The stock is over. Unknown lens turned out to be Mir-3V 3.5 / 65. Congratulations to the winner.
The essence of the action was as follows: determine with which lens the photos were taken in this promotion
Promotion number 4
Terms and Conditions: in the comments to this article, you need to specify a lens on which, in your opinion, everything is shot. Be sure to justify your conclusion in a few words... Also, do not forget to indicate your e-mail, which will be used to contact the winner. The promotion lasts until one of the participants guesses.
First who guesses the lens following the rules, receives a SLR Camera Zenit-TTL with Helios-44m 2.0 / 58 lens. Delivery in Ukraine by New Mail (warehouse). Participants from other countries can simply participate. Below is a view of the gift itself.
Tips: this is a damn expensive lens at the time of its release, shot on D700, added sharpness and contrast without cropping.
Here are the photos themselves, which should guess the lens:
1
Photograph of a cat. The look of the cat.
2
Photograph of a cat. Focusing on the cat’s nose.
3
Photograph of a cat. These eyes have never seen such a lens.
4
Photograph of a cat. Yes, the cat again!
5
Photograph of a cat. A look into an unknown lens.
6
Photograph of a cat. Eyes of a cat.
7
Photograph of a cat. They offended, they didn’t give me for shooting the meat.
8
Unknown lens bokeh
9
Flower
10
Another flower
11
And another flower
12
We make our way through the bars
13
Close-up
14
Another close up
15
And a million more flowers
16
A flower that has been photographed a lot
17
Flower and bokeh
18
Very close up
19
My favorite flower from this promotion
20
Recognizing bokeh
21
Just a flower
22
And then, unexpectedly, a general plan
23
General plan 2
24
Solar polygons
25
Overall plan
Help to the project. Thanks for attention. Arkady Shapoval.
Industar-29
I would not do two actions with the same lens.
If expensive, maybe something like Voigtlander 58 1.4? It seems to be in focal length, and the flu is very small.
not a bad option, but not him.
the shape of bokeh resembles helius 40
Far from Helios-40
Possibly carl zeiss planar 1.4 open. Small Grip, but at the same time a good viewing angle is similar to fifty dollars. Based on the bokeh and approximate data, 50mm 1.4 is the most likely candidate for Zeiss, and besides, “damn expensive” - this is just about him.
I dare to assume that this is Vega-12B 2.8 / 90
And it seems to me like Kaleinar 5H, I myself sometimes shoot it, and gives a similar picture ..
Although some examples of your photos make you think that this is still not him.
But let it be an option)
Really MS EUROPA-15H MS AF; Q
no :) since no one would be able to argue why it is he that contradicts the action.
I would suggest that this is a Nikkor 50mm f / 1.2 Ai-s.
Arguments: price (maybe) and shallow depth of field (on the cat = very small)
Off-topic question: Zenit photographed on the same lens? If not, tell me which lens the zenith was shot on (for the action).
And now on the topic: in the photo with the cat - you are showing a very small grip, or in other words, a high aperture ratio of 1.4 or even 1.2, this is clearly visible when aiming at the nose and eyes. Flowers speak of either macro mode or focal mode from 50mm, according to the general plan - it's hard for me to say something here.
I will assume (due to bokeh) that this is a Nikon 50mm f / 1.2 AI-s Nikkor
The gift itself was shot on a Nikon 100mm F2.8 E, photo is still in the review https://radojuva.com.ua/2012/04/obzor-nikon-100-mm-f2-8-e/
There are photos where the bokeh is twisted as on Helios-44.
He must be.
I think this is Jupiter-37A
Welcome all!
Industar-73 Industar-26m I think that this is this lens because: bokeh washes like on fixes and the angle of the shot is similar and 6 aperture plates are visible
The bokeh is somewhat reminiscent of Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 80 mm f / 2.8
I put on Helius 40-2
Boke reminds him of it, and I also see that there are 10 petals on the diaphragm, although the vision is poor
the aperture is the more good he has
in general, these photos are very close to mine
I think that with Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50 mm f / 1.8 I want to prove the lack of singing ale I try at random (:
For me, the bokeh looks more like Helios 81H. Judging by the “nuts” of photo 24 - not 10 petals, as mentioned above. Focal length less than 50 is unlikely, I shoot a lot at 35 mm, there is something to compare with. More than 50 is also unlikely, judging by the general plans.
The depth of the gap is even smaller and marvelous for a zychayy ob'ktiv, so I think it is also an object of the defocus control series. 105mm f / 2D DC-Nikkor or 135mm f / 2D DC-Nikkor. The first thing is not cheap.
no not him.
Arkady, please throw off the link to the picture in full format "And a million more flowers". I liked it very much. I want to put it on the desktop. And some kind of long-focal lens, because in the reflection in the cat's eyes you can't be seen at all
Please https://radojuva.com.ua/wp-content/big/for-desctop-1.jpg
Thanks. Beautiful Foto .
I’m thinking that I have a similarity with the Wave-3 80 mm f / 2.8, I think it’s possible to get out (: Ніби є similarity in the bokeh.
Vasil, the similarity in bokeh і і s Pentacon, ale tsiob "oktivi clearly does not fit into the firmness of the price.
Exactly (: Takozh є similarity і z takomaryami ale vidnno worth the price and the very bida.
And your cat accidentally didn’t see a Watering can 50mm f / 2? ))) True, they are now expensive. It is painfully small DOF.
No, not her.
I will say at random Biotar-75
NIKKOR-S 58 / 1.4 If not, I give up))) The bokeh looks like: http://i1008.photobucket.com/albums/af203/xrsonya/raznoe%20117/DSC_0031.jpg
Mozhlivo Jupiter-9
More options for Jupiter 6 180 / 2,8. Bokeh is better, and the depth of speed is better.
A small depth of field can give even a small MDF or super aperture.