The stock is over. Winner: Igor, the prize has been delivered to the right address. Unknown lens turned out to be Industar-29 2.8 / 80
Promotion from Radozhiva
The essence of the action was: determine with which lens the photos were taken below.
Terms and Conditions: in the comments to this article, you need to specify the lens on which everything is shot. Be sure to justify your conclusion in a few words... Also, do not forget to indicate your e-mail, which will be used to contact the winner. The promotion lasts until 20.09.2012/20.09.2012/XNUMX. If no one has identified the lens by XNUMX, then I will start giving hints in the comments until the winner is determined.
First who guesses the lens following the rules, gets the lens Vega-11U 2.8 / 50mm for Nikon for macro photography. Delivery in Ukraine by New Mail (warehouse). Participants from other countries can simply participate.
In previous promotions, I gave too many tips, this time the promotion has a time interval. Waiting for your bright thoughts.
So, the photo (modified for publication in Lighroom):
1
Raindrops on the leaves
2
After the rain
3
Flower after rain
4
Flowers and bee
5
Flowers
6
Flowers close up
7
Flower and bee
8
Flowers of my city
9
Boke
10
Autumn leaf
11
Wood and iron
12
Leaves. Clearly visible bokeh
13
Autumn in the yard
14
Autumn and flowers
15
Autumn and flowers 2
16
Close-up
17
Flowers
18
And more flowers
19
More colors
20
Viburnum after rain
21
Photographer Assistant
22
The second assistant came
23
Photographer assistant looking for trigger
24
The photographer's assistant lost the second camera ...
25
In the
26
Nature
27
Wild grapes in autumn
28
Sweet wild grapes
29
Grapes
30
Grapes in autumn
Here is a list of all the incorrect options that were sounded in the comments:
Jupiter-37A 135mm F3.5
Nikkor 50mm 1.4G
Pentacon auto 1.8 / 50
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 Carl Zeiss
Pancolar 1.8 / 50 ausJena
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2.8 / 50
Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 50mm T
Vega 11u 2.8 / 50
helios-81H 2/50
WORLD 24n 2/35
Petri C. Auto 55 mm f / 1.4
Nikon 85mm F / 1.8D AF Nikkor
Nikon 24-85mm f / 2.8-4D AF IF Nikkor
Zonnar 50-85mm
d90 F2.8 85
Jupiter-9 2/85
Nikon 85mm F / 1.4
XM F Porst Color Reflex 1: 1.6 / 50mm UMC
Canon 50mm f / 1.8
Canon 85 / 1.8
EF 50 mm f / 1.0 L USM
50mm f / 1.4 USM
EF 50 mm f / 2.5 Compact Macro
Canon EF 50mm f / 1.2L USM
Canon EF 50 mm f / 1.8 II
Nikon 85mm f / 1.4D AF Nikkor
Zenith 1.7 50mm
Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC
Industar 50-2
Industar 50U
Industar I96U
world 69
Jupiter-6 180 / 2.8?
telezenitar 135 / 2.8
Emitar / s 4,5 / 80
Nikon 50mm f / 1.2
Carl Zeiss Distagon T * 35mm f / 2.8
Nikon Nikkor-S Auto 1: 1.4 f = 50mm
MC Arsat H 2.8 / 100
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 35/2
World 1 37 / 2.8
Industar-26 (m)
Carl zeiss planar 50 / 1.7.
OM Zuiko 55/1.2
Nikon 70-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor
Nikon 50mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor
Vega 12-B
Helios 77-M4
Nikkor AF 24-85mm f / 2.8-4 D IF
Nikkor 85 1.4d
tair-11 / tair-11a
Nikon 24-120mm
wave-3 80 \ 2.8
Asahi Super-Takumar 50 mm f / 1.4
Optik Gorlitz Oreston 50 mm f / 1.8
Tair 3FS F4.5 300 mm
MS Wave 1.8 / 50
Nikkor-S 50 mm f / 1.4
helios 44-2
Era 6? 50 / 1.5
yashinon 50 / 1.4
Baltar 100mm f2.3
Vivitar 50 / 1.7
wave3
LOMO-OKS1-100-1
LOMO-OKS1-150-1
Yashinon-DX 1: 1,7 f = 50mm
Leica Noctilux 50mm f1.0
Nikkor DX 55-300mm f / 4.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S.
