.8
kaleinar 5 n or kaleinar 3
Nikon 24-120mm f / 4G N
MAMIYA / SEKOR 200 / 3,5
Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 4/135
ОКП1-100-1 1.8/100мм
Elicar V-HQ macro 90 / 2.5
Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f / 2.8G IF-ED
nikkor 35 1.8gdx
Helios-40-2
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.0 L USM
Canon 50mm f / 1.4 USM this one is popular for aperture, color and sharpness
Canon EF 50 mm f / 2.5 Compact Macro
Canon EF 50mm f / 1.2L USM possible
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.8 II it is more older
Vladimir, read the conditions of the action again, it says “Be sure to substantiate your conclusion in a few words”
Vladimir, can I also list all the existing lenses? it seems according to the rules only one position can be designated; because I also chose between canon f1.2 and f1.0, I decided to stay on the last
You can designate as many options as you like, the main thing is not to deviate from the rules and "Be sure to substantiate your conclusion in a few words"
Canon 50 / 2.5
I know two lenses that give this picture: Nikon 85mm f / 1.4D AF Nikkor
Zenith 1.7 50mm
Dear J-fx, if you look at the pictures taken with the above listed lenses, then you will hardly see a difference in sharpness and color filling, except for bagels on the side, it will be difficult.
Yes, but why the hell are you ... air?
All success and best photos.
my Helios-81N on open apertures gives exactly the same bokeh, but the last photos are embarrassing, too dark for me. But still I will dwell on it, it works perfectly, for these photos of work.
Dear Vladimir, listing the entire range of Canon lenses as part of the competition is at least incorrect, IMHO; Well, we are waiting for the results, it is interesting to know what kind of glass it is :)
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC is 100 percent of it, because for helios, clarity through measuredly good!
Arkady all the lenses I listed:
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.8
Canon EF 50mm f / 1.2L USM
Canon EF 50 mm f / 2.5 Compact Macro
Canon 50mm f / 1.4 USM
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.0 L USM
I noted how possible the options are, because all of them are very sharp, the bokeh will be similar to almost all lenses and the colors will be saturated. Some of them have been produced for a long time because I assume their cost is low and they are available
Good. Next time, include explanations that led you to one lens or another.
Vega-11U it can’t be anything, maybe it can be used only for macro :)
Judging by the images, the imaginary focusing distance is quite large, so this is 100-135mm. The aperture seems to open as far as F2.8
Quite strong chromatic aberrations of all types, including re-corrected spherical (circles of blur with a rim) and others (again circles of blur turn blue). So it looks more like pictures from an old manual lens.
I saw the suggestion in the comments about Carl Zeiss Planar 85 / 1.4, but for how long using these lenses I will say that the contouring is uncharacteristic for them, as I see on the stems and why I did not really like this bokeh.
The pictures are also with vignetting, which, as it were, negates my telephoto focus assumption, but we can write off poor-quality optics like the Soviet Helios-40 (but it disappears because there would be pictures on F1.5, but they are not).
There vignetting is introduced intentionally.
So rather something Soviet manual. 100 / 2.8 or 135 / 2.8
I can’t say more precisely, it would be just fortunetelling.
Jupiter-6 180 / 2.8?
telezenitar 135 / 2.8?
Jupiter-37A 135 / 3.5?
or a joke - a lens with a teleconverter = go and guess :)
No, without a converter, without macro rings, just a lens. Thanks for the Bright Thoughts.
ok I apologize that it was not correct
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2
In general, these photos remind me of this glass
Maybe it's just the world of 69 with 6/6 for medium formats on crop it is quite realistic to make such a picture.
it really is not mass-produced rare.
Radium to new actions. Duzhe garnі fotografії, garn gіzіkіst, good bokeh, I think that I can buti Industar 50-2 abo 50U, I96U is possible.
Before speech є dumka інshy ob'єktiv from fotozbіlshuvach.
May Emitar / s 4,5 / 80
And maybe Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2.8 / 50
in any case, this is a non-native, perhaps a Soviet manual lens with the loss of infinity (no general plans), focal about 135 (cats are far enough), f 3,5 (sharpness and grip). one could assume that Jupiter-37a, but that would be too simple. most likely this is some kind of "fresh" or very unusual lens.
I am young and green, therefore I will guess. This is not a telephoto (not that aperture), it is something from Nikon, because the author is a lover of this brand, but if it’s fixed, then we can assume that the focal length should be from 35 to 50 mm. (because they are most often used) I went to the lens reviews, looked at the quality, depth of field, compared the bokeh and I think that it is: Nikon 50mm f / 1.2, if I didn’t get it, then I’ll try from Carl Zeiss Distagon T * 35mm f / 2.8 Good luck to all ;-)
I'm not a very experienced photographer, but I think it's Nikon Nikkor-S Auto 1: 1.4 f = 50mm. Judging by the photographs, the lens is light-sighted, but by the blurring of the background (as in my opinion) the lens is not new ...
Goodnight)
I think that was shot on MC Arsat H 2.8 / 100