answers: 31

  1. Aleks de Kairoy
    06.08.2012

    Arkady, review as always a bomb, thank you!

    Reply

  2. Deimos
    06.08.2012

    Great review and comparisons with similar lenses, thanks.

    Reply

  3. Crelian
    06.08.2012

    Thanks for your review! The optical question is not Sonnar, by any chance? The drawing reminded me of my Ju-37

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      06.08.2012

      Looks like I can’t say for sure.

      Reply

  4. VALENTINE
    13.08.2012

    Alas! Far from being Kaleinar-5N. Compared to this, he is resting!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      13.08.2012

      And what does Kalainar have to do with it? K-5n is far from 135mm.

      Reply

  5. VALENTINE
    13.08.2012
    • Arkady Shapoval
      14.08.2012

      With all due respect, I already wrote to you that your crop is very doubtful.

      Reply

  6. Nadezhda
    21.09.2012

    Arkady, a question about the plate (by the way, thanks - it was clearly done). For the Pentacon ball exactly 1?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      21.09.2012

      According to the plate - yes, but it's very conditional.

      Reply

  7. Alex
    30.12.2012

    Good day, Arkady! I have a little question for you related to the lens ... I bought myself a Soligor 135 2.8 (as in this review). I like everything and bokeh, and color rendition ... for personal feelings, quite a decent glass. There is one but ... The grain appears in the pictures, like on film. Not that it was very bad, but somehow annoying. The grain appears when viewing the photo 1 to 2 approximately. Could it be a defect or just insufficient lens resolution? I use it on Nikon 3100. Thank you!

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.12.2012

      Usually, the lens is not related to grain, and the grain appears at medium and high values ​​of iSO, or in the shadow region, this is especially evident when increasing. It would be nice if you sent a link to an example.

      Reply

  8. Alex
    30.12.2012

    Arkady, nothing to do with the sensitivity of the matrix ... the grain appears at any ISO in dark areas. Here are some examples: http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/maxservis/view/530360/
    In this album, all photos were shot on this lens. I try various options when shooting.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.12.2012

      As I already wrote, the camera itself is noisy in the shadows, especially when underexposed.

      Reply

  9. Alex
    30.12.2012

    Those. the best option would be a slightly overexposed picture. ITS can be overexposed in the editor ... it is much more difficult to deal with noise ... So?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.12.2012

      Just when pulling shadows in the editor, the noise appears most. The on-camera noise reduction function will be just right, and ADL also slightly affects the noise, it usually needs to be turned off.

      Reply

  10. Alex
    30.12.2012

    From this place in more detail (sorry). ADL is disabled. Noise reduction is on. You see the result ... It turns out - buy another camera? But this is not the case on Nikon's lenses? (I use 18-55 kit and 55-200 VR DX 4 - 5,6).

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      30.12.2012

      relatives work in automatic modes, the camera very accurately selects the exposure pair. My D700 can also make noise in the shadows at ISO 200, I don’t see anything terrible in this. Another factor may be a slight haze from the lens, which works like a veil (gauze), can create a little grain effect, but this effect is created throughout the field and I rarely see it.

      Reply

  11. Alex
    30.12.2012

    thanks! Hopefully a more careful selection of the exposure pair will help ... I'm starting to understand the importance of exposure compensation on the device.
    Happy New Year! Well, happy holiday!

    Reply

  12. Roma
    31.12.2012

    spasibo ...

    Reply

  13. Serge
    24.03.2013

    Hello!
    Here is such a lens M42 Soligor 3.5 / 135
    I understand correctly that the KP-A / N adapter is needed for installation on Nikon
    will it have infinity with such an adapter?

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.03.2013

      You do not understand correctly. Need KP-42 \ N or M42-Nikon. Infinity with such an adapter will not.

      Reply

  14. Serge
    24.03.2013

    Thank you!

    Sorry, I wrote incorrectly =))
    adapter KP-42 \ N I have =))

    In general, does it make sense in this lens (M42 Soligor 3.5 / 135) in the presence of Helios 81N ??

    I have not tried it yet - it will only be delivered in a few days.

    Reply

    • Arkady Shapoval
      24.03.2013

      Yes, it makes sense. Everything is written in the review, there are examples of photos, there is enough information to determine.

      Reply

  15. Serge
    24.03.2013

    And at what distance can I focus?

    Reply

  16. Serega
    10.05.2013

    Mine is slightly different ... 3.5 / 135, double aperture ring, judging by the scale - the minimum focusing distance is 1.5, well, an interchangeable shank ...

    In general, it turned out funny, Soligor was sold as an m42 ... well, I used an adapter for several months, but today I bought a kp-a / n (I saw it for the first time) and took Jupiter 37a from friends to try it, began to compare lenses ... and to my surprise, m42 soligor turned out to have an interchangeable tail ... although this is not indicated on the lens itself ..
    =))))))))

    Reply

  17. Sergei
    04.07.2013

    Tell someone !!!
    On my Soligor 3.5 / 135 there is a replaceable shank, I put a kp-a / n, there is a gap of half a millimeter / millimeter between the lens and the adapter and, apparently, there is no infinity, no more than 25-30 meters ... the adapter sits to the maximum, it is impossible to go deeper ..
    Is the problem in the adapter?
    It seems factory, with marking kp-a / n
    Or maybe the problem is in the lens?
    Has anyone come across a similar one?

    Reply

    • anonym
      28.05.2015

      You can read the adapter on a lathe.

      Reply

  18. anonym
    14.10.2014

    The smallest MDF of the old 135-ok at Koniki 135 / 3.2 is one meter. Feels like even a little less.

    Reply

  19. anonym
    16.09.2015

    Arkady, please tell me if it can be used on the Canon 1100D?
    Thanks in advance.

    Reply

  20. Alexey
    27.03.2020

    Thank you for the storehouse of information and for the work done! Wow, you and the girl model! A sight for sore eyes

    Reply

Reply

 

 

Top
mobility. computer