Nikon 105mm F2.0DC
Nikon 70-200mm
Nikon 50mm f / 1.8
Nikkor 24-70mm f / 2.8
kaleinar 5 n or kaleinar 3
Nikon 24-120mm f / 4G N
MAMIYA / SEKOR 200 / 3,5
Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 4/135
ОКП1-100-1 1.8/100мм
Elicar V-HQ macro 90 / 2.5
Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 17-55mm f / 2.8G IF-ED
nikkor 35 1.8gdx
Helios-40-2
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
Hello
I would venture to suggest that the desired lens is "Jupiter 37 A"
The characteristic "oil" blur of the background and bokeh "circles" speaks for it)
Answer: The photos were taken with a cool lens!
judging by the depth of field for 10 and 11 photos, this is most likely “fifty dollars” ...
If you take a photo with spikelets, then there is clearly F 1.4
Usually for all super-fast lenses, the focal length is somewhere around 50-55mm
further, the blur is rather soft, not twisted, which means it is not helios sonnars.
The latest photos with finograd are quite clear and sharp, so this is most likely a modern lens.
I’ll venture to suggest that this is a Nikkor 50mm 1.4G
Yes, DOF, of course, is like a blade =) the picture is very similar to Zeiss glasses of the Pentacon type ... ..therefore, as to me, the picture is similar to Pentacon auto 1.8 / 50 (Pancolar 1.8 / 50 Carl Zeiss) ... another similar picture of Pancolar 1.8 / 50 ausJena ... ... but the courts with sharpness (and it seems to me “ringing”) it may well turn out to be a makrushik like Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 2.8 / 50…. well, Vega 11u as an option (we can play Arkady) =)
I'm new to this business, but I'll try my luck. The lens is "Helios-81H 2 \ 50" portrait, the background is very blurred.
I also think that this is a fifty dollars, but I think this is Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 1: 2,8 f = 50mm T, sharpness, the nature of the blur and bokeh
I also think that Jupiter is 37A.
I'll use Jupiter 37A, it won't give such a picture ... and the focus is definitely not the same
“Autumn in the yard” - I saw such bokeh on Nikon 28-85, and bokeh in “autumn and flowers” my 35 \ 1.8 does.
I will assume that this is Nikon 85mm F / 1.8D AF Nikkor, unless, of course, this is a thread or thread)
I have used MIR 24n here, because the blur pattern with a small depth of field very reminds me of the one that I get on it.
I would venture to suggest that this is Helios-81N
probably HELIOS ,,,,,
Good morning. Great photos! Apparently the lens is not with Nikon mount, because All photos were taken at a distance of no more than 1-2 meters. All photos are on a fully open aperture, so how many petals are incomprehensible. Very interesting unusual bokeh. Pretty little flu. I think the focal length is 35-50mm, but probably shot in full frame, so the focal length is probably 50mm. The aperture is large, but due to the fact that most of the photos were taken at about MDF, it's hard to say how big) As for me, the bokeh is not Zeiss, but the sharpness of the photo is excellent. But this is definitely not Yu-37, certainly not gel 81, and not 50 1.4. It’s hard to say that it’s .. but this interest does not become less, and vice versa :)
I will try to assume that this is: Petri C. Auto 55 mm f / 1.4
Greetings Arkady.
I can assume that this is Zonnar 50-85mm and it looks like some photos on the planar.
Sharpness is very strong. Zeisses from pressed glass give such analogues, possibly analogues from the USSR.
And I think that it is above 50mm
I think filmed on a smoked Nikon D90 F2.8 85
I think this is Helios 81 N.
Well, or Jupiter 9.
I also looked at Jupiter 9 as an option, but the photo will be even sharper than on Jupiter
Arkady can someone was generous and gave a test Carl Zeiss Planar 85 / 1.4)))
Or maybe you have found another version of Jupiter on the 9th of their kind, like 3 is?
In this promotion, I do not respond to comments and do not give hints until the 20th. You can lead the discussion yourself. All the best.
Good afternoon!
I can assume that this is Nikon 85mm / 1.8D AF Nikkor
If you look at the story, then this Nikon can not be in the promotion, develop that Nikon 85mm F / 1.4
Well, Nikon doesn’t have to be here, as in terms of noise, the Kenon 350D seems to be the same, especially since there is now the opportunity to test the lens of Kenon and m42 on it. And if you go the easiest way and look at the lenses from the reviews, then the Canon Lens FD 55mm f / 1.2 SSC seems to be out of reach, and from the XM F Porst Color Reflex 1: 1.6 / 50mm UMC it could be so.
Well, if you look at the canon, you can assume Canon 50mm f / 1.8 in sharpness and Canon 85 / 1.8
Hello, I will assume that this is a Canon 50mm f1.0, IMHO it is very similar in nature to the boke in some figures