The stock is over. Unknown lens turned out to be Mir-3V 3.5 / 65. Congratulations to the winner.
The essence of the action was as follows: determine with which lens the photos were taken in this promotion
Promotion number 4
Terms and Conditions: in the comments to this article, you need to specify a lens on which, in your opinion, everything is shot. Be sure to justify your conclusion in a few words... Also, do not forget to indicate your e-mail, which will be used to contact the winner. The promotion lasts until one of the participants guesses.
First who guesses the lens following the rules, receives a SLR Camera Zenit-TTL with Helios-44m 2.0 / 58 lens. Delivery in Ukraine by New Mail (warehouse). Participants from other countries can simply participate. Below is a view of the gift itself.
Tips: this is a damn expensive lens at the time of its release, shot on D700, added sharpness and contrast without cropping.
Here are the photos themselves, which should guess the lens:
1
Photograph of a cat. The look of the cat.
2
Photograph of a cat. Focusing on the cat’s nose.
3
Photograph of a cat. These eyes have never seen such a lens.
4
Photograph of a cat. Yes, the cat again!
5
Photograph of a cat. A look into an unknown lens.
6
Photograph of a cat. Eyes of a cat.
7
Photograph of a cat. They offended, they didn’t give me for shooting the meat.
8
Unknown lens bokeh
9
Flower
10
Another flower
11
And another flower
12
We make our way through the bars
13
Close-up
14
Another close up
15
And a million more flowers
16
A flower that has been photographed a lot
17
Flower and bokeh
18
Very close up
19
My favorite flower from this promotion
20
Recognizing bokeh
21
Just a flower
22
And then, unexpectedly, a general plan
23
General plan 2
24
Solar polygons
25
Overall plan
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
Muchce Industar-50 52 mm f / 3.5 abo Industar 50-2 50mm F / 3.5 is more similar to fіzkіst, focus on vіdstan. Tai Your review of Nikon 24-70mm on December pictures there є sharp-sighted and thinking about what’s not a good story for an hour (:
No, There is a range finder, certainly not infinity.
maybe it is “Dream Lens” Leica Noctilux-M 50 mm 1: 0.95 ASPH? Small depth of field and huge price.
I think the smile on the face of the readers of Radozhiva will be to their ears when they recognize the lens, and read the version about Noctilux-M 50 mm 1: 0.95 ASPH
Mauger Industar-61 L / W 50 mm f / 2.8 more macro close-ups are available, but you can take this picture (::
No, not industrial :)
Perhaps Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Biometar 2.8 / 120 saw comparisons with Jupiter 37a and the photo was similar to yours in the bokeh stock and sharply non-dimensional. The ray of sunshine in the non-sharpness zone shows on a closed hole shows a 6-gon, I think the diaphragm at 5.6 was
No, this is not Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Biometar 2.8 / 120.
Oh, a difficult task.
Then, the expensive Soviet World-20 remains)
I agree, not easy.
Maybe it’s Kaleinar 5N, although the angle is too big, but the bokeh seems very much and the cat can see that the focus is manual))
Iloi is not)) this is Helios 44))) The depth of field is so small ...) and 6 petals)) judging by the bokeh ...
maybe Mir-38B)
I see you are following the news on Radozhiva pretty well. But this is not World-38B
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35 mm f / 2.8 or Carl Zeiss Jena Macro-Prakticar 55 mm f / 2.8 in the first arc is similar to bokeh, rizkist, diaphragm paws, minimal focus focus. In another mfv, rіzkіst.
Suppose this is a Nikon 85mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor, high aperture, with such a focal length, will give a very small flu, which we see in the photographs with a cat. The nature of the bokeh is similar, and such photos are general plans, I guess you can get it. my answer is Nikon 85mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor :)
oh, if Soviet scientists were reading this now, they would have taken unthinkable pride in the child, who even now claims to be a Nikon 85mm f / 1.4G AF-S Nikkor
Jasper 4H? After all, the lens was unique.
Yes, I wouldn’t refuse a review of Jasper, can someone give a couple of minutes to test?
interested in a nightmare :) I'll try to put everything on the shelves. The lens is Soviet, very expensive, with a huge aperture ratio, with a focal value within 60 - 80, 6 aperture blades, incredibly rare, and has not yet been named ... an inner voice suggests something similar to Iskra-3 72 / 0.65 0_o only now I can’t find its characteristic, and even more so I cannot find examples of photos, so almost a finger in the sky :) your comment on this assumption is interesting)
It surprises me why many people think that there must be a huge aperture? After all, the industrialists and the tessars do not boast of aperture, and the drawing gives hoo. (this is not industrial and not tessar)
Tair 11
Anticipated00 I just wanted to ask, but I thought that Tair-11 already sounded in the subject
Arkadiy mozhe tse Volna-9 50 mm f / 2.8 (otherwise version with MS)? More often than not, smahuє na nei (:
I see you really want to get a prize. But this is not the Wave, the focal length is larger, the aperture is smaller.
Well prize sama himself ale then slit Je excitement, and I oskіlki Person of the gambling tsya aktsіya meni Duzhe Spodobaev. Dorechі is possible on tee, I’m not such a great uncle, so before me, you can be turned around (:
Ok :)
"MC Zenitar-1M" 1,4 / 85 the last thing I say before bedtime, I’ll fucking sleepy, and no less strongly know what the photos were taken for), at your prompts, reached this lens, already discarded everything that you can :)
This is not a fast lens, I already wrote about this in the comments, tips.
I wrote the wrong time the first time = (
My preference is MS EUROPA-15N AF
very little familiar with this lens
Explanations: a fairly expensive lens at the time of release and quite rare, even now
as far as I remember, he has a focal length from 50 to 80, and he set a power of about 2x, which just suits these photos
Due to the fact that Europe is very rare, I did not mock and include it in the action. This is not Europe.
nikkor 135 / 2,8
Not Nikkor.
Jupiter 9 85mm f2 I think it's true
Far from him.
Jupiter-11 135mm F4.0)) judging from the above, but I doubt very much)) the angle is too big
Well, the aperture is close to the truth.
Jupiter 9, white.
You should at least read the conditions that you need to explain the reason for choosing a lens, and not just write the name in guess
I have already written above my reasoning about FR. I inclined to fifty dollars, but Arkady pointed out that the FR is more - a campaign of 58 mm or 85 mm. More - hardly, although because in the examples there are photographs of flowers "top view". Hardly filmed from stairs or benches. As for the aperture ratio - after the assumption that the lens can boast of exceptional aperture ratio, and negative answers from the Author, we had to discard the options f0.95, 1.4, even 1.8.
Now for the other "tips". For the shape of the highlights, 6 aperture blades are obtained (for Jupiter - 15, therefore this fact strongly stops), another candidate suitable for this parameter is Helios 77m-4. But he has a FR of 50 mm.
Another hint is keeping a backlight. Among Soviet optics, there are not so many lenses capable of shooting in a backlight, therefore the circle of “suspects” is narrowing.
Bokeh In Jupiter, it is quite even, not as twisted as in the Helios. But! I did not see Helios bokeh on the FF, so again it’s difficult to judge.
It is from such assumptions that possible candidates are selected.
Another hint is holding back light. I wrote on the contrary that he has problems with this.
I can't explain, purely intuitively - Jupiter 9 85mm f2
and kamenty not bad to read before writing the answer)
or "MC Zenitar-1K" 1,4 / 85 I think there will be no difference in the picture, but the mounts are different
It is useful to read what Thu Osama wrote)) based on the results:
Mir-38B 3,5 / 65
and immediately disappears, because Does not hold back light.