The stock is over. Unknown lens turned out to be Mir-3V 3.5 / 65. Congratulations to the winner.
The essence of the action was as follows: determine with which lens the photos were taken in this promotion
Promotion number 4
Terms and Conditions: in the comments to this article, you need to specify a lens on which, in your opinion, everything is shot. Be sure to justify your conclusion in a few words... Also, do not forget to indicate your e-mail, which will be used to contact the winner. The promotion lasts until one of the participants guesses.
First who guesses the lens following the rules, receives a SLR Camera Zenit-TTL with Helios-44m 2.0 / 58 lens. Delivery in Ukraine by New Mail (warehouse). Participants from other countries can simply participate. Below is a view of the gift itself.
Tips: this is a damn expensive lens at the time of its release, shot on D700, added sharpness and contrast without cropping.
Here are the photos themselves, which should guess the lens:
1
Photograph of a cat. The look of the cat.
2
Photograph of a cat. Focusing on the cat’s nose.
3
Photograph of a cat. These eyes have never seen such a lens.
4
Photograph of a cat. Yes, the cat again!
5
Photograph of a cat. A look into an unknown lens.
6
Photograph of a cat. Eyes of a cat.
7
Photograph of a cat. They offended, they didn’t give me for shooting the meat.
8
Unknown lens bokeh
9
Flower
10
Another flower
11
And another flower
12
We make our way through the bars
13
Close-up
14
Another close up
15
And a million more flowers
16
A flower that has been photographed a lot
17
Flower and bokeh
18
Very close up
19
My favorite flower from this promotion
20
Recognizing bokeh
21
Just a flower
22
And then, unexpectedly, a general plan
23
General plan 2
24
Solar polygons
25
Overall plan
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
Well, also Nikon 70-200mm f / 2.8. I re-read the D700, I was smashed by the pantelic ...
no.
Judging by the focal and color (and tooltip) - Nikon 28-70 f / 2.8
not he
I am guessing at the NIKON AF 35-70 mm f / 2.8. That is why bokeh is a special visitor for the hand-wraps of a successful life-time buddy.
The plasticity of the image is even better, as well as the macro mode, which is even more important in case of zyomtsi quitiv, those bugs. Good trim, controve light, and at that hour, I will be even more popular among photographs, which have been lost on the current day! so tse I think - NIKON AF 35-70 mm f / 2.8D
25-70 does not hold backlight at all, where a photo with bunnies 35-70 would simply give a white spot in the photo.
And if not Nikon, but Sigma 70-200mm f / 2.8 Macro?
Actually, I want to say "thank you")) great puzzle, I read more about lenses and bokeh in a day than probably in a year))
Sigma was unlikely to squeeze out such sharpness on open.
Probably still. I just came across a selection of pictures with a similar bokeh pattern. We'll keep thinking )
Yeah, the cat is embarrassing)) Zeiss 100mm f / 2.0 Makro-Planar
The picture looks like ... http://www.flickr.com/photos/68582996@N05/7925617586/in/pool-zeiss_makro_planar
Yes, DOF is similar, but it is not Planar.
Yes, right here you can see from the luminosity and shape of the boke that this is Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Biometar 2.8 / 120
No, far from it, neither in aperture ratio nor in bokeh shape, much less in focal length.
Hmm, I thought it was already called - Nikon 24-70mm f / 2.8
This is not a zoom lens.
and my bokeh reminds me of Helius 81n, and I think the focal length suits it
Bokeh, in fact, is not like Helios-81N
Glad to new stocks. Nice pictures. Soft bokeh, good sharpness, small DOF, means high aperture. I think maybe: MC Pancolar 1.8 / 50 Carl
Zeiss Jena DDR
Not pankolar
I forgot to say I think that most likely the focal length is 50 mm.
Jupiter-8 50 mm f / 2
No, not Jupiter.
I assume that this is Zenitar-M 50 1.7, as evidenced by bokeh and phrases comparable to the aperture of this lens.
This is not the Zenith, and the lens has a smaller aperture.
MS Helios-123N 1.4 / 50 on 6 petals? Again, bokeh seems to be ..
Helios-77m-4
6 petals are visible, focal length and it seems that fifty dollars
aperture 1.8, less than 1.7 =)
no, not him either
I saw the photo in full size. I could assume that this is Canon FD 85mm 1,2 L. But it was shot on D700. My choice is Nikon 100mm f / 2.8. Bokeh is similar, sharpness with an open hole, and a razor on a closed hole.
I don’t know, maybe I’m going for a drink, I’m going to think about it, but Auto Mamiya-Sekor CS 50 mm f / 1.4, although I’m not bored with bokeh in a whole lens, it’s like it’s like “a drink is not a drink” I’ll also try to guess (:
Well, what is helios bokeh? =)
would tell though, dear Arkady, is it a Soviet lens =)
I’ll give one version of Carl Zeiss Planar T * 50 mm f / 1.4 more, more like a bokeh and a similar one. Also focus on walking (:
This is far from him.
But I don’t want to give a little tip? (: Ato, I’ve got a dead end too (: Can you know the Voigtlander 90mm / F3.5?
And it seems to me that this is Japanese Takumar, or 1.8 or 2. Most likely 2.
6 scaffolds, holds back light.
He does not hold back.
Perhaps Nikon Nikkor-S 55 mm f / 1.2, bokeh + sharpness.
it seems to me Nikon 24-120mm f / 3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor all the same it's a zoom) and the side looks very
Kaleinar-3
Close focusing distance, 6 blades, good sharpness in the open and most likely 50mm FR ... Maybe this is an old version of Pentacon auto 50 / 1.8 (without MULTI COATING)?
maybe it's Zeiss Apo Sonnar T * 4/1700, and if not, I would like to see a photo test of this lens :)